Group Decision and Negotiation

, Volume 26, Issue 6, pp 1209–1230 | Cite as

Understanding Conflicting Interests of a Government and a Tobacco Manufacturer: A Game-Theoretic Approach

  • Md. Tanveer Ahmed
  • Jun Zhuang
  • Changhyun Kwon


Rice is the staple food of nearly half of the population of the world, most of whom live in developing countries. Ensuring a domestic supply of rice from outside sources is difficult for developing countries as less than 5% of the total world’s production is available for international trade. Hence, in order to ensure domestic food security, e.g., food availability and access, governments provide subsidies in agriculture. In many occasions, public money used for the subsidy goes toward promoting undesirable crops like tobacco. Although the strategic interaction between governments and manufacturers is critical, it has not been studied in the literature. This study fills this gap by considering a game between a government (of a developing country) and a tobacco manufacturer in which the government decides on a mix of subsidies and the tobacco manufacturer decides on declaring a purchasing price of tobacco. We provide a numerical study to show that controlling the output harvest price is more effective in reaching the desired end result for both the government and the tobacco manufacturer. A subsidy in fertilizer results in the measurable increase in the government spending but does not have significant effect in reaching the production target. The fertilizer subsidy should be provided only when the output price is too high to be affordable for the population.


Farming Subsidy Food security Rice Tobacco Nash equilibrium 


  1. Abboushi S (2007) Agriculture subsidies: What are they and who receives them? Compet Forum 5(1):58–65Google Scholar
  2. Baron D (2001) Theories of strategic nonmarket participation: majority-rule and executive institutions. J Econ Manag Strat 10(1):47–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. BBC News India (2011) India cabinet approves cheap food bill for poor., online. Accessed 9 March 2012
  4. Browder F (1968) The fixed point theory of multi-valued mappings in topological vector spaces. Math Ann 177(4):283–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chambers RG, Quiggin I (2005) Output price subsidies in a stochastic world. Am J Agric Econ 87(2):501–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dexter PB (1998) Rice fortification for developing countries, Online. Accessed 13 April 2011
  7. Edwards C (2009) Agricultural subsidies. CATO Institute, online. Accessed 16 Feb 2010
  8. Fertilizer International Blog (2011) The food crisis is back on the agenda, Online. Accessed 3 April 2011
  9. Food and Agriculture Organization (2010) The state of food insecurity in the world addressing food insecurity in protracted crises., online. Accessed 9 March 2012
  10. Fukuda H, Dyck J, Stout J (2003) Rice sector policies in Japan. US Dept. of Agriculture, Economic Research Service (RCS-0303-01), online. Accessed 9 March 2012
  11. Grossman G, Helpman E (1992) Protection for sale. Tech. rep, National Bureau of Economic ResearchGoogle Scholar
  12. Gulati A, Sharma A (1995) Subsidy syndrome in Indian agriculture. Econ Political Weekly 30(39):A93–A102Google Scholar
  13. Harker PT, Pang JS (1990) Finite-dimensional variational inequality and nonlinear complementarity problems: a survey of theory, algorithms and applications. Math Program 48(1):161–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hillman A (1989) Political economy of protection, vol 32. Routledge, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  15. Hossain M, Naher F, Shahabuddin Q (2005) Food security and nutrition in Bangladesh: progress and determinants. Electron J Agric Dev Econ 2(2):103–132Google Scholar
  16. Jofre A, Rockafellar R, Wets RJB (2005) A variational inequality scheme for determining an economic equilibrium classical or extended type. In: Giannessi F, Maugeri A (eds) Variational analysis and applications, nonconvex optimization and its applications, vol 79. Springer, New York, pp 553–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Juliano BO (1993) Rice in human nutrition. No. 26 in FAO food and nutrition series. No. 26, Collaboration of the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome.
  18. Kafiluddin A, Islam M (2008) Fertilizer distribution, subsidy, marketing, promotion and agronomic use efficiency scenario in Bangladesh. In: IFA crossroads Asia-Pacific 2008 conference, the international fertilizer industry association, Melbourne, Australia.
  19. Knuth L, Vidar M (2011) Constitutional and legal protection of the right to food around the World. Right to Food Studies, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
  20. Lien G, Hardaker J (2001) Whole-farm planning under uncertainty: impacts of subsidy scheme and utility function on portfolio choice in Norwegian agriculture. Eur Rev Agric Econ 28(1):17–36. doi: 10.1093/erae/28.1.17 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Otañez M (2008) Social disruption caused by tobacco growing. Tech. rep., Study Group on Economically Sustainable Alternatives to Tobacco Growing - WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.
  22. Rahman M, Khan S (2005) Food security in Bangladesh: food availability. In: Food security in Bangladesh, Ministry of Food and Disaster Management and World Food Programme, Dhaka, Bangladesh, pp 7–16.
  23. Saloojee Y, Dagli E (2000) Tobacco industry tactics for resisting public policy on health. Bull World Health Org 78(7):902–910Google Scholar
  24. Stigler G (1971) The theory of economic regulation. Bell J Econ Manag Sci 2(1):3–21Google Scholar
  25. The Daily Star (2010) Govt to cut prices of non-urea fertilisers, Online. Accessed 9 March 2012
  26. The Daily Star (2011) Govt on food alert, Online. Accessed 9 March 2012
  27. United Nations General Assembly (2000) United Nations Millennium Declaration. Fifty-fifth session Agenda 60 (b) (A/RES/55/2), online. Accessed 9 March 2012
  28. van Liemt G (2002) The world tobacco industry: trends and prospects. International Labour Office Geneva, online. Accessed 13 April 2011
  29. Von Braun J, De Haen H (1983) The effects of food price and subsidy policies on Egyptian agriculture, vol 42. International Food Policy Research Institute, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  30. Wiggins S, Brooks J (2012) The use of input subsidies in low-income Countries, 5th edn. OECD Publishing, Paris, pp 169–191Google Scholar
  31. Wise TA (2004) The paradox of agricultural subsidies: measurement issues, agricultural dumping, and policy reform, online. Accessed 11 March 2012
  32. World Health Organization (2011) Food security, Online. Accessed 9 March 2012
  33. World Wildlife Fund (2011) Environmental impacts of production: deforestation, Online. Accessed 13 April 2011
  34. Yusuf M (2009) The evils of agriculture subsidy. Compet Forum 7(2):427–439Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Md. Tanveer Ahmed
    • 1
  • Jun Zhuang
    • 2
  • Changhyun Kwon
    • 3
  1. 1.Business AnalyticsDow AgroSciencesIndianapolisUSA
  2. 2.Department of Industrial and Systems EngineeringUniversity at BuffaloBuffaloUSA
  3. 3.Department of Industrial and Management Systems EngineeringUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA

Personalised recommendations