Advertisement

Journal of Grid Computing

, 2:369 | Cite as

HEP Applications and Their Experience with the Use of DataGrid Middleware

  • S. Burke
  • F. Harris
  • I. Stokes-Rees
  • I. Augustin
  • F. Carminati
  • J. Closier
  • E. van Herwijnen
  • A. Sciaba
  • D. Boutigny
  • J. J. Blaising
  • V. Garonne
  • A. Tsaregorodtsev
  • P. Capiluppi
  • A. Fanfani
  • C. Grandi
  • R. Barbera
  • E. Luppi
  • G. Negri
  • L. Perini
  • S. Resconi
  • M. Reale
  • A. De Salvo
  • S. Bagnasco
  • P. Cerello
  • K. Bos
  • D. Groep
  • W. van Leeuwen
  • J. Templon
  • O. Smirnova
  • O. Maroney
  • F. Brochu
  • D. Colling
Article

Abstract

An overview is presented of the characteristics of HEP computing and its mapping to the Grid paradigm. This is followed by a synopsis of the main experiences and lessons learned by HEP experiments in their use of DataGrid middleware using both the EDG application testbed and the LCG production service. Particular reference is made to experiment ‘data challenges’, and a forward look is given to necessary developments in the framework of the EGEE project.

Keywords

applications EDG EGEE Grid HEP LCG LHC middleware 

References

  1. 1.
    F. Carminati, P. Cerello, C. Grandi, E. Van Herwijnen, O. Smirnova and J. Templon, “Common Use Cases for a HEP Common Application Layer – HEPCAL”, Technical Report, LHC Computing Grid Project, 2002, http://lcg.web.cern.ch/LCG/sc2/RTAG4/finalreport.doc.
  2. 2.
    I. Foster, C. Kesselman and S. Tuecke, “The Anatomy of the Grid”, The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 200–222, Fall 2001. Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    F. Carminati, P. Cerello, C. Grandi, O. Smirnova, J. Templon and E. Van Herwijnen, “LHC Requirements for GRID Middleware”, Presentation Given at 2003 Conference for Computing in High-Energy and Nuclear Physics (CHEP 03), 2003, http://www.slac.stanford.edu/econf/C0303241/proc/pres/285.PPT.
  4. 4.
    “EDG WP8–HEP Applications”, DataGrid User Requirements and Specifications for the DataGrid Project, EU DataGrid Project, Deliverable D8.1, September 2001, http://edms.cern.ch/document/332409.
  5. 5.
    “EDG WP8–HEP Applications”, TestbedI Assessment by HEP Applications, EU DataGrid Project, Deliverable D8.2, Feb. 2002, http://edms.cern.ch/document/334920.
  6. 6.
    “EDG WP8–HEP Applications”, Testbed2 Assessment by HEP Applications, EU DataGrid Project, Deliverable D8.3, April 2003, http://edms.cern.ch/document/375586.
  7. 7.
    “EDG WP8–HEP Applications”, Final HEP Application Testbed Evaluation, EU DataGrid Project, Deliverable D8.3, Dec. 2003, http://edms.cern.ch/document/428171.
  8. 8.
    I. Augustin, F. Carminati, J. Closier et al., “HEP Applications Evaluation of the EDG Testbed and Middleware”, in 2003 Conference for Computing in High-Energy and Nuclear Physics (CHEP 03), La Jolla, California, 2003. Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    I. Foster, C. Kesselman, G. Tsudik and S. Tuecke, “A Security Architecture for Computational Grids”, in Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security Conference, November 1998, pp. 82–92. Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    I. Foster and C. Kesselman, “Globus: A Metacomputing Infrastructure Toolkit”, Intl. J. Supercomputer Applications, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 115–128, 1997. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    P. Kunszt, H. Stockinger, K. Stockinger, E. Laure, J.-P. Baud, S. Occhetti, J. Jensen, E. Knezo, O. Synge, O. Barring, B. Hess, A. Kowalski, C. Watson, D. Petravick, T. Perelmutov, R. Wellner, J. Gu, A. Shoshani and A. Sim, The Storage Resource Manager Interface Specification Version 2.1, Dec. 2003, http://sdm.lbl.gov/srm-wg/doc/SRM.spec.v2.l.final.pdf.
  12. 12.
    A. Chervenak et al., “Giggle: A Framework for Constructing Scalable Replica Location Services”, in SC’2002, Baltimore, USA, November 2002. Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    B. Allcock et al., “Efficient Data Transport and Replica Management for High-Performance Data-Intensive Computing”, in 18th IEEE Symposium on Mass Storage Systems and 9th NASA Goddard Conference on Mass Storage Systems and Technologies, San Diego, April 17–20, 2001. Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. Cooke, A.J.G. Gray, L. Ma, W. Nutt, J. Magowan, M. Oevers, P. Taylor, R. Byrom, L. Field, S. Hicks, J. Leake, M. Soni, A. Wilson, R. Cordenonsi, L. Cornwall, A. Djaoui, S. Fisher, N. Podhorszki, B.A. Coghlan, S. Kenny and D. O’Callaghan, “R-GMA: An Information Integration System for Grid Monitoring”, in On The Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2003: CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE, Catania, Sicily, Italy, Nov. 2003, Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci., Vol. 2888, Springer-Verlag, pp. 462–481. Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    X. Zhang, J. Freschl and J. Schopf, “A Performance Study of Monitoring and Information Services for Distributed Systems”, in Proceedings of HPDC, August 2003. Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. Andreozzi, C. Vistoli and M. Sgaravatto, “Sharing a Conceptual Model of Grid Resources and Services”, in 2003 Conference for Computing in High-Energy and Nuclear Physics (CHEP 03), La Jolla, California, 2003. Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    S. Andreozzi, A. Ghiselli, C. Vistoli, S. Fantinel, G. Tortone and N. De Bortoli, “GridICE: A Monitoring Service for the Grid”, in Cracow 03 Grid Workshop, Cracow, Poland, October 2003. Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    P. Anderson and A. Scobie, “LCFG: The Next Generation”, in UKUUG Winter Conference, UKUUG, 2002. Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    F. Carminati et al., “ALICE Experience with EDG”, in 2003 Conference for Computing in High-Energy and Nuclear Physics (CHEP 03), La Jolla, California, 2003. Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    S. Bagnasco, R. Barbera, P. Buncic, F. Carminati, P. Cerello and P. Saiz, “AliEn – EDG Interoperability in ALICE”, in 2003 Conference for Computing in High-Energy and Nuclear Physics (CHEP 03), La Jolla, California, 2003. Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    G. Poulard et al., “ATLAS Data Challenge 1”, in 2003 Conference for Computing in High-Energy and Nuclear Physics (CHEP 03), La Jolla, California, 2003. Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    D. Bonacorsi, P. Capiluppi, A. Fanfani et al., “Running CMS Software on GRID Testbeds”, in 2003 Conference for Computing in High-Energy and Nuclear Physics (CHEP 03), La Jolla, California, 2003. Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    N. Brook, A. Bogdanchikov, A. Buckley et al., “DIRAC – Distributed Infrastructure with Remote Agent Control”, in 2003 Conference for Computing in High-Energy and Nuclear Physics (CHEP 03), La Jolla, California, 2003. Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    K. Harrison, W.T.L.P. Lavrijsen, P. Mato et al., “GANGA: A User-Grid Interface for Atlas and LHCb”, in 2003 Conference for Computing in High-Energy and Nuclear Physics (CHEP 03), La Jolla, California, 2003. Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    D. Boutigny, D.H. Smith, E. Antonioli et al., “Use of the European Data Grid Software in the Framework of the BaBar Distributed Computing Model”, in 2003 Conference for Computing in High-Energy and Nuclear Physics (CHEP 03), La Jolla, California, 2003. Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    K. Riesselmann, “DZero Breaks New Ground in Global Computing Efforts”, Fermi News, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 2–5, Feb. 2004. Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    F. Carminati and J. Templon (eds.), Common Use Cases for a HEP Common Application Layer for Analysis – HEPCAL II, http://lcg.web.cern.ch/LCG/SC2/GAG/HEPCAL-II.doc.

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Burke
    • 1
  • F. Harris
    • 2
  • I. Stokes-Rees
    • 2
  • I. Augustin
    • 3
  • F. Carminati
    • 3
  • J. Closier
    • 3
  • E. van Herwijnen
    • 3
  • A. Sciaba
    • 3
  • D. Boutigny
    • 4
  • J. J. Blaising
    • 4
  • V. Garonne
    • 5
  • A. Tsaregorodtsev
    • 5
  • P. Capiluppi
    • 6
  • A. Fanfani
    • 6
  • C. Grandi
    • 6
  • R. Barbera
    • 7
  • E. Luppi
    • 8
  • G. Negri
    • 9
  • L. Perini
    • 9
  • S. Resconi
    • 9
  • M. Reale
    • 10
  • A. De Salvo
    • 10
  • S. Bagnasco
    • 11
  • P. Cerello
    • 11
  • K. Bos
    • 12
  • D. Groep
    • 12
  • W. van Leeuwen
    • 12
  • J. Templon
    • 12
  • O. Smirnova
    • 13
  • O. Maroney
    • 14
  • F. Brochu
    • 15
  • D. Colling
    • 16
  1. 1.Rutherford Appleton LaboratoryUK
  2. 2.Oxford UniversityUK
  3. 3.CERNSwitzerland
  4. 4.LAPP/Annecy, CNRSFrance
  5. 5.CNRSMarseilleFrance
  6. 6.INFNBolognaItaly
  7. 7.INFNCataniaItaly
  8. 8.INFNFerraraItaly
  9. 9.INFNMilanItaly
  10. 10.INFNRomalItaly
  11. 11.INFNTurinItaly
  12. 12.NIKHEFNetherlands
  13. 13.Lund UniversitySweden
  14. 14.Bristol UniversityUK
  15. 15.Cambridge UniversityUK
  16. 16.Imperial CollegeUK

Personalised recommendations