Health Care Analysis

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 20–30

Autism as a Natural Human Variation: Reflections on the Claims of the Neurodiversity Movement

Original Article

Abstract

Neurodiversity has remained a controversial concept over the last decade. In its broadest sense the concept of neurodiversity regards atypical neurological development as a normal human difference. The neurodiversity claim contains at least two different aspects. The first aspect is that autism, among other neurological conditions, is first and foremost a natural variation. The other aspect is about conferring rights and in particular value to the neurodiversity condition, demanding recognition and acceptance. Autism can be seen as a natural variation on par with for example homosexuality. The broad version of the neurodiversity claim, covering low-functioning as well as high-functioning autism, is problematic. Only a narrow conception of neurodiversity, referring exclusively to high-functioning autists, is reasonable. We will discuss the effects of DSM categorization and the medical model for high functioning autists. After a discussion of autism as a culture we will analyze various possible strategies for the neurodiversity movement to claim extra resources for autists as members of an underprivileged culture without being labelled disabled or as having a disorder. We will discuss their vulnerable status as a group and what obligation that confers on the majority of neurotypicals.

Keywords

Autism Disability DSM-V Equality Neurodiversity Vulnerability 

References

  1. 1.
    Allred, S. (2009). Reframing Asperger syndrome: Lessons from other challenges to the diagnostic and statistical manual and ICIDH approaches. Disability and Society, 24(3), 343–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baker, D. L. (2006). Neurodiversity, neurological disability and the public sector: notes on the autism spectrum. Disability and Society, 21(1), 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baron-Cohen, S. (2002). Is Asperger syndrome necessarily viewed as a disability? Focus on autism and other developmental disabilities, 17(3), 186–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Broderick, A. A. (2008). Autism as metaphor: Narrative and counter-narrative. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 12(5), 459–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brownlow, C., & O’Dell, L. (2009). Challenging understandings of theory of mind: A brief report. Intellectual and developmental disabilities, 47(6), 473–478.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davidson, J. (2008). Autistic culture online: Virtual communication and cultural expression on the spectrum. Social and Cultural Geography, 9(7), 791–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Farrugia, D. (2009). Exploring stigma: Medical knowledge and the stigmatisation of parents of children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. Sociology of Health and Illness, 31(7), 1011–1027.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fenton, A., & Krahn, T. (2007). Autism, neurodiversity and equality beyond the ‘normal’. Journal of Ethics in Mental Health, 2(2), 1–6.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fitzgerald, M., & O’Brien, B. (2007). Genius genes. How Asperger talents changed the world. Shawnee Mission/Autism Asperger Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goodin, R. E. (1985). Protecting the vulnerable: A reanalysis of our social responsibilities. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grandin, T. (2006). Thinking in pictures and other reports from my life with autism. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Griffin, E., & Pollak, D. (2009). Student experiences of neurodiversity in higher education: Insights from the BRAINHE Project. Dyslexia, 15, 23–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jones, R. S. P., Zahl, A., & Huws, J. C. (2001). First-hand accounts of emotional experiences in autism: A qualitative analysis. Disability and Society, 16(3), 393–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jurecic, A. (2006). Mind-blindness: Autism, writing, and the problem of empathy. Literature and Medicine, 25(1), 1–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kymlicka, W. (1996). Multicultural citizenship: A liberal theory of minority rights (pp. 107–110). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lawson, W. (2009). Single attention and associated cognition in autism (SAACA). PhD thesis Deakin University.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Levy, S. (2009). Autism. Lancet, 374, 1627–1638.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    McGeer, V. (2004). Autistic self-awareness. Philosophy Psychiatry and Psychology, 11(3), 253–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Moy, S. S., & Nadler, J. J. (2008). Advances in behavioral genetics: Mouse models of autism. Molecular Psychiatry, 13, 4–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Muhle, R. (2004). The genetics of autism. Pediatrics, 113, e472–e486.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nordenfelt, L. (1987). On the nature of health. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ortega, F. (2009). The cerebral subject and the challenge of neurodiversity. Biosciences, 4, 425–445.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Parens, E., & Asch, A. (2003). Disability rights critique of prenatal genetic testing: Reflections and recommendations. Mental retardation and developmental disabilities, 9, 40–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ruof, M. C. (2004). Vulnerability, vulnerable populations, and policy. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 14(4), 411–425.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schroeder, D., & Gefenas, E. (2009). Vulnerability: Too vague and too broad? Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 18, 113–121.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Singer, J. (1999). ‘Why can’t you be normal for once in your life?’ From a ‘problem with no name’ to the emergence of a new category of difference. In M. Corker & S. French (Eds.), Disability and discourse. Buckingham/Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Williams, D. (2002). Exposure anxietyThe invisible cage: An exploration of self-protection responses in the autism spectrum, Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wing, L. (1997). The autistic spectrum. The Lancet, 350(9093), 1761–1766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Aspies for freedom. Pro-neurodiversity website. Found at: http://www.aspiesforfreedom.com. Accessed 15/09/2010.
  30. 30.
    The human neurodiversity laboratory. Pro-neurodiversity website. Found at: http://eckertlab.org/neurodiversity, accessed 15/09/2010.
  31. 31.
    Wolbring, G. (2007). Neurodiversity, neuroenhancement, neurodisease, and neurobusiness. Pro-neurodiverswity website. Found at: http://innovationwatch-archive.com/choiceisyours/choiceisyours-2007-04-30.htm, accessed 15/09/2010.
  32. 32.
    Ventura33’s Neurodiversity Page. Pro-neurodiversity website. Found at: http://www.ventura33.com/neurodiversity/, accessed 15/09/2010.
  33. 33.
    American Psychiatric Association: DSM-V development. Found at: http://www.dsm5.org/ProposedRevisions/Pages/proposedrevision.aspx?rid=97, Accessed 15/09/2010.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Linköping UniversityLinköpingSweden

Personalised recommendations