Autism as a Natural Human Variation: Reflections on the Claims of the Neurodiversity Movement
Neurodiversity has remained a controversial concept over the last decade. In its broadest sense the concept of neurodiversity regards atypical neurological development as a normal human difference. The neurodiversity claim contains at least two different aspects. The first aspect is that autism, among other neurological conditions, is first and foremost a natural variation. The other aspect is about conferring rights and in particular value to the neurodiversity condition, demanding recognition and acceptance. Autism can be seen as a natural variation on par with for example homosexuality. The broad version of the neurodiversity claim, covering low-functioning as well as high-functioning autism, is problematic. Only a narrow conception of neurodiversity, referring exclusively to high-functioning autists, is reasonable. We will discuss the effects of DSM categorization and the medical model for high functioning autists. After a discussion of autism as a culture we will analyze various possible strategies for the neurodiversity movement to claim extra resources for autists as members of an underprivileged culture without being labelled disabled or as having a disorder. We will discuss their vulnerable status as a group and what obligation that confers on the majority of neurotypicals.
KeywordsAutism Disability DSM-V Equality Neurodiversity Vulnerability
- 8.Fenton, A., & Krahn, T. (2007). Autism, neurodiversity and equality beyond the ‘normal’. Journal of Ethics in Mental Health, 2(2), 1–6.Google Scholar
- 9.Fitzgerald, M., & O’Brien, B. (2007). Genius genes. How Asperger talents changed the world. Shawnee Mission/Autism Asperger Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- 10.Goodin, R. E. (1985). Protecting the vulnerable: A reanalysis of our social responsibilities. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- 11.Grandin, T. (2006). Thinking in pictures and other reports from my life with autism. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
- 15.Kymlicka, W. (1996). Multicultural citizenship: A liberal theory of minority rights (pp. 107–110). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 16.Lawson, W. (2009). Single attention and associated cognition in autism (SAACA). PhD thesis Deakin University.Google Scholar
- 21.Nordenfelt, L. (1987). On the nature of health. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
- 22.Ortega, F. (2009). The cerebral subject and the challenge of neurodiversity. Biosciences, 4, 425–445.Google Scholar
- 26.Singer, J. (1999). ‘Why can’t you be normal for once in your life?’ From a ‘problem with no name’ to the emergence of a new category of difference. In M. Corker & S. French (Eds.), Disability and discourse. Buckingham/Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- 27.Williams, D. (2002). Exposure anxiety–The invisible cage: An exploration of self-protection responses in the autism spectrum, Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
- 29.Aspies for freedom. Pro-neurodiversity website. Found at: http://www.aspiesforfreedom.com. Accessed 15/09/2010.
- 30.The human neurodiversity laboratory. Pro-neurodiversity website. Found at: http://eckertlab.org/neurodiversity, accessed 15/09/2010.
- 31.Wolbring, G. (2007). Neurodiversity, neuroenhancement, neurodisease, and neurobusiness. Pro-neurodiverswity website. Found at: http://innovationwatch-archive.com/choiceisyours/choiceisyours-2007-04-30.htm, accessed 15/09/2010.
- 32.Ventura33’s Neurodiversity Page. Pro-neurodiversity website. Found at: http://www.ventura33.com/neurodiversity/, accessed 15/09/2010.
- 33.American Psychiatric Association: DSM-V development. Found at: http://www.dsm5.org/ProposedRevisions/Pages/proposedrevision.aspx?rid=97, Accessed 15/09/2010.