Plant Growth Regulation

, Volume 72, Issue 1, pp 97–103 | Cite as

Ethylene influences in vitro regeneration frequency in the FR13A rice harbouring the SUB1A gene

  • Sabina Yasmin
  • Anna Mensuali-Sodi
  • Pierdomenico Perata
  • Chiara Pucciariello
Original paper

Abstract

Many studies have examined the effects of ethylene on in vitro plant growth and development, often with controversial results. Ethylene accumulates in culture vessels due to both the release from the tissues and the physical entrapment due to the need for closed containers. This hormone has several effects on plant regeneration, depending on the plant species and even the cultivar. A prerequisite for ethylene use for in vitro culture is thus to formulate a specific protocol for the genotype of interest. In rice, ethylene is a key regulator of adaptation strategies to low oxygen environments. In particular, the SUBMERGENCE1A (SUB1A) gene, when present, drives the acclimation response which when activated by ethylene produced by submerged plants leads to adaptation through reduced plant growth and ethanolic fermentation enhancement. This gene is restricted to a limited number of rice for which a very specific response to ethylene is expected, whatever the source. This paper reports the regeneration differences between a SUB1A rice landrace (indica-aus, FR13A) and a non-SUB1A variety (japonica, Nipponbare). Our results suggest that regeneration protocols with exogenous ethylene precursors supply are required for the FR13A rice harbouring the SUB1A gene to overcome the problem of low regeneration efficiency.

Keywords

Ethylene In vitro culture Oryza sativa Rice SUB1 gene 

References

  1. Auboiron E, Carron MP, Michaux-Ferriere N (1990) Influence of atmospheric gases, particularly ethylene, on somatic embryogenesis of Hevea brasiliensis. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 21:31–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailey-Serres J, Voesenek LACJ (2010) Life in the balance: a signaling network controlling survival of flooding. Curr Opin Cell Biol 13:489–494Google Scholar
  3. Biddington NL (1992) The influence of ethylene in plant tissue culture. Plant Growth Regul 11:173–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chatfield SP, Raizada MN (2008) Ethylene and shoot regeneration: hookless1 modulates de novo shoot organogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Rep 27:655–666PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Che P, Lall S, Nettleton D, Howell SH (2006) Gene expression programs during shoot, root, and callus development in Arabidopsis tissue culture. Plant Physiol 141:620–637PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chi GL, Barfield DG, Sim G-E, Pua EC (1990) Effect of AgNO3 and aminovinylglycine on in vitro shoot and root organogenesis from seedling explants of recalcitrant Brassica genotypes. Plant Cell Rep 9:195–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chraibi KMB, Latche A, Roustan JP, Fallot J (1991) Stimulation of shoot regeneration from cotyledons of Helianthus annuus by the ethylene inhibitors, silver and cobalt. Plant Cell Rep 10:204–207Google Scholar
  8. Cornejo-Martin MJ, Mingo-Caste AM, Primo-Millo E (1979) Organ redifferentiation in rice callus: effects of ethylene, carbon dioxide and cytokinins. Z Pflanzenphysiol 94:117–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fehér A, Pasternak TP, Dudits D (2003) Transition of somatic plant cells to an embryogenic state. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 74:201–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fukao T, Bailey-Serres J (2008) Submergence tolerance conferred by Sub1A is mediated by SLR1 and SLRL1 restriction of gibberellin responses in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:16814–16819Google Scholar
  11. Fukao T, Xu K, Ronald PC, Bailey-Serres J (2006) A variable cluster of ethylene responsive-like factors regulates metabolic and developmental acclimation responses to submergence in rice. Plant Cell 18:2021–2034PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goldstein CS, Kronstad WE (1986) Tissue culture and plant regeneration from immature embryo explants of barley, Hordeum vulgare. Theor Appl Genet 71:631–636Google Scholar
  13. Grady KL, Bassham JA (1982) 1-Aminocyclopropane-l-carboxylic acid concentrations in shoot-forming and non-shoot-forming tobacco callus cultures. Plant Physiol 70:919–921PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hiei Y, Ohta S, Komari T, Kumashiro T (1994) Efficient transformation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) mediated by Agrobacterium and sequence analysis of the boundaries of the T-DNA. Plant J 6:271–282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hu W-W, Gong H, Pua E-C (2006) Modulation of SAMDC expression in Arabidopsis thaliana alters in vitro shoot organogenesis. Physiol Plant 128:740–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jha AK, Dahleen LS, Suttle JC (2007) Ethylene influences green plant regeneration from barley callus. Plant Cell Rep 26:285–290PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Karthikeyan A, Thevar S, Pandian K, Ramesh M (2009) High frequency plant regeneration from embryogenic callus of a popular indica rice (Oryza sativa L.). Physiol Mol Biol Plants 15:371–375PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kępczyńska E, Ruduś I, Kępczynśki J (2009) Endogenous ethylene in indirect somatic embryogenesis of Medicago sativa L. Plant Growth Regul 59:63–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kudahettige NP, Pucciariello C, Parlanti S, Alpi A, Perata P (2011) Regulatory interplay of the Sub1A and CIPK15 pathways in the regulation of a-amylase production in flooded rice plants. Plant Biol 13:611–619PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mensuali-Sodi A, Panizza M, Tognoni F (1992) Quantification of ethylene losses in different container-seal systems and comparison of biotic and abiotic contributions to ethylene accumulation in cultured tissues. Physiol Plant 84:472–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mensuali-Sodi A, Panizza M, Serra G, Tognoni F (1993) Involvement of activated charcoal in the modulation of abiotic and biotic ethylene levels in tissue cultures. Sci Hortic 54:49–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mensuali-Sodi A, Panizza M, Tognoni F (1995) Endogenous ethylene requirement for adventitious root induction and growth in tomato cotyledons and lavandin microcuttings in vitro. Plant Growth Regul 17:205–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Plant Physiol 15:473–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nagai K, Hattori Y, Ashikari M (2010) Stunt or elongate? Two opposite strategies by which rice adapts to floods. J Plant Res 123:303–309PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Niroula RK, Pucciariello C, Ho VT, Novi G, Fukao T, Perata P (2012) SUB1A-dependent and -independent mechanisms are involved in the flooding tolerance of wild rice species. Plant J 72:282–293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nishimura A, Aichi I, Matsuoka M (2006) A protocol for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation in rice. Nat Protoc 1:2796–2802Google Scholar
  27. Panizza M, Mensuali-Sodi A, Tognoni F (1997) Morphological differentiation in callus cultures of lavandin: a role of ethylene. Biol Plant 39:481–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sahoo KK, Tripathi AK, Pareek A, Sopory SK, Singla-Pareek SL (2011) An improved protocol for efficient transformation and regeneration of diverse indica rice cultivars. Plant Methods 7:49–60PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Santana-Buzzy N, Canto-Flick A, Iglesias-Andreu LG, Montalvo-Peniche M, López-Puc G, Barahona-Pérez F (2006) Improvement of in vitro culturing of Habanero pepper by inhibition of ethylene effects. HortScience 41:405–409Google Scholar
  30. Septiningsih EM, Pamplona AM, Sanchez DL, Neeraja CN, Vergara GV, Heuer S, Ismail AM, Mackill DJ (2009) Development of submergence-tolerant rice cultivars: the Sub1 locus and beyond. Ann Bot 103:151–160PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Singh N, Dang TT, Vergara GV, Pandey DM, Sanchez D, Neeraja CN, Septiningsih EM, Mendioro M, Tecson-Mendoza EM, Ismail AM, Mackill DJ, Heuer S (2010) Molecular marker survey and expression analyses of the rice submergence-tolerance gene SUB1A. Theor Appl Genet 121:1441–1453PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Toki S (1997) Rapid and efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transformation in rice. Plant Mol Biol Rep 15:16–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Toki S, Hara N, Ono K, Onodera H, Tagiri A, Oka S, Tanaka H (2006) Early infection of scutellum tissue with Agrobacterium allows high-speed transformation of rice. Plant J 47:969–976PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Trujillo-Moya C, Gisbert C (2012) The influence of ethylene and ethylene modulators on shoot organogenesis in tomato. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 111:41–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Uze M, Wunn J, Pounti-Kaelas J, Potrykus I, Sauter C (1997) Plasmolysis of precultured immature embryos improves Agrobacterium mediated gene transfer to rice (Oryza sativa L). Plant Sci 130:87–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Xu K, Xu X, Fukao T, Canlas P, Maghirang-Rodriguez R, Heuer S, Ismail AM, Bailey-Serres J, Ronald PC, Mackill DJ (2006) Sub1A is an ethylene-response-factor-like gene that confers submergence tolerance to rice. Nature 442:705–708PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sabina Yasmin
    • 1
  • Anna Mensuali-Sodi
    • 1
  • Pierdomenico Perata
    • 1
  • Chiara Pucciariello
    • 1
  1. 1.PlantLab, Institute of Life SciencesScuola Superiore Sant’AnnaPisaItaly

Personalised recommendations