Advertisement

Journal of Grid Computing

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 323–341 | Cite as

Kosha: A Peer-to-Peer Enhancement for the Network File System

  • Ali R. Butt
  • Troy A. Johnson
  • Yili Zheng
  • Y. Charlie HuEmail author
Article

Abstract

The storage needs of modern scientific applications are growing exponentially, and designing economical storage solutions for such applications – especially in Grid environments – is an important research topic. This work presents Kosha, a system that aims to harvest redundant storage space on cluster nodes and user desktops to provide a reliable, shared file system that acts as a large distributed storage. Kosha utilizes peer-to-peer (p2p) mechanisms to enhance the widely-used Network File System (NFS). P2P storage systems provide location transparency, mobility transparency, load balancing, and file replication – features that are not available in NFS. On the other hand, NFS provides hierarchical file organization, directory listings, and file permissions, which are missing from p2p storage systems. By blending the strengths of NFS and p2p storage systems, Kosha provides a low overhead storage solution. Our experiments show that compared to unmodified NFS, Kosha introduces a 3.3% fixed overhead and 4.5% additional overhead as nodes are increased from two to sixteen. For larger number of nodes, the additional overhead increases slowly. Kosha achieves load balancing in distributed directories, and guarantees \(99.99\%\) or better file availability.

Key words

distributed storage fault tolerance load balancing location transparency mobility transparency NFS peer-to-peer 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    F. 180-1. Secure Hash Standard. Technical Report Publication 180-1, Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS), NIST, US Department of Commerce, Washington District of Columbia, April (1995)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adya, A., Bolosky, W.J., Castro, M., Cermak, G., Chaiken, R., Douceur, J.R., Howell, J., Lorch, J.R., Theimer, M., Wattenhofer, R.P.: FARSITE: Federated, Available, and Reliable Storage for an Incompletely Trusted Environment. In: Proc. OSDI, December (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anderson, T.E., Dahlin, M.D., Neefe, J.M., Patterson, D.A., Roselli, D.S., Wang, R.Y.: Serverless network file systems. ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 14(1), (1996)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bolosky, W.J., Douceur, J.R., Ely, D., Theimer, M.: Feasibility of a serverless distributed system deployed on an existing set of desktop pcs. In: Proc. SIGMETRICS, June (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brodsky, D., Pomkoski, J., Feely, M., Hutchinson, N., Brodsky, A.: Using versioning to simplify the implementation of a highly-available file system. Technical Report TR-2001-07, The University of British Columbia, Canada, (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Butt, A.R., Zhang, R., Hu, Y.C.: A self-organizing flock of Condors. In: Proc. ACM/IEEE SC2003: International Conference for High Performance Computing and Communications, Phoenix, AZ, November (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Callaghan, B.: NFS Illustrated. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc., (2000)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Castro, M., Druschel, P., Hu, Y.C., Rowstron, A.: Exploiting network proximity in peer-to-peer overlay networks. Technical Report MSR-TR-2002-82, Rice Univeristy, (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Castro, M., Ganesh, A., Rowstron, A., Wallach. D.S.: Security for structured peer-to-peer overlay networks. In: Proc. OSDI, December (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Castro, M., Liskov, B.: Practical Byzantine fault tolerance. In: Proc. OSDI, February (1999)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Clarke, I., Sandberg, O., Wiley, B., Hong, T.W.: Freenet: A Distributed Anonymous Information Storage and Retrieval System. 〈http://freenetproject.org/freenet.pdf〉 (1999)
  12. 12.
    Compaq. Compaq Product Information. 〈http://www.compaq.com/〉 (2004)
  13. 13.
    Dabek, F., Kaashoek, M.F., Karger, D., Morris, R., Stoica, I.: Wide-area cooperative storage with CFS. In: Proc. SOSP, October (2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dell Computer Corporation. Dell – Client & Enterprise Solutions, Software, Peripherals, Services. 〈http://www.dell.com/〉 (2004)
  15. 15.
    Druschel et al. Freepastry. 〈http://freepastry.rice.edu/〉 (2004)
  16. 16.
    Foster, I., Kesselman, C. Globus: A metacomputing infrastructure toolkit. Int. J. Supercomput. Appl. High Performance Comput. 11(2), 115–128, Summer (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Foster, I., Kesselman, C. (eds.). The GRID: Blueprint for a New Computing Infrastructure. Morgan Kaufmann, (1999)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Frankel, J., Pepper, T.: The Gnutella protocol specification v0.4. 〈http://cs.ecs.baylor.edu/d~onahoo/classes/4321/GNUTellaProtocolV0.4Rev1.2.pdf〉 (2003)
  19. 19.
    Howard, J.H., Kazar, M.L., Menees, S.G., Nichols, D.A., Satyanarayanan, M., Sidebotham, R.N., West, M.J.: Scale and performance in a distributed file system. ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 6(1), 51–81 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kubiatowicz, J. et al.: Oceanstore: An architecture for global-scale persistent store. In: Proc. ASPLOS, November (2000)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Litzkow, M.J.M.J., Livny, M., Mutka. M.W.: Condor – A hunter of idle workstations. In: Proc. ICDCS, June (1988)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mazieres, D.: A toolkit for user-level file systems. In: Proc. USENIX Technical Conference, June (2001)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Muthitacharoen, A., Morris, R., Gil, T.M., Chen, B.: Ivy: A read/write peer-to-peer file system. In: Proc. OSDI, December (2002)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ratnasamy, S., Francis, P., Handley, M., Karp, R., Schenker, S.: A Scalable Content-Addressable Network. In: Proc. SIGCOMM, August (2001)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rhea, S., Eaton, P., Geels, D., Weatherspoon, H., Zhao, B., Kubiatowicz, J.: Pond: The oceanstore prototype. In: Proc. USENIX FAST, December (2003)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rowstron, A., Druschel, P.: Pastry: Scalable, distributed object location and routing for large-scale peer-to-peer systems. In: Proc. IFIP/ACM Middleware, November (2001)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rowstron, A., Druschel, P.: Storage management and caching in PAST, a large-scale, persistent peer-to-peer storage utility. In: Proc. SOSP, October (2001)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Saito, Y., Karamanolis, C., Karlsson, M., Mahalingam, M.: Taming aggressive replication in the Pangaea wide-area file system. In: Proc. OSDI, December (2002)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sandberg, R., Goldberg, D., Kleiman, S., Walsh, D., Lyon, B.: Design and implementation of the Sun network file system. In: Proc. Summer USENIX, June (1985)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sharman Networks. Kazaa Media Desktop. 〈http://www.kazaa.com/index.htm〉 (2004)
  31. 31.
    Shepler, S., Callaghan, B., Robinson, D., Thurlow, R., Beame, C., Eisler, M., Noveck, D.: RFC3530: Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Protocol. 〈http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3530.txt〉 (2004)
  32. 32.
    Stoica, I., Morris, R., Karger, D., Kaashoek, M.F., Balakrishnan, H.: Chord: A Scalable Peer-to-peer Lookup Service for Internet Applications. In: Proc. SIGCOMM, August (2001)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Thekkath, C.A., Mann, T., Lee. E.K.: Frangipani: A scalable distributed file system. In: Proc. SOSP, October (1997)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhao, B.Y., Kubiatowicz, J.D., Joseph, A.D.: Tapestry: An Infrastructure for Fault-Resilient Wide-area Location and Routing. Technical Report UCB//CSD-01-1141, U. C. Berkeley, April (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ali R. Butt
    • 1
  • Troy A. Johnson
    • 1
  • Yili Zheng
    • 1
  • Y. Charlie Hu
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.School of Electrical and Computer EngineeringPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations