The Role of Family of Origin in Physicians Referred to a CME Course
- 117 Downloads
Few studies exist which look at psychological factors associated with physician sexual misconduct. In this study, we explore family dysfunction as a possible risk factor associated with physician sexual misconduct. Six hundred thirteen physicians referred to a continuing medical education (CME) course for sexual misconduct were administered the FACES-II survey, a validated and reliable measure of family dynamics. The survey was part of a self-learning activity. We collected data from February 2000 to February 2009. Participants were predominantly white, middle-aged males who represented the full range of medical specialties. Their results were compared against a sample of 177 physicians. The FACES-II is a self-report test that measures family of origin (the family in which one was raised) dynamics on two dimensions (1) flexibility, ranging from too flexible (chaotic) to not flexible enough (rigid) and (2) cohesion ranging from too close (enmeshed) to not close enough (disengaged). The most common family pattern observed among physicians accused of sexual misconduct was rigid flexibility paired with disengaged cohesion, indicative of unhealthy family functioning. This pattern was significantly different than the pattern observed in the comparison group. Physicians who engage in sexual misconduct are more likely to have family of origin dysfunction. Ethics is developmental and learned in one’s family of origin. Family of origin dynamics may be one risk factor predisposing one to ethical violations. These findings have important implications for screening, education, and treatment across the medical education continuum.
KeywordsSexual misconduct Boundary violations Professionalism Continuing medical education
Conflict of interest
- AMA. (2002). Code of medical ethics: Current opinions with annotations. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association.Google Scholar
- AMA. (2010). Physician characteristics and distributions in the U.S. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association.Google Scholar
- AMA Council on Ethical & Judicial Affairs (1991). Sexual misconduct in the practice of medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association, 266(19):2741–2745Google Scholar
- Duska, R. F. (1975). Moral development: A guide to Piaget and Kohlberg. Mahwah: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
- Elkin, K. J., Elkin, D. J., & Studdert, D. M. (2011). Doctors disciplined for professional misconduct in Australia and New Zealand, 2000–2009. Medical Journal of Australia, 194(9), 452–456.Google Scholar
- Federation of State Medical Boards. (2006) Addressing sexual boundaries: guidelines for state medical boards. http://www.fsmb.org/pdf/GRPOL_Sexual Boundaries.pdf. Accessed May 2010.
- Gabbard, G. (1989). Sexual exploitation in professional relationships. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.Google Scholar
- Gabbard, G. O., & Myers, M. D. (2008). The physician as patient. A clinical handbook for mental health professionals. Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
- Gartrell, N., & Milliken, N. (1992). Physician-patient sexual contact: Prevalence and problems. The Western Journal of Medicine, 157(2), 139–143.Google Scholar
- Gutheil, T., & Gabbard, G. O. (1993). The concept of boundaries in clinical practice: Theoretical and risk-management dimensions. American Journal of Psychiatry, 150(2), 188–196.Google Scholar
- Halter, M., Brown, H., & Stone, J. (2007). Sexual boundary violations by health professionals–an overview of the published empirical literature. London: The Council for Health Care Regulatory Excellence.Google Scholar
- International Association of Medical Colleges Ethics Committee (www.iaomc.org/ec.htm). Accessed October 2011.
- Irons, R., & Schneider, J. (1999). The wounded healer: Addiction-sensitive approach to the sexually exploitative professional. Northvale: Jason Aronson Publishers.Google Scholar
- Kohatsu, N., Gould, D., Ross L. K., Fox P. J. (2004). Characteristics associated with physician discipline: A case-control study, Arch Intern Med, 164, Mar 22. www.archinternmed.com. Accessed October 2011.
- Koneski, E. (2000). The family circumplex model. faces II and faces III: Overview of research and applications. St Paul: Department of Family Services.Google Scholar
- Olson, D., Bell, R., Portner, J. (1992). Faces II. Minneapolis, MN: Life Innovations.Google Scholar
- Powers, S. I. (1989). Family systems throughout the lifespan: Family constellations of development, meaning, and behavior. In K. Kreppner & R. Lerner (Eds.), Family systems and life-span development. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Roback, H. B., Strassberg, D., Iannelli, R. J., Finlayson, A. R., Blanco, M., & Neufeld, R. (2007). Problematic physicians: A comparison of personality profiles by offence type. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 52, 315–322.Google Scholar
- Smetana, J. G. (1997). Parenting and the development of social knowledge reconceptualized: A social domain analysis. In J. E. Grusec & L. Kuczynski (Eds.), Handbook of parenting and the transmission of values. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Spickard, W. A., Jr, Swiggart, W., Manley, G., Samenow, C., & Dodd, D. (2008). A CME course to improve sexual boundaries of physicians. Menninger Bulletin, 72(1), 63–77.Google Scholar
- The Council for Health Care Regulatory Excellence (CHRE) Report 2008 at www.chre.org.uk. Accessed October 2011.