Group Decision and Negotiation

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 451–475 | Cite as

Dynamics of Group Knowledge Production in Facilitated Modelling Workshops: An Exploratory Study

Article

Abstract

The term ‘facilitated modelling’ is used in the literature to characterise an approach to structuring problems, developing options and evaluating decisions by groups working in a model-supported workshop environment, and assisted by a facilitator. The approach involves an interactive process by which models are jointly developed with group members interacting face-to-face, with or without computer support. The models produced are used to inform negotiations about the nature of the issues faced by the group, and how to address them. While the facilitated modelling literature is impressive, published empirical research rarely examines what actually happens in a facilitated modelling environment. The present study addresses this gap by reporting on exploratory empirical research undertaken to closely examine the conduct of facilitated modelling within its actual context of immediate use, namely, the workshop. Drawing on the knowledge-perspective of group communication, we conducted a micro-level analysis of a transcript of a facilitated modelling workshop held with the management team of an Alternative Food Network in the UK. Our analysis suggests that facilitated modelling interactions can take the form of three distinct group knowledge production patterns: generative, collaborative and assertive. Further, each pattern is characterised by a particular mix of communicative behaviours and model-supported interactions that has implications for the creation of new knowledge within the workshop. Our findings contribute to increasing our understanding of the nature of facilitated modelling within its context of use.

Keywords

Facilitated modelling Workshops Knowledge production  Group negotiation Micro-level analysis 

References

  1. Ackermann F (1996) Participant’s perceptions on the role of facilitators using group decision support systems. Group Decis Negot 5(1):93–112Google Scholar
  2. Ackermann F, Andersen DF, Eden C, Richardson GP (2011) Scriptsmap: a tool for designing multi-method policy-making workshops. OMEGA Int J Manag Sci 39(4):427–434Google Scholar
  3. Ackermann F, Eden C (1994) Issues in computer and non-computer supported GDSSs. Decis Support Syst 12(4–5):381–390Google Scholar
  4. Ackermann F, Eden C (2001) Contrasting single user and networked group decision support systems for strategy making. Group Decis Negot 10(1):47–66Google Scholar
  5. Ackermann F, Eden C (2005) Using causal mapping with group support systems to elicit an understanding of failure in complex projects: some implications for organizational research. Group Decis Negot 14(5):355–376Google Scholar
  6. Ackermann F, Eden C (2010) Strategic options development and analysis. In: Reynolds M, Holwell S (eds) Systems approaches to managing change: a practical guide. Springer, London, pp 135–190Google Scholar
  7. Ackermann F, Eden C (2011a) Making strategy: mapping out strategic success, 2nd edn. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Ackermann F, Eden C (2011b) Negotiation in strategy making teams: group support systems and the process of cognitive change. Group Decis Negot 20(3):293–314Google Scholar
  9. Ackermann F, Franco LA, Gallupe B, Parent M (2005) Group support systems for multi-organizational collaboration: reflections on process and content. Group Decis Negot 14(4):307–331Google Scholar
  10. Andersen SM, Chen S (2002) The relational self: an interpersonal social-cognitive theory. Psychol Rev 109:619–645Google Scholar
  11. Azadeh A, Darivandi K, Fathi E (2012) Diagnosing, simulating and improving business process using cybernetic laws and the viable system model: the case of a purchasing process. Syst Res Behav Sci 29(1):66–86Google Scholar
  12. Bana e Costa C, Lourenço J, Oliveira M, Bana e Costa J (2013) A socio-technical approach for group decision support in public strategic planning: the Pernambuco PPA case. Group Decis Negot 23:1–25Google Scholar
  13. Barrett FJ (1999) Knowledge creating as dialogic accomplishment: a constructionist perspective. In: Montuori A, Purser RE (eds) Social creativity, vol 1. Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJ, pp 133–151Google Scholar
  14. Bartunek JM (1988) The dynamics of personal and organizational reframing. In: Quinn RE, Cameron KS (eds) Paradox and transformation. Ballinger, Cambridge, MA, pp 137–162Google Scholar
  15. Bateson G (1972) Steps to an ecology of mind. Jason Aronson, Northvale, NJGoogle Scholar
  16. Bechky BA (2003) Sharing meaning across occupational communities: the transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organ Sci 14(3):312–330Google Scholar
  17. Beer S (1979) The heart of enterprise. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  18. Beer S (1981) Brain of the firm. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  19. Beer S (1984) The viable system model: its provenance, development, methodology and pathology. J Oper Res Soc 35(1):7–25Google Scholar
  20. Beer S (1985a) Designing the system for organizations. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  21. Beer S (1985b) Diagnosing the system. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  22. Benner P (1994) The role of articulation in understanding practice and experience as sources of knowledge in clinical nursing. In: Tully J, Weinstock DM (eds) Philosophy in an age of pluralism: the Philosophy of Charles Taylor in question. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 136–156Google Scholar
  23. Bohm D (1996) On dialogue. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Cronin K, Midgley G, Jackson L (2014) Issues mapping: a problem structuring method for addressing science and technology conflicts. Eur J Oper Res 233(1):145–158Google Scholar
  25. Cross SE, Morris MAL, Gore JS (2002) Thinking about oneself and others: the relational-interdependent self-construal and social cognition. J Personal Soc Psychol 82(3):399–418Google Scholar
  26. Cushman M, Rosenhead J (2004) Planning in the face of politics: reshaping children’s health services in inner London. In: Sainfort F, Brandeau M, Pierskalla W (eds) Handbook of OR/MS applications in health care. Kluwer, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  27. Darling T, Mumpower J, Rohrbaugh J, Vari A (1999) Negotiation support for multi-party resource allocation: developing recommendation for decreasing transportation-related air pollution in Budapest. Group Decis Negot 8(1):51–75Google Scholar
  28. De Vreede GJ, Briggs RO, Kolfschoten GL (2006) ThinkLets: a pattern language for facilitated and practitioner-guided collaboration processes. Int J Comput Appl Technol 25(2/3):140–154Google Scholar
  29. Eden C (1990) The unfolding nature of group decision support: two dimensions of skill. In: Eden C, Radford J (eds) Tackling strategic problems: the role of group decision support. Sage, London, pp 48–52Google Scholar
  30. Eden C (1992) A framework for thinking about group decision support systems. Group Decis Negot 1:199–218Google Scholar
  31. Eden C (1995) On evaluating the performance of “wide-band” GDSS’s. Eur J Oper Res 81(2):302–311Google Scholar
  32. Eden C, Ackermann F (2001) SODA: the principles. In: Rosenhead J, Mingers J (eds) Rational analysis for a problematic world revisited: problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict. Wiley, Chichester, pp 21–41Google Scholar
  33. Eden C, Ackermann F (2013) ‘Joined-up’ policy-making: group decision and negotiation practice. Group Decis Negot October:1–17Google Scholar
  34. Eden C, Sims D (1979) On the nature of problems in consulting practice. OMEGA Int J Manag Sci 7(2):119–127Google Scholar
  35. Edmondson AC (2002) The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: a group-level perspective. Organ Sci 13(2):128–146Google Scholar
  36. Espinosa A, Harnden R, Walker J (2008) A complexity approach to sustainability—Stafford Beer revisited. Eur J Oper Res 187(2):636–651Google Scholar
  37. Espinosa A, Jackson MC (2002) A systemic look at educational development programs: two perspectives on a recent Colombian experience. Kybernetes 31(9/10):1324–1335Google Scholar
  38. Espinosa A, Walker J (2011) A complexity approach to sustainability: theory and application. Imperial College Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  39. Espinosa A, Walker J (2013) Managing Complexity in practice: a viable system model intervention in an Irish eco-community. Eur J Oper Res 225(1):118–129Google Scholar
  40. Franco LA (2006) Forms of conversation and problem structuring methods: a conceptual development. J Oper Res Soc 57(7):813–821Google Scholar
  41. Franco LA (2008) Facilitating collaboration with problem structuring methods: a case of an inter-organisational construction partnership. Group Decis Negot 17(4):267–286Google Scholar
  42. Franco LA (2013) Rethinking soft OR interventions: models as boundary objects. Eur J Oper Res 231(3):720–733Google Scholar
  43. Franco LA, Montibeller G (2010) Facilitated modelling in operational research (invited review). Eur J Oper Res 205(3):489–500Google Scholar
  44. Franco LA, Montibeller G (2011) ’On-the-Spot’ modelling and analysis: the facilitated modelling approach. In: Cochran JJ, Cox LA Jr, Keskinocak P, Kharoufeh JP, Smith JC (eds) Wiley encyclopedia of operations research and management science. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. Franco LA, Rouwette EAJA (2011) Decision development in facilitated modelling workshops. Eur J Oper Res 212(1):164–178Google Scholar
  46. Friend J (2001) The strategic choice approach. In: Rosenhead J, Mingers J (eds) Rational analysis for a problematic world revisited: problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict. Wiley, Chichester, pp 115–149Google Scholar
  47. Friend J, Hickling A (2005) Planning under pressure: the strategic choice approach, 3rd edn. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  48. Garfinkel H (1967) Studies in ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  49. Gratton L, Ghoshal S (2002) Improving the quality of conversations. Organ Dyn 31(3):209–223Google Scholar
  50. Hampton JA (1997) Emergent attributes in combined concepts. In: Ward TN, Smith SM, Vaid J (eds) Creative thought. American Psychological Association, Washington DC, pp 83–110Google Scholar
  51. Hargadon AB (2003) How breakthroughs happen. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  52. Hargadon AB, Sutton RI (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Adm Sci Q 42:716–749Google Scholar
  53. Harnden R (1989) Outside and then: an interpretive approach to the VSM. In: Espejo R, Harnden R (eds) The viable system model. Wiley, Chichester, pp 383–404Google Scholar
  54. Heritage J (1984) Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Polity, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  55. Horlick-Jones T, Rosenhead J (2007) The uses of observation: combining problem structuring methods and ethnography. J Oper Res Soc 58(5):588–601Google Scholar
  56. Huxham C, Cropper S (1994) From many to one and back: an exploration of the components of facilitation. OMEGA 22(1):1–11Google Scholar
  57. Ilbery B, Maye D (2005) Food supply chains and sustainability: evidence from specialist food producers in the Scottish/English borders. Land Use Policy 22:331–344Google Scholar
  58. Isaacs W (1999) Dialogue and the art of thinking together. Currency, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  59. Jackson M (2000) Systems approaches to management. Kluwer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  60. Jarosz L (2000) Understanding agri-food networks as social relations. Agric Hum Values 17:279–283Google Scholar
  61. Jones P, Comfort D, Hillier D (2004) A case study of local food and its routes to market in the UK. Br Food J 106:328–335Google Scholar
  62. Keys P (2007a) Knowledge work, design science and problem structuring methodologies. Syst Res Behav Sci 24:523–535Google Scholar
  63. Keys P (2007b) Reducing the process lacuna in operational research by taking a knowledge work perspective. Syst Res Behav Sci 24:285–296Google Scholar
  64. King CA (2008) Community resilience and contemporary agri-ecological systems: reconnecting people and food, and people with people. Syst Res Behav Sci 25:11–224Google Scholar
  65. Kogler HH (1996) The power of dialogue. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  66. Kolfschoten G, Hengst-Bruggeling M, Vreede G-J (2007) Issues in the design of facilitated collaboration processes. Group Decis Negot 16(4):347–361Google Scholar
  67. Kolfschoten GL, Briggs RO, de Vreede GJ, Jacobs PHM, Appelman JH (2006) Conceptual foundation of the ThinkLet concept for collaboration engineering. Int J Hum Comput Stud 64(7):611–621Google Scholar
  68. Kolfschoten GL, Grünbacher P, Briggs RO (2011) Modifiers for quality assurance in group facilitation. Group Decis Negot 20:685–705Google Scholar
  69. Liu F, Maitlis S (2014) Emotional dynamics and strategizing processes: a study of strategic conversations in top team meetings. J Manag Stud 51(2):202–234Google Scholar
  70. Luckmann T (1990) Social communication, dialogue and conversation. In: Markova I, Foppa K (eds) The dynamics of dialogue. Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead, pp 45–61Google Scholar
  71. Marsden T, Banks J, Bristow G (2000) Food supply chain approaches: exploring their role in rural development. Sociologia Ruralis 40(4):424–438Google Scholar
  72. Mengis J, Eppler MJ (2008) Understanding and managing conversations from a knowledge perspective: an analysis of the roles and rules of face-to-face conversations in organizations. Organ Stud 29(10):1287–1313Google Scholar
  73. Merleau-Ponty M (1962) Phenomenology of perception [Translated by C. Smith]. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  74. Midgley G, Cavana R, Brocklesby J, Foote J, Ahuriri-Drscoll A, Wood D (2012) Towards a new framework for evaluating systemic problem structuring methods. Eur J Oper Res 229(1):143–154Google Scholar
  75. Milestad R, Bartel-Kratochvil R, Leitner H, Axmann P (2010) Being close: the quality of social relationships in a local organic cereal and bread network in Lower Austria. J Rural Stud 26:228–240Google Scholar
  76. Möllering G (2006) Trust: reason, routine, reflexivity. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  77. Morton A, Ackermann F, Belton V (2003) Technology-driven and model-driven approaches to group decision support: focus, research philosophy and key concepts. Eur J Inf Syst 12(2):110–126Google Scholar
  78. Murphy GL (1997) Polysemy and the creation of novel meanings. In: Ward TN, Smith SM, Vaid J (eds) Creative thought. American Psychological Association, Washington DC, pp 235–266Google Scholar
  79. Nonaka IG, Takeuchi H (1995) The knowledge-creating company. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  80. Nonaka IG, Toyama R, Byosiere P (2001) A theory of organizational knowledge creation: understanding the dynamic process of creating knowledge. In: Dierkes MD, Antal AB, Child J, Nonaka IG (eds) Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 491–517Google Scholar
  81. Phillips L (2007) Decision conferencing. In: Edwards W, Miles R Jr, von Winterfeldt D (eds) Advances in decision analysis: from foundations to applications. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 375–399Google Scholar
  82. Phillips L, Bana e Costa CA (2007) Transparent prioritisation, budgeting, and resource allocation with multi-criteria decision analysis and decision conferencing. Ann Oper Res 154(1):51–68Google Scholar
  83. Phillips L, Phillips M (1993) Facilitated Work groups: theory and practice. J Oper Res Soc 44(6):533–549Google Scholar
  84. Preece G, Shaw D, Hayashi H (2013) Using the Viable System Model (VSM) to structure information processing complexity in disaster response. Eur J Oper Res 224:209–218Google Scholar
  85. Rosenhead J, Mingers J (eds) (2001) Rational analysis for a problematic world revisited: problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  86. Rouwette EAJA (2011) Facilitated modelling in strategy development: measuring the impact on communication, consensus and commitment. J Oper Res Soc 62(5):879–887Google Scholar
  87. Rouwette EAJA, Bastings I, Blokker H (2011a) A comparison of group model building and strategic options development and analysis. Group Decis Negot 20(6):781–803Google Scholar
  88. Rouwette EAJA, Korzilius H, Vennix JAM, Jacobs E (2011b) Modeling as persuasion: the impact of group model building on attitudes and behavior. Syst Dyn Rev 27(1):1–21Google Scholar
  89. Rouwette EAJA, Vennix JAM (2009) Group model building. In: Meyers RE (ed) Encyclopedia of complexity and systems science. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 4474–4486Google Scholar
  90. Rouwette EAJA, Vennix JAM, Felling AJA (2009) On evaluating the performance of problem structuring methods: an attempt at formulating a conceptual model. Group Decis Negot 18(6):567–587Google Scholar
  91. Sage C (2003) Social embeddedness and relations of regard: alternative ‘good food’ networks in south-west Ireland. J Rural Stud 19:47–60Google Scholar
  92. Sawyer RK (2007) Group genius. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  93. Shaw D, Ackermann F, Eden C (2003) Approaches to sharing knowledge in group problem structuring. J Oper Res Soc 54(9):936–948Google Scholar
  94. Taket A (2002) Facilitation: some contributions to theorising the practice of operational research. J Oper Res Soc 53(2):126–136Google Scholar
  95. Thomas R, Sargent LD, Hardy C (2011) Managing organizational change: negotiating meaning and power-resistance relations. Organ Sci 22(1):22–41Google Scholar
  96. Tschang FT (2007) Balancing the tensions between rationalization and creativity in the video games industry. Organ Sci 18:989–1005Google Scholar
  97. Tsoukas H (2003) Do we really understand tacit knowledge? In: Easterby-Smith M, Lyles MA (eds) Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 410–427Google Scholar
  98. Tsoukas H (2009) A dialogical approach to the creation of new knowledge in organizations. Organ Sci 20(6):941–957Google Scholar
  99. Tsoukas H, Chia R (2002) On organizational becoming: rethinking organizational change. Organ Sci 13(5):567–582Google Scholar
  100. Vennix JAM (1995) Building consensus in strategic decision making. Insights from the process of group model building. Group Decis Negot 4:335–355Google Scholar
  101. Visser M (2007) System dynamics and group facilitation: contributions from communication theory. Syst Dyn Rev 23(4):453–463Google Scholar
  102. Walton DN (1998) The new dialectic: conversational contexts of argument. University of Toronto Press, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  103. Walton DN (2000) The place of dialogue theory in logic, computer science and communication studies. Synthese 123:327–346Google Scholar
  104. Walton DN (2006) Fundamentals of critical argumentation. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  105. White L (2009) Understanding problem structuring methods interventions. Eur J Oper Res 99(3):823–833Google Scholar
  106. Yankelovich D (1999) The magic of dialogue: turning conflict into cooperation. Simon and Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Food and Resources EconomicsUniversity of CopenhagenFrederiksberg CDenmark
  2. 2.School of Business and EconomicsLoughborough UniversityLeicestershire UK

Personalised recommendations