Group Decision and Negotiation

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 77–95 | Cite as

The Role of Information Feedback in the Management Group Decision-Making Process Applying System Dynamics Models

  • Andrej ŠkrabaEmail author
  • Miroljub Kljajić
  • Mirjana Kljajić Borštnar


The research project addresses the influence of feedback information on the decision process supported by the application of system dynamics models. A user-friendly application was developed and used in the experiment with decision groups. The participants were 174 undergraduate management science students. They had the task of determining the optimum business strategy by maximizing the multiple criteria function under three experimental conditions: a 1) an indivIDual decision process without the support of a system dynamics model, a 2) an indivIDual decision process supported by a system dynamics model, and a 3) a decision process supported by a system dynamics model and subject interaction via computer mediation. The hypotheses that the indivIDual decision process supported by a system dynamics model yields higher Criteria Function values than one without a system dynamics model, as well as the decision process supported by both a system dynamics model and subject interaction yields higher Criteria Function values than one supported by a system dynamics model alone were confirmed.

Key words

group decision process feedback system dynamics multi-criteria function 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andersen, D. F., G. P. Richardson, and J. A. M. Vennix. (1997). “Group Model Building: Adding More Science to the Craft,” System Dynamics Review 13, 187–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beach, R. L. (1997). The Psychology of Decision Making: People in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Bohlmann, J. (1996). Disconfirmed Expectations and Group Decision Behavior. Doctoral Thesis. MIT, Sloan School of Management MA.Google Scholar
  4. Briggs, R. O. and G. J. De Vreede. (1997). “Meetings of the Future: Enhancing Group Collaboration with Group Support Systems,” Creativity and Management 6, 106–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caouette, M. J. and B. N. O'Connor. (1998). “The Impact of Group Support Systems on Corporate Teams’ Stages of Development,'' Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 8, 57–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cavaleri, S. and J. D. Sterman. (1997). “Towards Evaluation of Systems Thinking Interventions: A Case Study,” System Dynamics Review 13, 171–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chun, K. J. and H. K. Park. (1998). “Examining the Conflicting Results of GDSS Research,” Information & Management 33, 313–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dennis, A. R., C. K. Tyran, D. R. Vogel, and J. F. Nunmaker. (1997). “Group Support Systems for Strategic Planning,” Journal of Management Information Systems 14, 155–184.Google Scholar
  9. Ford, D. N. and J. D. Sterman. (1998). “Expert Knowledge Elicitation to Improve Formal and Mental Models,” System Dynamics Review 14, 309–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Forrester, J. W. (1973). Industrial Dynamics. CambrIDge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hale, R. and P. Whitman. (1997). Practical Problem Solving & Decision Making. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  12. Henry, R. A., O. J. Strickland, S. L. Yorges, and D. Ladd. (1996). “Helping Groups Determine Their Most Accurate Member: The Role of Outcome Feedback,” Journal of Applied Psychology 26, 1153–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hines, J. (2005). Molecules of Structure, Version 2.02, Building Blocks for System Dynamics Models. Software documentation. LeapTec and Ventana Systems Inc.: available at: http:/// (11 November 2005).Google Scholar
  14. Isaacs, W. N. (1999). Dialogic Leadership. Systems Thinker 10, 1–5.Google Scholar
  15. Jacobs, F. R. (2000). “Playing the Beer Distribution Game Over the Internet,” Production and Operations Management 9, 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kljajić, B. M. (2003). Groups Learning by Feedback Information. Unpublished Master thesis. University of Maribor, Faculty of Organizational Sciences. Kranj, Slovenia.Google Scholar
  17. Kljajić, M. (1994). Teorija Sistemov, Moderna organizacija, Kranj, Slovenia.Google Scholar
  18. Kljajić, M., I. Bernik, and A. Škraba. (2000). “Simulation Approach to Decision Assessment in Enterprises,” Simulation 75, 199–210.Google Scholar
  19. Korsgaard, A. M. and M. DIDdams. (1996). “The Effect of Process Feedback and Task Complexity on Personal Goal, Information Searching, and Performance Improvement,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 26, 1889–1911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kuchinke, P. K. (2000). “The Role of Feedback in Management Training Settings,” Human Resource Development Quarterly 11, 381–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kwok, R. C. W. and M. Khalifa. (1998). “Effect of GSS on Knowledge Acquisition,” Information & Management 34, 307–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Langley, P. A. and D. W. Morecroft (2004). “Performance and Learning in a Simulation of Oil Industry Dynamics,” European Journal of Operational Research 155, 715–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Larsen, E. R., A. Ackere, and K. Warren. (1997). “The Growth of Service and the Service of Growth: Using System Dynamics to Understand Service Quality and Capital Allocation,” Decision Support Systems 19, 271–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Miller, C. E. (1989). “The Social Psychological Effects of Group Decision Rules”, In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of Group Influence (2nd ed., 327–355). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  25. Nunamaker J. F., N. C. Romano, and R. O. Briggs. (2002). “ Increasing Intellectual BandwIDth: Generating Value from Intellectual Capital with Information Technology,” Group Decision and Negotiation 11, 69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Paul S., W. D. Haseman, and K. Ramamurthy. (2004). “Collective Memory Support and Cognitive-Conflict Group Decision-Making: An Experimental Investigation,” Decision Support Systems 36, 261–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Paulus, P. B. (1989). “An Overview and Evaluation of Group Influence.” In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of Group Influence (2nd ed., p. 9). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  28. Paulus, P. B. and H. Yang. (2000). “IDea Generation in Groups: A Basis for Creativity in Organizations,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 82, 76–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Powell, S. G., M. Schwaninger, and C. Trimble. (2001). “Measurement and Control of Business Processes,” System Dynamics Review 17, 63–91.Google Scholar
  30. Richardson, G. P. and D. F. Andersen. (1995). “Teamwork in Group Model Building,” System Dynamics Review 11, 113–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rouwette, E. A. J. A., J. A. M. Vennix, and T. van Mullekom. (2002). “Group Model Building Effectiveness: A Review of Assessment Studies,” System Dynamics Review 18, 5–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shakun, M. F. (1999). “Consciousness, Spirituality and Right Decision/Negotiation in Purposeful Complex Adaptive Systems,” Group Decision and Negotiation 8, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Simon, H. (1997). Models of Bounded Rationality: Empirically grounded Economic Reason. Vol. 3, MIT.Google Scholar
  34. Škraba, A. (2000). Multicriteria Group Decision Making with System Dynamics Models. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, University of Maribor. Kranj, Slovenia.Google Scholar
  35. Škraba, A., M. Kljajić, and R. Leskovar. (2003). “Group Exploration of System Dynamics Models –Is There a Place for a Feedback Loop in the Decision Process?,” System Dynamics Review 19, 243–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stasser, G., L. K. Norbert, and J. H. Davis. (1989). “Influence Processes and Consensus Models in Decision-Making Groups”. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of Group Influence (2nd ed., pp. 279–326). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  37. Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Boston, MA: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  38. Tung X. B., J. Yen, J. Hu and S. Sankaran. (2001), “A Multi-Attribute Negotiation Support System with Market Signaling for Electronic Markets,” Group Decision and Negotiation 10, 515–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tung, X. B. (1987). Co-oP: A Group Decision Support System for Cooperative Multiple Criteria Group Decision Making. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  40. Vennix, J. A. M. (1996). Group Model Building: Facilitating Team Learning Using System Dynamics. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  41. Wang, H. (1997). “Knowledge Level Analysis of Group Decision Support Systems,” Expert System with Application 13, 155–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Warren K. (2002). Competitive Strategy Dynamics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  43. Warren, K. and P. Langley. (1999). “The Effective Communication of System Dynamics to Improve Insight and Learning in Management Education,” Journal of Operational Research Society 50, 396–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yim, N. H., S. H. Kim, H. W. Kim and K. Y. Kwahk. (2004). “Knowledge Based Decision Making on Higher Level Strategic Concerns: System Dynamics Approach,” Expert Systems with Application 27, 143–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zeleny, M. (1982). Multiple Criteria Decision Making. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrej Škraba
    • 1
    Email author
  • Miroljub Kljajić
    • 1
  • Mirjana Kljajić Borštnar
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Organizational SciencesUniversity of MariborKranjSlovenia

Personalised recommendations