Surgical block scheduling in a system of hospitals: an application to resource and wait list management in a British Columbia health authority
- 1k Downloads
Scheduling surgical specialties in a medical facility is a very complex process. The choice of schedules and resource availability impact directly on the number of patients treated by specialty, cancellations, wait times, and the overall performance of the system. In this paper we present a system-wide model developed to allow management to explore trade-offs between OR availability, bed capacity, surgeons’ booking privileges, and wait lists. We developed a mixed integer programming model to schedule surgical blocks for each specialty into ORs and applied it to the hospitals in a British Columbia Health Authority, considering OR time availability and post-surgical resource constraints. The results offer promising insights into resource optimization and wait list management, showing that without increasing post-surgical resources hospitals could handle more cases by scheduling specialties differently.
KeywordsHealth care Hospitals Operating rooms Wait list management Surgical scheduling Programming Optimization Integer Applications
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Beliën J, Demeulemeester E (2004) Integer programming for building robust surgery schedules. Working paper, Katholieke Universiteit LeuvenGoogle Scholar
- 5.Weiss E (1990) Models for determining estimated start times and case orderings in hospital operating rooms. IIE Trans 22:143–150Google Scholar
- 9.Population Section, BC Stats, Ministry of Management Services, Government of British Columbia. PEOPLE 29 population forecast for British Columbia and zones/communities within the province, May 2004. Government of British Columbia, VictoriaGoogle Scholar
- 13.Blake JT, Carter M (1997) Surgical process management: a conceptual framework. Surg Serv Manag 3(9):31–37Google Scholar
- 14.Litvak E, Long M (2000) Cost and quality under managed care: irreconcilable differences? Am J Manag Care 6:305–312Google Scholar