Group Decision and Negotiation

, Volume 22, Issue 5, pp 873–896

Individual Priming in Virtual Team Decision-Making

  • Valerie L. Bartelt
  • Alan R. Dennis
  • Lingyao Yuan
  • Jordan B. Barlow
Article

Abstract

Virtual teams have different interactions than face-to-face teams because they rely on information and communication technologies, which can impede or assist certain human cognitive processes. Past research has shown that although virtual teams exchange more information than face-to-face teams, poor decisions often result, because team members do not consider the unique information they receive from others. Drawing from cognitive psychology, our research explored a unique way to improve team decision-making through the use of cognitive priming. We proposed that priming group members to pay attention to others or to engage in counterfactual thinking would improve team members’ cognition and, therefore, team performance. Prior research with individuals and brainstorming teams has shown these forms of priming to improve performance; however, no research has attempted to use priming to improve the outcomes of virtual team decision-making, which requires deeper interaction and cognitive involvement than brainstorming. We performed two lab experiments using primes that have been found to improve the individual decision-making process. We found that priming had some impact, but it did not significantly improve decision quality. Various reasons are discussed to explain why priming techniques may not be as powerful in teams as in individuals, and future research ideas are suggested to build on our initial work on priming in virtual team decision-making.

Keywords

Priming Cognition Virtual teams Decision-making  Decision quality Team performance 

References

  1. Allchin D (1999) Negative results as positive knowledge, and zeroing in on significant problems. Mar Ecol 793 Prog Ser 191:303–305 http://www.int-res.com/articles/theme/m191p301.pdf.Google Scholar
  2. Antunes P, Ferreira A (2011) Developing collaboration awareness support from a cognitive perspective. In: Proceedings of the 44th annual hawaii international conference on system sciences, January 4–7, 2011, Computer Society Press, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  3. Ask K, Granhag PA (2005) Motivational sources of confirmation bias in criminal investigations: the need for cognitive closure. J Investig Psychol Offender Profiling 2(1):43–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bargh JA, Chartrand TL (2000) A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. In: Reis H, Judd C (eds) Handbook of research methods in social psychology. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 253–285Google Scholar
  5. Bargh JA, Gollwitzer PM, Lee-Chai A, Barndollar K, Trötschel R (2001) The automated will: nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. J Pers Soc Psychol 81(6):1014–1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baumann N, Kuhl J (2005) Positive affect and flexibility: overcoming the precedence of global over local processing of visual information. Motiv Emot 29(2):123–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bell BS, Kozlowski SWJ (2002) A typology of virtual teams: implications for effective leadership. Group Organ Manag 27(1):14–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blair IV, Banaji MR (1996) Automatic and controlled processes in stereotype priming. J Pers Soc Psychol 70(6):1142–1163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bradley MM, Lang PJ (1999) Affective norms for english words (ANEW): instruction manual and affective ratings. Technical Report C-1. The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of FloridaGoogle Scholar
  10. Briggs RO, de Vreede GJ, Nunamaker JF (2004) Collaboration engineering with thinklets to pursue sustained success with group support systems. J Manag Inf Syst 19(4):31–64Google Scholar
  11. Browman HI (1999) Negative results. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 191: 301–302. http://www.int-res.com/articles/theme/m191p301.pdf
  12. Burnham T, McCabe K, Smith VL (2000) Friend-or-foe intentionality priming in an extensive form trust game. J Econ Behav Organ 43(1):57–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Byrne RMJ, Girotto V (2009) Cognitive processes in counterfactual thinking. In: Markman KD, Klein WMP, Surh JA (eds) Handbook of imagination and mental simulation. Psychology Press, New York, pp 151–160Google Scholar
  14. Chalfoun P, Frasson C (2011) Subliminal cues while teaching: HCI technique for enhanced learning. Adv Hum-Comput Interact 2011:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chudoba KM, Wynn E, Lu M, Watson-Manheim MB (2005) How virtual are we? measuring virtuality and understanding its impact in a global organization. Inf Syst J 15(4):279–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cohen SG, Bailey DE (1997) What makes teams work: group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. J Manag 23(3):239–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Connolly T, Reb J (2003) Omission bias in vaccination decisions: where’s the ’omission’? Where’s the ’bias’? Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 91(2):186–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Connolly T, Zeelenberg M (2002) Regret in decision making. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 11(6):212–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Credé M, Sniezek JA (2003) Group judgment processes and outcomes in video-conferencing versus face-to-face groups. Int J Hum-Comput Stud 59(6):875–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Curseu PL, Schruijer S (2008) The effects of framing on inter-group negotiation. Group Decis Negot 17(4):347–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dean JW Jr, Sharfman MP (1993) Procedural rationality in the strategic decision making process. J Manag Stud 30(4):587–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dean JW Jr, Sharfman MP (1996) Does decision process matter? A study of strategic decision-making effectiveness. Acad Manag J 39(2):368–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. DeCoster J, Claypool HM (2004) A meta-analysis of priming effects on impression formation supporting a general model of information biases. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 8(1):2–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dennis AR (1996) Information exchange and use in group decision making: you can lead a group to information, but you can’t make it think. MIS Q 20(4):433–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dennis AR, Hilmer KM, Taylor NJ (1997–1998) Information exchange and use in GSS and verbal group decision making: effect of minority influence. J Manag Inf Syst 14(3):61–68Google Scholar
  26. Dennis AR, Minas RK, Bhagwatwar A (2012) Sparking creativity: improving electronic brainstorming with individual cognitive priming. In: Proceedings of the 45th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, January 4–7, 2012, Computer Society Press, pp 139–148Google Scholar
  27. Dennis AR, Wixom BH, Vandenberg RJ (2001) Understanding fit and appropriation effects in group support systems via meta-analysis. MIS Q 25(2):167–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dimoka A, Banker RD, Benbasat I, Davis FD, Dennis AR, Gefen D, Gupta A, Ischebeck A, Kenning P, Pavlou PA, Müller-Putz G, Riedl R, vom Brocke J, Weber B (2012) On the use of neurophysiological tools in information systems research: Developing a research agenda for NeuroIS. MIS Q, forthcomingGoogle Scholar
  29. Duncker K (1945) On problem solving. Psychological monographs. Am Psychol Assoc 58(5)Google Scholar
  30. Espinosa JA, Armour F, Boh WF (2011) The role of group cognition in enterprise architecting. Proceedings of the 44th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, January 4–7, 2011, Computer Society Press, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  31. Festinger L (1957) A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  32. Galinsky AD, Moskowitz GB (2000) Counterfactuals as behavioral primes: priming the simulation heuristic and consideration of alternatives. J Exp Soc Psychol 36(4):384–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gilbert DT, Morewedge CK, Risen JL, Wilson TD (2004) Looking forward to looking backward: the misprediction of regret. Assoc Psychol Sci 15(5):346–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Glass GV (1966) Testing homogeneity of variances. Am Educ Res J 3(3):187–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Graf P, Mandler G, Haden P (1982) Simulating amnesic symptoms in normal subjects. Science 218(4578):1243–1244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Graf P, Schacter DL (1985) Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic subjects. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 11(3):501–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Heninger WG, Dennis AR, Hilmer KM (2006) Individual cognition and dual-task interference in group support systems. Inf Syst Res 17(4):415–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Higgins ET, Chaires WM (1980) Accessibility of interrelational constructs: implications for stimulus encoding and creativity. J Exp Soc Psychol 16(4):348–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hilmer KM, Dennis AR (2001) Stimulating thinking in decision making: cultivating better decisions with groupware one individual at a time. J Manag Inf Syst 17(3):93–114Google Scholar
  40. Jacoby LL, Dallas M (1981) On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. J Exp Psychol Gen 110(3):306–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jonas E, Schulz-Hardt S, Frey D, Thelen N (2001) Confirmation bias in sequential information search after preliminary decisions:an expansion of dissonance theoretical research on selective exposure to information. J Pers Soc Psychol 80(4):557–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kahai SS, Carroll E, Jestice R (2007) Team collaboration in virtual worlds. SIGMIS Database 38(4):61–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kahneman D, Miller D (1986) Norm theory: comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychol Rev 93(2):136–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kay AC, Wheeler SC, Bargh JA, Ross L (2004) Material priming: the influence of mundane physical objects on situational construal and competitive behavioral choice. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 95(1):83–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kerr DS, Murthy US (2004) Divergent and convergent idea generation in teams: a comparison of computer-mediated and face-to-face communication. Group Decis Negot 13(4):381–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kersten GE, Cray D (1996) Perspectives on representation and analysis of negotiation: towards cognitive support systems. Group Decis Negot 5(4–6):433–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kolfschoten GL (2011) Cognitive load in collaboration—brainstorming. In: Proceedings of the 44th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, January 4–7, 2011, Computer Society Press, pp 1–9Google Scholar
  48. Kolfschoten GL, Lee C (2010) Self-guiding group support systems: can groups use GSS without support? In: Proceedings of the 43rd annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, January 5–8, 2010, Computer Society Press, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  49. Kolfschoten GL, Vreede G-J, Pietron LR (2011) A training approach for the transition of repeatable collaboration processes to practitioners. Group Decis Negot 20(3):347–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Koriat A, Feuerstein N (1976) The recovery of incidentally acquired information. Acta Psychol 40(6):463–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Larsen RJ, Ketelaar T (1991) Personality and susceptibility to positive and negative emotional states. J Pers Soc Psychol 61(1):132–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Martin A, Chao LL (2001) Semantic memory and the brain: structure and processes. Curr Opin Neurobiol 11(2):194–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Martz WB, Shepherd MM (2004) Group consensus: the impact of multiple dialogues. Group Decis Negot 13(4):315–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. McGrath JE (1991) Time, interaction, and performance (TIP): a theory of groups. Small Group Res 22(2):147–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Meyers-Levy J, Zhu R (2007) The influence of ceiling height: the effect of priming on the type of processing that people use. J Consum Res 34(2):174–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Montoya-Weiss MM, Massey AP, Song M (2001) Getting it together: temporal coordination and conflict management in global virtual teams. Acad Manag J 44(6):1251–1262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Nagasundaram M, Dennis AR (1993) When a group is not a group. Small Group Res 24(4):463–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. O’Leary D (2011) The emergence of individual knowledge in a group setting: mitigating cognitive fallacies. Group Decis Negot 20(1):3–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Otten S, Wentura D (1999) About the impact of automaticity in the minimal group paradigm: evidence from affective priming tasks. J Soc Psychol 29(8):1049–1071Google Scholar
  60. Pendry L, Carrick R (2001) Doing what the mob do: priming effects on conformity. Eur J Soc Psychol 31(1):83–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Petty RE, DeMarree KG, Briñol P, Horcajo J, Strathman AJ (2008) Need for cognition can magnify or attenuate priming effects in social judgment. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 34(7):900–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pichon I, Boccato G, Saroglou V (2007) Nonconscious influences of religion on prosociality: a priming study. Eur J Soc Psychol 37(5):1032–1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Powell CA (1994) Cognitive hurdles in the use of decision support systems to enhance problem understanding. Group Decis Negot 3(4):413–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Reb J (2008) Regret aversion and decision process quality: effects of regret salience on decision process carefulness. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 105(2):169–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Reb J, Connolly T (2009) Myopic regret avoidance: feedback avoidance and learning in repeated decision making. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 109(2):182–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Reinig B (2003) Toward an understanding of satisfaction with the process and outcomes of teamwork. J Manag Inf Syst 19(4):65–83Google Scholar
  67. Reinig B, Briggs RO, Shepherd MM, Yen J, Nunamaker JF, Jr (1995–1996) Affective reward and the adoption of group support systems: productivity is not always enough. J Manag Inf Syst 12(3):171–185Google Scholar
  68. Reinig B, Shin B (2002) The dynamic effects of group support systems on group meetings. J Manag Inf Syst 19(2):303–325Google Scholar
  69. Robert L, Dennis AR (2005) The paradox of richness: a cognitive model of media choice. IEEE Trans Prof Commun 48(1):10–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Robinson MD, Moeller SK, Ode S (2010) Extraversion and reward-related processing: incentive motivation in affective priming tasks. Emotion 10(5):615–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Santanen EL, Briggs RO, de Vreede GJ (2004) Causal relationships in creative problem solving: compaing faciliatation interventions for ideation. J Manag Inf Syst 20(4):167–197Google Scholar
  72. Schacter DL (1987) Implicit memory: history and current status. J Exp Psychol Mem Learn Cognit 13(3):501–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Schmidt JB, Montoya-Weiss MM, Massey AP (2001) New product development decision-making effectiveness: comparing individuals, face-to-face teams, and virtual teams. Decis Sci 32(4):575–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Shantz A, Latham GP (2009) An exploratory field experiment of the effect of subconscious and conscious goals on employee performance. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 109(1):9–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Shepherd MM, Briggs RO, Reinig BA, Yen J, Nunamaker JR (1995–1996) Invoking social comparison to improve electronic brainstorming: Beyond anonymity. J Manag Inf Syst 12(3): 155–170Google Scholar
  76. Simonson I (1992) The influence of anticipating regret and responsibility on purchase decisions. J Consum Res 19(1):105–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Srull TK, Wyer RS Jr (1979) The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: some determinants and implications. J Pers Soc Psychol 37(10):1660–1672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Stahl G (2006) Analyzing and designing the group cognition experience. Int J Co-op Inf Syst 15(2):157–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Stajkovic AD, Locke EA, Blair ES (2006) A first examination of the relationships between primed subconscious goals, assigned conscious goals, and task performance. J Appl Psychol 91(5):1172–1180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Stasser G (1992) Information salience and the discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: a thought experiment. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 52(1):156–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Steiner ID (1972) Group process and productivity. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  82. Strahan EJ, Spencer SJ, Zanna MP (2002) Subliminal priming and persuasion: striking while the iron is hot. J Exp Soc Psychol 38(6):556–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Taylor SE (1991) Asymmetric effects of positive and negative events: the mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Psychol Bull 110(1):67–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Tulving E, Schacter DL, Stark HA (1982) Priming effects in word-fragment completion are independent of recognition memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 8(4):336–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Webster DM, Richter L, Kruglanski AW (1996) On leaping to conclusions when feeling tired: mental fatigue effects on impressional primacy. J Exp Soc Psychol 32(2):181–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Whitworth B, Gallupe B, McQueen R (2000) A cognitive three-process model of computer-mediated group interaction. Group Decis Negot 9(5):431–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Woolley AW, Chabris CF, Pentland A, Hashmi N, Malone TW (2010) Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups, Science 330 (29 October):686–688Google Scholar
  88. Wong EM, Galinsky AD, Kray LJ (2009) The counterfactual mind-set: a decade of research. In: Markman KD, Klein WMP, Surh JA (eds) Handbook of imagination and mental simulation. Psychology Press, New York, pp 161–174Google Scholar
  89. Wroe AL, Turner N, Salkovskis PM (2004) Understanding and predicting parental decisions about early childhood immunizations. Health Psychol 23(1):33–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Zeelenberg M (1999) The use of crying over spilled milk: a note on the rationality and functionality of regret. Philos Psycol 12(3):325–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Zeelenberg M, Beattie J (1997) Consequences of regret aversion 2: additional evidence for effects of feedback on decision making. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 72(1):63–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Zeelenberg M, Beattie J, van der Pligt J, de Vries NK (1996) Consequences of regret aversion: effects of expected feedback on risky decision making. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 65(2):148–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Zeelenberg M, Pieters R (2007) A theory of regret regulation 1.0. J Consum Psychol 17(1):3–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Zeelenberg M, van Dijk WW, Manstead ASR, van der Pligt J (1998) The experience of regret and disappointment. Cognit Emot 12(2):221–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Valerie L. Bartelt
    • 1
  • Alan R. Dennis
    • 2
  • Lingyao Yuan
    • 2
  • Jordan B. Barlow
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Information Systems, College of Business AdministrationTexas A&M University-KingsvilleKingsvilleUSA
  2. 2.Operations and Decision Technologies Department, Kelley School of BusinessIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations