Plant Growth Regulation

, Volume 77, Issue 3, pp 289–297 | Cite as

Expressing AtNHX1 in barley (Hordium vulgare L.) does not improve plant performance under saline conditions

  • Getnet D. Adem
  • Stuart J. Roy
  • Darren C. Plett
  • Meixue Zhou
  • John P. Bowman
  • Sergey Shabala
Original Paper

Abstract

Salinity is one of the main causes of yield loss in agricultural crop production worldwide. Numerous attempts have been made to produce salinity tolerant crops by manipulating the expression of genes involved in ion transport; yet, the reported results are often rather controversial. In this work, Arabidopsis AtNHX1 gene encoding vacuolar Na+/H+ exchanger was introduced into barley (Horduem vulgare L. cv. Golden Promise) plants grown under saline conditions. Transgenic plants were compared to null segregants for biomass, water content, gas exchange, and Na+ and K+ content of the leaf. It was shown that most of the lines expressing AtNHX1 have no significant difference to null segregants, suggesting the lack of beneficial effect of expressing the AtNHX1 gene in barley, at least under our experimental conditions. The lack of phenotype might be explained by: (1) low level of activity of vacuolar H+-inorganic pyrophosphatase and vacuolar H+-ATPase resulting in an insufficient proton gradient required for the vacuolar Na+/H+ exchanger; (2) the inability of transgenic plants to prevent a passive leak of sodium via Na+ permeable slow activating and fast activating channels; (3) insufficient ATP pool to support H+ pumping activity; and (4) the fact that the AtNHX1 protein might not been properly folded, inactive or incorrectly targeted. Overall, this study suggests that, while targeting vacuolar Na+ sequestration, at least several genes need to be pyramided to ensure the efficiency of the above process.

Keywords

Barley AtNHX1 Salinity Vacuolar sequestration Vacuolar channels Proton pumping 

References

  1. Adem GD, Roy SJ, Zhou M, Bowman JP, Shabala S (2014) Evaluating contribution of ionic, osmotic and oxidative stress components towards salinity tolerance in barley. BMC Plant Biol 14:113PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Aharon GS, Apse MP, Duan SL, Hua XJ, Blumwald E (2003) Characterization of a family of vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporters in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Soil 253:245–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmad I, Maathuis FJM (2014) Cellular and tissue distribution of potassium: physiological relevance, mechanisms and regulation. J Plant Physiol 171:708–714CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Anschütz U, Beckera D, Shabala S (2014) Going beyond nutrition: regulation of potassium homoeostasis as a common denominator of plant adaptive responses to environment. J Plant Physiol 171:670–687CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Apse MP, Aharon GS, Snedden WA, Blumwald E (1999) Salt tolerance conferred by overexpression of a vacuolar Na+/H+ antiport in Arabidopsis. Science 285:1256–1258CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Barragan V et al (2012) Ion exchangers NHX1 and NHX2 mediate active potassium uptake into vacuoles to regulate cell turgor and stomatal function in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 24:1127–1142PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bassil E et al (2011a) The Arabidopsis intracellular Na+/H+ antiporters NHX5 and NHX6 are endosome associated and necessary for plant growth and development. Plant Cell 23:224–239PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bassil E et al (2011b) The Arabidopsis Na+/H+ antiporters NHX1 and NHX2 control vacuolar pH and K+ homeostasis to regulate growth, flower development, and reproduction. Plant Cell 23:3482–3497PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bayat F, Shiran B, Belyaev DV (2011) Overexpression of HvNHX2, a vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporter gene from barley, improves salt tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Aust J Crop Sci 5:428–432Google Scholar
  10. Blumwald E (2000) Sodium transport and salt tolerance in plants. Curr Opin Cell Biol 12:431–434CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bonales-Alatorre E, Shabala S, Chen Z-H, Pottosin I (2013) Reduced tonoplast fast-activating and slow-activating channel activity is essential for conferring salinity tolerance in a facultative halophyte, quinoa. Plant Physiol 162:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brummer B, Warncke J, Slayman C (1985) Control of membrane permeability by extracellular calcium pump and leak behavior of the Neurospora plasma membrane. Plant Physiol 77:143Google Scholar
  13. Chen Z, Cuin TA, Zhou M, Twomey A, Naidu BP, Shiabala S (2007) Compatible solute accumulation and stress-mitigating effects in barley genotypes contrasting in their salt tolerance. J Exp Bot 58:4245–4255CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dubcovsky J, Maria GS, Epstein E, Luo MC, Dvorak J (1996) Mapping of the K+/Na+ discrimination locus Kna1 in wheat. Theor Appl Genet 92:448–454CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gaxiola RA, Rao R, Sherman A, Grisafi P, Alper SL, Fink GR (1999) The Arabidopsis thaliana proton transporters, AtNhx1 and Avp1, can function in cation detoxification in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:1480–1485PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gaxiola RA, Palmgren MG, Schumacher K (2007) Plant proton pumps. FEBS Lett 581:2204–2214CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gaxiola RA, Sanchez CA, Paez-Valencia J, Ayre BG, Elser JJ (2012) Genetic manipulation of a “vacuolar” H+-PPase: from salt tolerance to yield enhancement under phosphorus-deficient soils. Plant Physiol 159:3–11PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gorham J, Hardy C, Wyn Jones RG, Joppa LR, Law CN (1987) Chromosomal location of a K+/Na+ discrmination character in the d genome of wheat. Theor Appl Genet 74:584–588CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hedrich R, Marten I (2011) TPC1-SV channels gain shape. Mol Plant 4:428–441CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hedrich R, Neher E (1987) Cytoplasmic calcium regulates voltage-dependent ion channels in plant vacuoles. Nature 329:833–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jacobs A, Lunde C, Bacic A, Tester M, Roessner U (2007) The impact of constitutive heterologous expression of a moss Na+ transporter on the metabolomes of rice and barley. Metabolomics 3:307–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Leidi OE et al (2010) The AtNHX1 exchanger mediates potassium compartmentation in vacuoles of transgenic tomato. Plant J 61:495–506CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Li JS et al (2005) Arabidopsis H+-PPase AVP1 regulates auxin-mediated organ development. Science 310:121–125CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lu Z, Percy R, Qualset C, Zeiger E (1998) Stomatal conductance predicts yields in irrigated Pima cotton and bread wheat grown at high tempratures. J Exp Bot 49:453–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mengel K, Arneke W-W (1982) Effect of potassium on water potential, the pressure potential, the osmotic potential and cell elongation in leaves of Phaseolus vulgaris. Physiol Plant 54:402–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Munns R (2002) Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant, Cell Environ 25:239–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nass R, Rao R (1998) Novel localization of a Na+/H+ exchanger in a late endosomal compartment of yeast—implications for vacuole biogenesis. J Biol Chem 273:21054–21060CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Nass R, Cunningham KW, Rao R (1997) Intracellular sequestration of sodium by a novel Na+/H+ exchanger in yeast is enhanced by mutations in the plasma membrane H+-ATPase—insights into mechanisms of sodium tolerance. J Biol Chem 272:26145–26152CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Neuhaus HE, Trentmann O (2014) Regulation of transport processes across the tonoplast. Front Plant Sci 5Google Scholar
  30. Nieves-Cordones M, Miller AJ, Aleman F, Martinez V, Rubio F (2008) A putative role for the plasma membrane potential in the control of the expression of the gene encoding the tomato high-affinity potassium transporter HAK5. Plant Mol Biol 68:521–532CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Plett D et al (2010) Improved salinity tolerance of rice through cell type-specific expression of AtHKT1;1. PLoS One 5:1–8Google Scholar
  32. Pottosin I, Dobrovinskaya O (2014) Non-selective cation channels in plasma and vacuolar membranes and their contribution to K+ transport. J Plant Physiol 171:732–742CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Qadir M et al (2014) Economics of salt-induced land degradation and restoration. Nat Resour Forum 38:282–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Qiu Q-S (2012) Plant and Yeast NHX antiporters: roles in membrane Trafficking. J Integr Plant Biol 54:66–72CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Ren ZH et al (2005) A rice quantitative trait locus for salt tolerance encodes a sodium transporter. Nat Genet 37:1141–1146CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Rengasamy P (2002) Transient salinity and subsoil constraints to dryland farming in Australian sodic soils: an overview. Aust J Exp Agric 42:351–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rengasamy P (2006) World salinization with emphasis on Australia. J Exp Bot 57:1017–1023CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Richards RA (2000) Selectable traits to increase crop photosynthesis and yield of grain crops. J Exp Bot 51:447–458CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Rodriguez-Rosales MP, Jiang XY, Galvez FJ, Aranda MN, Cubero B, Venema K (2008) Overexpression of the tomato K+/H+ antiporter LeNHX2 confers salt tolerance by improving potassium compartmentalization. New Phytol 179:366–377CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Ruan C, da Silva J, Mopper S, Qin P, Lutts S (2010) Halophyte improvment for a salinized world. Crit Rev Plant Sci 29:329–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schachtman DP, Bloom AJ, Dvorak J (1989) Salt-tolerant Triticum × Lophopyrum derivatives limit the accumulation of sodium and chloride ions under saline-stress. Plant Cell Environ 12:47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schilling RK, Marschner P, Shavrukov Y, Berger B, Tester M, Roy SJ, Plett DC (2014) Expression of the Arabidopsis vacuolar H+-pyrophosphatase gene (AVP1) improves the shoot biomass of transgenic barley and increases grain yield in a saline field. Plant Biotech J 12:378–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Serrano R, Rodriguez-Navarro A (2001) Ion homeostasis during salt stress in plants. Curr Opin Cell Biol 13:399–404CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Shabala S (2013) Learning from halophytes: physiological basis and strategies to improve abiotic stress tolerance in crops. Ann Bot 112:1209–1221PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Shabala S, Pottosin I (2014) Regulation of potassium transport in plants under hostile conditions: implications for abiotic and biotic stress tolerance. Physiol Plant 151:257–279CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Shi HZ, Quintero FJ, Pardo JM, Zhu JK (2002) The putative plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporter SOS1 controls long-distance Na+ transport in plants. Plant Cell 14:465–477PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Sze H, Li XH, Palmgren MG (1999) Energization of plant cell membranes by H + -pumping ATPases: regulation and biosynthesis. Plant Cell 11:677–689PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Weinl S, Kudla J (2009) The CBL-CIPK Ca2+-decoding signaling network: function and perspectives. New Phytol 184:517–528CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Wu CA, Yang GD, Meng QW, Zheng CC (2004) The cotton GhNHX1 gene encoding a novel putative tonoplast Na+/H+ antiporter plays an important role in salt stress. Plant Cell Physiol 45:600–607CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Wu C, Gao X, Kong X, Zhao Y, Zhang H (2009) Molecular cloning and functional analysis of a Na+/H+ antiporter gene ThNHX1 from a halophytic plant Thellungiella halophila. Plant Mol Biol Report 27:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Xue ZY, Zhi DY, Xue GP, Zhang H, Zhao YX, Xia GM (2004) Enhanced salt tolerance of transgenic wheat (Tritivum aestivum L.) expressing a vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporter gene with improved grain yields in saline soils in the field and a reduced level of leaf Na+. Plant Sci 167:849–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yokoi S, Quintero FJ, Cubero B, Ruiz MT, Bressan RA, Hasegawa PM, Pardo JM (2002) Differential expression and function of Arabidopsis thaliana NHX Na+/H+ antiporters in the salt stress response. Plant J 30:529–539CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang HX, Blumwald E (2001) Transgenic salt-tolerant tomato plants accumulate salt in foliage but not in fruit. Nat Biotechnol 19:765–768CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhang HX, Hodson JN, Williams JP, Blumwald E (2001) Engineering salt-tolerant Brassica plants: characterization of yield and seed oil quality in transgenic plants with increased vacuolar sodium accumulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:12832–12836PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Zhao FY, Zhang XJ, Li PH, Zhao YX, Zhang H (2006) Co-expression of the Suaeda salsa SsNHX1 and Arabidopsis AVP1 confer greater salt tolerance to transgenic rice than the single SsNHX1. Mol Breed 17:341–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Getnet D. Adem
    • 1
  • Stuart J. Roy
    • 2
    • 3
  • Darren C. Plett
    • 2
    • 3
  • Meixue Zhou
    • 1
  • John P. Bowman
    • 1
  • Sergey Shabala
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Land and FoodUniversity of TasmaniaHobartAustralia
  2. 2.Australian Centre for Plant Functional GenomicsGlen OsmondAustralia
  3. 3.School of Agriculture, Food and WineUniversity of AdelaideGlen OsmondAustralia

Personalised recommendations