Using a Simple Prioritisation Mechanism to Effectively Interoperate Service and Opportunistic Grids in the EELA-2 e-Infrastructure
- 112 Downloads
Grids currently in production can be broadly classified as either service Grids, composed of dedicated resources, or opportunistic Grids that harvest the computing power of non-dedicated resources when they are idle. While a service Grid provides high and well defined levels of quality of service, an opportunistic Grid provides only a best-effort service. Nevertheless, since opportunistic Grids do not require resources to be fully dedicated to the Grid, they have the potential to assemble a much larger number of resources. Moreover, these Grids cater very well to the execution of the so-called embarrassingly parallel applications, a type of application that is frequently found in practice, and that comprises the largest portion of the typical workload processed in production Grid systems. The EELA-2 e-infrastructure is comprised of a service Grid and an opportunistic Grid that federates computing resources from scientific institutions in both Europe and Latin America. Due to the complementary characteristics of these two types of Grids, a lot of attention has recently been placed in how to interoperate them. In this paper we focus on the less studied problem of assessing the feasibility of such interoperation. We analyse different prioritisation policies that define when the resources of one Grid can be used to run jobs originating from the other. Our results show that in the absence of a suitable prioritisation policy, the benefits that the users of one Grid may have, frequently come with an important negative impact on the users of the other Grid. We also show that a simple reciprocation mechanism is capable of arbitrating the interoperation in such a way that, whenever possible, users profit from the interoperation and, in no case, this benefit leads to a noticeable reduction on the quality of service that the users would experience were the Grids not to interoperate. We conclude discussing how we have implemented, in the context of the EELA-2 project, this prioritisation mechanism, allowing the effective interoperation of a service Grid based on the gLite middleware with an opportunistic Grid that uses the OurGrid middleware.
KeywordsGrid computing Service Grids Opportunistic Grids Prioritisation EELA-2
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 5.Brochu, F., Egede, U., Elmsheuser, J., Harrison, K., Jones, R.W.L., Lee, H.C., Liko, D., Maier, A., Moscicki, J.T., Muraru, A., Patrick, G.N., Pajchel, K., Reece, W., Samset, B.H., Slater, M.W., Soroko, A., Tan, C.L., Vanderster, D.C.: Ganga: a tool for computational-task management and easy access to Grid resources. CoRR. abs/0902.2685 (2009)
- 7.da Silva, D.P, Cirne, W, Brasileiro, F.: Trading cycles for information: using replication to schedule bag-of-tasks applications on computational Grids. In: Proceedings of the Euro-Par 2003: International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Computing, pp. 169–180. Klagenfurt, Austria (2003)Google Scholar
- 8.de Barros, A.G., Furtado, A.A., Brasileiro, F.: Bridging OurGrid-based and gLite-based Grid infrastructures. In: Proceedings of the Second EELA-2 Conference (2009)Google Scholar
- 15.Hernández, V., Blanquer, I., Aparicio, G., Isea, R., Chaves, J.L., Hernández, Á., Mora, H.R., Fernández, M., Acero, A., Montes, E., Mayo, R.: Advances in the biomedical applications of the EELA project. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 126, 31–36 (2007)Google Scholar
- 18.Litzkow, M., Livny, M., Mutka, M.: Condor—a hunter of idle workstations. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of Distributed Computing Systems, pp. 104–111. IEEE Computer Society, San Jose, CA, USA (1988)Google Scholar
- 19.Marechal, B., Bello, P.H.R., Carvalho, D.: Building a Grid in latin america: the EELA project e-infrastructure. In: CCGRID ’07: Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid, pp. 835–839. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Marzolla, M., Andreetto, P., Venturi, V., Ferraro, A., Memon, A.S., Memon, M.S., Twedell, B., Riedel, M., Mallmann, D., Streit, A., van de Berghe, S., Li, V., Snelling, D., Stamou, K., Shah, Z.A., Hedman, F.: Open standards-based interoperability of job submission and management interfaces across the Grid middleware platforms gLite and UNICORE. In: Proceedings of International Interoperability and Interoperation Workshop (IGIIW) 2007 at 3rd IEEE International Conference on e-Science and Grid Computing, pp. 592–599. IEEE Computer Society, Bangalore, India (2007)Google Scholar
- 22.Riedel, M., Memon, A.S., Memon, M.S., Mallmann, D., Streit, A., Wolf, F., Lippert, Th., Venturi, V., Andreetto, P., Marzolla, M., Ferraro, A., Ghiselli, A., Hedman, F., Shah, Z.A., Salzemann, J., Da Costa, A., Breton, V., Kasam, V., Hofmann-Apitius, M., Snelling, D., van de Berghe, S., Li, V., Brewer, S., Dunlop, A., De Silva, N.: Improving e-science with interoperability of the e-infrastructures EGEE and DEISA. In: Proceedings of the 31st International Convention MIPRO, Conference on Grid and Visualization Systems (GVS), pp. 225–231. Opatija, Croatia, Croatian Society for Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (2008)Google Scholar
- 24.Urbah, E., Kacsuk, P., Farkas, Z., Fedak, G., Kecskemeti, G., Lodygensky, O., Marosi, A., Balaton, Z., Caillat, G., Gombas, G., Kornafeld, A., Kovacs, J., He, H., Lovas, R.: EDGeS: bridging EGEE to BOINC and XtremWeb. J. Grid Computing 7, 335–354 (2009). doi: 10.1007/s10723-009-9137-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Wang, Y., Scardaci, D., Yan, B., Huang, Y.: Interconnect EGEE and CNGRID e-infrastructures through interoperability between gLite and GOS middlewares. In: Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Conference on e-Science and Grid Computing (e-Science’07)—International Grid Interoperability and Interoperation Workshop. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, USA (2007)Google Scholar