Group Decision and Negotiation

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 129–132 | Cite as

Research Developments of Group Decision and Negotiation in Latin America

  • Adiel Teixeira de Almeida
  • Ana Paula Cabral Seixas Costa
Article

References

  1. Ekel P, Queiroz J, Parreiras R, Palhares R (2008) Fuzzy set based models and methods of multicriteria group decision making. Nonlinear Anal Theory Methods Appl 71(12): 409–419Google Scholar
  2. Espin R, Fernandez E, Mazcorro G, Lecich MI (2007) A fuzzy approach to cooperative n-person games. Eur J Oper Res 176(3): 1735–1751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Krohling RA, Campanharo VC (2011) Fuzzy TOPSIS for group decision making: a case study for accidents with oil spill in the sea. Expert Syst Appl 38(4): 4190–4197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Leyva-Lopez JC, Fernandez-Gonzalez E (2003) A new method for group decision support based on ELECTRE III methodology. Eur J Oper Res 148(1): 14–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Medina S, Moreno J (2007) Risk evaluation in Colombian electricity market using fuzzy logic. Energy Econ 29(5): 999–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Metcalf LE, Bird A, Shankarmahesh M, Aycan Z, Larimo J, Valdelamar DD (2006) Cultural tendencies in negotiation: a comparison of Finland, India, Mexico, Turkey, and the United States. J World Bus 41(4): 382–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Morais DC, de Almeida AT (2007) Group decision-making for leakage management strategy of water distribution metwork. Resour Conserv Recycl 52(2): 441–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Morais DC, de Almeida AT (2010) Water network rehabilitation: a group decision-making approach. Water SA 36(4): 487–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Morais DC, deAlmeida AT (2012) Group decision making on water resources based on analysis of individual rankings. Omega 40: 42–45. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2011.03.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Munoz-Pina C, Guevara A, Torres JM, Brana J (2008) Paying for the hydrological services of Mexico’s forests: analysis, negotiations and results. Ecol Econ 65(4): 725–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Parreiras RO, Ekel PY, Martini JSC, Palhares RM (2010) A flexible consensus scheme for multicriteria group decision making under linguistic assessments. Inf Sci 180(7): 1075–1089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Romero D, Molina A (2009) VO breeding environments & virtual organizations integral business process management framework. Inf Syst Frontiers 11(5): 569–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Silva VBS, Morais DC, de Almeida AT (2010) A multicriteria group decision model to support watershed committees in Brazil. Water Resour Manag 24: 4075–4091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wainer J, Ferreira PR Jr, Constantino ER (2007) Scheduling meetings through multi-agent negotiations. Decis Support Syst 44(1): 285–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wester P, Vargas-Velazquez S, Mollard E, Silva-Ochoa P (2008) Negotiating surface water allocations to achieve a soft landing in the closed Lerma-Chapala basin, Mexico. Int J Water Resour Dev 24(2): 275–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Zamora LP, Burguete STG (2008) Second-order preferences in group decision making. Open Res Lett 36(1): 99–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adiel Teixeira de Almeida
    • 1
  • Ana Paula Cabral Seixas Costa
    • 1
  1. 1.Federal University of PernambucoRecifeBrazil

Personalised recommendations