Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution

, Volume 59, Issue 6, pp 1015–1026 | Cite as

Effects of domestication on structural polysaccharides and dietary fiber in nopalitos (Opuntia spp.)

  • Cristian López-Palacios
  • Cecilia Beatriz Peña-ValdiviaEmail author
  • J. Antonio Reyes-Agüero
  • Adriana Inés Rodríguez-Hernández
Research Article


Domestication is an evolutionary process that modifies morphological, physiological, chemical and genetic features of wild plants, and is a product of artificial selection. A gradient of domestication can be appreciated in species of the Opuntia genus. There are wild species like O. streptacantha, others semi-domesticated like O. hyptiacantha O. megacantha and O. albicarpa, or other like O. ficus-indica with the highest degree of domestication. At the same time, some structural polysaccharides have been associated with plant drought and freeze resistance. This study aimed at quantify five groups of structural polysaccharides in 14 variants of nopalitos (edible young cladodes of flat-stemmed spiny cacti consumed as vegetables) of Opuntia spp. in a domestication gradient. Given that extreme environment is less frequent under cultivation than in the wild, we hypothesized that structural polysaccharides in nopalitos are reduced throughout the domestication process. The experiment was conducted as a completely randomized design with a 5 × 14 two-factor factorial treatment structure, with four replications. Mucilages, pectins, hemicelluloses and cellulose were extracted and dietary fiber content was calculated. ANOVA of data was performed, pair wise comparisons of species and variants were conducted by Tukey test and principal components analysis was carried out. Mucilages were higher in O. ficus-indica (12% of total dry mass) and pectins, loosely and tightly bound hemicelluloses in O. streptacantha (2.5, 9 and 3%, respectively). All five species had similar content of cellulose (5.1% dry mass); but, O. streptacantha presented more dietary fiber. Higher pectins and both loosely and tightly bound hemicelluloses content in wild species can be related to genotype and the persistence of reaction to a wild environment. Mucilages which are one of the main characteristics of consumer preference and loosely bound hemicelluloses could have impact for selection during Opuntia domestication.


Cacti Cellulose Dietary fiber Domestication Hemicelluloses Mucilage Opuntia spp. Pectins 



The first author was awarded Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología scholarship for undertaking his M. Sc. program. Sarah Kohl reviewed the English version.


  1. Álvarez AR, Peña-Valdivia CB (2009) Structural polysaccharides in xoconostle (Opuntia matudae) fruits with different ripening stages. J Prof Assoc Cactus Dev 11:26–44Google Scholar
  2. Anderson EF (2001) The cactus family. Timber, PortlandGoogle Scholar
  3. Bravo HH (1978) Las cactáceas de México. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, MéxicoGoogle Scholar
  4. Callen EO (1966) Analysis of the Tehuacan coprolites. In: Byers DS (ed) The prehistory in Tehuacan valley. I. Environment and subsistence. University of Texas, Austin, pp 261–289Google Scholar
  5. Calvo-Arriaga AO, Hernández-Montes A, Peña-Valdivia CB, Corrales-García J, Aguirre-Mandujano E (2010) Preference mapping and rheological properties of four nopal (Opuntia spp.) cultivars. J Prof Assoc Cactus Dev 12:127–142Google Scholar
  6. Camacho CO, Peña-Valdivia CB, Sánchez-Urdaneta A (2007) El potencial de agua del suelo en el crecimiento y contenido de polisacáridos estructurales de nopalito (Opuntia spp.). Rev Fac Agron LUZ 24:254–259Google Scholar
  7. Cárdenas A, Goycoolea FM, Rianuado M (2008) On the gelling behaviour of ‘nopal’ (Opuntia ficus indica) low methoxyl pectin. Carbohydr Polym 73:212–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Casas A, Caballero J, Valiente BA, Soriano A, Dávila P (1999) Morphological variation and the process of domestication os Stenocereus stellatus (Cactaceae) in Central Mexico. Am J Bot 86:522–533PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Colunga-García MP, Hernández XE, Castillo MA (1986) Variación morfológica, manejo agrícola tradicional y grado de domesticación de Opuntia spp. en el Bajío guanajuatense. Agrociencia 65:7–49Google Scholar
  10. Corrales-García J, Peña-Valdivia CB, Razo-Martínez Y, Sánchez-Hernández M (2004) Acidity changes and pH-buffering capacity of nopalitos (Opuntia spp.). Postharv Biol Technol 32:169–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gallegos-Vázquez C (compilator) (2007) Recursos Fitogenéticos de Nopal (Opuntia spp.) en México: 2002–2005. Servicio Nacional de Inspección y Certificación de Semillas—Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación (SNICS-SAGARPA) y Dirección de Centros Regionales Universitarios—Universidad Autónoma Chapingo (DCRU-UACh). Chapingo, Edo. de MéxGoogle Scholar
  12. Gallegos-Vázquez C, Valdez-Cepeda RD, Barrón-Macías M, Barrientos-Priego AF, Andrés-Agustín J, Nieto-Ángel R (2006) Caracterización morfológica de 40 cultivares de nopal de uso como hortaliza del banco de germoplasma del CRUCEN-UACh. Rev Chapingo Ser Hortic 12:41–49Google Scholar
  13. García E (2004) Modificaciones al Sistema de Clasificación Climática de Köppen. Instituto de Geografía-Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, MéxicoGoogle Scholar
  14. García HE, Peña VC (1995) La pared celular. Componente funcional de las células vegetales. Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Estado de MéxicoGoogle Scholar
  15. Goldstein G, Nobel PS (1994) Water relations and low-temperature acclimation for cactus species varying in freezing tolerance. Plant Physiol 104:675–681PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Goycoolea FM, Cárdenas A (2003) Pectins from Opuntia spp.: a short review. J Prof Assoc Cactus Dev 5:17–29Google Scholar
  17. Griffith MP (2004) The origins of an important cactus crop, Opuntia ficus-indica (Cactaceae): new molecular evidence. Am J Bot 91:1915–1921PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. López-Palacios C, Reyes-Agüero JA, Ramírez-Tobías HM, Juárez-Flores BI, Aguirre-Rivera JR, Yañez-Espinoza L, Ruíz-Cabrera MA (2010) Evaluation of attributes associated with the quality of nopalito (Opuntia spp. and Nopalea sp.). Ita J Food Sci 22:423–431Google Scholar
  19. Loveys BR, Stoll M, Davies WJ (2004) Physiological approaches to enhance water use efficiency in agriculture: exploiting plant signaling in novel irrigation practice. In: Bacon MA (ed) Water use efficiency in plant biology. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, London, pp 113–141Google Scholar
  20. Mondolot L, Marlas A, Barbeau D, Gargadennet A, Pujol B, McKey D (2008) Domestication and defence: foliar tannins and C/N ratios in cassava and a close wild relative. Acta Oecol 34:147–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nobel PS, Cavelier J, Andrade JL (1992) Mucilage in cacti: its apoplastic capacitance, associated solutes, and influence on tissue water relations. J Exp Bot 43:641–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Peña-Valdivia CB, Sánchez-Urdaneta AB (2004) Polisacáridos de nopalito y tuna (Opuntia spp.). X Congreso Nacional y VIII Congreso Internacional Sobre Conocimiento y Aprovechamiento del Nopal y Otras Cactáceas de Valor Económico. Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Food and Agriculture Organization e International Society for Horticultural Science, Chapingo CD EditionGoogle Scholar
  23. Peña-Valdivia CB, Sánchez-Urdaneta AB (2006) Nopalito and cactus pear (Opuntia spp.) polysaccharides: mucilage and pectin. Acta Hortic 728:241–247Google Scholar
  24. Perales H, Aguirre RJR (2008) Biodiversidad humanizada. In: Sarukhán J, Dirzo R, González R, March I (eds) Capital Natural de México. Tomo 1. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, México, pp 565–603Google Scholar
  25. Popper ZA, Fry SC (2004) Primary cell wall composition of Pteridophytes and Spermatophytes. New Phytol 164:165–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ramírez-Tobías HM, Reyes-Agüero JA, Pinos-Rodríguez JM, Aguirre-Rivera JR (2007) Efecto de la especie y madurez sobre el contenido de nutrientes de cladodios de nopal. Agrociencia 41:619–626Google Scholar
  27. Ramírez-Tobías HM, Aguirre-Rivera JR, Pinos-Rodríguez JM, Reyes-Agüero JA (2010) Nopalito and forage productivity of Opuntia spp. and Nopalea sp. (Cactaceae) growing under green-house hydroponics system. J Food Agric Environ 8:660–665Google Scholar
  28. Razo MY, Sánchez HM (2002) Acidez de 10 variantes de nopalito (Opuntia spp.) y su efecto en las propiedades químicas y sensoriales. Tesis de Licenciatura. Departamento de Ingeniería Agroindustrial. Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, MéxicoGoogle Scholar
  29. Reid GJS (1985) Cell wall storage carbohydrates in seeds biochemistry of seed gums and hemicelluloses. Adv Bot Res 2:125–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Reyes-Agüero JA, Aguirre-Rivera JR, Flores-Flores JA (2005) Variación morfológica de Opuntia (Cactaceae) en relación con su domesticación en la Altiplanicie Meridional de México. Interciencia 30:476–484Google Scholar
  31. Reyes-Agüero JA, Aguirre RJR, Carlín CF, González DA (2009) Catálogo de las principales variantes silvestres y cultivadas de Opuntia en la Altiplanicie Meridional de México. UASLP, SAGARPA y CONACYT, San Luis PotosíGoogle Scholar
  32. Rodríguez-Felix A, Cantwell M (1988) Developmental changes in composition and quality of prickly pear cactus cladodes (nopalitos). Plant Foods Hum Nutr 38:83–93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rosenthal JP, Dirzo R (1997) Effects of life history, domestication and agronomic selection on plant defense against insects: Evidence from maizes and wild relatives. Evol Ecol 11:337–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sodi PE (1967) Las Cactáceas en las épocas pre-Colombina y Virreynal, y en el siglo XIX. Cact Suculentas Mex 1:3–12Google Scholar
  35. Villarreal F, Rojas P, Arellano V, Moreno J (1963) Estudio químico sobre seis especies de nopales (Opuntia spp.). Cienc Mex 22:59–65Google Scholar
  36. York WS (2004) Structural analysis of xyloglucans produced by diverse plant species. Evolutionary and functional implications. Invited lecture. Tsukuba University, TsukubaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cristian López-Palacios
    • 1
  • Cecilia Beatriz Peña-Valdivia
    • 1
    Email author
  • J. Antonio Reyes-Agüero
    • 2
  • Adriana Inés Rodríguez-Hernández
    • 3
  1. 1.Botánica, Colegio de PostgraduadosCampus MontecillosMéxicoMéxico
  2. 2.Instituto de Investigación de Zonas DesérticasUniversidad Autónoma de San Luis PotosíSan Luis PotosíMéxico
  3. 3.Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencia y Tecnología de los AlimentosUniversidad Autónoma del Estado de HidalgoTulancingoMéxico

Personalised recommendations