An examination of competition and efficiency for hospital industry in Turkey
- 818 Downloads
The two particular reforms that have been undertaken under the Health Transformation Program in Turkey are enhancing efficiency and increasing competition. However, there is a lack of information about the relationship between competition and hospital efficiency. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the effect of competition on technical efficiency for the hospital industry in Turkey. The target population included all public and private general hospitals that were open in 2010 in Turkey (n = 1,224). From these, 1,103 hospitals met the selection criteria and were included in the study. Data were obtained from the Turkish Statistical Institute, the Ministry of Health, and through a field survey. Technical efficiency of hospitals was estimated using Data Envelopment Analysis with five outputs and five inputs. The intensity of competition among hospitals was measured by objective and subjective measures. Objective competition was measured using the Hirschman-Herfindahl Index, and subjective competition was measured based on the perceptions of top level hospital managers. Multivariate Tobit regression was used to investigate the relationship between competition and efficiency while controlling the effects of demand and supply characteristics of the market and the hospital traits. Efficiency results showed that 17 % of hospitals were technically efficient. Regression analyses portrayed that the degree of competition among general hospitals did not have a statistically significant relationship with hospitals’ technical efficiency. To conclude, hospital efficiency in Turkey does not seem to be affected by the intensity of competition among hospitals.
KeywordsHospital efficiency Hospital competition Perceived competition Turkey
MSC code90-XX Operations research mathematical programming
This study was funded by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey with a project number of 110 K443. The authors retained control over the entire process during the production of the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest in connection with this paper.
- 2.Başara BB, Güler C, Yentür GK et al. (2013) Ministry of Health Statistical Yearbook of Health 2012. Ankara, TurkeyGoogle Scholar
- 3.www.sgk.gov.tr Accessed 21 May 2014
- 4.OECD & IBRD/World Bank (2008) OECD Health System Reviews Turkey. ParisGoogle Scholar
- 10.Torun N (2010) Development of competition in Turkish healthcare system and an assessment of its effect on hospital efficiency and quality. Dissertation, Hacettepe UniversityGoogle Scholar
- 11.Ozcan YA (2014) Health care benchmarking and performance evaluation: an assessment using data envelopment analysis (DEA), 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 12.Clarkson K, Miller RL (1982) Industrial organization: theory, evidence, and public policy. McGraw-Hill Book Company, USAGoogle Scholar
- 26.Cooper Z, Gibbons S, Jones S, McGuire A (2010) Does hospital competition improve efficiency? an analysis of the recent market-based reforms to the English NHS. CEP Discussion Paper No 988. http://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/dp0988.pdf. Accessed 11 February 2013
- 30.Büyükkayıkçı H, Sahin I (2000) The comparative MoH payment list with SSI ulus hospital surgical services patient costs. Hacettepe Saglık İdare Derg 5(3):119–148Google Scholar
- 42.Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K (2007) Introduction to data envelopment analysis and its uses: with DEA solver software and references. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 44.OECD (2011) Health at a Glance 2011: OECD Indicators http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1787/health_glance-2011-en. OECD Publishing
- 46.Tuckman HP, Chang CF (1988) Cost convergence between for-profit and not-for-profit nursing homes: does competition matter? Q Rev Econ Bus 28(4):50–65Google Scholar
- 53.Schultz MA, van Servellen G et al (1998) The relationship of hospital structural and financial characteristics to mortality and length of stay in acute myocardial ınfarction patients. Outcomes Manag Nursing Prac 2:130–36Google Scholar
- 55.Wennberg JE, Fisher ES et al (2005) Evaluating the efficiency of california providers in caring for patients with chronic illnesses. Health Affair 24:526–43Google Scholar
- 56.Bijlsma M, Koning P, Shestalova V, Aouragh A (2010) The effect of competition on process and outcome quality of hospital care: an empirical analysis for the Netherlands. CPB Discussion Paper No 157. CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, The Hague.Google Scholar
- 58.Angela Testi A, Fareed N, Ozcan YA, Tanfani E (2014) Assessment of physician performance for diabetes: a bias-corrected DEA model. Quality in Primary Care 21(6):345–357Google Scholar
- 59.Kacak H, Ozcan YA, Kavuncubasi SA (2014) New examination of hospital performance after health care reform in Turkey: sensitivity and quality comparisons. Int J Public Policy 10(4/5):178–194Google Scholar