Health Care Management Science

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 239–252

A linear programming model for allocating HIV prevention funds with state agencies: a pilot study

  • Stephanie R. Earnshaw
  • Katherine Hicks
  • Anke Richter
  • Amanda Honeycutt
Article

Abstract

Given the initiatives to improve resource allocation decisions for HIV prevention activities, a linear programming model was designed specifically for use by state and local decision-makers. A pilot study using information from the state of Florida was conducted and studied under a series of scenarios depicting the impact of common resource allocation constraints. Improvements over the past allocation strategy in the number of potential infections averted were observed in all scenarios with a maximal improvement of 73%. When allocating limited resources, policymakers must balance efficiency and equity. In this pilot study, the optimal allocation (i.e., most-efficient strategy) would not distribute resources in an equitable manner. Instead, only 12% of at-risk people would receive prevention funds. We find that less efficient strategies, where 58% fewer infections are averted, result in significantly more equitable allocations. This tool serves as a guide for allocating funds for prevention activities.

Keywords

HIV/AIDS Resource allocation Linear program Prevention Economic model State funding decisions Efficiency Equity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ruiz MS, Gable AR, Kaplan EH, Stoto MA, Fineberg H, Trussell J (2001) No time to lose: getting more from HIV prevention, committee on HIV prevention strategies in the United States, Division of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention. National Academy Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Academy for Educational Development’s Center for Community-based Health Strategies, HIV Prevention Community Planning (2000) Setting HIV prevention priorities: a guide for community planning groups. Academy for Educational Development’s Center for Community-based Health Strategies, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brandeau ML (2004) Allocating resources to control infectious diseases. In: Brandeau ML, Sainfort F, Pierskalla WP (eds) Operations research and health care: a handbook of methods and applications. Kluwer, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Paltiel AD, Stinnett, AS (1998) Resource allocation and the funding of HIV prevention. In: Holtgrave DR (ed) Handbook of economic evaluation of HIV prevention programs. Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stinnett AA, Paltiel AD (1996) Mathematical programming for the efficient allocation of health care resources. J Health Econ 15:641–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kaplan EH, Merson MH (2002) Allocating HIV-prevention resources: balancing efficiency and equity. Am J Public Health 92:1905–1907Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zaric GS, Brandeau ML (2001) Optimal investment in a portfolio of HIV prevention programs. Med Decis Mak 21:391–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kaplan EH (1998) Economic evaluation and HIV prevention community planning: a policy analyst’s perspective. In: Holtgrave DR (ed) Handbook of economic evaluation of HIV prevention programs. Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pinkerton SD, Abramson PR (1998) The Bernoulli-process model of HIV transmission: applications and implications. In: Holtgrave DR (ed) Handbook of economic evaluation of HIV prevention programs. Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zaric GS, Brandeau ML (2001) Resource allocation for epidemic control over short time horizons. Math Biosci 171:33–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brandeau ML, Zaric GS, Richter A (2003) Resource allocation for control of infectious diseases in multiple independent populations: beyond cost-effectiveness analysis. J Health Econ 22:575–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Richter A, Loomis B (2005) Health and economic impacts of an HIV intervention in out of treatment substance abusers: evidence from a dynamic model. Health Care Manage Sci 8:67–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zaric GS, Brandeau ML (2007) A little planning goes a long way: Multi-level allocation of HIV prevention resources. Med Decis Mak 27:71–81Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lasry A, Zaric GS, Carter MW (2007) Multi-level resource allocation for HIV prevention: A model for developing countries. Eur J Oper Res 180(2):786–799Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tengs TO, Meyer G, Siegel JE, Pliskin JS, Graham JD, Weinstein MC (1996) Oregon’s medicaid ranking and cost-effectiveness: is there a relationship? Med Decis Mak 16:99–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pinkerton SD, Johnson-Masotti AP, Derse A, Layde PM (2002) Ethical issues in cost-effectiveness analysis. Eval Program Plann 25:71–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Holtgrave DR (2004) HIV prevention, cost-utility analysis, and race/ethnicity: methodological considerations and recommendations. Med Decis Mak 24:181–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, Cumulative HIV infection cases reported through 2004 among states with confidential name-based reporting. Available at: http://www.statehealthfacts.org/cgi-bin/healthfacts.cgi?action=compare&category=HIV%2fAIDS&subcategory=Cumulative+Reported+HIV+Infections+%28Cases%29&topic=Cumulative+Reported+HIV+Cases+All+Ages. Accessed November 13, 2006
  19. 19.
    Florida Epidemiologic Profile 2000, HIV/AIDS summary analyses of community planning partnerships, Section 3B, 195–230. Available at: http://www.doh.state.fl.us/disease_ctrl/aids/trends/epiprof/16epiprofgeosum.pdf. Accessed November 13, 2006
  20. 20.
    Kaplan EH, Heimer R (1992) A model-based estimate of HIV infectivity via needle sharing. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 5:1116–1118Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Abdala N, Gleghorn AA, Carney JM, Heimer R (2001) Can HIV-1 contaminated syringes by disinfected? Implications for transmission among IDUs. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 28:487–494Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Anderson RM, May RM (1998) Epidemiological parameters of HIV transmission. Nature 333:514–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pinkerton SD, Abramson PR (1997) Effectiveness of condoms in preventing HIV transmission. Soc Sci Med 44:1303–1312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Silverman BG, Gross TP (1997) Use and effectiveness of condoms during anal intercourse. Sex Transm Dis 24:11–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Anderson J (2003) Condom use and HIV risk among US adults. Am J Public Health 93:912–914Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kahn J (1998) Economic evaluation of primary HIV prevention in injection drug users. In: Holtgrave DR (ed) Handbook of economic evaluation of HIV prevention programs. Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Laumann E, Gagnon J, Michael R, Michaels S (1994) The social organization of sexuality: sexual practices in the United States. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kamb ML, Fishbein M, Douglas JM Jr., Rhodes F, Rogers J, Bolan, G, Zenilman, J, Hoxworth T, Malotte CK, Iatesta M, Kent C, Lentz A, Graziano, S, Byers RH, Peterman TA (1998) Efficacy of risk-reduction counseling to prevent human immunodeficiency virus and sexually transmitted diseases. J Am Med Assoc 280:1161–1167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zaric GS, Barnett PG, Brandeau ML (2000) HIV transmission and the cost effectiveness of methadone maintenance. Am J Public Health 90:1100–1111Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pinkerton SD, Holtgrave DR, Valdiserri R (1997) Cost-effectiveness of HIV-prevention skills training for men who have sex with men. AIDS 11:347–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bedimo A, Pinkerton S, Cohen D, Gray B, Farley T (2002) Condom distribution: A cost-utility analysis. Int J STD AIDS 13:384–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Holtgrave DR, Kelly J (1997) Cost-effectiveness of an HIV/AIDS prevention intervention for gay men. AIDS Behav 1:173–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kahn J, Kegeles S, Hays R, Beltzer N (2001) Cost-effectiveness of the empowerment project, a community-level intervention for young gay men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 27:482–491Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Holtgrave DR, Reiser WJ, DiFranceisco W (1997) The evaluation of HIV counseling-and-testing services: making the most of limited resources. AIDS Educ Prev 9:105–118Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pinkerton SD, Holtgrave DR, DiFranceisco W, Stevenson Y, Kelly, J (1998) Cost-effectiveness of a community-level HIV risk reduction intervention. Am J Public Health 1239–1242Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tao G, Remafedi G (1998) Economic evaluation of an HIV prevention intervention for gay and bisexual adolescents. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 17:83–90Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Chesson H, Greenberg J, Hennessy M (2002) The cost-effectiveness of the WINGS intervention: a program to prevent HIV and sexually transmitted diseases among high-risk urban women. BMC Infect Dis 2:24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Holtgrave DR, Kelly J (1996) Preventing HIV/AIDS among high-risk urban women: the cost-effectiveness of a behavioral group intervention. Am J Public Health 86:1442–1445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Pinkerton SD, Holtgrave DR, Jemmott J III (2000) Economic evaluation of HIV risk reduction intervention in African-American male adolescents. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 25:164–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Pinkerton SD, Holtgrave DR, DiFranceisco W, Semann S, Coyle S, Johnson-Masotti A (2000) Cost-threshold analyses of the national AIDS demonstration research HIV prevention interventions. AIDS 14:1257–1268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kahn JG, Washington AE, Showstack JA, Berlin M, Phillips K (1992) Updated estimates of the impact and cost of HIV prevention in injection drug users. Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephanie R. Earnshaw
    • 1
  • Katherine Hicks
    • 1
  • Anke Richter
    • 2
  • Amanda Honeycutt
    • 1
  1. 1.RTI Health SolutionsRTI InternationalResearch Triangle ParkUSA
  2. 2.Naval Post Graduate SchoolMontereyUSA

Personalised recommendations