Health Care Analysis

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 303–314

Conceptualising Health: Insights from the Capability Approach

Original Article

Abstract

This paper suggests the adoption of a ‘capability approach’ to key concepts in healthcare. Recent developments in theoretical approaches to concepts such as ‘health’ and ‘disease’ are discussed, and a trend identified of thinking of health as a matter of having the capability to cope with life’s demands. This approach is contrasted with the WHO definition of health and Boorse’s biostatistical account. We outline the ‘capability approach’, which has become standard in development ethics and economics, and show how existing work in those areas can profitably be adapted to healthcare. Cases are used to illustrate the value of adopting a capability approach.

Keywords

Capability approach Health Disease Illness Definition of health Concepts in healthcare 

References

  1. 1.
    Alkire, S. (2002). Valuing freedoms: Sen’s capability approach and poverty reduction. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anstey, K. W. (2002). Are attempts to have impaired children justifiable? Journal of Medical Ethics, 28, 286–288.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bircher, J. (2005). Towards a dynamic definition of health and disease. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 8, 335–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boorse, C. (1975). On the distinction between disease and illness. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 5.1, 49–68.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boorse, C. (1976). What a theory of mental health should be. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour vol. 6.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boorse, C. (1977). Health as a theoretical concept. Philosophy of Science, 44, 542–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boorse, C. (1997). A rebuttal on health. In J. M. Humber & R. F. Almeder (Eds.), What is disease? (pp. 3–134). Totowa, NJ: Humana Press.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brock, D. (1993). Quality of life measures in health care and medical ethics. In M. C. Nussbaum & A. Sen (Eds.), The quality of life (pp. 95–132). Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Crocker, D. A. (1992). Functioning and capability: the foundations of Sen’s and Nussbaum’s development ethic. Political Theory, 20(4), 584–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gammelgaard, A. (2000). Evolutionary biology and the concept of disease. Medicine, Healthcare and Philosophy, 3, 109–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hofmann, B. (2002). On the triad disease, illness and sickness. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 27.6, 651–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kovacs, J. (1998). The concept of health and disease. Medicine, Healthcare and Philosophy, 1, 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Levy, N. (2002). Deafness, culture and choice. Journal of Medical Ethics, 28, 284–285.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lewens, T., & McMillan, J. (2004). Defining disease. The Lancet, 363, 664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nordenfelt, L. (1995). On the nature of health. An action theoretic approach. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nordenfelt, L. (2001). Health, science, and ordinary language. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nordenfelt, L. (2007a). The concepts of health and illness revisited. Medicine, Healthcare and Philosophy, 10, 5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nordenfelt, L. (2007b). Establishing a middle-range position in the theory of health: a reply to my critics. Medicine, Healthcare and Philosophy, 10, 29–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nussbaum, M. C. (1988). Nature, function, and capability: Aristotle on political distribution. Oxford studies in ancient philosophy, supp vol.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ruger, J. P. (2004). Ethics of the social determinants of health. The Lancet, 364, 1092–1097 Sept 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schramme, T. (2007). A qualified defence of a naturalist theory of health. Medicine, Healthcare and Philosophy, 10, 11–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sen, A. (1979). Equality of what? The tanner lecture on human values. Delivered May 22 at Stanford University.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sen, A. (1992). Inequality re-examined. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sen, A. (1993). Capability and well-being. In M. C. Nussbaum & A. Sen (Eds.), The quality of life (pp. 30–54). Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Knopf Press.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Spriggs, M. (2002). Lesbian couple create a child who is deaf like them. Journal of Medical Ethics, 28, 283.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Verkerk, M. A., Busschback, J. J. V., Karssing, E. D. (2001). Health-related quality of life research and the capability approach of Amartya Sen. Quality of Life Research, 10, 49–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    WHO (1948). Preamble of the Constitution of the World Health Organisation as adopted by the International Health Conference (Official Records of the WHO, No. 2, p. 100).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations