Group Decision and Negotiation

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 323–343 | Cite as

Emergent Leadership in Self-Managed Virtual Teams

A Longitudinal Study of Concentrated and Shared Leadership Behaviors


The issue of leadership in virtual teams is an increasingly important one for many modern organizations, because these teams – typically project-based with a finite lifespan and specific deliverables – are frequently self-managed, having no designated leader within the team (Yukl 1998). While such teams may have increased flexibility in setting goals and achieving them, the virtual context may hinder team members' abilities to coordinate activities and influence others (Manz and Sims 1993). Longitudinal data were collected over the course of a semester from virtual teams, comprised of students from three North American universities. Our results suggest that high performing self-managed virtual teams displayed significantly more leadership behaviors over time compared to their low performing counterparts. Specifically, these teams displayed significantly more concentrated leadership behavior focused on performance (i.e. “Producer” behavior) and shared leadership behavior focused on keeping track of group work (i.e. “Monitor” behavior) than the lower performing teams. Interestingly, these behaviors emerged strongly during the first half of the groups' lifespan, and stayed throughout the life of the groups, but steadily dissipated in strength over time.


leadership team performance longitudinal study virtual teams 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Avolio, B. J. (1999). Full Leadership Development: Building the Vital Forces in Organizations, Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  2. Avolio, B. J. and B. M. Bass. (1995). “Individual Consideration Viewed at Multiple Levels of Analysis: A Multi-level Framework for Examining the Diffusion of Transformational Leadership,” Leadership Quarterly 6, 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Avolio, B. J. and S. S. Kahai. (2003). “Adding the “E” to E-Leadership: How it May Impact Your Leadership,” Organizational Dynamics 31(4), 325–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Avolio, B. J., S. S. Kahai and G. E. Dodge. (2001). “E-Leadership — Implications for Theory, Research, and Practice,” Leadership Quarterly 11(4), 615–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Avolio, B., N. Sivasubramaniam, W. Murry, D. Jung, and J. Garger. (2003). “Assessing Shared Leadership: Development and Preliminary Validation of a Team Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire,” In Pearce, C. and Conger, J. (eds.), Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership, Sage Pulications: Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
  6. Balthazard, P., D. Waldman, J. Howell, and L. Atwater. (2004). “Shared Leadership and Group Interaction Styles in Problem-Solving Virtual Teams,” Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.Google Scholar
  7. Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. New York: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
  8. Barge, J. K. and R. Y. Hirokawa. (1989). “Toward a Communication Competency Model of Group Leadership,” Small Group Behavior 20(2), 167–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barry, D. (1991). “Managing the Bossless Team: Lessons in Distributed Leadership,” Organizational Dynamics 20(1), 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and Performance beyond Expectations. Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass and Stodgill's Handbook of Leadership. Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Bass, B. M., E. Valenzi, D. Farrow, and R. Solomon. (1975). “Management Styles Associated with Organizational, Task, Personal, and Interpersonal Contingencies,” Journal of Applied Psychology 60, 720–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bell, B. S. and S. W. J. Kozlowski. (2002). “A Typology of Virtual Teams: Implications for Effective Leadership,” Group & Organization Management 27(1), 14–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bormann, E. G. (1990). Small Group Communication: Theory and Practice. HarperCollins, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Brown, M. E. and D. A. Gioia. (2002). “Making Things Click: Distributive Leadership in an Online Division of an Offline Organization,” Leadership Quarterly 13(4), 397–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Cohen, S. G., G. E. Ledford, and G. M. Spreitzer. (1996). “A Predictive Model of Self-Managing Work Team Effectiveness,” Human Relations 49(5), 643–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cruz, M. G., D. D. Henningsen, and B. A. Smith. (1999). “The Impact of Directive Leadership on Group Information Sampling, Decisions, and Perceptions of the Leader,” Communication Research 26(3), 349–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Denison, D. R., R. Hooijberg, and R. E. Quinn. (1995). “Paradox and Performance: Toward a Theory of Behavioral Complexity in Managerial Leadership,” Organization Science 6(5), 524–540.Google Scholar
  20. Dennis, A., J., Valacich, T., Carte, M., Garfield, B., Haley, and J. Aronson. (1997). “The Effectiveness of Multiple Dialogs in Electronic Brainstorming,” Information Systems Research 8(2), 203–211.Google Scholar
  21. DeSanctis, G. (1988). “Small Group Research in Information Systems: Theory and Method,” Paper presented at the Harvard Colloquium on Experimental Research in Information Systems.Google Scholar
  22. Erez, A., J. Lepine, and H. Elms. (2002). “Effects of Rotated Leadership and Peer Evaluation on the Functioning and Effectiveness of Self-Managed Teams: A Quasi-Experiment,” Personnel Psychology 55, 932–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gersick, C. J. G. (1988). “Time and Transition in Work Teams: Toward a New Model of Group Development,” Academy of Management Journal 31(1), 9–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Goodman, P. S., R. Devadas, and T. L. Hughson. (1988). “Groups and Productivity: Analyzing the Effectiveness of Self-Managing Teams,” In Campbell, J. P. and Campbell, R. J. (eds.), Productivity in Organizations, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 295–325.Google Scholar
  25. Griffith, T. L., J. E. Sawyer, and M. A. Neale. (2003). “Virtualness and Knowledge in Teams: Managing the Love Triangle of Organizations, Individuals, and Information Technology,” MIS Quarterly 27(2), 265–287.Google Scholar
  26. Guzzo, R. A., P. R.Yost, R. J. Campbell, and G. P. Shea. (1993). “Potency in Groups: Articulating a Construct,” British Journal of Social Psychology 32, 87–106.Google Scholar
  27. Hooijberg, R., J. G. Hunt, and G. E. Dodge. (1997). “Leadership Complexity and Development of the Leaderplex Model,” Journal of Management 23(3), 375–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. House, R. J. and R. N. Aditya. (1997). “The Social Scientific Study of Leadership: Quo Vadis?” Journal of Management 23(3), 409–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Howell, J., P. Dorfman, and S. Kerr. (1986). “Moderator Variables in Leadership Research,” Academy of Management Review 11(1), 88–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hoyt, C. L. and J. Blascovich. (2003). “Transformational and Transactional Leadership in Virtual and Physical Environments,” Small Group Research 34(6), 678–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jarvenpaa, S. L. and D. E. Leidner. (1999). “Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams,” Organization Science 10(6), 791–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jung, D. I. (2001). “Transformational and Transactional Leadership and Their Effects on Creativity in Groups,” Creativity Research Journal 13, 185–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jung, D. I. and B. J. Avolio. (2000). “Opening the Black Box: An Experimental Investigation of the Mediating Effects of Trust and Value Congruence on Transformational and Transactional Leadership,” Journal of Organizational Behavior 21, 949–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kahai, S. S., J. J. Sosik, and B. J. Avolio. (1997). “Effects of Leadership Style and Problem Structure on Work Group Process and Outcomes in an Electronic Meeting System Environment,” Personnel Psychology 50(1), 121–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kahai, S. S., J. J. Sosik, and B. J. Avolio. (2004). “Effects of Participative and Directive Leadership in Electronic Groups,” Group & Organization Management 29(1), 67–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Klauss, R. and B. M. Bass. (1981). Impact of Communication. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  37. Kolb, J. (1993). “Leading Engineering Teams: Leader Behaviors Related to Team Performance,” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communications 36(4), 206–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Majchrzak, A., R. E. Rice, A. Malhotra, N. King, and S. Ba. (2000). “Technology Adaptation: The Case of a Computer-Supported Inter-Organizational Virtual Team,” MIS Quarterly 24(4), 569–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Manz, C. C. (1986). “Self-Leadership: Toward an Expanded Theory of Self-Influence Processes in Organizations,” Academy of Management Review 11, 585–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Manz, C. C. and H. P. Sims. (1987). “Leading Workers to Lead Themselves: The External Leadership of Self-Managing Work Teams,” Administrative Science Quarterly 31(1), 106–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Manz, C. C. and H. P. Sims. (1993). Business Without Bosses: How Self-Managing Teams are Building High Performing Companies. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  42. Mintzberg, H. (1973). The Nature of Managerial Work. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  43. Nygren, R. and E. Levine. (1996). “Leadership of Work Teams: Factors Influencing Team Outcomes,” In Beyerlein, M. Johnson, D. and Beyerlein, S. (eds.), Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams: Team Leadership, London: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  44. O'Connell, M. S., D. Doverspike, and A. B. Cober. (2002). “Leadership and Semiautonomous Work Team Performance: A Field Study,” Group and Organization Management 27(1), 50–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pearce, C. L. and J. A. Conger. (2003). Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
  46. Pearce, C., Y., Yoo, and M. Alavi. (2003). “Leadership, Social Work, and Virtual Teams: the Relative Influence of Vertical vs. Shared Leadership in Non-Profits.” In Riggio, R.E. and S. Smith Orr (eds.), Improving Leadership in Non-Profit Organizations, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  47. Politis, J. D. (2002). “Transformational and Transactional Leadership Enabling (Disabling) Knowledge Acquisition of Self-Managed Teams: The Consequences for Performance,” Leadership & Organizational Development Journal 23(4), 186–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Quinn, R. E. (1984). “Applying the Competing Values Approach to Leadership: Toward and Integrative Model,” In Hunt, J. G., Stewart, R., Schriesheim, C. and Hosking, D. (eds.): Managers and Leaders: An International Perspective, Pergamon, New York.Google Scholar
  49. Sarker, S., R., Grewal, and S. Sarker. (2002). “Emergence of Leaders in Virtual Teams: What Matters?” Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.Google Scholar
  50. Seers, A. (1989). “Team-Member Exchange Quality: A New Construct for Role-Making Research,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 43(1), 118–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Seers, A. (1996). “Better Leadership through Chemistry,” In Beyerlein, M. Johnson, D. and Beyerlein, S. (eds.), Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams: Team Leadership, London: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  52. Sivasubramaniam, N., W. D. Murry, B. J. Avolio, and D. I. Jung. (2002). “A Longitudinal Model of the Effects of Team Leadership and Group Potency on Group Performance,” Group & Organization Management 27(1), 66–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stewart, G. L. and C. C. Manz. (1995). “Leadership for Self-Managing Work Teams: A Typology and Integrative Model,” Human Relations 48(7), 747–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Taggar, S., R. Hackett, and S. Saha. (1999). “Leadership Emergence in Autonomous Work Teams: Antecedents and Outcomes,” Personnel Psychology 52, 899–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tyran, K. L., C. K. Tyran, and M. Shepherd. (2003). “Exploring Emerging Leadership in Virtual Teams,” In Gibson, C. B. and Cohen, S. G. (eds.), Virtual Teams that Work: Creating Conditions for Virtual Team Effectiveness. John Wiley & Sons, San Francisco, CA, 183–195.Google Scholar
  56. Van Dierendonck, D., C. Haynes, C. Borrill, and C. Stride. (2004). “Leader Behavior and Subordinate Well Being,” Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 9(2), 165–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wageman, R. (1997). “Critical Success Factors for Creating Superb Self-Managing Teams,” Organizational Dynamics 26(1), 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wageman, R. (2001). “How Leaders Foster Self-managing Team Effectiveness: Design Choices Versus Hands-on Coaching,” Organization Science 12(5), 559–576.Google Scholar
  59. Yoo, Y. and M. Alavi. (2004). “Emergent Leadership in Virtual Teams: What Do Emergent Leaders Do?” Information and Organization 14, 27–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yukl, G. A. (1998). Leadership in Organizations. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  61. Zhang, S., J. Fjermestad, and M. Tremaine. (2005). “Leadership Styles in Virtual Team Context: Limitations, Solutions and Propositions,” Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.Google Scholar
  62. Zigurs, I. (2003). “Leadership in Virtual Teams: Oxymoron or Opportunity?” Organizational Dynamics 31(4), 339–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Traci A. Carte
    • 1
  • Laku Chidambaram
    • 1
  • Aaron Becker
    • 1
  1. 1.Price College of Business, Division of MISUniversity of OklahomaNormanUSA

Personalised recommendations