Health Care Management Science

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 188–196

Determining the optimal vaccine vial size in developing countries: a Monte Carlo simulation approach

Article

Abstract

Outreach immunization services, in which health workers immunize children in their own communities, are indispensable to improve vaccine coverage in rural areas of developing countries. One of the challenges faced by these services is how to reduce high levels of vaccine wastage. In particular, the open vial wastage (OVW) that result from the vaccine doses remaining in a vial after a time for safe use -since opening the vial- has elapsed. This wastage is highly dependent on the choice of vial size and the expected number of participants for which the outreach session is planned (i.e., session size). The use single-dose vials results in zero OVW, but it increases the vaccine purchase, transportation, and holding costs per dose as compared to those resulting from using larger vial sizes. The OVW also decreases when more people are immunized in a session. However, controlling the actual number of people that show to an outreach session in rural areas of developing countries highly depends on factors that are out of control of the immunization planners. This paper integrates a binary integer-programming model to a Monte Carlo simulation method to determine the choice of vial size and the optimal reordering point level to implement an (nQ, r, T) lot-sizing policy that provides the best tradeoff between procurement costs and wastage.

Keywords

Vaccines Lot sizing policy Stochastic Perishable products Session size Vial size 

Mathematics Subject Classification (2010)

90B05 

References

  1. 1.
    Assi TM, Brown S, Djibo A, Norman B, Rajgopal J, Welling J, Chen SI, Bailey R, Kone S, Kenea H, Connor D, Wateska A, Jana A, Wisniewski S, Van Panhuis W, Burke D, Lee B (2011) Impact of changing the measles vaccine vial size on niger’s vaccine supply chain: a computational model. BMC Public Health 11(1):1186–1471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bosu W, Ahelegbe D, Edum-Fotwe E, Bainson K, Turkson P (1997) Factors influencing attendance to immunization sessions for children in a rural district of Ghana. Acta Trop 68(3):259–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Centeno M, Reyes M (1998) So you have your model: what to do next. A tutorial on simulation output analysis. In: Winter simulation conference, vol 1, pp 23–29Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cohen M (1976) Analysis of single critical number ordering policies for perishable inventories. Oper Res 24(4):726–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dhamodharan A, Proano R, Kumar S (2011) A stochastic approach to determine the optimal vaccine vial size. In: Doolen T, Van Aken E (eds) Proceedings of the 2011 industrial engineering research conferenceGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ebong C, Levy P (2011) Impact of the introduction of new vaccines and vaccine wastage rate on the cost-effectiveness of routine epi: lessons from a descriptive study in a cameroonian health district. Cost Eff Resour Alloc 9(1):9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guichard S, Hymbaugh K, Burkholder B, Diorditsa S, Navarro C, Ahmed S, Rahman M (2010) Vaccine wastage in Bangladesh. Vaccine 28(3):858–863. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.08.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hadley G, Whitin T (1961) A family of inventory models. Manage Sci 7(4):351–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee B, Norman B, Assi T, Chen S, Bailey R, Rajgopal J, Brown S, Wiringa A, Burke D (2010) Single versus multi-dose vaccine vials: an economic computational model. Vaccine 28(32):5292–5300. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.05.048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liu L, Lian Z (1999) (s, S) continuous review models for products with fixed lifetimes. Oper Res 47(1):150–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mangrio N, Alam M, Shaikh B (2008) Is expanded programme on immunization doing enough? Viewpoint of health workers and managers in Sindh, Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc 58(2):64–67Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nahmias S (1975) Optimal ordering policies for perishable inventory II. Oper Res 23(4):735–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nahmias S (1982) Perishable inventory theory: a review. Oper Res 30(4):680–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nahmias S, Wang S (1979) A heuristic lot size reorder point model for decaying inventories. Manage Sci 25(1):90–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Plotkin S (2005) Vaccines: past, present and future. Nat Med 11(4 Suppl):S5–11. doi:10.1038/nm1209 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ravichandran N (1995) Stochastic analysis of a continuous review perishable inventory system with positive lead time and Poisson demand. Eur J Oper Res 84(2):444–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tekin E, Gürler Ü, Berk E (2001) Age-based vs. stock level control policies for a perishable inventory system. Eur J Oper Res 134(2):309–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    UNICEF, National Rural Health Mission I (2010) Vaccine wastage assessment. ReportGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Veinott A (1965) Optimal inventory policy for batch ordering. Oper Res 13(3):424–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Weiss H (1980) Optimal ordering policies for continuous review perishable inventory models. Oper Res 28(2):365–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zyl V (1964) Inventory control for perishable commodities. PhD thesis, University of North CarolinaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial and Systems EngineeringRochester Institute of TechnologyRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations