Advertisement

HEC Forum

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 295–304 | Cite as

Inclusive Consultation: A Hermeneutical Approach to Ethical Deliberation in the Clinical Setting

  • Andreas Vieth
Article
  • 147 Downloads

Abstract

The problem of ethical consultations in the clinical setting should be reasonable, but it cannot be reduced to reason and philosophical theory alone. I will argue that emotions are constitutively and discursively relevant features of the evaluative experience of persons. Ethical consultations should include emotions. Emotions like shame and guilt are complex and learned reactions of persons, which form one basis of ethical reflection. I argue that ethical consultation can rely neither on a strict theory or method nor on a philosophical theory that is external to the situational triggers of consultations in the clinical setting. Emotions are one essential trigger of the need for ethical consultations. I will show that methodologically consultation depends on understanding the evaluative experiences of persons who cooperate in the clinical setting. Moreover, such evaluative experiences includes emotive reactions as well as reason. My conclusion is that ethical consultation in the clinical setting needs a conceptual understanding of epistemic, justificatory and methodological inclusiveness. This circumstance can be summarized: ethical consultations need the ongoing development of a moral hermeneutics of clinical consultation.

Keywords

Ethical consultation Moral justification Emotions Philosophical expertize Hermeneutics 

Notes

Acknowledgment

I am grateful to the editors of HEC Forum for reviewing and finalizing the text.

References

  1. Clouser, K. D., & Gert, B. (1990). A critique of principlism. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 15, 219–236.Google Scholar
  2. DuVal, G. (2001). What triggers requests for ethics consultations. Journal of Medical Ethics, 27(supp. 1), 124–129.Google Scholar
  3. Fournier, V., Rari, E., et al. (2009). Clinical ethics consultation in Europe a comparative and ethical review of the role of patients. Clinical Ethics, 4, 131–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fox, E., Myers, S., & Pearlman, R. A. (2007). Ethics consultation in United States hospitals. A national survey. American Journal of Bioethics, 7(2), 12–25.Google Scholar
  5. Garrett, P. M. (2009). Questioning Habermasian social work a note on some alternative theoretical ressources. British Journal of Social Work, 39, 867–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Howe, E. G. (2010). All careproviders need more opportunities to share their ethical concerns with others. Journal of Clinical Ethics, 21(3), 179–188.Google Scholar
  7. La Puma, J., Schiedermayer, D., & Siegler, M. (1995). How ethics consultation can help resolve dilemmas about dying patients. Western Journal of Medicine, 163, 263–267.Google Scholar
  8. Losa Iglesias, M. E., de Bengoa Vallejo, R., & Salvadores Fuentes, P. (2010). Moral distress related to ethical dilemmas among Spanish podiatrists. Journal of Medical Ethics, 36, 310–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Opel, D. J., Wilfond, B. S., et al. (2009). Characterisation of organisational issues in paediatric clinical ethics consultation a qualitative study. Journal of Medical Ethics, 35, 477–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Perkins, H. S., & Saathoff, B. S. (1988). Impact of medical ethics consultations on physicians an exploratory study. American Journal of Medicine, 85, 761765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Peter, E., & Liaschenko, J. (2004). Perils of proximity a spatiotemporal analysis of moral distress and moral ambiguity. Nursing Inquiry, 11(4), 218–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Quante, M., & Vieth, A. (2002). Defending principlism well understood. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 27(6), 621–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Steinkamp, N., & Gordijn, B. (2003). Ethical case deliberation on the ward a comparison of four methods. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 6, 235–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Vieth, A. (2006). Einführung in die Angewandte Ethik. Darmstadt: Wiss. Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
  15. Vieth, A. (2009). Emotionen in der Ethik. In R. Esterbauer & S. Rinofner-Kreidl (Eds.), Emotionen im Spannungsfeld von Phänomenologie und Wissenschaften (pp. 185–199). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  16. Vieth, A., & Quante, M. (2010). The structure of perception. Ethical Perspectives, 17(1), 5–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Williamson, L. (2007). Empirical assessments of clinical ethics services implications for clinical ethics committees. Clinical Ethics, 2, 187–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Duisburg-EssenEssenGermany
  2. 2.University of MünsterMünsterGermany

Personalised recommendations