Health Care Management Science

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 253–261 | Cite as

Modelling catchment areas for secondary care providers: a case study

  • Simon Jones
  • Jessica Wardlaw
  • Susan Crouch
  • Michelle Carolan
Article

Abstract

Hospitals need to understand patient flows in an increasingly competitive health economy. New initiatives like Patient Choice and the Darzi Review further increase this demand. Essential to understanding patient flows are demographic and geographic profiles of health care service providers, known as ‘catchment areas’ and ‘catchment populations’. This information helps Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) to review how their populations are accessing services, measure inequalities and commission services; likewise it assists Secondary Care Providers (SCPs) to measure and assess potential gains in market share, redesign services, evaluate admission thresholds and plan financial budgets. Unlike PCTs, SCPs do not operate within fixed geographic boundaries. Traditionally, SCPs have used administrative boundaries or arbitrary drive times to model catchment areas. Neither approach satisfactorily represents current patient flows. Furthermore, these techniques are time-consuming and can be challenging for healthcare managers to exploit. This paper presents three different approaches to define catchment areas, each more detailed than the previous method. The first approach ‘First Past the Post’ defines catchment areas by allocating a dominant SCP to each Census Output Area (OA). The SCP with the highest proportion of activity within each OA is considered the dominant SCP. The second approach ‘Proportional Flow’ allocates activity proportionally to each OA. This approach allows for cross-boundary flows to be captured in a catchment area. The third and final approach uses a gravity model to define a catchment area, which incorporates drive or travel time into the analysis. Comparing approaches helps healthcare providers to understand whether using more traditional and simplistic approaches to define catchment areas and populations achieves the same or similar results as complex mathematical modelling. This paper has demonstrated, using a case study of Manchester, that when estimating the catchment area of a planned new hospital, the extra level of detail provided by the gravity model may prove necessary. However, in virtually all other applications, the Proportional Flow method produced the optimal model for catchment populations in Manchester, based on several criteria: it produced the smallest RMS error; it addressed cross-boundary flows; the data used to create the catchment was readily available to SCPs; and it was simpler to reproduce than the gravity model method. Further work is needed to address how the Proportional Flow method can be used to reflect service redesign and handle OAs with zero or low activity. A next step should be the rolling out of the method across England and looking at further drill downs of data such as catchment by Healthcare Resource Group (HRG) rather than specialty level.

Keywords

Proportional Flow First Past the Post Gravity model Catchment areas Catchment populations Secondary care providers Providers 

References

  1. 1.
    Bailey NTJ (1956) Statistics in hospital planning and design. Appl Stat 5(2):146–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bailey TC, Gatrell AC (1995) Interactive spatial data analysis. Longman Scientific & TechnicalGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bikker JA, de Vos AF (1992) A regional supply and demand model for inpatient hospital care. Environ Plann A 24(8):1097–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Congdon P (2001) The development of gravity models for hospital patient flows under system change: a bayesian modelling approach. Health Care Manage Sci 4(4):289–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Congdon P, Best N (2000) Small area variation in hospital admission rates: Bayesian adjustment for primary care and hospital factor. Appl Stat 49(2):207–226Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cooper Z, Gibbons S, Jones S, McGuire A (2010) Does hospital competition improve efficiency? Paper No’ CEPDP0988, An Analysis of the Recent Market-Based Reforms to the English NHS, LSE Centre for Economic Performance, Download from http://cep.lse.ac.uk/_new/publications/abstract.asp?index=3620.
  7. 7.
    Flowers J (2003) Catchment areas and populations [online]. INphoRM, February 2003 Issue 2. Available at: http://www.erpho.org.uk/download.aspx?urlid=9480&urlt=1 (Accessed 07/03/11).
  8. 8.
    Flowers J (2005) Catchment areas and populations - a lost art. June 10. [lecture] Eastern Regional Public Health Observatories. Available online at: http://www.erpho.org.uk/download.aspx?urlid=12449&urlt=1 (Accessed 07/03/11).
  9. 9.
    Gandy RJ (1979) The calculation of catchment population within the National Health Service. Statistician 28(1):29–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gu W, Wang X, McGregor SE (2010) Optimization of preventive health care facility locations. International Journal of Health Geographics 9(17). Available online at: http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/9/1/17 (accessed 09/01/11).
  11. 11.
    Harper PR (2002) A framework for operational modelling of hospital resources. Health Care Manage Sci 5(3):165–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Harper PR, Shahani AK (2003) A decision support system for the care of HIV and AIDS patients in India. Eur J Oper Res 147(1):187–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harper PR (2005) Planning health services with explicit geographical considerations: a stochastic location-allocation approach. Omega 33(2):142–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Harper PR, Phillips S, Gallagher JE (2005) Geographical simulation modeling for the regional planning of oral and maxillofacial surgery across London. J Oper Res Soc 56(2):134–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Health and Social Care (Community Health and Standards) Act (2003) Available online at: http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2003/ukpga_20030043_en_1 (accessed 14/07/10).
  16. 16.
    Huff DL (1964) Defining and Estimating a Trading Area. J Mark 28(3):34–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lippi Bruni M, Nobilio L, Ugolini C (2008) The analysis of a cardiological network in a regulated setting: a spatial interaction approach. Health Econ 17(2):221–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lowe JM, Sen A (1996) Gravity model applications in health planning: analysis of an urban hospital market. J Reg Sci 36(3):437–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mayer JD (1983) The distance behavior of hospital patients: a disaggregated analysis. Soc Sci Med 17(12):819–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mayhew LD, Gibberd RW, Hall H (1986) Predicting patient flows and hospital case-mix. Environ Plann A 18(5):619–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Morrill RL, Earickson RJ (1968) Hospital Variation and Patient Travel Distances. Inquiry V(4):26–34, published by the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, Chicago, IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Morrill RL, Earickson RJ, Rees P (1970) Factors Influencing distances traveled to hospitals. Econ Geogr 46(2):161–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Morrill RL, Kelley MB (1970) The simulation of hospital use and the estimation of location efficiency. Geogr Anal 2:283–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Norris V (1952) Role of statistics in regional hospital planning with special reference to the Birmingham hospital region. Br Med J 1(4750):129–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Office for National Statistics (2007) Beginner’s guide to UK geography: census geography. Available online at: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/geography/census_geog.asp (accessed 10/01/11)
  26. 26.
    Oliveira MD (2004) Modelling demand and supply influences on utilization: a flow demand model to predict hospital utilization at the small area level. Appl Econ 36(20):2237–2251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Oliveira MD, Bevan G (2006) Modelling the redistribution of hospital supply to achieve equity taking account of patient’s behaviour. Health Care Manage Sci 9(1):19–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Reilly WJ (1931) The law of retail gravitation. Knickerbocker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Senn SJ (1981) Some comments on “The calculation of catchment populations within the National Health Service”. Statistician 30(1):73–75Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Senn SJ, Samson WB (1982) Estimating hospital catchment populations. Statistician 31(1):81–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Shewan J (2003) Catchment areas and populations. INphoRM, (2, February 2003) [online]. Available at: http://www.erpho.org.uk/download.aspx?urlid=9480&urlt=1 (accessed 14/07/10)
  32. 32.
    Skidmore S (1981) Some Comments on the “Calculation of catchment populations within the National Health Service” by Gandy. Statistician 30(1):69–72Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Taket AR (1989) Equity and Access: exploring the effects of hospital location on the population served—a case study in strategic planning. J Oper Res Soc 40(11):1001–1009Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wilson RM, Gibberd RW (1990) Allocating resources between health care regions: catchment populations and allocating for equity. Eur J Oper Res 49(3):333–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simon Jones
    • 1
  • Jessica Wardlaw
    • 2
  • Susan Crouch
    • 3
  • Michelle Carolan
    • 3
  1. 1.Centre for Workforce IntelligenceLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic EngineeringUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.Dr Foster IntelligenceLondonUK

Personalised recommendations