Advertisement

Impact of Decision Rules and Non-cooperative Behaviors on Minimum Consensus Cost in Group Decision Making

  • Weijun Xu
  • Xin Chen
  • Yucheng DongEmail author
  • Francisco Chiclana
Article
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

In group decision making, it is sensible to achive minimum consensus cost (MCC) because the consensus reaching process resources are often limited. In this endeavour, though, there are still two issues that require paying attention to: (1) the impact of decision rules, including decision weights and aggregation functions, on MCC; and (2) the impact of non-cooperative behaviors on MCC. Hence, this paper analytically reveals the decision rules to minimize MCC or maximize MCC. Furthermore, detailed simulation experiments show the joint impact of non-cooperative behavior and decisions rules on MCC, as well as revealing the effect of the consensus within the established MCC target.

Keywords

Group decision making Consensus Cost Decision rules Non-cooperative behaviors Simulation experiment 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Weijun Xu would like to acknowledge the financial support of Grants (Nos. 71771091, 71720107002) from NSF of China, and Yucheng Dong would like to acknowledge the financial support of Grant (No. 71871149) from NSF of China, and Grant (No. sksyl201705) from Sichuan University.

References

  1. Akram M, Arshad M (2018) A novel trapezoidal bipolar fuzzy topsis method for group decision-making. Group Decis Negot 28(3):565–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akram M, Adeel A, Alcantud JCR (2019a) Group decision-making methods based on hesitant N-soft sets. Expert Syst Appl 115:95–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akram M, Ali G, Alcantud JCR (2019b) New decision-making hybrid model: intuitionistic fuzzy N-soft rough sets. Soft Comput 23(20):9853–9868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Akram M, Ilyas F, Garg H (2019c) Multi-criteria group decisionmaking based on ELECTRE I method in Pythagorean fuzzy information. Soft Comput (in press).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04105-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ben-Arieh D, Easton T (2007) Multi-criteria group consensus under linear cost opinion elasticity. Decis Support Syst 43(3):713–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ben-Arieh D, Easton T, Evans B (2008) Minimum cost consensus with quadratic cost functions. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern-Part A Syst Hum 39(1):210–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheng D, Zhou ZL, Cheng FX, Zhou YF, Xie YJ (2018) Modeling the minimum cost consensus problem in an asymmetric costs context. Eur J Oper Res 270:1122–1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chiclana F, Tapia García JM, Del Moral MJ, Herrera-Viedma E (2013) A statistical comparative study of different similarity measures of consensus in group decision making. Inf Sci 221:110–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dong YC, Xu JP (2016) Consensus building in group decision making: Searching the consensus path with minimum adjustments. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dong YC, Xu YF, Li HY, Feng B (2010) The OWA-based consensus operator under linguistic representation models using position indexes. Eur J Oper Res 203(2):455–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dong YC, Li CC, Xu YF, Gu X (2015) Consensus-based group decision making under multi-granular unbalanced 2-tuple linguistic preference relations. Group Decis Negot 24:217–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dong YC, Zhang HJ, Herrera-Viedma E (2016) Integrating experts’ weights generated dynamically into the consensus reaching process and its application in managing non-cooperative behaviors. Decis Support Syst 84:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dong YC, Liu YT, Liang HM, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E (2017) Strategic weight manipulation in multiple attribute decision making. Omega 75:154–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dong YC, Zha QB, Zhang HJ, Kou G, Fujita H, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E (2018a) Consensus reaching in social network group decision making: research paradigms and challenges. Knowl-Based Syst 162:3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dong YC, Zhao SH, Zhang HJ, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E (2018b) A self-management mechanism for non-cooperative behaviors in large-scale group consensus reaching processes. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 26(6):3276–3288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fedrizzi KM (1988) A ‘soft’ measure of consensus in the setting of partial (fuzzy) preferences. Eur J Oper Res 34(3):316–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gong ZW, Xu XX, Lu FL, Li LS, Xu C (2015a) On consensus models with utility preferences and limited budget. Appl Soft Comput 35:840–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gong ZW, Zhang HH, Forrest J, Li L, Xu X (2015b) Two consensus models based on the minimum cost and maximum return regarding either all individuals or one individual. Eur J Oper Res 240:183–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gong ZW, Xu C, Chiclana F, Xu XX (2017) Consensus measure with multi-stage fluctuation utility based on china’s urban demolition negotiation. Group Decis Negot 26(2):379–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gong ZW, Guo WW, Herrera-Viedma E, Gong ZJ, Wei G (2019) Consistency and consensus modeling of linear uncertain preference relations. Eur J Oper Res (in press).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.10.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gong ZW, Wang H, Guo WW, Gong ZJ, Wei G (2020) Measuring trust in social networks based on linear uncertainty theory. Inf Sci 508:154–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F, Chiclana F (2002) A consensus model for multiperson decision making with different preference structures. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 32(3):394–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Herrera-Viedma E, Cabrerizo FJ, Kacprzyk J, Pedrycz W (2014) A review of soft consensus models in a fuzzy environment. Inf Fus 17:4–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kacprzyk J, Zadrożny S (2010) Soft computing and Web intelligence for supporting consensus reaching. Soft Comput 14:833–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kacprzyk J, Zadrożny S (2016) On a fairness type approach to consensus reaching support under fuzziness via linguistic summaries. In: IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems (FUZZ-IEEE), pp 1999–2006Google Scholar
  26. Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M, Nurmi H (1992) Group decision making and consensus under fuzzy preference and fuzzy majority. Fuzzy Sets Syst 49(1):21–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M, Nurmi H (1997) Soft degrees of consensus under additive preferences and fuzzy majorities. Consensus Under Fuzziness. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  28. Kacprzyk J, Zadrozny S, Ras ZW (2010) How to support consensus reaching using action rules: a novel approach. Int J Uncertain 18:451–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ogryczak W, Śliwiński T (2003) On solving linear programs with the ordered weighted averaging objective. Eur J Oper Res 148(1):80–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Palomares I, Estrella FJ, Martínez L, Herrera F (2014a) Consensus under a fuzzy context: taxonomy, analysis framework AFRYCA and experimental case of study. Inf Fus 20:252–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Palomares I, Martínez L, Herrera F (2014b) A consensus model to detect and manage noncooperative behaviors in large-scale group decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22:516–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pelta DA, Yager RR (2010) Decision strategies in mediated multiagent negotiations: an optimization approach. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 40:635–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Quesada FJ, Palomares I, Martínez L (2014) Managing experts behaviors in large-scale consensus reaching process with uninorm aggregation operators. Appl Soft Comput 35:873–887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tan X, Gong ZW, Chiclana F, Zhang N (2018) Consensus modeling with cost chance constraint under uncertainty opinions. Appl Soft Comput 67:721–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yager RR (2001) Penalizing strategic preference manipulation in multi-agent decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 9:393–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yager RR (2002) Defending against strategic manipulation in uninorm-based multi-agent decision making. Eur J Oper Res 141:217–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhang GQ, Dong YC, Xu YF, Li HY (2011) Minimum-cost consensus models under aggregation operators. IEEE Trans Syst Man Part A Syst Hum 41(6):1253–1261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang N, Gong Z, Chiclana F (2017) Minimum cost consensus models based on random opinions. Expert Syst Appl 89:149–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang BW, Dong YC, Herrera-Viedma E (2019a) Group decision making with heterogeneous preference structures: an automatic mechanism to support consensus reaching. Group Decis Negot 28:585–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhang HH, Gang K, Yi P (2019b) Soft consensus cost models for group decision making and economic interpretations. Eur J Oper Res 277(3):964–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhang HJ, Dong YC, Chiclana F, Yu S (2019c) Consensus efficiency in group decision making: a comprehensive comparative study and its optimal design. Eur J Oper Res 275:580–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Weijun Xu
    • 1
  • Xin Chen
    • 1
  • Yucheng Dong
    • 2
    Email author
  • Francisco Chiclana
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Business AdministrationSouth China University of TechnologyGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.Business School, Sichuan UniversityChengduChina
  3. 3.Institute of Artificial Intelligence, School of Computer Science and InformaticsDe Montfort UniversityLeicesterUK
  4. 4.Andalusian Research Institute in Data Science and Computational IntelligenceUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain

Personalised recommendations