Advertisement

Health Care Analysis

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 35–59 | Cite as

Physician Remuneration Methods for Family Physicians in Canada: Expected Outcomes and Lessons Learned

  • Dominika W. WranikEmail author
  • Martine Durier-Copp
Original Article

Abstract

Canada is a leader in experimenting with alternative, non fee for service provider remuneration methods; all jurisdictions have implemented salaries and payment models that blend fee for service with salary or capitation components. A series of qualitative interviews were held with 27 stakeholders in the Canadian health care system to assess the reasons and expectations behind the implementation of these payment methods for family physicians, as well as the extent to which objectives have been achieved. Results indicate that the main reasons are a need to recruit and retain primary care physicians to rural and remote regions of the country, and the desire to increase collaboration, care continuity, prevention and health promotion. The general perception is that positive results have been observed, but problems are not alleviated. Blended payments have had some positive effects on preventive care delivery, collaboration, and care continuity. Salaries have provided a stable, predictable, and high source of income for physicians, thereby improving recruitment and retention. The implementation of salaries, however, led to concerns with declining physician productivity, and has brought to light a need for improved measurement and monitoring systems.

Keywords

Physician remuneration models Provider incentives Recruitment and retention Collaborative care Canadian health care 

References

  1. 1.
    Ariizumi, H. (2004) Physician competition, and managed care organizations’ contract choice. Department of Economics. The University of Western Ontario.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barro, J., & Beaulieu, N. (2003). Selection and improvement: Physician responses to financial incentives. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc., NBER working papers: 10017.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bliemel, M., & Hassanein, K. (2004). E-health: Applying business process reengineering principles to healthcare in Canada. International Journal of E-Business, 2(6), 625–643. doi: 10.1504/IJEB.2004.006129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blomqvist, A. (1991). The doctor as double agent: Information asymmetry, health insurance and medical care. Journal of Health Economics, 10(4), 411–422. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(91)90023-G.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bolduc, D., Fortin, B., & Fournier, M. A. (1996). The effects of incentive policies on the practice location of doctors: A multinomial probit analysis. Journal of Labor Economics, 14(4), 703–732. doi: 10.1086/209828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Canadian Institute of Health Information. (2005). Alternative Payments and the National Physician Database, The Status of Alternative Payment Programs for Physicians in Canada 2002–2003; Information for 2003–2004. Ottawa, Ontario.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Carlsen, F., & Grytten, J. (1998). More physicians: Improved availability or induced demand? Health Economics, 7, 495–508. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199809)7:6<495::AID-HEC368>3.0.CO;2-S.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carlsen, F., & Grytten, J. (2000). Consumer satisfaction and supplier induced demand. Journal of Health Economics, 19(5), 731–753. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(00)00044-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chaix-Couturier, C., Durand-Zalenski, I., Jolly, D., & Durieux, P. (2000). Effects of financial incentives on medical practice: Results from a systematic review of the literature and methodological issues. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 12(2), 133–142. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/12.2.133.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chalkley, M., & Tilley, C. (2005). The existence and nature of physician agency: Evidence of stinting in the British National Health Service. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 14(3), 647–664. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-9134.2005.00077.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Christensen, A. J., & Johnson, J. A. (2002). Patient adherence with medical treatment regiments: An interactive approach. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(3), 94–97. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.00176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cuffel, B. J., Bloom, J. R., Wallace, N., Hausman, J. W., & Hu, T. W. (2002). Two year outcomes of fee-for-service and capitated Medicaid programs for people with severe mental illness. HSR: Health Services Research, 37(2), 341–359. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.026.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Delattre, E., & Dormont, B. (2003). Fixed fees and physician-induced demand: A panel data study of French physicians. Health Economics, 12, 741–754. doi: 10.1002/hec.823.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Denzii, C. (2000). Medication noncompliance: What is the problem? Managed Care Supplement, 9(9), 7–12.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ellickson, P., Stern, S., & Trajtenberg, M. (2000). Patient welfare and compliance: An empirical framework for measuring the benefits from pharmaceutical innovation, NBER Working Paper No. W6890.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ellis, R. P., & McGuire, T. G. (1996). Optimal payment systems for health services. Journal of Health Economics, 9, 375–396. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(90)90001-J.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Evans, R. (1984). Strained mercy: The economics of Canadian medical care. Toronto: Butterworths.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Farley, P. (1986). Theories of the price and quantity of physcian services. Journal of Health Economics, 5, 315–333. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(86)90007-X.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Forsberg, E., Axelsson, R., & Arnetz, B. (2001). Financial incentives in health care. The impact of performance-based reimbursement. Health Policy (Amsterdam), 58, 243–262. doi: 10.1016/S0168-8510(01)00163-4.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fuchs, V. (1996). Economics, values, and health care reform. The American Economic Review, 86, 1–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gafni, A., Charles, C., & Whelan, T. (1998). The physician-patient encounter: The physician as a perfect agent for the patient versus the informed treatment decision-making model. Social Science and Medicine, 47(3), 347–354. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00091-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gagne, R., & Leger, P. T. (2005). Determinants of physicians’ decisions to specialize. Health Economics, 14, 721–735. doi: 10.1002/hec.970.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gene-Badia, J., Escaramis-Babiano, G., Sans-Corrales, M., Sampietro-Colom, L., Aguado-Menguy, F., Cabezas-Pena, C., et al. (2007). Impact of economic incentives on quality of professional life and on end-user satisfaction in primary care. Health Policy (Amsterdam), 80(1), 2–10. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.02.008.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gosden, T., Forland, F., Kristiansen, I. S., Sutton, M., Leese, B., Guifidda, A., et al. (2001). Impact of payment method on behaviour of primary care physicians: A systematic review. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 6(1), 44–55. doi: 10.1258/1355819011927198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gosden, T., Sibbald, B., Williams, J., Petchey, R., & Leese, B. (2003). Paying doctors by salary: A controlled study of general practitioner behaviour in England. Health Policy (Amsterdam), 64, 415–423. doi: 10.1016/S0168-8510(02)00204-X.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Greenfield, S., Rogers, W., Mangotich, M., Carney, M., & Tarlow, A. R. (1995). Outcomes of patients with hypertension and non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus treated by different systems and specialties. Journal of the American Medical Association, 274(18), 1436–1444. doi: 10.1001/jama.274.18.1436.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gruber, J., & Owings, M. (1996). Physician financial incentives and cesarean section delivery. The Rand Journal of Economics, 27, 99–123. doi: 10.2307/2555794.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Grytten, J., & Sorensen, R. (2001). Type of contract and supplier-induced demand for primary physicians in Norway. Journal of Health Economics, 20, 379–393. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(00)00087-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Grytten, J., & Sorensen, R. (2003). Practice variation and physician specific effects. Journal of Health Economics, 22(3), 403–418. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(02)00105-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jegers, M., Kesteloot, K., De Graeve, D., & Gilles, W. (2002). A typology for provider payment systems in health care. Health Policy (Amsterdam), 60, 255–273. doi: 10.1016/S0168-8510(01)00216-0.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jelovac, I. (2001). Physicians’ payment contracts, treatment decisions and diagnosis accuracy. Health Economics, 10, 9–25. doi:10.1002/1099-1050(200101)10:1<9::AID-HEC560>3.0.CO;2-Y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kyngas, H., Duffy, M. E., & Kroll, J. (2000). Conceptual framework of compliance. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 9, 5–12. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2000.00309.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lee, C. (1995). Optimal medical treatment under asymmetric information. Journal of Health Economics, 14, 419–441. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(95)00012-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lomas, J. (1996). Reluctant rationer: Public input to health care priorities. Hamilton, ON: Centre for Health Economic and Policy Analysis.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lurie, N., Christianson, J., Finch, M., & Moscovice, M. (1994). The effects of capitation on health and functional status of the Medicaid elderly: A randomized trail. Annals of Internal Medicine, 120(6), 506–511.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ma, A. (1994). Health care payment systems: Cost and quality incentives. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 3, 93–112. doi: 10.1111/j.1430-9134.1994.00093.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ma, A., & McGuire, T. (1997). Optimal health insurance and provider payment. The American Economic Review, 87, 685–704.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    McGuire, T. G. (2000). Physician agency. In A. J. Culyer, & J. P. Newhouse (Eds.), Handbook of health economics (pp. 461–536). Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    McGuire, T. G., & Pauly, M. V. (1991). Physician response to fee changes with multiple payers. Journal of Health Economics, 10, 385–410. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(91)90022-F.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Menec, V., Black, C., Roos, N., & Bogdanovic, B. (2001). What is the potential for formal patient registration in Canadian primary care? The scale of ‘informal registration’ in Manitoba. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 6(4), 202–206. doi: 10.1258/1355819011927495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Nassiri, A., & Rochaix, L. (2006). Revisiting physicians’ financial incentives in Québec: A panel system approach. Health Economics, 15(1), 49–64. doi: 10.1002/hec.1012.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Newhouse, J. (1996). Reimbursing health plans and health providers: Efficiency in production versus selection. Journal of Economic Literature, 34, 1236–1263.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    North South Group Inc. (2005). Critical inventory of family physician alternative remuneration models. The Nova Scotia Department of Health, Halifax, Canada, submitted.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Quast, T., Sappington, D. E., & Shenkman, E. (2008). Does the quality of care in medicaid MCOs vary with the form of physician compensation? Health Economics, 17(4), 545–550. doi: 10.1002/hec.1264.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Retchin, S. M., Brown, B., Yeh, S. C., Chu, D., & Moreno, L. (1997). Outcomes of stroke patients in Medicare fee for service and managed care. Journal of the American Medical Association, 278(2), 119–124. doi: 10.1001/jama.278.2.119.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Robinson, J. C. (2001). Theory and practice in the design of physician payment incentives. The Milbank Quarterly, 79(2), 149–177. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00202.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Rochaix, L. (1989). Information asymmetry and search in the market for physicians’ services. Journal of Health Economics, 8, 53–84. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(89)90009-X.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Rogerson, W. (1994). Choice of treatment intensities by a non-profit hospital under perspective coverage. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 7, 51.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Rosenthal, M. B., Frank, R. G., Li, Z., & Epstein, A. M. (2005). Early experience with pay-for-performance: From concept to practice. Journal of the American Medical Association, 294(14), 1788–1793. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.14.1788.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Scott, A. (2001). Eliciting GPs’ preferences for pecuniary and non-pecuniary job characteristics. Journal of Health Economics, 20, 329–347. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(00)00083-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Sloan, F. A., & Feldman, R. (1978). Competition among physicians. In W. Greenberg (Ed.) (pp. 45–102).Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Sobrero, M. E. S., Dick, A. W., Zwanziger, J., Mukamel, D., & Weyl, N. (2003). Effects of capitation on switching primary care physicians. HSR: Health Services Research, 31(1), 191–209.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Sorensen, R. J., & Grytten, J. (1999). Competition and supplier-induced demand in a health care system with fixed fees. Health Economics, 8(6), 497–508. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199909)8:6<497::AID-HEC439>3.0.CO;2-D.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Sorensen, R. J., & Grytten, J. (2003). Service production and contract choice in primary physician services. Health Policy (Amsterdam), 66, 73–93. doi: 10.1016/S0168-8510(03)00026-5.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Stano, M. (1987). A further analysis of the physician inducement controversy. Journal of Health Economics, 6, 227–238. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(87)90010-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Vernon, S. W., Hughes, J. I., Heckel, V. M., & Jackson, G. L. (1992). Quality of care for colorectal cancer in a fee-for-service and health maintenance organization practice. Cancer, 69(10), 2418–2425. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19920515)69:10<2418::AID-CNCR2820691006>3.0.CO;2-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Vick, S., & Scott, A. (1998). Agency in health care. examining patients’ preferences for attributes of the doctor-patient relationship. Journal of Health Economics, 17(5), 587–605. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(97)00035-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Ware, J. E., Bayliss, M. S., Rogers, W. H., Kosinski, M., & Tarlow, A. R. (1996). Differences in 4-year health outcomes for elderly and poor, chronically ill patients treated in HMO and fee-for-service systems. Journal of the American Medical Association, 276(13), 1039–1047. doi: 10.1001/jama.276.13.1039b.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Whynes, D. K., & Baines, D. L. (1998). Income-based incentives in UK general practice. Health Policy (Amsterdam), 43, 15–31. doi: 10.1016/S0168-8510(97)00078-X.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Woodward, R. S., & Warren-Boulton, F. (1984). Considering the effects of financial incentives and professional ethics on ‘appropriate’ medical care. Journal of Health Economics, 3, 223–237.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Wranik, D. (2008). A Taxonomy of Quality Based Incentive Payments, Faculty of Management, Dalhousie University, Working Paper.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Wranik, D. (2008). Are doctors lazy? Inappropriate and ineffective treatment recommendations. Faculty of Management, Dalhousie University, Working Paper.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Wranik, D. (2008). Health Human Resource Planning in Canada: A Typology and application. Health Policy (Amsterdam), 86, 27–41. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.08.004.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Public AdministrationDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations