Advertisement

Ethnobotanical study and traditional use of autochthonous pear varieties (Pyrus communis L.) in southwest Serbia (Polimlje)

  • Aleksandra SavićEmail author
  • Snežana Jarić
  • Zora Dajić-Stevanović
  • Sonja Duletić-Laušević
Research Article
  • 28 Downloads

Abstract

This work represents an ethnobotanical and ethnomedicinal study focused on recording autochthonous pear varieties of the Polimlje region in southwest Serbia. The purpose of the study was to highlight genetic resources of pear varieties in situ and emphasize aspects of ethnodiversity and traditional knowledge. A special feature of the research area is the great diversity of indigenous varieties of pear, which have been cultivated for hundreds of years. Forty-six respondents from 25 to 78 years of age residing in 23 villages were interviewed, and 26 autochthonous pear varieties were recorded in the field. Among them 11.5% are widely available, 26.9% are rare, and 61.5% are very rare. For ethnomedicinal purposes, pear is used as a remedy against hypertension, diabetes, high cholesterol, and constipation; for reduction of body mass; as a uroseptic and/or an antirheumatic; and for cancer prevention. Pears are consumed as fresh fruit and in numerous food products. Depopulation of the investigated rural area is directly responsible for depletion of the gene pool of pear varieties and for loss of traditional knowledge. Preservation can be achieved by in situ methods such as raising awareness of the local inhabitants and ensuring support of the State.

Keywords

Diversity of pear varieties Ethnobotany Ethnomedicine Traditional knowledge 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Bora Milićević for drawings of Pyrus varieties. They are also grateful to Mr. Raymond Dooley for proofreading the text and improving the English. This work was supported by the Ministry of Education, Science, and Technological Development of Serbia (Grants 173018, 173029, TR 31005).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Ethical approval

The ethnobotanical research “Ethnobotanical study and traditional use of autochthonous pear varieties (Pyrus communis L.) in Southwest Serbia (Polimlje)” and related activities, including collecting of plants, compiling databases, images, data recordings, gathering information on the uses of traditional knowledge or other elements of biocultural heritage found in the study area, were undertaken in compliance with the ISE Code of Ethics (http://ethnobiology.net/code-of-ethics/).

No harmful consequences (biological or cultural) for the local people and local communities arose from this research and its related activities. Each information has been recorded with the approval of the informants. During research, all principles of the Code of Ethics were adhered to including intellectual property rights and support to the development of local people’s cultures.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the research “Ethnobotanical study and traditional use of autochthonous pear varieties (Pyrus communis L.) in Southwest Serbia (Polimlje)”. Each information has been recorded with the approval of the informants.

References

  1. Beširević V (2009) Indigenous varieties of apples and pears from Bosnia and Herzegovina. Harvo-graf doo, Tuzla (in Bosnian) Google Scholar
  2. Carbonaro M, Mattera M, Nicoli S, Bergamo P, Cappelloni M (2002) Modulation of antioxidant compounds in organic vs conventional fruit (Peach, Prunus persica L., and Pear, Pyrus communis L.). J Agric Food Chem 50:5458–5462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dajić-Stevanović Z, Petrović M, Aćić S (2014) Ethnobotanical knowledge and traditional use of plants in Serbia in relation to sustainable rural development. In: Pieroni A, Quave CL (eds) Ethnobotany and Biocultural Diversities in the Balkans. Springer, New York, pp 229–252Google Scholar
  4. Gasi F, Kurtović M, Kalamujić B, Pojskić N, Grahica J, Kaiser C, Meland M (2013) Assessment of European pear (Pyrus communis L.) genetic resources in Bosnia and Herzegovina using microsatellite markers. Sci Hortic 157:74–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Guo X, Yang B, Tang J, Jiang JJ, Li D (2017) Apple and pear consumption and type 2 diabetes mellitus risk: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Food Funct 8:927–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Haas G (2012) The state and framework of crop agro-biodiversity in organic agriculture in the EU—conclusion and perspectives for Serbia. Research and Development Center, Novi Sad (in Serbian) Google Scholar
  7. Imeh U, Khokhar S (2002) Distribution of conjugated and free phenols in fruits. J Agric Food Chem 50(22):6301–6306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jarić S, Popović Z, Mačukanović-Jocić M, Djurdjević L, Mijatović M, Karadžić B, Mitrović M, Pavlović P (2007) An ethnobotanical study on the usage of wild medicinal herbs from Kopaonik Mountain (Central Serbia). J Ethnopharmacol 111:160–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jarić S, Mitrović M, Karadžić B, Kostić O, Djurdjević L, Pavlović M, Pavlović P (2014) Plant resources used in Serbian medieval medicine. Ethnobotany and ethnomedicine. Genet Resour Crop Evol 61:1359–1379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jarić S, Mačukanović-Jocić M, Djurdjević L, Mitrović M, Kostić O, Karadžić B, Pavlović P (2015) An ethnobotanical survey of traditionally used plants on Suva Planina mountain (Southeastern Serbia). J Ethnopharmacol 175:93–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kaur R, Arya V (2012) Ethnomedicinal and Phytochemical Perspectives of Pyrus communis Linn. J Pharmacogn Phytochem 1(2):14–19Google Scholar
  12. Khare CP (2007) Indian medicinal plants: an illustrated dictionary. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  13. Li X, Zhang JY, Gao VVY, Wang HY, Cao JG, Huang LQ (2012) Chemical composition and anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activities of either pear cultivars. J Agric Food Chem 60(35):8738–8744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Li X, Li X, Wang T, Gao W (2016) Nutritional composition of pear cultivars (Pyrus spp.). In: Preedy VR, Simmonds MSJ (eds) Nutritional Composition of fruit cultivars. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 573–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mahammad MU, Kamba AS, Abubakar L, Bagna EA (2010) Nutritional composition of pear fruits (Pyrus communis). Afr J Food Sci 1(3):76–81Google Scholar
  16. Menković N, Šavikin K, Tasić S, Zdunić G, Stesević D, Milosavljević S, Vincek D (2011) Ethnobotanical study on traditional uses of wild medicinal plants in Prokletije Mountains. Montenegro J Ethnopharmacol 133:97–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mratinić E (2000) Pear. Veselin Masleša, Belgrade (in Serbian) Google Scholar
  18. Mustafa B, Hajdari A, Pajazita Q, Syla B, Quave CL, Pieroni A (2012a) An ethnobotanical survey of the Gollak region, Kosovo. Genet Resour Crop Evol 59:739–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mustafa B, Hajdari A, Krasniqi F, Hoxha E, Ademi H, Quave CL, Pieroni A (2012b) Medical ethnobotany of the Albanian Alps in Kosovo. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 8:6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Myers N, Russell A, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Parle M, Arzoo (2016) Why is pear so dear. Int J Res Ayurveda Pharm 7:108–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pavlović M, Šabić D, Vujadinović S (2009) Natural resources as a of socioeconomic development factor of Polimlje region. Bull Serb Geogr Soc 89(2):1–26Google Scholar
  23. Pieroni A, Giusti ME, Quave CL (2011) Cross-cultural ethnobiology in the Western Balkans: medical ethnobotany and ethnozoology among Albanians and Serbs in the Pešter Plateau, Sandžak South-Western Serbia. Hum Ecol 39:333–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pieroni A, Rexhepi B, Nedelcheva A, Hajdari A, Mustafa B, Kolosova V, Cianfaglione K, Quave CL (2013) One century later: the folk botanical knowledge of the last remaining Albanians of the upper Reka Valley, Mount Korab, Western Macedonia. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 9:22–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pieroni A, Cianfaglione K, Nedelcheva A, Hajdari A, Mustafa B, Quave C (2014) Resilience at the border: traditional botanical knowledge among Macedonians and Albanians living in Gollobordo, Eastern Albania. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 10:1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pieroni A, Ibraliu I, Abbasi AM, Papajani-Toska V (2015) An ethnobotanical study among Albanians and Aromanians living in the Rraicë and Mokra areas of Eastern Albania. Genet Resour Crop Evol 62:477–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Premović M (2013) Middle and Lower Polimlje and Upper Podrinje in the Middle Ages. Dissertation, Faculty of Philosophy, Univesity of Belgrade, SerbiaGoogle Scholar
  28. Reiland H, Slavin J (2015) systematic review of pears and health. Food Nutr Today 50(6):301–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Salta J, Martins A, Santos RG, Neng NR, Nogneira JMF, Justino J, Ruter AP (2010) Phenolic composition and antioxidant activity of Rocha pear and other pear cultivars—a comparative study. J Funct Foods 2:153–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Šarić-Kundalić B, Dobeš C, Klatte-Asselmeyer V, Saukel J (2010) Ethnobotanical study on medicinal use of wild and cultivated plants in middle, south and west Bosnia and Herzegovina. J Ethnopharmacol 131:33–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Šarić-Kundalić B, Dobeš C, Klatte-Asselmeyer V, Saukel J (2011) Ethnobotanical survey of traditionally used plants in human therapy of east, north and north-east Bosnia and Herzegovina. J Ethnopharmacol 133:1051–1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Savić A (2014) Indigenous varieties of Polimlje fruit, the richness of nature and man: the results of field research. Mileševa Writings 9:295–306Google Scholar
  33. Savić A (2016) Autochthonous fruit varieties in Serbia: importance, diversity, heritage. Plants and herbs in traditional Serbian culture. Serb Folklorist Assoc 2:153–165Google Scholar
  34. Šavikin K, Zdunić G, Menković N, Živković J, Ćujić N, Tereščenko M, Bigović D (2013) Ethnobotanical study on traditional use of medicinal plants in South-Western Serbia, Zlatibor district. J Ethnopharmacol 146:803–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Selamovska A, Miskoska-Milevska E, Najdenovska O, Canev I (2015) Fruit characteristics of some traditional pear varieties in the Prespa region. Acta Agric Serb Vol XX 40:107–1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Trotter R, Logan M (1986) Informant consensus: a new approach for identifying potentially effective medicinal plants. In: Nina L (ed) Etkin. Plants in indigenous medicine and diet: biobehavioral approaches. Redgrave Publishers, Bedford Hills, pp 91–112Google Scholar
  37. Vasić M, Milošević M, Savić A, Petrović A, Nikolić Z, Terzić S, Gvozdanović-Varga J, Vladimir S, Adamović D, Červenski J, Maksimović L, Đalović I, Popović V (2013) Agrobiodiversity preservation as a chance for sustainable and rural development. Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops, Novi SadGoogle Scholar
  38. Weckerle C, De Boerb H, Purid R, Van Andele T, Bussmanng R, Leontih M (2018) Recommended standards for conducting and reporting ethnopharmacological field studies. J Ethnopharmacol 210:25–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wolko L, Antkowiak W, Lenartowicz E, Bocianowski J (2010) Genetic diversity of European pear cultivars (Pyrus communis L.) and wild pear (Pyrus pyraster (L.) Burgsd.) inferred from microsatellite markers analysis. Genet Resour Crop Evol 57:801–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zlatković BK, Bogosavljević SS, Radivojević AR, Pavlović MA (2014) Traditional use of the native medicinal plant resource of Mt. Rtanj (Eastern Serbia): ethnobotanical evaluation and comparison. J Ethnopharmacol 151:704–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Natural History Museum BelgradeBelgradeSerbia
  2. 2.Department of Ecology, Institute for Biological Research ‘Siniša Stanković’University of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia
  3. 3.Faculty of AgricultureUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia
  4. 4.Faculty of Biology, Institute of Botany and Botanical Garden “Jevremovac”University of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia

Personalised recommendations