Advertisement

Health Care Analysis

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 119–122 | Cite as

Response to Westin and Nilstun

  • Simon WalthoEmail author
Original Paper

Credit should be given to Westin and Nilstun in for the preceding article’s thoughtful and detailed analysis of the ethical problems posed by ischemic heart disease within the context of Western medicine and society, and for highlighting the shortcomings of principles in providing normative action-guides when applied to such situations in the manner described. However, certain reservations may be expressed as to whether this manner of applying principles is indeed a fair or generally accepted interpretation of the thought behind them, and as to whether the authors’ implied solution to these difficulties is either a viable or necessary one. To this end, the following article will examine some of the assumptions underlying Westin and Nilstun’s account of how the competing demands of principles are to be balanced and specified and by offering a contrasting, more flexible view of the use of principles suggests several possible solutions to the problems they describe and reaffirm the value...

Keywords

Moral Philosophy Ethical Theory Moral Theory Reflective Equilibrium Common Morality 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Beauchamp T, Childress J (1979) Principles of Biomedical Ethics (1st ed). Oxford University Press: Oxford.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beauchamp T, Childress J (2001) Principles of Biomedical Ethics (5th ed). Oxford University Press: Oxford.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Downie RS, Calman KC (1987) Health Respect: Ethics in Health Care. Faber: London.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Westin L, Nilstun T (2006) Principles help to analyse but often give no solution—secondary prevention after a cardiac event. Health Care Analysis 14(2).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Winkler ER (1993), From Kantianism to Contextualism: the rise and fall of paradigm theory in bioethics. In: Winkler ER, Coombs JR (eds) Applied Ethics: A Reader. Blackwell Oxford.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of English Communications and PhilosophyCardiff UniversityCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations