Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution

, Volume 64, Issue 6, pp 1133–1139 | Cite as

U.S. ratification of Plant Treaty: benefit sharing ambiguity for plant genomics researchers does not change

Short Communication

Abstract

Plant genomics data and information are widely acknowledged to have potential benefits for plant breeding and global food security. Yet, at present, there is a great deal of confusion over potential benefit sharing obligations arising from use of genomics data and information, particularly if the data and information are derived from plant genetic resources accessed from gene banks that are part of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources in Food and Agriculture (Treaty) Multilateral System (MLS). To some extent, this lack of clarity stemmed from the fact that the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s National Plant Germplasm System was not, until recently, part of the Treaty MLS. In October 2016, however, the U.S. ratified the Treaty. This paper addresses whether the U.S. ratification of the Treaty has ameliorated or exacerbated the confusion. In reviewing Treaty benefit sharing obligations and their impact on plant genomics pre- and post-U.S. ratification, it appears that ambiguity around genomics data and information is largely unchanged. In light of this, the paper recommends further dialogue about this important issue.

Keywords

International Treaty for plant genetic resources on food and agriculture Access and benefit sharing Plant genetic resources Standard material transfer agreement Genomic data Plant genomics research 

References

  1. Bretting P (2015) The national plant germplasm system: 2015 status, prospects, and challenges, http://www.escop.info/docs/ARS%20and%20NPGS%20Update.pdf. Accessed May 2017
  2. Grossenbacher G (2015) Final statement presented at the GB-6. Civil Society Organizations. http://seedmap.org/wp-content/uploads/closing-statement-CSO_Oct-9-2015_FINAL_31.pdf. Accessed Jan 2017
  3. Halewood M (2013) What kind of goods are plant genetic resources for food and agriculture? Toward the identification and development of a new global commons. Int J Commons 7:278–312. doi:10.18352/ijc.412 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Halewood M, Noriega I, Louafi S (2013) The global crop commons and access and benefit-sharing laws, examining the limits of international policy support for the collective pooling and management of plant genetic resources. In: Halewood M, Noriega I, Louafi S (eds) Crop genetic resources as a global commons. Routledge, New York, pp 1–36Google Scholar
  5. Manzella D (2013) The design and mechnics of the multilateral system of access and benefit sharing. In: Halewood M, Noriega I, Louafi S (eds) Crop genetic resources as a global commons. Routledge, New York, pp 150–163Google Scholar
  6. Manzella D (2016) The global information system and genomic information: transparency of rights and obligations: background study paper n. 10. food and agriculture organization. http://www.fao.org/3/a-bq620e.pdf. Accessed Jan 2017
  7. Marden E, Godfrey N, Manion R (2016) The intellectual property—regulatory complex. UBC Press, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  8. McCouch S, Baute GJ, Bradeen J, Bramel P, Bretting PK, Buckler E, Burke JM, Charest D, Cloutier S, Cole G, Dempewolf H, Dingkuhn M, Feuillet C, Gepts P, Grattapaglia D, Guarino L, Jackson S, Knapp S, Langridge P, Lawton-Rauh A, Lijua Q, Lusty C, Michael T, Myles S, Naito K, Nelson RL, Pontarollo R, Richards CM, Rieseberg L, Ross-Ibarra J, Rounsley S, Hamilton RS, Schurr U, Stein N, Tomooka N, van der Knaap E, van Tassel D, Toll J, Valls J, Varshney RK, Ward J, Waugh R, Wenzl P, Zamir D (2013) Agriculture: feeding the future. Nature 499:23–24. doi:10.1038/499023a
  9. Moore G, Tymowski W (2005) Explanatory guide to the international treaty for plant genetic resources in food and agriculture. IUCN, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. National Plant Germplasm System (2008). Standard material transfer agreement (SMTA) standard operating procedure and guide. Accepting and distributing material covered by the SMTA on behalf of the NPGS. www.ars-grin.gov/npgs/cgc_reports/SMTA_GuideDEcmts.doc. Accessed May 2017
  11. Senate Report (2010) International treaty on plant genetic resources for food and agriculture, report 111–117. Available at https://www.congress.gov/111/crpt/erpt7/CRPT-111erpt7.pdf. Accessed Jan 2017
  12. Sherkow J, Greeley H (2015) A history of patenting genetic material. Annu Rev Genet 49:161–182. doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-112414-05473 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Tanksley S, McCouch S (1997) Seed banks and molecular maps: unlocking genetic potential from the wild. Science 277:1063–1066. doi:10.1126/science.277.5329.1063 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Williams K (2005) An overview of the U.S. national plant germplasm system’s exploration program, HortScience 40: 297–30. https://naldc.nal.usda.gov/download/20500/PDF. Accessed May 2017

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of British Columbia Faculty of LawUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  2. 2.Sidley Austin LLPPalo AltoUSA

Personalised recommendations