Plant Growth Regulation

, Volume 87, Issue 2, pp 267–276 | Cite as

Mapping of QTLs associated with lodging resistance in rice (Oryza sativa L.) using the recombinant inbred lines derived from two high yielding cultivars, Tachisugata and Hokuriku 193

  • Mingjin Jiang
  • Eiji Yamamoto
  • Toshio Yamamoto
  • Kazuki Matsubara
  • Hiroshi Kato
  • Shunsuke Adachi
  • Tomohiro Nomura
  • Eri Kamahora
  • Jun MaEmail author
  • Taiichiro OokawaEmail author
Original paper


Lodging is one of the major problems in rice production. In this study, we identified quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for lodging resistance traits using recombinant inbred lines (RILs) derived from a cross between two high yielding and superior lodging resistant rice cultivars, Tachisugata and Hokuriku 193. A total of 19 QTLs were detected on chromosomes (Chrs.) 2, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 10 in the F6 and F7 populations. In particular, one stable QTL for the section modulus (SM) and the outer diameter of the major axis (ODMA) was detected on Chr. 2 in both the F6 and F7 populations, and the positive allele was derived from Tachisugata. Correlation analysis showed that the SM and ODMA were positively correlated with the bending moment at breaking, the primary factor for the breaking type lodging resistance in rice. In addition, two QTLs for the spikelet number of the secondary branch and the spikelet number per panicle were also detected on Chr. 2, which overlapped with the stable QTL for the traits related to lodging resistance. These results indicated that the stable QTL might have combined effects on the traits associated with lodging resistance and grain yield. The novel QTL would be a promising target in marker-assisted selection to improve lodging resistance and grain yield in rice.


Grain yield Lodging resistance Quantitative trait loci Recombinant inbred line Rice Section modulus 



The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support that was provided by China Scholarship Council (Grant No. 201606910002); a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Grant No. 15H04442).

Supplementary material

10725_2018_468_MOESM1_ESM.docx (314 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 313 KB)
10725_2018_468_MOESM2_ESM.docx (250 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 250 KB)
10725_2018_468_MOESM3_ESM.docx (17 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (DOCX 16 KB)
10725_2018_468_MOESM4_ESM.docx (13 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (DOCX 12 KB)
10725_2018_468_MOESM5_ESM.docx (14 kb)
Supplementary material 5 (DOCX 14 KB)


  1. Ashikari M, Sakakibara H, Lin S, Yamamoto T, Takashi T, Nishimura A, Angeles ER, Qian Q, Kitano H, Matsuoka M (2005) Cytokinin oxidase regulates rice grain production. Science 309(5735):741–745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berry PM, Sylvester-Bradley R, Berry S (2007) Ideotype design for lodging-resistant wheat. Euphytica 154(1–2):165–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Braumann I, Urban W, Preuáẞ A, Dockter C, Zakhrabekova S, Hansson M (2018) Semi-dwarf barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) brh2 and ari-l mutants are deficient in a U-box E3 ubiquitin ligase. Plant Growth Regul 86(2):223–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cui K, Peng S, Ying Y, Yu S, Xu C (2004) Molecular dissection of the relationships among tiller number, plant height and heading date in rice. Plant Prod Sci 7(3):309–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gao Q, Yang Z, Zhou Y, Yin Z, Qiu J, Liang G, Xu C (2012) Characterization of an Abc1 kinase family gene OsABC1-2 conferring enhanced tolerance to dark-induced stress in rice. Gene 498(2):155–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gomi K, Sasaki A, Itoh H, Ueguchi-Tanaka M, Ashikari M, Kitano H, Matsuoka M (2004) GID2, an F-box subunit of the SCF E3 complex, specifically interacts with phosphorylated SLR1 protein and regulates the gibberellin-dependent degradation of SLR1 in rice. Plant J 37(4):626–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Goto A, Sasahara H, Shigemune A, Miura K (2009) Hokuriku 193: a new high-yielding indica rice cultivar bred in Japan. JARQ 43(1):13–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hirano K, Ordonio RL, Matsuoka M (2017) Engineering the lodging resistance mechanism of post-green revolution rice to meet future demands. Proc Jpn Acad Ser B 93(4):220–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hirose N, Makita N, Kojima M, Kamada-Nobusada T, Sakakibara H (2007) Overexpression of a type-A response regulator alters rice morphology and cytokinin metabolism. Plant Cell Physiol 48(3):523–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hu J, Fujimoto K, Guo LB, Zeng DL, Zhang GH, Dong GJ, Wang XH, Zhu LH, Qian Q (2008) QTL analysis of lodging resistance force and lodging resistance-related traits in rice. Chinese J Rice Sci 22(2):211–214Google Scholar
  11. Ishimaru K, Togawa E, Ookawa T, Kashiwagi T, Madoka Y, Hirotsu N (2008) New target for rice lodging resistance and its effect in a typhoon. Planta 227(3):601–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kashiwagi T, Madoka Y, Hirotsu N, Ishimaru K (2006) Locus prl5 improves lodging resistance of rice by delaying senescence and increasing carbohydrate reaccumulation. Plant Physiol Biochem 44(2–3):152–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kashiwagi T, Togawa E, Hirotsu N, Ishimaru K (2008) Improvement of lodging resistance with QTLs for stem diameter in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor Appl Genet 117(5):749–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kashiwagi T, Munakata J, Ishimaru K (2016) Functional analysis of the lodging resistance QTL BSUC11 on morphological and chemical characteristics in upper culms of rice. Euphytica 210(2):233–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kikuchi K, Ueguchi-Tanaka M, Yoshida K, Nagato Y, Matsusoka M, Hirano H-Y (2000) Molecular analysis of the NAC gene family in rice. Mol Gen Genet 262(6):1047–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lee YS, Jeong DH, Lee DY, Yi J, Ryu CH, Kim SL, Jeong HJ, Choi SC, Jin P, Yang J, Cho LH, Choi H, An G (2010) OsCOL4 is a constitutive flowering repressor upstream of Ehd1 and downstream of OsphyB. Plant J 63(1):18–30Google Scholar
  17. Marri PR, Sarla N, Reddy LV, Siddiq EA (2005) Identification and mapping of yield and yield related QTLs from an Indian accession of Oryza rufipogon. BMC Genet 6:33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Matsubara K, Yamamoto E, Kobayashi N, Ishii T, Tanaka J, Tsunematsu H, Yoshinaga S, Matsumura O, Yonemaru J, Mizobuchi R, Yamamoto T, Kato H, Yano M (2016) Improvement of rice biomass yield through QTL-based selection. PLoS ONE 11(3):e0151830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Miyamoto N, Goto Y, Matsui M, Ukai Y, Morita M, Nemoto K (2004) Quantitative trait loci for phyllochron and tillering in rice. Theor Appl Genet 109(4):700–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mulsanti IW, Yamamoto T, Ueda T, Samadi AF, Kamahora E, Rumanti IA, Thanh VC, Adachi S, Suzuki S, Kanekatsu M, Hirasawa T, Ookawa T (2018) Finding the superior allele of japonica-type for increasing stem lodging resistance in indica rice varieties using chromosome segment substitution lines. Rice (N Y) 11(1):25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ogawa D, Abe K, Miyao A, Kojima M, Sakakibara H, Mizutani M, Morita H, Toda Y, Hobo T, Sato Y, Hattori T, Hirochika H, Takeda S (2011) RSS1 regulates the cell cycle and maintains meristematic activity under stress conditions in rice. Nat Commun 2:278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ogawa D, Morita H, Hattori T, Takeda S (2012) Molecular characterization of the rice protein RSS1 required for meristematic activity under stressful conditions. Plant Physiol Biochem 61:54–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ohta H, Nemoto H, Ando I, Kato H, Sato H, Hirabayashi H (2010) “Tachisugata”, a new rice cultivar for whole crop silage use. Bull Natl Inst Crop Sci 11:67–84Google Scholar
  24. Okuno A, Hirano K, Asano K, Takase W, Masuda R, Morinaka Y, Ueguchi-Tanaka M, Kitano H, Matsuoka M (2014) New approach to increasing rice lodging resistance and biomass yield through the use of high gibberellin producing varieties. PloS one 9(2):e86870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ookawa T, Ishihara K (1992) Varietal difference of physical characteristics of the culm related to lodging resistance in paddy rice. Jpn J Crop Sci 61(3):419–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ookawa T, Hobo T, Yano M, Murata K, Ando T, Miura H, Asano K, Ochiai Y, Ikeda M, Nishitani R, Ebitani T, Ozaki H, Angeles ER, Hirasawa T, Matsuoka M (2010a) New approach for rice improvement using a pleiotropic QTL gene for lodging resistance and yield. Nat Commun 1:132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ookawa T, Yasuda K, Kato H, Sakai M, Seto M, Sunaga K, Motobayashi T, Tojo S, Hirasawa T (2010b) Biomass production and lodging resistance in’Leaf Star’, a new long-culm rice forage cultivar. Plant Prod Sci 13(1):58–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ookawa T, Aoba R, Yamamoto T, Ueda T, Takai T, Fukuoka S, Ando T, Adachi S, Matsuoka M, Ebitani T, Kato Y, Mulsanti IW, Kishii M, Reynolds M, Pinera F, Kotake T, Kawasaki S, Motobayashi T, Hirasawa T (2016) Precise estimation of genomic regions controlling lodging resistance using a set of reciprocal chromosome segment substitution lines in rice. Sci Rep 6:30572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sowadan O, Li D, Zhang Y, Zhu S, Hu X, Bhanbhro LB, Edzesi WM, Dang X, Hong D (2018) Mining of favorable alleles for lodging resistance traits in rice (Oryza sativa) through association mapping. Planta. Google Scholar
  30. Takai T, Ikka T, Kondo K, Nonoue Y, Ono N, Arai-Sanoh Y, Yoshinaga S, Nakano H, Yano M, Kondo M (2014) Genetic mechanisms underlying yield potential in the rice high-yielding cultivar Takanari, based on reciprocal chromosome segment substitution lines. BMC Plant Biol 14(1):295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang S, Basten C, Zeng Z (2006) Windows QTL Cartographer 2.5. Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, RaleighGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang Q, Zhang W, Yin Z, Wen CK (2013) Rice CONSTITUTIVE TRIPLE-RESPONSE2 is involved in the ethylene-receptor signalling and regulation of various aspects of rice growth and development. J Exp Bot 64(16):4863–4875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Weinig C, Schmitt J (2004) Environmental effects on the expression of quantitative trait loci and implications for phenotypic evolution. AIBS Bull 54(7):627–635Google Scholar
  34. Xu J, Xiong W, Cao B, Yan T, Luo T, Fan T, Luo M (2013) Molecular characterization and functional analysis of “fruit-weight 2.2-like” gene family in rice. Planta 238(4):643–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yadav S, Singh UM, Naik SM, Venkateshwarlu C, Ramayya PJ, Raman KA, Sandhu N, Kumar A (2017) Molecular mapping of QTLs associated with lodging resistance in dry direct-seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.). Front Plant Sci 8:1431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yano M, Sasaki T (1997) Genetic and molecular dissection of quantitative traits in rice. Plant Mol Biol 35(1–2):145–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yano K, Ookawa T, Aya K, Ochiai Y, Hirasawa T, Ebitani T, Takarada T, Yano M, Yamamoto T, Fukuoka S, Wu J, Ando T, Ordonio RL, Hirano K, Matsuoka M (2015) Isolation of a novel lodging resistance QTL gene involved in strigolactone signaling and its pyramiding with a QTL gene involved in another mechanism. Mol Plant 8(2):303–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yuan AP, Cao LY, Zhuang JY, Li RZ, Zheng KL, Zhu J, Cheng SH (2003) Analysis of additive and AE interaction effects of QTLs controlling plant height, heading date and panicle number in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Acta Genet Sin 30(10):899–906Google Scholar
  39. Zhang B, Liu X, Qian Q, Liu L, Dong G, Xiong G, Zeng D, Zhou Y (2011) Golgi nucleotide sugar transporter modulates cell wall biosynthesis and plant growth in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(12):5110–5115CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of AgricultureTokyo University of Agriculture and TechnologyFuchuJapan
  2. 2.Rice Research Institute of Sichuan Agricultural UniversityWenjiangChina
  3. 3.Institute of Crop ScienceNAROTsukubaJapan
  4. 4.Genetic Resources CenterNAROTsukubaJapan

Personalised recommendations