Advertisement

Group Decision Making with Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Multiplicative Linguistic Preference Relations

  • Jie Tang
  • Fanyong MengEmail author
  • Francisco Javier Cabrerizo
  • Enrique Herrera-Viedma
Article
  • 40 Downloads

Abstract

To express the asymmetrically uncertain preferred and non-preferred qualitative judgments of decision makers, this paper introduces interval-valued intuitionistic multiplicative linguistic variables (IVIMLVs). To show their application in decision making, a ranking method is first offered. Then, we introduce IVIMLVs for preference relations and propose interval-valued intuitionistic multiplicative linguistic preference relations (IVIMLPRs). To obtain the ranking reasonably, a consistency definition for IVIMLPRs is presented. A mathematical optimization model for judging the consistency of IVIMLPRs based on the new concept is constructed. To address two general cases: incompleteness and inconsistency, mathematical optimization models for ascertaining unknown values in incomplete IVIMLPRs and deriving completely consistent IVIMLPRs from inconsistent ones are built, respectively. For group decision making, a consensus index is defined to measure the consensus achieved among the decision makers’ preferences. If the consensus is not enough, a mathematical optimization model for improving the consensus level is established. Furthermore, a linear optimization model for determining the weights of the decision makers based on the consensus analysis is constructed. Finally, a group decision-making method with IVIMLPRs based on consistency and consensus analysis is offered, and its application on selecting supply chain cooperative partners is offered.

Keywords

Group decision making IVIMLPR Consistency Consensus Mathematical optimization model 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by the Grant from the FEDER funds provided by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (No. TIN2016-75850-R), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71571192), the Beijing Intelligent Logistics System Collaborative Innovation Center (No. 2019KF-09), and the Innovation-Driven Project of Central South University (No. 2018CX039).

References

  1. An QX, Meng FY, Xiong BB (2018) Interval cross efficiency for fully ranking decision making units using DEA/AHP approach. Ann Oper Res 271:297–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atanassov KT (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20:87–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atanassov KT, Gargov G (1989) Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 31:343–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cabrerizo FJ, Chiclana F, Al-Hmouz R, Morfeq A, Balamash AS, Herrera-Viedma E (2015) Fuzzy decision making and consensus: challenges. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 29:1109–1118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cabrerizo FJ, Al-Hmouz R, Morfeq A, Balamash AS, Martínez MA, Herrera-Viedma E (2017) Soft consensus measures in group decision making using unbalanced fuzzy linguistic information. Soft Comput 21:3037–3050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Capuano N, Chiclana F, Fujita H, Herrera-Viedma E, Loia V (2018) Fuzzy group decision making with incomplete information guided by social influence. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 26:1704–1718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen SM, Lee LW (2012) Autocratic decision making using group recommendations based on the ILLOWA operator and likelihood-based comparison relations. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 45:1115–1129Google Scholar
  8. Chen HY, Zhou LG, Han B (2011) On compatibility of uncertain additive linguistic preference relations and its application in the group decision making. Knowl Based Syst 24:816–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E, Alonso S, Herrera F (2009) Cardinal consistency of reciprocal preference relations: a characterization of multiplicative transitivity. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 17:14–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. del Moral MJ, Chiclana F, Tapia JM, Herrera-Viedma E (2018) A comparative study on consensus measures in group decision making. Int J Intell Syst 33:1624–1638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dong YC, Xu YF, Li H (2008) On consistency measures of linguistic preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 189:430–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dong QX, Zhou X, Martínez L (2019) A hybrid group decision making framework for achieving agreed solutions based on stable opinions. Inf Sci 490:227–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gong ZW, Li LS, Zhou FX, Yao TX (2009) Goal programming approaches to obtain the priority vectors from the intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Comput Ind Eng 57:1187–1193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gong ZW, Li LS, Forrest J, Zhao Y (2011) The optimal priority models of the intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation and their application in selecting industries with higher meteorological sensitivity. Expert Syst Appl 38:4394–4402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gong ZW, Zhang N, Chiclana F (2018) The optimization ordering model for intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations with utility functions. Knowl Based Syst 162:174–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Herrera F, Martínez L (2000) A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 8:746–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Herrera-Viedma E, Cabrerizo FJ, Kacprzyk J, Pedrycz W (2014) A review of soft consensus models in a fuzzy environment. Inf Fusion 17:4–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jin FF, Ni ZW, Chen HY, Li YP (2016a) Approaches to group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations based on multiplicative consistency. Knowl Based Syst 97:48–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jin FF, Ni ZW, Chen HY, Li YP (2016b) Approaches to decision making with linguistic preference relations based on additive consistency. Appl Soft Comput 49:71–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jin FF, Ni ZW, Pei LD, Chen HY et al (2019) A decision support model for group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy linguistic preferences relations. Neural Comput Appl 31:1103–1124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liao HC, Xu ZS (2014) Priorities of intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation based on multiplicative consistency. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22:1669–1681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu W, Dong YC, Chiclana F, Cabrerizo FJ, Herrera-Viedma E (2017) Group decision-making based on heterogeneous preference relations with self-confidence. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 16:429–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu X, Xu YJ, Herrera F (2019a) Consensus model for large-scale group decision making based on fuzzy preference relation with self-confidence: detecting and managing overconfidence behaviors. Inf Fusion 52:245–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu HB, Ma Y, Jiang L (2019b) Managing incomplete preferences and consistency improvement in hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations with applications in group decision making. Inf Fusion 51:19–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liu JP, Song JM, Xu Q, Tao ZF, Chen HY (2019c) Group decision making based on DEA cross-efficiency with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 18:345–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liu YT, Zhang HJ, Wu YZ, Dong YC (2019d) Ranking range based approach to MADM under incomplete context and its application in venture investment evaluation. Technol Econ Dev Econ.  https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2019.10296 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Meng FY, Chen XH (2018) A robust additive consistency-based method for decision making with triangular fuzzy reciprocal preference relations. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 17:49–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Meng FY, Tan CQ (2017) A new consistency concept for interval multiplicative preference relations. Appl Soft Comput 52:262–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Meng FY, An QX, Chen XH (2016) A consistency and consensus-based method to group decision making with interval linguistic preference relations. J Oper Res Soc 67:1419–1437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meng FY, Tan CQ, Chen XH (2017) Multiplicative consistency analysis for interval reciprocal preference relations: a comparative study. Omega 68:17–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Meng FY, Tang J, An QX, Chen XH (2019a) Decision making with intuitionistic linguistic preference relations. Int Trans Oper Res 26:2004–2031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Meng FY, Tang J, Xu ZS (2019b) Exploiting the priority weights from interval linguistic preference relations. Soft Comput 23:583–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Perez IJ, Cabrerizo FJ, Alonso S, Herrera-Viedma E (2014) A new consensus model for group decision making problems with non-homogeneous experts. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 44:4494–4498Google Scholar
  34. Rodríguez RM, Martínez L, Herrera F (2012) Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 20:109–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Saaty TL, Vargas LG (1987) Uncertainty and rank order in the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 32:107–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sahu M, Gupta A (2018) Incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relation. J Stat Manag Syst 21:1459–1479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Szmidt E, Kacprzyk J (1988) Group decision making under intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. In: Proceedings of the 7th conference on IPMU knowledge-based systems, Paris, pp 172–178Google Scholar
  39. Tang J, Meng FY (2018) Ranking objects from group decision making with interval-valued hesitant fuzzy preference relations in view of additive consistency and consensus. Knowl Based Syst 162:46–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tang J, Meng FY (2019) Decision making with multiplicative hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations. Neural Comput Appl 31:2749–2761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tang J, Chen SM, Meng FY (2019) Group decision making with multiplicative interval linguistic hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Inf Sci 495:215–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tanino T (1984) Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making. Fuzzy Sets Syst 12:117–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tapia García JM, del Moral MJ, Martinez MA, Herrera-Viedma E (2012) A consensus model for group decision making problems with linguistic interval fuzzy preference relations. Expert Syst Appl 39:10022–10030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ureña MR, Chiclana F, Morente-Molinera JA, Herrera-Viedma E (2015a) Managing incomplete preference relations in decision making: a review and future trends. Inf Sci 302:14–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ureña MR, Chiclana F, Fujita H, Herrera-Viedma E (2015b) Confidence-consistency driven group decision making approach with incomplete reciprocal intuitionistic preference relations. Knowl Based Syst 89:86–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. van Laarhoven PJM, Pedrycz W (1983) A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst 11:229–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wang H, Xu ZS (2015) Some consistency measures of extended hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations. Inf Sci 297:316–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wu ZB, Xu JP (2016a) Managing consistency and consensus in group decision making with hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations. Omega 65:28–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wu ZB, Xu JP (2016b) Possibility distribution based approach for MAGDM with hesitant fuzzy linguistic information. IEEE Trans Cybern 46:694–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wu J, Chang JL, Cao QW, Liang CY (2019a) A trust propagation and collaborative filtering based method for incomplete information in social network group decision making with type-2 linguistic trust. Comput Ind Eng 127:853–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wu J, Li X, Chiclana F (2019b) An attitudinal trust recommendation mechanism to balance consensus and harmony in group decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2019.2895564 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wu J, Sun Q, Fujita H (2019c) An attitudinal consensus degree to control feedback mechanism in group decision making with different adjustment cost. Knowl Based Syst 164:265–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wu ZB, Yang XY, Tu JC, Chen X (2019d) Optimal consistency and consensus models for interval additive preference relations: a discrete distribution perspective. J Oper Res Soc.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2019.1621219 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Xu ZS (2004a) EOWA and EOWG operators for aggregating linguistic labels based on linguistic preference relations. Int J Uncertain Fuzz Knowl Based Syst 12:791–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Xu ZS (2004b) Uncertain linguistic aggregation operators based approach to multiple attribute group decision making under uncertain linguistic environment. Inf Sci 168:171–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Xu ZS (2005) Deviation measures of linguistic preference relations in group decision making. Omega 33:249–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Xu ZS (2006) An approach based on the uncertain LOWG and induced uncertain LOWG operators to group decision making with uncertain multiplicative linguistic preference relations. Decis Support Syst 41:488–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Xu ZS (2007) Approaches to multiple attribute decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference information. Syst Eng Theory Pract 27:62–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Xu ZS (2011) An approach to group decision making based on incomplete linguistic preference relations. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 4:631–634Google Scholar
  60. Xu JP, Wu ZB (2013) A maximizing consensus approach for alternative selection based on uncertain linguistic preference relations. Comput Ind Eng 64:999–1008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yang Y, Wang XX, Xu ZS (2019) The multiplicative consistency threshold of intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation. Inf Sci 477:349–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zadeh LA (1975) The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning—part I. Inf Sci 8:199–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhang ZM, Pedrycz W (2018) Goal programming approaches to managing consistency and consensus for intuitionistic multiplicative preference relations in group decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 26:3261–3275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zhang ZM, Pedrycz W (2019) A consistency and consensus-based goal programming method for group decision-making with interval-valued intuitionistic multiplicative preference relations. IEEE Trans Cybern 49:3640–3654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zhang ZM, Wang C (2014) On the use of multiplicative consistency in hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations. Knowl Based Syst 72:13–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zhang HJ, Dong YC, Herrera-Viedma E (2018a) Consensus building for the heterogeneous large-scale GDM with the individual concerns and satisfactions. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 26:884–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zhang BW, Liang HM, Gao Y, Zhang GQ (2018b) The optimization-based aggregation and consensus with minimum-cost in group decision making under incomplete linguistic distribution context. Knowl Based Syst 162:92–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zhou LG, Chen HY (2013) On compatibility of uncertain additive linguistic preference relations based on the linguistic COWA operator. Appl Soft Comput 13:3668–3682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zhou LG, He YD, Chen HY, Liu JP (2014) On compatibility of uncertain multiplicative linguistic preference relations based on the linguistic COWGA. Appl Intell 40:229–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zhu B, Xu ZS (2014) Consistency measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22:35–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jie Tang
    • 1
  • Fanyong Meng
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Francisco Javier Cabrerizo
    • 3
  • Enrique Herrera-Viedma
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.School of BusinessCentral South UniversityChangshaChina
  2. 2.School of Management Science and EngineeringNanjing University of Information Science and TechnologyNanjingChina
  3. 3.Department of Computer Science and Artificial IntelligenceUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain
  4. 4.Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringKing Abdulaziz UniversityJeddahSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations