HEC Forum

, 23:129

Core Competencies for Health Care Ethics Consultants: In Search of Professional Status in a Post-Modern World

Article

Abstract

The American Society for Bioethics and the Humanities (ASBH) issued its Core Competencies for Health Care Ethics Consultation just as it is becoming ever clearer that secular ethics is intractably plural and without foundations in any reality that is not a social–historical construction (ASBH Core Competencies for Health Care Ethics Consultation, 2nd edn. American Society for Bioethics and Humanities, Glenview, IL, 2011). Core Competencies fails to recognize that the ethics of health care ethics consultants is not ethics in the usual sense of a morally canonical ethics. Its ethics is the ethics established at law and in enforceable health care public policy in a particular jurisdiction. Its normativity is a legal normativity, so that the wrongness of violating this ethics is simply the legal penalties involved and the likelihood of their being imposed. That the ethics of ethics consultation is that ethics legally established accounts for the circumstance that the major role of hospital ethics consultants is as quasi-lawyers giving legal advice, aiding in risk management, and engaging in mediation. It also indicates why this collage of roles has succeeded so well. This article shows how moral philosophy as it was reborn in the 13th century West led to the ethics of modernity and then finally to the ethics of hospital ethics consultation. It provides a brief history of the emergence of an ethics that is after morality. Against this background, the significance of Core Competencies must be critically reconsidered.

Keywords

Bioethics Clinical ethics Hospital ethics consultants Post-modernity Moral pluralism 

References

  1. American Society for Bioethics & Humanities. (2011). Core competencies for healthcare ethics consultation (2nd ed.). Glenview, IL: American Society for Bioethics and Humanities.Google Scholar
  2. Beauchamp, T. (2004). Does ethical theory have a future in bioethics? Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 32, 209–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Caws, P. (1991). Committees and consensus: How many heads are better than one? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 16.4, 375–391.Google Scholar
  4. Chrysostom, S. (1994). Nicene and post-Nicene fathers: Homilies on the Gospel of Saint Matthew (Vol. 10). Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Engelhardt, H. T, Jr. (1999). Healthcare ethics committees: Re-examining their social and moral functions. HEC Forum, 11.2, 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Engelhardt, H. T, Jr. (2000). The foundations of Christian bioethics. Salem, MA: Scrivener Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Engelhardt, H. T, Jr. (2003). The bioethics consultant: Giving moral advice in the midst of moral controversy. HEC Forum, 15.4(December), 362–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Engelhardt, H. T, Jr. (2006). Critical reflections on theology’s handmaid: Why the role of philosophy in Orthodox Christianity is so different. Philosophy & Theology, 18.1, 53–75.Google Scholar
  9. Engelhardt, H. T, Jr. (2007). The Euthyphro’s dilemma reconsidered: A variation on a theme from Brody on halakhic method. In M. Cherry & A. Iltis (Eds.), Pluralistic casuistry (pp. 109–130). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Engelhardt, H. T, Jr. (2009). Credentialing strategically ambiguous and heterogeneous social skills: The emperor without clothes. HEC Forum, 21.3, 293–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Engelhardt, H. T, Jr. (2010a). Moral obligation after the death of God: Critical reflections on concerns from Immanuel Kant, G.W.F. Hegel, and Elizabeth Anscombe. Social Philosophy & Policy, 27.2, 317–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Engelhardt, H. T, Jr. (2010b). Kant, Hegel, and Habermas: Reflections on ‘Glauben und Wissen’. The Review of Metaphysics, 63.4, 871–903.Google Scholar
  13. Engelhardt, H. T, Jr. (2011a). Confronting moral pluralism in posttraditional Western societies: Bioethics critically reassessed. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 36.3, 243–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Engelhardt, H. T, Jr. (Ed.). (2011b). Bioethics critically reconsidered: Having second thoughts. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Fox, E., Myers, S., & Pearlman, R. A. (2007). Ethics consultation in United States hospitals: A national survey. American Journal of Bioethics, 72, 13–25.Google Scholar
  16. Hegel, G. W. F. (1968). Jenaer kritische Schriften, in Gesammelte Werke (Vol. 4). Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
  17. Hegel, G. W. F. (1977). Faith and knowledge. W. Cerf & H. S. Harris (Trans.). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hegel, G. W. F. (1991). Elements of the philosophy of right. A. W. Wood (Ed.), H. B. Nisbet (Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Knowles, D. (1962). The evolution of medieval thought. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  20. Kuehn, M. (2001). Kant: A biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. May, T. (2001). The breadth of bioethics: Core areas of bioethics education for hospital ethics committees. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 26.1, 101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moreno, J. (1988). Ethics by committee: The moral authority of consensus. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 13.4, 411–432.Google Scholar
  23. Moreno, J. (1991). Consensus, contracts, and committees. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 16.4, 393–408.Google Scholar
  24. Rawls, J. (1985). Justice as fairness: Political not metaphysical. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 14(Summer), 223–251.Google Scholar
  25. Tertullian. (1994). In A. Roberts & J. Donaldson (Eds.), Ante-Nicene fathers, Latin Christianity: Its founder, Tertullian. (Vol. 3). Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers.Google Scholar
  26. Tong, R. (1991). The epistemology and ethics of consensus: Uses and misuses of ‘ethical’ expertise. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 16(4), 409–426.Google Scholar
  27. Vattimo, G. (1991). The end of modernity. J. R. Snyder (Trans.). Baltimore: Jon R. Snyder.Google Scholar
  28. Wildes, S. J., & Kevin, W. M. (1993). The priesthood of bioethics and ethics and the return of casuistry. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 18.1, 33–49.Google Scholar
  29. Zaner, R. (1993). Voices and time: The venture of clinical ethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 18.1, 9–31.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyRice UniversityHoustonUSA
  2. 2.Baylor College of MedicineHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations