Advertisement

HEC Forum

, 20:29 | Cite as

Politics, Bioethics, and Science Policy

  • Leigh TurnerEmail author
Article

Keywords

Political Party Science Policy Policy Formation Precautionary Principle Advisory Body 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Almond G., Verba S. (1963). The civic culture: political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton, Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, M. (2004). Bush dismisses council members. The Scientist, March 3.Google Scholar
  3. Barke R.P. (2003). Politics and interests in the republic of science. Minerva, 41, 305–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bellah R.N. (1975). The broken covenant: American civil religion in time of trial. Chicago, The University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  5. Blackburn, E. (2004a). A ‘full range” of bioethical views just got narrower. Washington Post, March 7, B02.Google Scholar
  6. Blackburn E. (2004b). Bioethics and the political distortion of biomedical science. New England Journal of Medicine, 350, 1379–1380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blackburn E., Rowley J. (2004) Reason as our guide. PloS Biology 2: 0001–0003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boonstra, H. (2003). Critics charge Bush mix of science and politics is unprecedented and dangerous. The Guttmacher Report on Public Policy, May, 1–3.Google Scholar
  9. Callahan D. (2005). Bioethics and the culture wars. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 14, 424–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Caplan, A. (2005). ‘Who lost China?’ A foreshadowing of today’s ideological disputes in bioethics. Hastings Center Report, May–June, 12–13.Google Scholar
  11. Charo R.A. (2004). Passing on the right: conservative bioethics is closer than it appears. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 32(2): 307–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Charo, R.A. (2005). Realbioethik. Hastings Center Report, July–August, 13–14.Google Scholar
  13. Check E. (2005). U.S. progressives fight for a voice in bioethics. Nature, 437, 932–933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Emery D.D., Schneiderman L.J. (1989). Cost–effectiveness analysis in health care. Hastings Center Report, 19(4): 8–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Engelhardt H.T., Jr. (2002). Consensus formation: the creation of an ideology. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 11(1): 7–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ferber D. (2002). Overhaul of CDC panel revives lead safety debate. Science, 298, 732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goklany I.M. (2002). From precautionary principle to risk–risk analysis. Nature Biotechnology, 20(11): 1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Green R. (2006). For richer or poorer? Evaluating the President’s Council on bioethics. HEC Forum, 18, 108–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Greenberg D. (2004). New report accuses Bush of suppressing research data. The Lancet, 363, 874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Greenberg D. (2001). The Bush White House: science advice still out in the cold. The Lancet, 357, 1773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grimes D. (2004). Emergency contraception: politics trumps science at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 104(2): 220–221Google Scholar
  22. Gutmann A., Thompson D. (1996). Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  23. Hampshire S. (2000). Justice is conflict. Princeton, Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  24. Holm S. (2004). Bioethics down under—medical ethics engages with political philosophy. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31(1):1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hunter J.D. (1991). Culture wars: the struggle to define America. New York, Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
  26. Kass, L. (2004). We don’t play politics with science. Washington Post, March 3, A27.Google Scholar
  27. Kennedy D. (2003). An epidemic of politics. Science, 299, 625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kingdon J. (1999). America the unusual. New York, Worth PublishersGoogle Scholar
  29. Lancet Editors. (2002). Keeping scientific advice non–partisan. The Lancet, 360, 1525.Google Scholar
  30. Leshner A.I. (2003). Don’t let ideology trump science. Science, 302, 1479Google Scholar
  31. Malakoff D. (2003). Democrats accuse Bush of letting politics distort science. Science, 301, 901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marchant G.E. (2003). From general policy to legal rule: aspirations and limitations of the precautionary principle. Environmental Health Perspectives 111(14): 1799–1803Google Scholar
  33. May C. (2006). Mobilizing modern facts: health technology assessment and the politics of evidence. Sociology of Health and Illness, 28, 513–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mooney C. (2005). The Republican war on science. New York, Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
  35. Moreira T. (2007). Entangled evidence: knowledge making in systematic reviews in healthcare. Sociology of Health and Illness, 29, 180–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moreno, J.D. (2002). The brief career of a Government Advisory Committee: one member’s perspective. The American Journal of Bioethics, 2(4).Google Scholar
  37. Moreno, J.D. (2005). The end of the great bioethics compromise. Hastings Center Report, January–February, 14–15.Google Scholar
  38. Novak K. (2003). U.S. scientific panels Bush–whacked. Nature Medicine, 9(2): 153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pellegrino E. (2006). Bioethics and politics: “doing ethics”in the public square. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 31, 569–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pielke R.A. Jr. (2002). Policy, politics and perspective. Nature, 416, 367–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pollard T.D. (2001). Life scientists and politics in the United States. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 2, 929–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Powers M. (2005). Bioethics as politics: the limits of moral expertise. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 15(3): 205–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Revkin, A.C. (2004). Bush vs. the laureates: how science became a partisan issue. The New York Times, October 19.Google Scholar
  44. Rorty R. (1999). Philosophy and social hope. London, Penguin BooksGoogle Scholar
  45. Shulman S. (2007). Undermining science: suppression and distortion in the Bush Administration. Berkeley, University of California PressGoogle Scholar
  46. Sowell T. (2002). A conflict of visions: ideological origins of political struggle. New York, Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
  47. Union of Concerned Scientists. (2004). Scientific integrity in policymaking: an investigation into the Bush Administration’s misuse of science. February. Cambridge: Union of Concerned Scientists.Google Scholar
  48. United States House of Representatives Committee on Government Reform—Minority Staff Special Investigation Division. (2003). Politics and science in the Bush Administration. Prepared for Henry A. Waxman. August. Van den Belt, H. (2003). Debating the precautionary principle: ‘guilty until proven innocent,’or ‘innocent until proven guilty’? Plant Physiology, 132(3), 1122–1126.Google Scholar
  49. Weiss, R. (2004). Bush ejects two from bioethics council. Washington Post, February 28, A06.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.William Dawson Scholar, Biomedical Ethics Unit, Department of Social Studies of Medicine, Faculty of MedicineMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations