Advertisement

Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution

, Volume 60, Issue 2, pp 639–659 | Cite as

Phenotypic diversity in Cajanus species and identification of promising sources for agronomic traits and seed protein content

  • H. D. Upadhyaya
  • K. N. Reddy
  • Sube Singh
  • C. L. L. Gowda
Research Article

Abstract

A total of 198 accessions representing 18 species of the genus Cajanus, assembled at the ICRISAT genebank, was characterized for 27 morpho-agronomic traits at ICRISAT farm, Patancheru, India. Newman–Keuls test of significance for mean values indicated significant differences among the species for one or more traits under study. Mean diversity for all traits was maximum in C. scarabaeoides (H′ = 0.590 ± 0.010). First three principal components (PCs) captured 84.3 % of total variation among all species. Cluster analysis resulted in three clusters. C. albicans and C. mollis formed Cluster 1; C. cajanifolius, C. crassus and C. platycarpus formed Cluster 2 and C. acutifolius, C. scarabaeoides, C. lineatus and C. sericeus formed Cluster 3. C. platycarpus for extra early flowering (34–40 days); C. scarabaeoides for early flowering (51–118 days); C. albicans for broad pods; C. mollis, C. albicans, C. cinereus for more seeds per pod (>6) and C. crassus, C. cajanifolius, C. mollis, C. platycarpus and C. albicans for high seed protein (>30 %) were found as promising sources. Long duration perennial species such as C. crassus, C. mollis and C. albicans are good sources for forage. Five accessions (ICP 15661, ICP 15664, ICP 15666, ICP 15668 and ICP 15671) of C. platycarpus, two accessions (ICP 15653 and ICP 15658) of C. mollis and one accession each of C. acutifolius (ICP 15611), C. albicans (ICP 15620), C. cajanifolius (ICP 15632), C. crassus (ICP 15768), C. lineatus (ICP 15646), C. scarabaeoides (ICP 15922) and C. sericeus (ICP 15760), found as promising for multiple trait combinations are useful in pigeonpea improvement programs.

Keywords

Cajanus species Characterization Diversity Genepool Germplasm Wild relatives 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Authors sincerely acknowledge the contribution of all former and present staff of Genetic Resources Unit (GRU), ICRISAT in collection, assembly and conservation of pigeonpea genetic resources. The help of Jacob Mathew, D. Bapa Rao, G. Dasaratha Rao and G. Ram Reddy, Research Technicians, Genetic Resources Unit, ICRISAT, Patancheru, India, in recording observations and documentation of the data for this study is highly appreciated.

References

  1. Bohra A, Mallikarjuna N, Saxena KB, Upadhyaya HD, Vales I, Varshney R (2010) Harnessing the potential of crop wild relatives through genomics tools for pigeonpea improvement. J Plant Biol 37(1):85–100Google Scholar
  2. Dodia DA, Patel AJ, Patel IS, Dhulia FK, Tikka SBS (1996) Antibiotic effect of pigeonpea wild relatives on Heliothis armigera. Int Chickpea Pigeonpea Newsl 3:100–101Google Scholar
  3. Food and Agriculture Organization (2009) ORG/FAOSTAT database. http://www/FAO
  4. Gower JC (1985) Measures of similarity, dissimilarity and distance. In: Kotz S, Johnson NL (eds) Encyclopedia of statistical sciences, vol 5. Wiley Interscience, New York, pp 397–405Google Scholar
  5. IBPGR, ICRISAT (1993) Descriptors for pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]. IBPGR, Rome, Italy and ICRISAT, Patancheru, India, p 31Google Scholar
  6. ICRISAT (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics) (1978) Annual report 1977/78. Patancheru, India, ICRISAT, p 295Google Scholar
  7. Jarvis A, Lane A, Hijmans RJ (2008) The effect of climate change on crop wild relatives. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 126:13–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Keuls M (1952) The use of the “studentized range” in connection with an analysis of variance. Euphytica 1:112–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lenne JM, David W (1991) Plant diseases and the use of wild germplasm. Annu Rev Phytopathol 29:35–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Levene H (1960) Robust tests for equality of variances. In: Olkin I (ed) Contributions to probability and statistics: essays in honor of Harold Hotelling. Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp 278–292Google Scholar
  11. Mallikarjuna N, Moss JP (1995) Production of hybrids between C. platycarpus and Cajanus cajan. Euphytica 83:43–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mallikarjuna N, Jadhav D, Reddy P (2006) Introgression of Cajanus platycarpus genome into cultivated pigeonpea, C. cajan. Euphytica 149:161–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mallikarjuna N, Saxena KB, Jadhav DR (2011a) Wild crop relatives. In: Kole C (ed) Genomic and breeding resources, legume crops and forages. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg, pp 21–33Google Scholar
  14. Mallikarjuna N, Senthilvel S, Deepak RJ, Saxena KB, Sharma HC, Upadhyaya HD, Rathore A, Varshney R (2011b) Progress in the utilization of Cajanus platicarpus (Benth.) Maesen in pigeonpea improvement. Plant Breed. doi: 10.1111/J.1439-0523.2011.01870.x
  15. Nadimpalli RG, Jarret RL, Phatak SC, Kochart G (1994) Phylogenetic relationships of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) based on nuclear restriction fragment length polymorphism. Genome 36:216–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Newman D (1939) The distribution of range in samples from a normal population expressed in terms of an independent estimate of standard deviation. Biometrika 31:20–30Google Scholar
  17. Parani M, Lakshmi M, Senthil Kumar P, Parida A (2000) Ribosomal DNA variation and phylogenetic relationships among Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. and its wild relatives. Curr Sci 78(10):1235–1238Google Scholar
  18. Pundir RPS, Singh RB (1985a) Crossability relationships among Cajanus, Atylosia and Rhynchosia species and detection of crossing barriers. Euphytica 34:303–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pundir RPS, Singh RB (1985b) Biosystematic relationships among Cajanus, Atylosia, and Rhynchocsia species and evolution of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.). Thoer Appl Genet 69:531–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rao NK, Reddy LJ, Bramel PJ (2003) Potential of wild species for genetic enhancement of some semi-arid food crops. Genet Resour Crop Evol 50:707–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Reddy LJ, Saxena KB, Jain KC, Singh U, Green JM, Sharma D, Faris DG, Rao AN, Kumar RV, Nene YL (1997) Registration of high-protein pigeonpea elite germplasm ICPL 87162. Crop Sci 37:294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Reddy LJ, Bramel P, Saxena KB, Ortiz R (2000) Utilization of wild species in pigeonpea improvement at ICRISAT. In: Poster presented in international conference on science and technology for managing plant genetic diversity in the 21st century, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 12–16 June 2000Google Scholar
  23. Remanandan P (1981) The wild genepool of Cajanus at ICRISAT, present and future. In. Proceedings of international workshop on pigeonpeas, vol 2, pp 29–38Google Scholar
  24. Sahrawat KL, Ravi Kumar G, Murthy KVS (2002) Sulphuric acid-selenium digestion for multi-element analysis in a single plant digests. Common soil Sci Plant Anal 33:3757–3765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Saxena KB, Kumar RV, Rao PV (2002) Pigeonpea nutrition and its improvement. In: Basara AS, Randhawa LS (eds) Quality improvement in field crops. Haworth Press, Binghamton, pp 227–260Google Scholar
  26. Shannon CE, Weaver W (1949) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, UrbanaGoogle Scholar
  27. Shanower TG, Yoshida M, Peter AJ (1997) Survival, growth, fecundity and behavior of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on pigeonpea and two wild Cajanus species. J Econ Entomol 90:837–841Google Scholar
  28. Sharma HC (2006) Wild relatives of pigeonpea as sources of resistance to cotton bollworm/legume pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner). Research briefs-biodiversity. http://www.icrisat.org/text/research/grep/homepage/grephomepage/archives/wild.htm
  29. Sharma SB, Remanandan P, McDonald D (1993) Resistance to Meloidogyne javanica and Rotylenchulus reniformis in wild relatives of pigeonpea. J Nematol 25:824–829PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Sharma HC, Pampapathy G, Reddy LJ (2003) Wild relatives of pigeonpea as a source of resistance to the podfly (Melanagromyza obtusa Malloch) and pod wasp (Tanaostigmodes cajaninae La Salle). Genet Resour Crop Evol 50:817–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Skinner SZ, Bauchan GR, Auricht G, Hughes S (1999) A method for the efficient management and utilization of large germplasm collections. Crop Sci 39:1237–1242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1980) Statistical methods, 7th edn. Iowa State University Press, AmesGoogle Scholar
  33. Srivastava N, Vadez V, Upadhyaya HD, Saxena KB (2006) Screening for intra and inter specific variability for salinity tolerance in pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) and its related species. SAT eJournal 2(1). August 2006. ejournal.icrisat.org
  34. Upadhyaya HD (2006) Improving pigeonpea with the wild. SAT Trends Newsl 62. Jan 2006. http://icrisat:8080/satrends/jan2006.htm
  35. Upadhyaya HD, Gowda CLL (2009) Managing and enhancing the use of germplasm—strategies and methodologies. Technical manual no. 10. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, PatancheruGoogle Scholar
  36. Upadhyaya HD, Reddy KN, Sharma S, Varshney RK, Bhattacharjee R, Singh S, Gowda CLL (2011) Pigeonpea composite collection and identification of germplasm for use in crop improvement programmes. Plant Genet Resour Charact Util 9(1):97–108Google Scholar
  37. van der Maesen LJG (1986) Cajanus DC. and Atylosia W. & A. (Leguminosae). Agricultural University Wageningen papers 85-4. Agricultural University, Wageningen, 225 ppGoogle Scholar
  38. van der Maesen LJG (1990) Pigeonpea: origin, history, evolution and taxonomy. In: Nene YL, Hall SD, Sheila VK (eds) The pigeonpea. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 44–87Google Scholar
  39. Wald A (1943) Test of statistical hypotheses concerning several parameters when the number of observations is large. Trans Am Math Soc 54:426–482. doi: 10.1090/S0002-9947-1943-0012401-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ward JH (1963) Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J Am Stat Assoc 58:236CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. D. Upadhyaya
    • 1
  • K. N. Reddy
    • 1
  • Sube Singh
    • 1
  • C. L. L. Gowda
    • 1
  1. 1.International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Genetic ResourcesPatancheruIndia

Personalised recommendations