Advertisement

Health Care Analysis

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 308–329 | Cite as

Imagining Global Health with Justice: In Defense of the Right to Health

  • Eric A. FriedmanEmail author
  • Lawrence O. Gostin
Original Article

Abstract

The singular message in Global Health Law is that we must strive to achieve global health with justice—improved population health, with a fairer distribution of benefits of good health. Global health entails ensuring the conditions of good health—public health, universal health coverage, and the social determinants of health—while justice requires closing today’s vast domestic and global health inequities. These conditions for good health should be incorporated into public policy, supplemented by specific actions to overcome barriers to equity. A new global health treaty grounded in the right to health and aimed at health equity—a Framework Convention on Global Health (FCGH)—stands out for its possibilities in helping to achieve global health with justice. This far-reaching legal instrument would establish minimum standards for universal health coverage and public health measures, with an accompanying national and international financing framework, require a constant focus on health equity, promote Health in All Policies and global governance for health, and advance the principles of good governance, including accountability. While achieving an FCGH is certainly ambitious, it is a struggle worth the efforts of us all. The treaty’s basis in the right to health, which has been agreed to by all governments, has powerful potential to form the foundation of global governance for health. From interpretations of UN treaty bodies to judgments of national courts, the right to health is now sufficiently articulated to serve this role, with the individual’s right to health best understood as a function of a social, political, and economic environment aimed at equity. However great the political challenge of securing state agreement to the FCGH, it is possible. States have joined other treaties with significant resource requirements and limitations on their sovereignty without significant reciprocal benefits from other states, while important state interests would benefit from the FCGH. And from integrating the FCGH into the existing human rights system to creative forms of compliance and enforcement and strengthened domestic legal and political accountability mechanisms, the treaty stands to improve right to health compliance. The potential for the FCGH to bring the right to health nearer universal reality calls for us to embark on the journey towards securing this global treaty.

Keywords

Right to health Global health Justice Equity Global health with justice Framework Convention on Global Health Public health Universal health coverage Social determinants of health 

References

  1. 1.
    Bailliet, C. M. (2013). Measuring compliance with the Inter-American Court of Human Rights: The ongoing challenge of judicial independence in Latin America. Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 31(4), 477–495.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Balakrishnan, R., Elson, D., Heintz, J., & Lusiani, N. (2011). Maximum available resources and human rights: Analytical report. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Women’s Global Leadership, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. http://www.cwgl.rutgers.edu/docman/economic-and-social-rights-publications/362-maximumavailableresources-pdf/file. Accessed 2 September 2015.
  3. 3.
    Buse, K., Gostin, L. O., & Friedman, E. A. (2014). Pathways towards a Framework Convention on Global Health: Political mobilization for the human right to health. In M. Freeman, S. Hawkes, & B. Bennett (Eds.), Law and global health (Current legal issues) (Vol. 16, pp. 37–62). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Commission on the Social Determinants of Health. (2008). Closing the gap in a generation: Health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Geneva: WHO. http://www.who.int/social_determinants/thecommission/finalreport/en/. Accessed 25 August 2015.
  5. 5.
    Consultative Expert Working Group on Research and Development: Financing and Coordination. (2012). Research and development to meet health needs in developing countries: Strengthening global financing and coordination (pp. 107–126). Geneva: WHO. http://www.who.int/phi/cewg_report/en/. Accessed 31 August 2015.
  6. 6.
    Daniels, N. (2015). A progressively realizable right to health and global governance. Health Care Analysis. doi: 10.1007/s10728-015-0298-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    de Barcellos, A. P. (2015). Sanitation rights, public law litigation, and inequality: A case study from Brazil. Health and Human Rights, 16(2), 35–46.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Declaration of Alma-Ata, International Convention on Primary Health Care, Alma-Ata, USSR, September 6–12, 1978. http://www.who.int/publications/almaata_declaration_en.pdf. Accessed 24 August 2015.
  9. 9.
    Essa, A. (2013). Q&A: What does the AU suspension mean for Egypt? Al Jazeera, July 6, 2013. http://www.aljazeera.com/news/africa/2013/07/20137518523285137.html. Accessed 4 September 2015.
  10. 10.
    European Commission. Budget: Financial report 2014, revenue. http://ec.europa.eu/budget/financialreport/2014/revenue/index_en.html. Accessed 3 September 2015.
  11. 11.
    Foreman, L., et al. (2014). What could a strengthened right to health bring to the post-2015 health development agenda? Interrogating the role of the minimum core concept in advancing essential global health needs. BMC International Health and Human Rights, 13, 48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Friedman, E. A., & Gostin, L. O. (2012). Pillars for progress on the right to health: Harnessing the potential of human rights through a Framework Convention on Global Health. Health and Human Rights, 14(1), 4–19.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Garay, J., Harris, L., Beam. M., & Zompi, S. (2013). Global inequity death toll: Targeting global health equity and estimating the burden of inequity. In 141st American Public Health Association Annual Meeting, Boston, MA, USA, Abstr 291133 cited in Chiriboga, D., et al. (2014). Investing in health. Lancet, 383(9921), 949.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Goldade, K., Burgess, D., Olayinka, A., Whembolua, G. L. S., & Okuyemi, K. S. (2012). Applying anthropology to eliminate tobacco-related health disparities. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 14(6), 631–638.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gostin, L. O. (2008). Meeting basic survival needs of the world’s least healthy people: Toward a Framework Convention on Global Health. Georgetown Law Journal, 96(2), 331–392.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gostin, L. O. (2014). Global health law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (quotations pp. 6–7 condensed and revised).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gostin, L. O., & Friedman, E. A. (2013). Towards a Framework Convention on Global Health: A transformative agenda for global health justice. Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics, 13(1), 1–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gostin, L. O., & Friedman, E. A. (2015). A retrospective and prospective analysis of the West African Ebola virus disease epidemic: Robust national health systems at the foundation and an empowered WHO at the apex. Lancet, 385(9980), 1902–1909.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gostin, L. O., et al. (2011). The Joint Action and Learning Initiative: Towards a global agreement on national and global responsibilities for health. PLoS Med. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001031.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Government of the Republic of South Africa v Grootboom. (2000). CCT11/00, (Constitutional Court, South Africa), October 4, 2000. http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACC/2000/19.html. Accessed 2 September 2015.
  21. 21.
    Harding, L. (2014). Russia delegation suspended from Council of Europe over Crimea. Guardian, April 10, 2014. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/apr/10/russia-suspended-council-europe-crimea-ukraine. Accessed 4 September 2015.
  22. 22.
    Harmon, S. H. E. (2015). In search of global health justice: A need to reinvigorate institutions and make international law. Health Care Analysis. doi: 10.1007/s10728-015-0296-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hart, J. W. (2010). The European human rights system. Law Library Journal, 102(4), 533–559.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Health Impact Fund. http://healthimpactfund.org/. Accessed 31 August 2015.
  25. 25.
    Heymann, J., Cassola, A., Raub, A., & Mishra, L. (2013). Constitutional rights to health, public health and medical care: The status of health protections in 191 countries. Global Public Health, 8(6), 639–653.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Heyns, C., & Viljoen, F. (2002). The impact of the United Nations human rights treaties on the domestic level. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hillebrecht, C. (2014). The power of human rights tribunals: Compliance with the European Court of Human Rights and domestic policy change. European Journal of International Relations, 20(4), 1100–1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Holloway, K. (2015). Five transgender women of color have been murdered in the past five weeks. AlertNet, February 12, 2015. http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/five-transgender-women-color-have-been-murdered-past-five-weeks. Accessed 26 August 2015.
  29. 29.
    Huneeus, A. (2011). Courts resisting courts: Lessons from the Inter-American Court’s struggle to enforce human rights. Cornell International Law Journal, 44(3), 493–533.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hunt, P., & Backman, G. (2008). Health systems and the right to the highest attainable standard of health. Health and Human Rights, 10(1), 81–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hunt, P. (2007). The Millennium Development Goals and the right to the highest attainable standard of health. John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation international lecture series on population and reproductive health, Abuja, Nigeria, August 17, 2007. https://www.macfound.org/media/article_pdfs/HUNT_POPULATION.PDF. Accessed 1 September 2015.
  32. 32.
    Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluations. (2015). Financing global health 2014: Shifts in funding as the MDG era closes, Seattle, WA: Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation. http://www.healthdata.org/policy-report/financing-global-health-2014-shifts-funding-mdg-era-closes. Accessed 24 August 2015.
  33. 33.
    International Budget Partnership. Article 2 and governments’ budgets. http://internationalbudget.org/publications/escrarticle2/. Accessed 2 September 2015.
  34. 34.
    International Labour Organization. (2012). Recommendation concerning national floors of social protection, no. 202. Geneva: ILO. http://www.social-protection.org/gimi/gess/RessourcePDF.action;jsessionid=5e6e0a9dd108f67948cf070859ba1a390ff62b62690f5b86c3ca69f85da6ca34.e3aTbhuLbNmSe34MchaRahaNax50?ressource.ressourceId=31088. Accessed 25 August 2015.
  35. 35.
    International Labour Organization. (2014). World social protection report 2014/15: Building economic recovery, inclusive development and social justice. Geneva: ILO. http://www.ilo.org/global/research/global-reports/world-social-security-report/2014/WCMS_245201/lang–en/index.htm. Accessed 25 August 2015.
  36. 36.
    Jamison, D. T., et al. (2013). Global health 2035: A world converging within a generation. Lancet, 382(9908), 1898–1955.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kristof, N. D. (2012). Poverty’s poster child. New York Times, May 10, 2012. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/10/opinion/kristof-povertys-poster-child.html. Accessed 26 August 2015.
  38. 38.
    Leppo, K., Ollila, E., Peña, S., Wismar, M., & Cook, S. (eds.). (2013). Health in all policies: Seizing opportunities, implementing policies. Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, Finland. http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/188809/Health-in-All-Policies-final.pdf. Accessed 27 August 2015.
  39. 39.
    Maastricht Principles on Extraterritorial Obligations of States in the Area of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. (2011). Maastricht, The Netherlands, September 28, 2011. http://www.etoconsortium.org/nc/en/library/maastricht-principles/?tx_drblob_pi1%5BdownloadUid%5D=23. Accessed 1 September 2015.
  40. 40.
    Maru, V. (2010). Allies unknown: Social accountability and legal empowerment. Health and Human Rights, 12(1), 83–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Medicines Patent Pool. http://www.medicinespatentpool.org. Accessed 31 August 2015.
  42. 42.
    Meier, B. M., & Kim, Y. (2015). Human rights accountability through treaty bodies: Examining human rights treaty monitoring for water and sanitation. Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law, 26(1). http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2596276. Accessed 4 September 2015.
  43. 43.
    Meyer, P. J. (2014). Organization of American States: Background and issues for Congress. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. http://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R42639.pdf. Accessed 4 September 2015.
  44. 44.
    Murli S. Deora vs. Union of India and Ors. (2001). A.I.R. 2002 SC 40 (India). http://www.globalhealthrights.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/SC-2001-Murli-S.-Deora-v.-Union-Of-India-and-Ors.pdf. Accessed 2 September 2015.
  45. 45.
    Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. Special rapporteur on the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Health/Pages/SRRightHealthIndex.aspx. Accessed 1 September 2015.
  46. 46.
    Ooms, G., & Hammonds, R. (2014). Financing global health through a global fund for health? Chatham House Centre for Global Health Security Working Group Papers. http://www.chathamhouse.org/publications/papers/view/197444. Accessed 31 August 2015.
  47. 47.
    Organisation of African Unity. (2001). Abuja declaration on HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and other related infectious diseases, Abuja, Nigeria, April 24–27, 2001. http://www.un.org/ga/aids/pdf/abuja_declaration.pdf. Accessed 3 September 2015.
  48. 48.
    Platform for a Framework Convention on Global Health. http://www.globalhealthtreaty.org. Accessed 1 September 2015.
  49. 49.
    Ruger, J. P. (2013). Governing for the common good. Health Care Analysis. doi: 10.1007/s10728-015-0294-y.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Schmidt, H., Gostin, L. O., & Emanuel, E. J. (2015). Public health, universal health coverage, and sustainable development goals: Can they coexist? Lancet, 386(9996), 928–930.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Secretary-General of the United Nations. (2011). Uniting for universal access: Towards zero new HIV infections, zero discrimination and zero AIDS-related deaths: Report of the Secretary-General. UN Doc A/65/979. New York: United Nations, para 73. http://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/en/media/unaids/contentassets/documents/document/2011/A-65-797_English.pdf. Accessed 8 September 2015.
  52. 52.
    Sidibé, M., & Buse, K. (2012). A Framework Convention on Global Health: A catalyst for justice. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 90(12), 870–870A.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Soobramoney v Minister of Health (Kwazulu-Natal). (1997). CCT32/97 (Constitutional Court of South Africa), November 27, 1997, http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACC/1997/17.html. Accessed 2 September 2015.
  54. 54.
    UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. (2000). General comment no. 14: The right to the highest attainable standard of health, U.N. Doc. E/C.12/2000/4. http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/gencomm/escgencom14.htm. Accessed 28 August 2015.
  55. 55.
    UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women. (1999). General recommendation 24, women and health, U.N. Doc. A/54/38. http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/gencomm/generl24.htm. Accessed 1 September 2015.
  56. 56.
    UN Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2013). General comment no. 15, the right of the child to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health (art. 24), U.N. Doc. CRC/C/GC/15. http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/crc/gencom15.html. Accessed 1 September 2015.
  57. 57.
    UN General Assembly. (1966). International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). UN G.A. Res. 2200A (XXI). http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/instree/b2esc.htm. Accessed 27 August 2015.
  58. 58.
    UN General Assembly. (1970). International development strategy for the second United Nations development decade. UN G.A. Res. 2626 (XXV), U.N. Doc. A/RES/25/2626 (1970). http://www.un-documents.net/a25r2626.htm. Accessed 3 September 2015.
  59. 59.
    UN General Assembly. (2008). Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. (2008). UN G.A. Res. 63/117. http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/instree/opt-prot08.html. Accessed 1 September 2015.
  60. 60.
    UN General Assembly. (2012). Global health and foreign policy, UN G.A. Res. 67/81, UN Doc. A/RES/67/81, December 12, 2012. http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/67/81. Accessed 24 August 2015.
  61. 61.
    UN General Assembly. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/7891Transforming%20Our%20World.pdf. Accessed 24 August 2015.
  62. 62.
    UN Treaty Collection. Chapter IX: Health. 4. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IX-4&chapter=9&lang=en. Accessed 3 September 2015.
  63. 63.
    UNAIDS. (2015). How AIDS changed everything: MDG6: 15 years, 15 lessons of hope from the AIDS response. Geneva: UNAIDS. http://www.unaids.org/en/resources/documents/2015/MDG6_15years-15lessonsfromtheAIDSresponse. Accessed 26 August 2015.
  64. 64.
    UNICEF. (2010). Progress for children: Achieving the MDGs with equity, no. 9. New York: UNICEF. http://www.unicef.org/publications/files/Progress_for_Children-No.9_EN_081710.pdf. Accessed 27 August 2015.
  65. 65.
    U.S. Office of Management and Budget. (2011). FY2010 annual report of United States contributions to the United Nations. https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/legislative_reports/us_contributions_to_the_un_06062011.pdf. Accessed 3 September 2015.
  66. 66.
    Viens, A. M. (2015). Interdependence, human rights and global health law. Health Care Analysis. doi: 10.1007/s10728-015-0302-2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Waris, A., & Latif, L. A. (2015). Towards establishing fiscal legitimacy through settled fiscal principles in global health financing. Health Care Analysis. doi: 10.1007/s10728-015-0305-z.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Widdows, H. (2015). Global health justice and the right to health. Health Care Analysis. doi: 10.1007/s10728-015-0297-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Woolf, S. H., & Braverman, P. (2011). Where health disparities begin: The role of social and economic determinants—and why current policies may make matters worse. Health Affairs, 30(10), 1852–1859.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. (2003). http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/42811/1/9241591013.pdf. Accessed 3 September 2015.
  71. 71.
    World Health Organization. (2011). Pandemic influenza preparedness framework for the sharing of influenza viruses and access to vaccines and other benefits. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2011/9789241503082_eng.pdf. Accessed 1 September 2015.
  72. 72.
    World Health Organization. (2014). 2014 global progression report on implementation of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Geneva: WHO. http://www.who.int/fctc/reporting/2014globalprogressreport.pdf. Accessed 3 September 2015.
  73. 73.
    World Health Organization. (2014). Maternal mortality, fact sheet no. 348. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs348/en/. Accessed 25 August 2015.
  74. 74.
    World Health Organization. (2015). World health statistics 2015. Geneva: WHO. http://who.int/gho/publications/world_health_statistics/EN_WHS2015_Part2.pdf?ua=1. Accessed 26 August 2015.
  75. 75.
    World Health Organization. Global health observatory (GHO) data: Under-five mortality. http://www.who.int/gho/child_health/mortality/mortality_under_five_text/en/. Accessed 25 August 2015.
  76. 76.
    Yamin, A. E. (2014). Promoting equity in health: What role for courts? Health and Human Rights, 16(2), 1–9.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Yamin, A. E., & Parra-Vera, O. (2010). Judicial protection of the right to health in Colombia: From social demands to individual claims to public debates. Hastings International and Comparative Law Review, 33(2), 101–129.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health LawGeorgetown University Law CenterWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations