Health Care Management Science

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 37–47 | Cite as

U.S. hospital efficiency and adoption of health information technology

Article

Abstract

This study empirically examines the association between hospital inefficiency and the decision to introduce electronic medical records (EMR) and computerized physician order entry (CPOE) in a national sample of U.S. general hospitals in urban areas in 2006. The main research question is whether the presence of hospital cost inefficiency or other factors driving inefficiency in the production process of a hospital explain low adoption rates of health information technology (HIT) in a hospital setting. We estimated a logistic regression of HIT adoption as a function of hospital cost inefficiency scores obtained using a stochastic frontier analysis. The results demonstrate that hospitals with a greater degree of cost inefficiency were more likely to introduce EMR, suggesting that the benefits of EMR implementation in terms of improved efficiency were likely to outweigh the costs of adoption compared to hospitals that are more efficient. The results showed no association between cost inefficiency and the CPOE adoption decision.

Keywords

Health information technology EMR CPOE HIT adoption Hospital inefficiency Cost 

References

  1. 1.
    Chernew ME, Hirth RA, Cutler DM (2009) Increased spending on health care: long-term implications ofr the nation. Healh Affairs 28(5):1253–1255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sommers BD (2010) Why lowering health costs should be a key adjunct to slowing health spending growth. Health Aff (Millwood) 29(9):1651–1655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Borzekowski R (2009) Measuring the cost impact of hospital information systems: 1987–1994. J Health Econ 28(5):938–949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, Maglione M, Mojica W, Roth E, Morton SC, Shekelle PG (2006) Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med 144(10):742–752Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Institute of Medicine (2001) Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Institute of Medicine, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McCullough JS, Casey M, Moscovice I, Prasad S (2010) The effect of health information technology on quality in U.S. hospitals. Health Aff (Millwood) 29(4):647–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    The Leapfrog Group (2009) Computerized physician order entry. The Leapfrog Group. http://www.leapfroggroup.org/media/file/FactSheet_CPOE.pdf. Accessed March 28 2009
  8. 8.
    Hillestad R, Bigelow J, Bower A, Girosi F, Meili R, Scoville R, Taylor R (2005) Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. Health Aff (Millwood) 24(5):1103–1117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jha AK, DesRoches CM, Kralovec PD, Joshi MS (2010) A progress report on electronic health records in U.S. hospitals. Health Aff (Millwood) 29(10):1951–1957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Anderson GF, Frogner BK, Johns RA, Reinhardt UE (2006) Health care spending and use of information technology in Oecd countries. Health Aff (Millwood) 25(3):819–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goldzweig CL, Towfigh A, Maglione M, Shekelle PG (2009) Costs and benefits of health information technology: new trends from the literature. Health Aff (Millwood) 28(2):w282–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McCullough JS (2008) The adoption of hospital information systems. Health Econ 17(5):649–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mick SS (1990) Innovations in health care delivery: insights for organization theory. 1st edition edn. Jossey-Bass Publishers San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sloan FA, Valvona J, Perrin JM, Adamache KW (1986) Diffusion of surgical technology. An exploratory study. J Health Econ 5(1):31–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fendrick AM, Escarce JJ, McLane C, Shea JA, Schwartz JS (1994) Hospital adoption of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Med Care 32(10):1058–1063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cutler DM, Feldman NE, Horwitz JR (2005) U.S. adoption of computerized physician order entry systems. Health Aff (Millwood) 24(6):1654–1663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fonkych K, Taylor R (2005) The state and pattern of health information technology adoption. Rand Corp, Santa Monica, CAGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Borzekowski R (2002) Health care finance and the early adoption of hospital information systems. Working Paper. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve SystemGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang BB, Wan TT, Burke DE, Bazzoli GJ, Lin BY (2005) Factors influencing health information system adoption in American hospitals. Health Care Manage Rev 30(1):44–51Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Romeo AA, Wagner JL, Lee RH (1984) Prospective reimbursement and the diffusion of new technologies in hospitals. J Health Econ 3(1):1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lee RH, Waldman DM (1985) The diffusion of innovations in hospitals. Some econometric considerations. J Health Econ 4(4):373–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Baker LC (2001) Managed care and technology adoption in health care: evidence from magnetic resonance imaging. J Health Econ 20(3):395–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Baker LC, Phibbs CS (2002) Managed care, technology adoption, and health care: the adoption of neonatal intensive care. Rand J Econ 33(3):524–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cutler DM, McClellan M, Newhouse JP, Remler D (1998) Are medical prices declining? Evidence from heart attack treatments. Q J Econ 113(4):991–1024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rosko MD, Mutter RL (2011) What have we learned from the application of stochastic frontier analysis to U.S. hospitals? Med Care Res Rev 68(1 Suppl):75S–100SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chirikos TN, Sear AM (2000) Measuring hospital efficiency: a comparison of two approaches. Health Serv Res 34(6):1389–1408Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Leibenstein H, Maital S (1992) Empirical estimation and partitioning of X-inefficiency—a data-envelopment approach. Am Econ Rev 82(2):428–433Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rosko MD, Mutter RL (2008) Stochastic frontier analysis of hospital inefficiency: a review of empirical issues and an assessment of robustness. Med Care Res Rev 65(2):131–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Deily ME, McKay NL (2006) Cost inefficiency and mortality rates in Florida hospitals. Health Econ 15(4):419–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    McKay NL, Deily ME (2008) Cost inefficiency and hospital health outcomes. Health Econ 17(7):833–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Deily ME, McKay NL, Dorner FH (2000) Exit and inefficiency—the effects of ownership type. J Hum Resour 35(4):734–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Frech HE, Mobley LR (2000) Efficiency, growth, and concentration: an empirical analysis of hospital markets. Econ Inq 38(3):369–384Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Furukawa MF, Raghu TS, Shao BB (2010) Electronic medical records and cost efficiency in hospital medical-surgical units. Inquiry 47(2):110–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kazley AS, Ozcan YA (2009) Electronic medical record use and efficiency: a dea and windows analysis of hospitals. Socioecon Plann Sci 43(3):209–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Poon EG, Blumenthal D, Jaggi T, Honour MM, Bates DW, Kaushal R (2004) Overcoming barriers to adopting and implementing computerized physician order entry systems in U.S. hospitals. Health Aff (Millwood) 23(4):184–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Girosi F, Meili R, Scoville RP (2005) Extrapolating evidence of health information technology savings and costs. RAND Health, Santa Monica, CAGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Franklin BD, O’Grady K, Donyai P, Jacklin A, Barber N (2007) The impact of a closed-loop electronic prescribing and administration system on prescribing errors, administration errors and staff time: a before-and-after study. Qual Saf Health Care 16(4):279–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hakes B, Whittington J (2008) Assessing the impact of an electronic medical record on nurse documentation time. Comput Inform Nurs 26(4):234–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Jha AK, Li Z, Orav EJ, Epstein AM (2005) Care in U.S. hospitals—the hospital quality alliance program. N Engl J Med 353(3):265–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Metzger J, Turisco F (2001) Computerized physician order entry: a look at the vendor marketplace and getting started. The Leapfrog Group,. http://www.leapfroggroup.org/media/file/Leapfrog-CPO_Guide.pdf. Accessed December 2010
  41. 41.
    Burke D, Menachemi N (2004) Opening the black box: measuring hospital information technology capability. Health Care Manage Rev 29(3):207–217Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kazley AS, Diana ML (2010) Hospital Cpoe adoption and quality: an examination of the United States. Health Care Manage Rev 36(1):86–94Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kazley AS, Ozcan YA (2008) Do hospitals with electronic medical records (Emrs) provide higher quality care? Med Care Res Rev 65(4):496–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Diana ML, Kazley AS, Menachemi N (2011) An assessment of health care information and management systems society and leapfrog data on computerized provider order entry. Health Services ResearchGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Bazzoli GJ, Shortell SM, Dubbs N, Chan C, Kralovec P (1999) A taxonomy of health networks and systems: bringing order out of chaos. Health Serv Res 33(6):1683–1717Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Rosko MD (2001) Cost efficiency of Us hospitals: a stochastic frontier approach. Health Econ 10(6):539–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Zuckerman S, Hadley J, Iezzoni L (1994) Measuring hospital efficiency with frontier cost functions. J Health Econ 13(3):255–280, discussion 335–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kumbhakar S, Lovell CAK (2000) Stochastic frontier analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge [England]; New YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Jondrow J, Lovell CAK, Materov IS, Schmidt P (1982) On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model. J Econometrics 19(2–3):233–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wooldridge JM (2001) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. 1 edition edn. The MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Baum CF, Schaffer ME, Stillman E (2003) Instrumental variables and Gmm: estimation and testing. Working paper. Boston College, Department of EconomicsGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Baum CF, Schaffer ME, Stillman E (2007) Enhanced routines for instrumental: variables/Gmm estimation and testing. Working paper. Boston College, Department of EconomicsGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Bound J, Jaeger DA, Baker RM (1995) Problems with instrumental variables estimation when the correlation between the instruments and the endogenous explanatory variable is weak. J Am Stat Assoc 90(430):443–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Jha AK, DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Donelan K, Rao SR, Ferris TG, Shields A, Rosenbaum S, Blumenthal D (2009) Use of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals. N Engl J Med 360(16):1628–1638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Vest JR (2009) Health information exchange and healthcare utilization. J Med Syst 33(3):223–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Vest JR, Gamm LD (2010) Health information exchange: persistent challenges and new strategies. J Am Med Inform Assoc 17(3):288–294Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Miller AR, Tucker C (2010) User size and network externalities. NET Institute Working Paper No. 09–07Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Chirikos TN (1998) Identifying efficiently and economically operated hospitals: the prospects and pitfalls of applying frontier regression techniques. J Health Polit Policy Law 23(6):879–904Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Street A (2003) How much confidence should we place in efficiency estimates? Health Econ 12(11):895–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Global Health Systems and Development, School of Public Health and Tropical MedicineTulane UniversityNew OrleansUSA

Personalised recommendations