Plant Growth Regulation

, Volume 82, Issue 2, pp 305–315 | Cite as

Regulating the regulators: responses of four plant growth regulators during clonal propagation of Lachenalia montana

  • Adeyemi O. Aremu
  • Lenka Plačková
  • Nqobile A. Masondo
  • Stephen O. Amoo
  • Mack Moyo
  • Ondřej Novák
  • Karel Doležal
  • Johannes Van StadenEmail author
Original paper


Lachenalia species are endemic southern African plants with narrow geographical distribution, and are well-traded as ornamental plants in the international floriculture industry. In an attempt to have a better understanding of their growth and hormonal physiology, we evaluated the effects of different plant growth regulators (PGRs) during the clonal regeneration of Lachenalia montana. An auxin (α-naphthaleneacetic acid = NAA) and three cytokinin (CK) types (benzyladenine = BA, meta-topolin riboside = mTR and isopentenyladenine = iP), each at three concentrations (1, 5 and 10 µM), were tested and the effect of these PGRs on the accumulation of endogenous CK metabolites was evaluated to provide clues on the observed morphological responses. As the most efficient PGR, 10 µM mTR treatment produced the highest number of shoots (approximately five shoots per explant) while 1 µM BA-treated plants had more bulbs (approximately three bulbs per plantlet). Rooting was generally lower with increasing concentration of PGRs especially with the aromatic-type CKs. Based on the concentrations of endogenous CKs, 10 µM mTR regenerants also had the highest CKs (40 142.5 pmol g−1 DW) which were mainly of the aromatic-type (98%). In terms of the functional role of the CKs, O-glucosides (which are reversible CK storage forms) were the most dominant CK-type in the regenerants from 10 µM mTR treatment. On the other hand, the poor rooting, mostly prominent in regenerants from BA treatments was closely related to the high accumulation of N 9-glucosides (well-known CK metabolites directly involved in rooting inhibition) when compared to regenerants from other treatments. Overall, the current findings provide evidence on the interrelationship existing among the exogenous PGRs, phenotypic responses and the endogenous CKs in the in vitro regenerants.


Asparagaceae Floriculture Phytohormones Physiological disorders meta-Topolin Ornamentals 



N 6-Benzyladenine


N 6-Benzyladenine-9-glucoside


N 6 -Benzyladenine-9-riboside


N 6 -Benzyladenine-9-riboside-5′-monophosphate












cis-Zeatin-O-glucoside riboside








Dihydrozeatin-O-glucoside riboside


Electro-spray interface


N 6-Isopentenyladenine


N 6-Isopentenyladenine-9-riboside


N 6-Isopentenyladenine-9-riboside-5′-monophosphate


Murashige and Skoog medium












meta-Topolin-O-glucoside riboside


α-Naphthaleneacetic acid






Photosynthetic photon flux density






para-Topolin-O-glucoside riboside










trans-Zeatin-O-glucoside riboside


Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography



We thank Prof G. D. Duncan for the generous gift of bulbs used for the study. This work was financially supported by the University of KwaZulu-Natal and National Research Foundation (Green Economy Fellowship—U98028), South Africa. Additional finance was provided by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport of the Czech Republic (the Program “Návrat” for Research, Development, and Innovations, no. LK21306), National Program for Sustainability (Grant LO1204) and the Czech Science Foundation (Grant 14-34792S). We thank Mrs Alison Young (UKZN Botanical Garden, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa) and her staff for maintaining the mother plants in the greenhouse. We acknowledge the contribution of the Southern African Systems Analysis Centre, the National Research Foundation and the Department of Science and Technology in South Africa as well as the International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis in Austria.

Author contributions

AOA conceived the research idea and designed the experiments. Micropropagation experiments and data collection were conducted by AOA, NAM, MM and SOA. LP and ON conducted and (together with KD) analysed the CK data. AOA prepared the draft manuscript with help of all the other authors. KD prepared mTR, KD and JVS contributed research facilities/reagents/materials and supervised the research. All authors read and edited the final manuscript.

Supplementary material

10725_2017_260_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (30 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 30 KB)


  1. Aremu AO, Bairu MW, Doležal K, Finnie JF, Van Staden J (2012) Topolins: a panacea to plant tissue culture challenges? Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 108:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aremu AO, Plačková L, Bairu MW, Novák O, Plíhalová L, Doležal K, Finnie JF, Van Staden J (2014) How does exogenously applied cytokinin type affect growth and endogenous cytokinins in micropropagated Merwilla plumbea? Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 118:245–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aremu AO, Masondo NA, Rengasamy KRR, Amoo SO, Gruz J, Bíba O, Šubrtová M, Pěnčík A, Novák O, Doležal K, Van Staden J (2015) Physiological role of phenolic biostimulants isolated from brown seaweed Ecklonia maxima on plant growth and development. Planta 241:1313–1324CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Aremu AO, Plačková L, Pěnčík A, Novák O, Doležal K, Van Staden J (2016) Auxin-cytokinin interaction and variations in their metabolic products in the regulation of organogenesis in two Eucomis species. New Biotechnol 33:883–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ault JR (1995) In vitro rooting and greenhouse acclimatization of Lachenalia shoots. HortScience 30:1304–1305Google Scholar
  6. Bairu MW, Kane ME (2011) Physiological and developmental problems encountered by in vitro cultured plants. Plant Growth Regul 63:101–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bairu MW, Aremu AO, Van Staden J (2011) Somaclonal variation in plants: causes and detection methods. Plant Growth Regul 63:147–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beyl CA (2005) Getting started with tissue culture: media preparation, sterile technique, and laboratory equipment. In: Trigiano RN, Gray DJ (eds) Plant development and biotechnology. CRC Press, Florida, pp 19–38Google Scholar
  9. Ċosiċ T, Motyka V, Raspor M, Savić J, Cingel A, Vinterhalter B, Vinterhalter D, Trávníčková A, Dobrev P, Bohanec B, Ninković S (2015) In vitro shoot organogenesis and comparative analysis of endogenous phytohormones in kohlrabi (Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes): effects of genotype, explant type and applied cytokinins. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 121:741–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Doležal K, Popa I, Hauserová E, Spíchal L, Chakrabarty K, Novák O, Kryštof V, Voller J, Holub J, Strnad M (2007) Preparation, biological activity and endogenous occurrence of N 6-benzyladenosines. Bioorg Med Chem 15:3737–3747CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. du Toit ES, Robbertse PJ, Niederwieser JG (2001) An evaluation of bulb growth and structure of Lachenalia cv. Ronina bulbs. S Afr J Bot 67:667–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. du Toit ES, Robbertse PJ, Niederwieser JG (2002) Effects of growth and storage temperature on Lachenalia cv. Ronina bulb morphology. Sci Hortic 94:117–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. du Toit ES, Robbertse PJ, Niederwieser JG (2004) Plant carbohydrate partitioning of Lachenalia cv. Ronina during bulb production. Sci Hortic 102:433–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Duncan G (2012) The genus Lachenalia. Botanical magazine monograph. Kew Publishing, Royal Botanic Gardens, KewGoogle Scholar
  15. Fennell CW, Van Staden J (2004) Biotechnology of southern African bulbs. S Afr J Bot 70:37–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gajdošová S, Spíchal L, Kamínek M, Hoyerová K, Novák O, Dobrev PI, Galuszka P, Klíma P, Gaudinová A, Žižková E, Hanuš J, Dančák M, Trávníček B, Pešek B, Krupička M, Vaňková R, Strnad M, Motyka V (2011) Distribution, biological activities, metabolism, and the conceivable function of cis-zeatin-type cytokinins in plants. J Exp Bot 62:2827–2840CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Grace OM, Van Staden J (2003) A horticultural history of Lachenalia (Hyacinthaceae). S Afr J Sci 99:526–531Google Scholar
  18. Hoagland DR, Arnon DI (1950) The water-culture method for growing plants without soil, vol 347, 2nd edn. Circular California Agricultural Experiment Station, Berkeley, College of Agriculture, University of CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  19. Holub J, Hanuš J, Hanke DE, Strnad M (1998) Biological activity of cytokinins derived from ortho- and meta-hydroxybenzyladenine. Plant Growth Regul 26:109–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jameson PE (2017) Cytokinins. In: Murray BG, Murphy DJ (eds) Encyclopedia of applied plant sciences, 2nd edn. Academic Press, Oxford, pp 391–402. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-394807-6.00102-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kamínek M, Vaněk T, Motyka V (1987) Cytokinin activities of N6-benzyladenosine derivatives hydroxylated on the side-chain phenyl ring. J Plant Growth Regul 6:113–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kapczńska A (2009) Lachenalia - breeding, culture and usage of a new ornamental bulbous plant. Hortic Landscape Archit 30:5–10Google Scholar
  23. Kapczyńska A (2013) Effect of plant spacing on the growth, flowering and bulb production of four lachenalia cultivars. S Afr J Bot 88:164–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kiran NS, Polanská L, Fohlerová R, Mazura P, Válková M, Šmeral M, Zouhar J, Malbeck J, Dobrev PI, Macháčková I, Brzobohatý B (2006) Ectopic over-expression of the maize β-glucosidase Zm-p60.1 perturbs cytokinin homeostasis in transgenic tobacco. J Exp Bot 57:985–996CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kleynhans R, Niederwieser JG, Hancke FL (2002) Lachenalia: Development and commercialization of a new flower bulb crop. Acta Hortic 570:81–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kumar V, Moyo M, Van Staden J (2016) Enhancing plant regeneration of Lachenalia viridiflora, a critically endangered ornamental geophyte with high floricultural potential. Sci Hortic 211:263–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Malá J, Máchová P, Cvrčková H, Karady M, Novák O, Mikulík J, Hauserová E, Greplová J, Strnad M, Doležal K (2009) Micropropagation of wild service tree (Sorbus torminalis [L.] Crantz): the regulative role of different aromatic cytokinins during organogenesis. J Plant Growth Regul 28:341–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McCartan SA, Van Staden J (1999) Micropropagation of members of the Hyacinthaceae with medicinal and ornamental potential—a review. S Afr J Bot 65:361–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Montalbán IA, Novák O, Rolčik J, Strnad M, Moncaleán P (2013) Endogenous cytokinin and auxin profiles during in vitro organogenesis from vegetative buds of Pinus radiata adult trees. Physiol Plant 148:214–231CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Motte H, Vereecke D, Geelen D, Werbrouck S (2014) The molecular path to in vitro shoot regeneration. Biotechnol Adv 32:107–121CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Moyo M, Bairu MW, Amoo SO, Van Staden J (2011) Plant biotechnology in South Africa: micropropagation research endeavours, prospects and challenges. S Afr J Bot 77:996–1011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nel DD (1983) Rapid propagation of Lachenalia hybrids in vitro. S Afr J Bot 2:245–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Niederwieser JG (2004) Role of biotechnology in the development and production of Lachenalia and Ornithogalum cultivars in South Africa. S Afr J Bot 70:47–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Niederwieser JG, Van Staden J (1990) The relationship between genotype, tissue age and endogenous cytokinin levels on adventitious bud formation on leaves of Lachenalia. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 22:223–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Niederwieser JG, Van Staden J, Upfold SJ, Drewes FE (1992) Metabolism of 6-benzyladenine by leaf explants of Lachenalia during adventitious bud formation. S Afr J Bot 58:236–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Novák O, Hauserová E, Amakorová P, Doležal K, Strnad M (2008) Cytokinin profiling in plant tissues using ultra-performance liquid chromatography—electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. Phytochemistry 69:2214–2224CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Pérez-Jiménez M, Cantero-Navarro E, Pérez-Alfocea F, Cos-Terrer J (2014) Endogenous hormones response to cytokinins with regard to organogenesis in explants of peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch) cultivars and rootstocks (P. persica × Prunus dulcis). Plant Physiol Biochem 84:197–202CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Plačková L, Hrdlička J, Smýkalová I, Cvečková M, Novák O, Griga M, Doležal K (2015) Cytokinin profiling of long-term in vitro pea (Pisum sativum L.) shoot cultures. Plant Growth Regul 77:125–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Plíhalová L, Vylíčilová H, Doležal K, Zahajská L, Zatloukal M, Strnad M (2016) Synthesis of aromatic cytokinins for plant biotechnology. New Biotechnol 33:614–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Raimondo D, von Staden L, Foden W, Victor JE, Helme NA, Turner RC, Kamundi DA, Manyama PA (2009) Red list of south african plants. Strelitzia 25. South African National Biodiversity Institute, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  42. Reinten EY, Coetzee JH, van Wyk BE (2011) The potential of South African indigenous plants for the international cut flower trade. S Afr J Bot 77:934–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ruffoni B, Savona M (2013) Physiological and biochemical analysis of growth abnormalities associated with plant tissue culture. Hortic Environ Biotechnol 54:191–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sakakibara H (2006) Cytokinins: activity, biosynthesis, and translocation. Ann Rev Plant Biol 57:431–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schäfer M, Brütting C, Meza-Canales ID, Großkinsky DK, Vankova R, Baldwin IT, Meldau S (2015) The role of cis-zeatin-type cytokinins in plant growth regulation and mediating responses to environmental interactions. J Exp Bot 66:4873–4884CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Slabbert MM, Niederwieser GJ (1999) In vitro bulblet production of Lachenalia. Plant Cell Rep 18:620–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adeyemi O. Aremu
    • 1
  • Lenka Plačková
    • 2
  • Nqobile A. Masondo
    • 1
  • Stephen O. Amoo
    • 1
    • 3
  • Mack Moyo
    • 1
    • 4
  • Ondřej Novák
    • 2
  • Karel Doležal
    • 2
  • Johannes Van Staden
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Research Centre for Plant Growth and Development, School of Life SciencesUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal, PietermaritzburgScottsvilleSouth Africa
  2. 2.Laboratory of Growth Regulators & Department of Chemical Biology and Genetics, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Faculty of SciencePalacký University and Institute of Experimental Botany AS CROlomoucCzech Republic
  3. 3.Agricultural Research Council, Roodeplaat Vegetable and Ornamental PlantsPretoriaSouth Africa
  4. 4.Department of Horticultural Sciences, Faculty of Applied SciencesCape Peninsula University of TechnologyBellvilleSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations