Conflict in Medical Co-Production: Can a Stratified Conception of Health Help?
This paper considers proposals for developing ‘co-productive’ medical partnerships, within the UK National Health Service (NHS), concentrating in particular on the potential problem involved in combining professional and lay conceptions of health. Much of the literature that advocates the introduction of co-productive healthcare partnerships assumes that medical professionals and patients share, or can easily come to share, a common set of beliefs about what is valuable with regard to health interventions and outcomes. However, a substantial literature documents the contestability of the concept of health, particular across professional and lay divides. We suggest that this potential disagreement ought to be taken seriously, and suggest that the prospect of a co-productive NHS in which patients and professionals act in partnership is threatened by the existence of unresolved epistemic differences. We suggest that part of the solution may lie in re-framing this potential disagreement in the terms provided by Engel’s bio-psycho-social account of health, and demonstrate how support for this account can be grounded upon a critical realist foundation. What we call a ‘stratified conception of health’ reveals the potential complementarity between health beliefs which may have at first seemed to be essentially contradictory. We consider some of the practical implications this idea has for conceiving and creating co-productive medical partnerships.
KeywordsBio-psycho-social Co-production Critical realism Medical partnership NHS Patient choice Personalisation Shared decision making
- 1.Bhaskar, R. (1998). The possibility of naturalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- 2.Bhaskar, R. (2008). A realist theory of science. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- 3.Bhaskar, R. (2009). Scientific realism and human emancipation. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- 6.Bury, M. (1998). Postmodernity and health. In G. Scambler & P. Higgs (Eds.), Modernity, medicine, and health: Medical sociology towards 2000 (pp. 1–29). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- 7.Canguilhem, G. (1991). The normal and the pathological. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
- 8.Danermark, B. (2002). Interdisciplinary research and critical realism: The example of disability research. Alethia, 5, 56–64.Google Scholar
- 10.Daniels, N. (2008). Just health: Meeting health needs fairly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- 11.Department of Health. (2004). Better information, better choices, better health. London: DH Publications.Google Scholar
- 12.Department of Health. (2008). High quality care for all: NHS next stage review final report. London.Google Scholar
- 14.Groopman, J. E. (2007). How doctors think. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
- 19.Marmot, M. (2005). Social determinants of health inequalities. The Lancet, 365, 1099–1104.Google Scholar
- 20.Marmot, M., et al. (2010). Fair society, health lives: Strategic review of health inequalities in England post 2010. London: University College London.Google Scholar
- 21.Mol, A. (2008). The logic of care: Health and the problem of patient choice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- 22.National Prescribing Centre. (2007). Introduction to medicines concordance & adherence to treatment. Available online at http://www.npci.org.uk/adherence_to_medicines/atm/intro/workshops/workshop_60minute_elearn_event1.php.
- 23.Nordenfelt, L. (1995). On the nature of health: An action-theoretic approach. London: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- 24.Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain. (1997). From compliance to concordance achieving shared goals in medicine taking. London: Royal Pharmaceutical Society.Google Scholar
- 26.Seedhouse, D. (2001). Health: The foundations for achievement (2nd ed.). Chicester: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
- 28.Shorter, E. (1991). Doctors and their patients: A social history. Piscataway: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
- 29.Stilgoe, J., & Farook, F. (2008). The talking cure. London: Demos.Google Scholar
- 30.Tannen, D. (1998). The argument culture: Moving from debate to dialogue. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
- 33.World Health Organization. (1946). WHO definition of health. Available online at: http://www.who.int/about/definition/en/print.html.
- 34.World Health Organization. (2003). Adherence to long-term therapies: Evidence for action. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar