Humour in Negotiations: A Pragmatic Analysis of Humour in Simulated Negotiations
- 859 Downloads
This research attempts to shed light on the possible ways which humour could be used to improve the negotiation process in conflictual settings. Negotiators were observed for their use of humour in simulated negotiation scenarios, and a relationship has been observed between humour and laughter, and the structure of the negotiations. The structural and functional implications of humour observed and discussed in this research illustrate the potential for humour in negotiation processes at large.
KeywordsHumour Negotiations Pragmatics Communication in conflict Argument formation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Attardo S (2001) Humorous texts: a semantic and pragmatic analysis. Mouton de Gruyter, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Clarke A (2010) The Faculty of Adaptability. Preview eBook. http://www.pyrrhichouse.co.uk. (last accessed on 1 March 2010)
- Forbes HD (1997) Ethnic conflict: commerce, culture, and the contact hypothesis. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
- Freud S (1905) Jokes and their relation to the unconscious. Pelican Books, VictoriaGoogle Scholar
- Hauck W, Thomas J (1972) The relationship of humor to intelligence, creativity, and intentional and incidental learning. J Exp Educ 40(4): 52–55Google Scholar
- Leung S (2004) Conflict talk: a discourse analytical perspective. Working Paper in TESOL & Applied Linguistics. 2:3, [Online] http://www.journals.tc-library.org/index.php/tesol/article/download/20/27 (last accessed on 1 March 2010)
- Mulder M, Nijholt A (2002) Humour research: state of the art. Technical Report from the Center for Telematics and Information Technology University of TwenteGoogle Scholar
- Pasupuleti S (2008) Emotional intelligence and its relation to humor styles. Int J Psychol 43(3–4): 414Google Scholar
- Raskin V (1985) Semantic mechanisms of humor. D. Reidel, BostonGoogle Scholar
- Shook C, Payne G, Voges K (2005) The ‘What’ in top management group conflict: the effects of organizational issue interpretation on conflict among hospital decision makers. J Manag Issues 17(2): 162–177Google Scholar