Health Care Management Science

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 149–156

The Cost Efficiency and Clinical Quality of Institutional Long-Term Care for the Elderly

  • Juha Laine
  • Miika Linna
  • Anja Noro
  • Unto Häkkinen
Article

Abstract

This study applied the stochastic frontier cost function with inefficiency effects to estimate the association between quality of care and cost efficiency in institutional long-term care wards for the elderly in Finland. We used several clinical quality indicators for indicating adverse care processes and outcomes, based on the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI)/Minimum Data Set (MDS). Average cost inefficiency among the wards was 22%. We found an association between the clinical quality indicators and cost inefficiency. Higher prevalence of pressure ulcers was associated with higher costs, whereas the higher prevalence of use of depressants and hypnotics increased inefficiency.

Keywords

cost efficiency stochastic frontier long-term care resident assessment instrument minimum data set 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. Newhouse, Toward a theory of nonprofit institutions: An economic model of a hospitals, American Economic Review 60 (1970) 64–74.Google Scholar
  2. J. Laine, Pitkäaikaishoidon tehokkuus ja laatu vuosina 2000–2002, in R. Hjerppe, A. Kangasharju and R. Vuorento (eds.), Kunnalliset palvelut—Terveyden- ja vanhustenhuollon tuottavuus. Helsinki: VATT, 2003.Google Scholar
  3. J.N. Morris, C. Hawes, B.E. Fries, C.D. Phillips, V. Mor, S. Katz, K. Murphy, M.L. Drugovich and A.S. Friedlob, Designing the national resident assessment instrument for nursing homes, The Gerontologist 30 (1990) 293–307.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. M. Vaarama, J. Luomahaara, A. Peiponen and P. Voutilainen, Koko kunta ikääntyneiden asialle. Näkökulmia ikääntyneiden itsenäisen selviytymisen sekä hoidon ja palvelun kehittämiseen, in Stakes, (ed), Raportteja. Helsinki: Stakes, 2001.Google Scholar
  5. J. Laine, Selvitys sosiaalihuollon erityispalveluiden tuotantomalleista ja sopimusmenettelyistä. Helsinki: Stakes, 1999.Google Scholar
  6. A. Donabedian, The quality of care? How can it be assessed? JAMA 260 (1988) 1743–1748.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. D.R. Zimmermann, S.L. Karon and G.E.A. Arling, Development and testing of nursing home quality indicators, Health Care Finance Review 16 (1995) 107–140.Google Scholar
  8. B.E. Fries, J.R. Cooney and M. Leo, Resource utilization groups. A patient classification system for long–term care, Medical Care 23 (1985) 110–122.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. M. Rosko, J. Chilingerian, J. Zinn and W. Aaronson, The effects of ownership, operating environment, and strategic choices on nursing home efficiency, Medical Care 33 (1995) 1001–1021.Google Scholar
  10. S.-Y. Chou, Asymmetric information, ownership and quality of care: An empirical analysis of nursing homes, Journal of Health Economics 21 (2002) 293–311.Google Scholar
  11. J. Newhouse, Frontier estimation: How useful a tool for health economics?, Journal of Health Economics 13 (1994) 317–322.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. A.O. Hirschman, Exit, Voice, and Loyalty. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  13. P.J. Gertler and D.M. Waldman, Quality-adjusted cost functions and policy evaluation in the nursing home industry, Journal of Political Economy 100 (1992) 1232–1256.Google Scholar
  14. J.L.T. Blank and E. Eggink, A quality-adjusted cost function in a regulated industry: The case of dutch nursing homes, Health Care Management Science 4 (2001) 201–211.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. M. Rosko, Cost efficiency of us hospitals: A stochastic frontier approach, Health Economics 10 (2001) 539–551.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. O. Olesen and N. Petersen, Incorporating quality into data envelopment analysis: A stochastic dominance approach, International Journal of Production Economics 39 (1995) 117–35.Google Scholar
  17. R.J. Weech-Maldonado, G. Neff and V. Mor, Does quality of care lead to better financial performance? The case of the nursing home industry., Health Care Management Review 28 (2003) 201–216.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. M.E. Dellefield, The relationship between nurse staffing in nursing homes and quality indicators, Journal of Gerontological Nursing 27 (2000) 14-28.Google Scholar
  19. C. Harrington, D. Zimmermann, S.L. Karon, J. Robinson and P. Beutel, Nursing home staffing and its relationship to deficiencies, Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences 55 (2000) 278–287.Google Scholar
  20. GAO. Nursing Homes—Quality of Care More Related to Staffing than Spending, in GAO, T. G. A. O.-. ed., GAO Report. Washington: The General Accounting Office–GAO, 2002.Google Scholar
  21. K.J. Knox, E.C. Blankmeyer and J.R. Stutzman, Organizational efficiency and quality in texas nursing facilities, Health Care Management Science 6 (2003) 175–188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. A. Noro, H. Finne-Soveri, M. Björkgren, U. Häkkinen, J. Laine, P. Vähäkangas, S. Kerppilä and R. Storbacka, RAI -tietojärjestelmän esittely ja kokemuksia pitkäaikaishoidon benchmarkingista. RAI -raportti 1/2000. Helsinki: Stakes, 2001.Google Scholar
  23. C. Hawes, J. Morris, C. Phillips, V. Mor, B. Fries and S. Nonemaker, Reliability estimates for the minimum data set for nursing home resident assessment and care screening, The Gerontologist 35 (1995) 172-178.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. C. Hawes, J. Morris, C. Phillips, B. Fries, C. Murphy and V. Mor, Development of the nursing home resident assessment instrument in the USA, Age and Ageing 26–S2 (1997) 19–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. C. Murphy and J. Morris, The resident assessment instrument: Implications for quality, reimbursement and research., Generations 19 (1995) 43–46.Google Scholar
  26. B.E. Fries, D.P. Schneider, W.J. Foley, M. Gavazzi, R. Burke, and E. Cornelius, Refining a case-mix measure for nursing homes: Resource utilization groups (RUG-III), Medical Care 32 (1995) 668–685.Google Scholar
  27. M. Björkgren, U. Häkkinen, H. Finne-Soveri and B. Fries, Validity and reliability of Resource Utilization Groups (RUG-III) in Finnish long-term care facilities, Scandinavian Journal of Public Health (1999) 228-234.Google Scholar
  28. S. Karon and D. Zimmermann, Using indicators to structure quality improvement initiatives in long-term care, Quality Management in Health Care 4 (1996) 54–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. S. Kumbhakar, S. Ghosh and J. McGuckin, A generalized production frontier approach for estimating determinants of inefficiency in U.S. dairy farms., Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 9 (1991) 279–286.Google Scholar
  30. D. Reifscheider and R. Stevenson, Systematic departures from the frontier: A framework for the analysis of firm inefficiency, International Economic Review 32 (1991) 715–723.Google Scholar
  31. H.-J. Wang and P. Schmidt, One-step and two-step estimation of the effects of exogenous variables on technical efficiency levels, Journal of Productivity Analysis 18 (2002) 129–144.Google Scholar
  32. G.E. Battese and T.J. Coelli, A stochastic frontier production function incorporating a model for technical inefficiency effects, Working Papers in Econometrics and Applied Statistics (1993).Google Scholar
  33. L. Crivelli, M. Filippini and D. Lunati, Regulation, ownership and efficiency in the swiss nursing home industry, International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics 2 (2002) 79–97.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. S.T. Folland and R.A. Hofler, How reliable are hospital efficiency estimates? Exploiting the dual to homothetic production, Health Economics 10 (2001) 683–698.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. S. Zuckerman, J. Hadley and L. Iezzoni, Measuring hospital efficiency with frontier cost functions, Journal of Health Economics 13 (1994) 255–280.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. T. Li and R. Rosenman, Cost inefficiency in washington hospitals: A stochastic frontier approach using panel data, Health Care Management Science 4 (2001) 73–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. M. Linna, Measuring hospital cost efficiency with panel data models, Health Economics 7 (1998) 415–427.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. G.E. Battese and T.J. Coelli, A model for technical inefficiency effects in stochastic frontier production function for panel data, Empirical Economics 20 (1995) 325–332.Google Scholar
  39. C.J. Huang and J.T. Liu, A non-neutral stochastic frontier production function, Journal of Productivity Analysis 5 (1994) 171–180.Google Scholar
  40. S. Ngwenya, G. Battese and E. Fleming, The relationship between farm size and the technical inefficiency of production of wheat farmers in the eastern free state province of South Africa, Agrekon 36 (1997) 283–301.Google Scholar
  41. M.D. Rosko, Performance of U.S. Teaching Hospitals: A panel analysis of cost inefficiency, Health Care Management Science 7 (2004) 7-16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. W. Greene, LIMDEP 6.0. User’s Manual and Reference Guide. Version 6.0. New York: Belport: Econometric Software, Inc., 1992.Google Scholar
  43. T. Coelli, A Guide to FRONTIER version 4.1: A computer program for stochastic frontier production and cost function estimation, CEPA Working Paper: Department of Econometrics, University of New England, Armidale NSW Australia, 1996.Google Scholar
  44. D.A. Kodde and F.C. Palm, Wald criteria for jointly testing equality and inequality restrictions, Econometrica 54 (1986) 1243-1248.Google Scholar
  45. S.W. Frame and T.J. Coelli, U.S. Financial services consolidation: The case of corporate credit unions, Review of Industrial Organization 18 (2001) 229–242.Google Scholar
  46. M. Björkgren, U. Häkkinen and M. Linna, Measuring efficiency of long-term care units in finland, Health Care Management Science 4 (2001) 193–200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. N. Ikegami, J.P. Hirdes and I. Carpenter, Measuring the quality of long-term care in institutional and community setting, in OEDC (ed.), Measuring UP: Improving Health System Performance in OECD Countries. Paris: OECD, 2002.Google Scholar
  48. CMS. Identification and Evaluation of Existing Quality Indicators that are Approriate for Use in Long-Term Care Setting, in Inc, A. A. (ed.), The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), 2001.Google Scholar
  49. A. Street, How much confidence should we place in efficiency estimates?, Health Economics 12 (2003) 895–907.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juha Laine
    • 1
  • Miika Linna
    • 1
  • Anja Noro
    • 1
  • Unto Häkkinen
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Health Economics at Stakes—CHESSHelsinki

Personalised recommendations