Advertisement

Health Care Analysis

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 261–276 | Cite as

Human Health and the Environment: In Harmony or in Conflict?

  • David B. ResnikEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Health policy frameworks usually construe environmental protection and human health as harmonious values. Policies that protect the environment, such as pollution control and pesticide regulation, also benefit human health. In recent years, however, it has become apparent that promoting human health sometimes undermines environmental protection. Some actions, policies, or technologies that reduce human morbidity, mortality, and disease can have detrimental effects on the environment. Since human health and environmental protection are sometimes at odds, political leaders, citizens, and government officials need a way to mediate and resolve conflicts between these values. Unfortunately, few approaches to applied bioethics have the conceptual tools to do accomplish this task. Theories of health care ethics have little to say about the environment, and theories of environmental ethics don’t say much about human health. In this essay, I defend an approach to ethical decision-making that gives policy-makers some tools for balancing promotion of human health and protection of the environment.

Keywords

Human health Environment Ethics Policy Bioethics Malaria 

Abbreviations

CDC

Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention

DDT

Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane

EPA

Environmental Protection Agency

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the intramural program of the NIEHS/NIH. It does not represent the views of the NIEHS or NIH.

References

  1. 1.
    Aristotle. (330 BC) [1984]. Nichomachean ethics. In J. Barnes (Ed.), Complete works of Aristotle. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Attfield, R. (2003). Environmental ethics. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bayer, R., Gostin, L., Jennings, B., & Steinbock, B. (Eds.). (2006). Public health ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beauchamp, T., & Childress, J. (2001). Principles of bioethics (5th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berenbaum, M. (5 June 2005). If malaria’s the problem, DDT’s not the only answer. Washington Post, B3.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Callicott, J. (1989). In defense of the land ethic. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    CARE. (2008). Facts about hunger. http://www.care.org/campaigns/world-hunger/facts.asp. Accessed 28 May 2008.
  8. 8.
    CDC. (2007). Malaria. http://www.cdc.gov/malaria/. Accessed 28 December 2007.
  9. 9.
    Cochrane, A. (2007). Environmental ethics. The internet encyclopedia of philosophy. http://www.iep.utm.edu/e/envi-eth.htm. Accessed 30 May 2008.
  10. 10.
    Cohen, C., & Regan, T. (2001). The animal rights debate. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    EPA. (2007). DDT regulatory history: A brief survey. http://www.epa.gov/history/topics/ddt/02.htm. Accessed 29 December 2007.
  12. 12.
    EPA. (2008a). About EPA. http://www.epa.gov/epahome/aboutepa.htm. Accessed 27 May 2008.
  13. 13.
    EPA. (2008b). Laws that we enforce. http://www.epa.gov/lawsregs/laws/index.html#caa. Accessed 27 May 2008.
  14. 14.
    Frankena, W. (1973). Ethics (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gert, B., Culver, C., & Clouser, K. (1997). Bioethics: A return to fundamentals. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gert, B., Culver, C., & Clouser, K. (2006). Bioethics: A systematic approach. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gewirth, A. (2001). Human rights and future generations. In M. Boylan (Ed.), Environmental ethics (pp. 207–211). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (1996). Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jonsen, A., Siegler, M., & Winslade, W. (2006). Clinical ethics: A practical approach to ethical decisions in clinical medicine. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kubasek, N., & Silverman, G. (2007). Environmental law (6th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    LaFollette, H., & Shanks, S. (1996). Brute science. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Leopold, A. (1989). A sand county almanac and sketches here and there, commemorative edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mason, E. (2006). Value pluralism. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://www.seop.leeds.ac.uk/entries/value-pluralism/. Accessed 5 June 2008.
  24. 24.
    Naess, A. (1973). The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement. Inquiry, 16, 97–107.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Naess, A. (1986). The deep ecological movement: Some philosophical aspects. Philosophical Inquiry, 8, 1–2.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Norton, B. (1991). Toward unity among environmentalists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Norton, B. (2005). Sustainability: A philosophy of adaptive ecosystem management. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pellegrino, E., Thomasma, D., & Miller, D. (1996). The Christian virtues in medical practice. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pesticide Action Network of North America. (2007). Safe malaria solutions—beyond DDT. http://www.panna.org/ddt. Accessed 29 December 2007.
  30. 30.
    Pierce, J., & Jameton, A. (2004). The ethics of environmentally responsible health care. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pious, R. (2006). The war on terrorism and the rule of law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rabin, R., & Sugarman, S. (Eds.). (2001). Regulating tobacco. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rawls, J. (2005). Political liberalism (2nd ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Regan, T. (2004). The case for animal rights (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Roberts, D., Manguin, S., & Mouchet, J. (2000). DDT House spraying and re-emerging malaria. Lancet, 356, 330–332.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rolston, H., III. (1994). Environmental ethics: Values in and duties toward the natural world. In L. Gruen & D. Jamieson (Eds.), Reflecting on nature (pp. 65–84). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rolston, H., III. (2006). Intrinsic values on earth: Nature and nations. In A. ten Have (Ed.), Environmental ethics and international policy (pp. 47–68). Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rosen, D., Tel-Or, E., Hadar, Y., & Chen, Y. (Eds.). (1997). Modern agriculture and the environment. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ross, W. (1930). The right and the good. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Shamoo, A., & Resnik, D. (2003). Responsible conduct of research. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Shrader-Frechette, K. (2002). Environmental justice. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Silberner, J. (2006). WHO backs use of DDT against malaria. National Public Radio, 15 September 2006. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6083944. Accessed 29 December 2007.
  43. 43.
    Singer, P. (1993). Practical ethics (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Steinbock, B. (1996). Life before birth: The moral and legal status of embryos and fetuses. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Taylor, P. (1986). Respect for nature: A theory of environmental ethics. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Varner, G. (1998). In nature’s interests? Interests, animal rights, and environmental ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), National Institutes of Health (NIH)Research Triangle ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations