Advertisement

Health Care Management Science

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 379–394 | Cite as

Comparing the Efficiency of Hospitals in Italy and Germany: Nonparametric Conditional Approach Based on Partial Frontier

  • Yauheniya Varabyova
  • Carl Rudolf Blankart
  • Aleksandra Torbica
  • Jonas Schreyögg
Article
  • 536 Downloads

Abstract

Traditional nonparametric frontier techniques to measure hospital efficiency have been criticized for their deterministic nature and the inability to incorporate external factors into the analysis. Moreover, efficiency estimates represent a relative measure meaning that the implications from a hospital efficiency analysis based on a single-country dataset are limited by the availability of suitable benchmarks. Our first objective is to demonstrate the application of advanced nonparametric methods that overcome the limitations of the traditional nonparametric frontier techniques. Our second objective is to provide guidance on how an international comparison of hospital efficiency can be conducted using the example of two countries: Italy and Germany. We rely on a partial frontier of order-m to obtain efficiency estimates robust to outliers and extreme values. We use the conditional approach to incorporate hospital and regional characteristics into the estimation of efficiency. The obtained conditional efficiency estimates may deviate from the traditional unconditional efficiency estimates, which do not account for the potential influence of operational environment on the production possibilities. We nonparametrically regress the ratios of conditional to unconditional efficiency estimates to examine the relation of hospital and regional characteristics with the efficiency performance. We show that the two countries can be compared against a common frontier when the challenges of international data compatibility are successfully overcome. The results indicate that there are significant differences in the production possibilities of Italian and German hospitals. Moreover, hospital characteristics, particularly bed-size category, ownership status, and specialization, are significantly related to differences in efficiency performance across the analyzed hospitals.

Keywords

Nonparametric conditional approach Partial order-m frontier Hospital efficiency International comparison 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We express our gratitude to Kristof De Witte for providing the R code, which we used for our analysis, and to Cinzia Daraio for providing the MATLAB code, which we used for reference. We thank Bruce Hollingsworth for his guidance in the conceptualization stage of the study. We also thank our three anonymous reviewers for providing insightful comments and suggesting ways to improve our study.

References

  1. 1.
    Kruk ME, Freedman LP (2008) Assessing health system performance in developing countries: a review of the literature. Health Policy 85(3):263–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hollingsworth B (2008) The measurement of efficiency and productivity of health care delivery. Health Economics 17(10):1107–1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ozcan YA (2014) Health Care benchmarking and performance evaluation An assessment using data envelopment analysis (DEA), 2nd edn. Springer, Newton, MAGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Daraio C, Simar L (2007) Advanced robust and nonparametric methods in efficiency analysis [electronic resource]: Methodology and applications, vol 4. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Daraio C, Bonaccorsi A, Simar L (2015) Efficiency and economies of scale and specialization in european universities: a directional distance approach. J Informetrics 9(3):430–448. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2015.03.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Witte K, Marques RC (2010) Designing performance incentives, an international benchmark study in the water sector. Central European Journal of Operations Research 18(2):189–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Medin E, Häkkinen U, Linna M, Anthun KS, Kittelsen SA, Rehnberg C (2013) international hospital productivity comparison: experiences from the nordic countries. Health Policy 112(1):80–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dervaux B, Ferrier GD, Leleu H, Valdmanis V (2004) Comparing French and US hospital technologies: a directional input distance function approach. Applied Economics 36(10):1065–1081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mobley LR IV, Magnussen J (1998) An international comparison of hospital efficiency: does institutional environment matter? Applied Economics 30(8):1089–1100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Steinmann L, Dittrich G, Karmann A, Zweifel P (2004) Measuring and comparing the (in) efficiency of german and swiss hospitals. The European Journal of Health Economics 5(3):216–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mateus C, Joaquim I, Nunes C (2015) Measuring hospital efficiency—comparing four european countries. European Journal of Public Health 25(suppl 1):52–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cazals C, Florens J-P, Simar L (2002) Nonparametric frontier estimation: a robust approach. J Econometrics 106(1):1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Daraio C, Simar L (2005) Introducing environmental variables in nonparametric frontier models: a probabilistic approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis 24(1):93–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bădin L, Daraio C, Simar L (2014) Explaining inefficiency in nonparametric production models: the state of the art. Annals of Operations Research 214(1):5–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cordero JM, Alonso-Morán E, Nuño-Solinis R, Orueta JF, Arce RS (2015) Efficiency assessment of primary care providers: a conditional nonparametric approach. European Journal of Operational Research 240(1):235–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ferreira D, Marques R (2014) Should inpatients be adjusted by their complexity and severity for efficiency assessment? Evidence from Portugal. Health Care Manag Sci:1–15. doi: 10.1007/s10729-014-9286-y
  17. 17.
    Barbetta GP, Turati G, Zago AM (2007) Behavioral differences between public and private not-for-profit hospitals in the italian national health service. Health Economics 16(1):75–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Berta P, Callea G, Martini G, Vittadini G (2010) The effects of upcoding, cream skimming and readmissions on the italian hospitals efficiency: a population-based investigation. Economic Modelling 27(4):812–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cellini R, Pignataro G, Rizzo I (2000) Competition and efficiency in health care: an analysis of the italian case. Int Tax Public Finan 7(4–5):503–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Daidone S, D’Amico F (2009) Technical efficiency, specialization and ownership form: evidences from a pooling of italian hospitals. Journal of Productivity Analysis 32(3):203–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Matranga D, Bono F, Casuccio A, Firenze A, Marsala L, Giaimo R, Sapienza F, Vitale F (2013) Evaluating the effect of organization and context on technical efficiency: a second-stage dea analysis of italian hospitals. Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Public Health 11(1):1–11Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Siciliani L (2006) Estimating Technical Efficiency in the Hospital Sector with Panel Data. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 5(2):99–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Atella V, Belotti F, Daidone S, Ilardi G, Marini G (2012) Cost-containment policies and hospital efficiency: evidence from a panel of Italian hospitals. CEIS Working Paper No 228. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2038398
  24. 24.
    Herr A (2008) Cost and technical efficiency of german hospitals: does ownership matter? Health Economics 17(9):1057–1071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Herr A, Schmitz H, Augurzky B (2011) Profit efficiency and ownership of german hospitals. Health Economics 20(6):660–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Herwartz H, Strumann C (2012) On the effect of prospective payment on local hospital competition in Germany. Health Care Manag Sci 15(1):48–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Staat M (2006) Efficiency of hospitals in germany: a dea-bootstrap approach. Applied Economics 38(19):2255–2263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tiemann O, Schreyögg J (2009) Effects of ownership on hospital efficiency in germany. Business Research 2(2):115–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tiemann O, Schreyögg J (2012) Changes in hospital efficiency after privatization. Health Care Management Science 15(4):310–326. doi: 10.1007/s10729-012-9193-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lindlbauer I, Schreyögg J (2014) The relationship between hospital specialization and hospital efficiency: do different measures of specialization lead to different results? Health Care Management Science 17(4):365–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Büchner VA, Hinz V, Schreyögg J (2014) Health systems: changes in hospital efficiency and profitability. Health Care Manag Sci: 1–14. doi: 10.1007/s10729-014-9303-1
  32. 32.
    Ferrer F, de Belvis AG, Valerio L, Longhi S, Lazzari A, Fattore G, Ricciardi W, Maresso A (2014) Italy: health system review. Health Systems in Transition 16(4):1–168Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    OECD (2014) Health statistics. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). doi: 10.1787/health-data-en Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Piacenza M, Turati G, Vannoni D (2010) Restructuring hospital industry to control public health care expenditure: the role of input substitutability. Economic Modelling 27(4):881–890. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2009.10.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tauchmann H (2012) Partial frontier efficiency analysis. Stata J 12(3):461–478Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bădin L, Daraio C, Simar L (2010) Optimal bandwidth selection for conditional efficiency measures: a data-driven approach. The European Journal of Health Economics 201(2):633–640Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Jeong S-O, Park BU, Simar L (2010) Nonparametric conditional efficiency measures: asymptotic properties. Annals of Operations Research 173(1):105–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Simar L, Wilson PW (2011) Two-Stage DEA: caveat emptor. Journal of Productivity Analysis 36(2):205–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Simar L, Wilson PW (2007) Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. J Econometrics 136(1):31–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Daraio C, Simar L, Wilson PW (2010) Testing whether two-stage estimation is meaningful in non-parametric models of production. ISBA Discussion Papers,Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bădin L, Daraio C, Simar L (2012) How to measure the impact of environmental factors in a nonparametric production model. Eur J Health Econ 223(3):818–833Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Simar L (2003) Detecting outliers in frontier models: a simple approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis 20(3):391–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    De Witte K, Kortelainen M (2013) What explains the performance of students in a heterogeneous environment? conditional efficiency estimation with continuous and discrete environmental variables. Applied Economics 45(17):2401–2412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Li Q, Racine JS (2008) Nonparametric estimation of conditional cdf and quantile functions with mixed categorical and continuous data. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 26(4):423–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hayfield T, Racine JS (2008) Nonparametric econometrics: The np package. J Stat Softw 27(5):1–32Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    OECD (2014) Regional Statistics. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). doi: 10.1787/region-data-en Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Worthington AC (2004) Frontier efficiency measurement in health care: a review of empirical techniques and selected applications. Medical Care Research and Review 61(2):135–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Linna M, Häkkinen U, Peltola M, Magnussen J, Anthun KS, Kittelsen S, Roed A, Olsen K, Medin E, Rehnberg C (2010) Measuring cost efficiency in the nordic hospitals—a cross-sectional comparison of public hospitals in 2002. Health Care Management Science 13(4):346–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Varabyova Y, Schreyögg J (2013) International comparisons of the technical efficiency of the hospital sector: panel data analysis of oecd countries using parametric and non-parametric approaches. Health Policy 112(1):70–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Clark JR, Huckman RS (2012) Broadening focus: spillovers, complementarities, and specialization in the hospital industry. Management Science 58(4):708–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Kobel C, Theurl E (2013) Hospital specialisation within a DRG-framework: The Austrian case. Working papers in economics and statistics,Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    DeLellis NO, Ozcan YA (2013) Quality outcomes among efficient and inefficient nursing homes: a national study. Health Care Manage R 38(2):156–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Narcı HÖ, Ozcan YA, Şahin İ, Tarcan M, Narcı M (2015) An examination of competition and efficiency for hospital industry in Turkey. Health Care Manag Sci 18(4):407–418. doi: 10.1007/s10729-014-9315-x
  54. 54.
    Zwanziger J, Melnick GA (1988) The effects of hospital competition and the medicare pps program on hospital cost behavior in california. Journal of Health Economics 7(4):301–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Carr WJ, Feldstein PJ (1967) The relationship of cost to hospital size. Inquiry 4(2):45–65Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Tiemann O, Schreyögg J, Busse R (2012) Hospital ownership and efficiency: a review of studies with particular focus on germany. Health Policy 104(2):163–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Ettelt S, Thomson S, Nolte E, Mays N (2007) The regulation of competition between publicly-financed hospitals. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Araújo C, Barros CP, Wanke P (2014) Efficiency determinants and capacity issues in brazilian for-profit hospitals. Health Care Management Science 17(2):126–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Porter ME (2010) What is value in health care? New Engl J Med 363(26):2477–2481. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1011024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Fattore G, Torbica A (2006) Inpatient reimbursement system in italy: how do tariffs relate to costs? Health Care Management Science 9(3):251–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yauheniya Varabyova
    • 1
  • Carl Rudolf Blankart
    • 1
    • 2
  • Aleksandra Torbica
    • 3
  • Jonas Schreyögg
    • 1
  1. 1.Hamburg Center for Health EconomicsUniversität HamburgHamburgGermany
  2. 2.Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research, School of Public HealthBrown UniversityProvidenceUSA
  3. 3.CERGAS-Department of Policy Analysis and Public ManagementBocconi UniversityMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations