Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution

, Volume 54, Issue 4, pp 759–766 | Cite as

Evaluating landraces of bread wheat Triticum aestivum L. for tolerance to aluminium under low pH conditions

Original Paper

Abstract

Bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) landraces held within ex situ collections offer a valuable and largely unexplored genetic resource for wheat improvement programs. To maximise full utilisation of such collections the evaluation of landrace accessions for traits of interest is required. In this study, 250 accessions from 21 countries were screened sequentially for tolerance to aluminium (Al) using haematoxylin staining of root tips and by root regrowth measurement. The staining test indicated tolerance in 35 accessions, with an intermediate response to Al exhibited in a further 21 accessions. Of the 35 accessions classified as tolerant, 33 also exhibited increased root length following exposure to Al. The tolerant genotypes originated from Bulgaria, Croatia, India, Italy, Nepal, Spain, Tunisia, and Turkey. AFLP analysis of the 35 tolerant accessions indicated that these represent diverse genetic backgrounds. These accessions form a valuable set of germplasm for the study of Al tolerance and may be of benefit to breeding programs for expanding the diversity of the gene pool from which tolerant cultivars are developed.

Keywords

AFLP Aluminium tolerance Haematoxylin staining Landraces Root regrowth Triticum aestivum L. 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the financial support given under the Preservation of Biological Assets program by the BioFirst initiative of the New South Wales Government, Australia.

References

  1. Aniol A (1990) Genetics of tolerance to aluminium in wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell.). Plant Soil 123:223–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aniol A, Gustafson JP (1984) Chromosome location of genes controlling aluminium tolerance in wheat, rye and triticale. Can J Genet Cytol 26:701–705Google Scholar
  3. Baier AC, Somers DL, Gustafson JP (1995) Aluminium tolerance in wheat: correlating hydroponic evaluation with field and soil performances. Plant Breed 114:291–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennet RJ, Breen CM (1991) The aluminium signal: new dimensions to mechanisms of aluminium tolerance. Plant Soil 134:153–166Google Scholar
  5. Carver BF, Ownby JD (1995) Acid soil tolerance in wheat. In: Sparks DL (ed) Advances in agronomy. Academic Press Inc., San Diego, pp 117–173Google Scholar
  6. Coombes NE (2002) The reactive tabu search for efficient correlated experimental designs. PhD Thesis, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UKGoogle Scholar
  7. Delhaize E, Ryan PR, Randall PJ (1993) Aluminium tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Part II. Aluminium-stimulated excretion of malic acid from root apices. Plant Physiol 103:695–702PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Felsenstein J (2002) PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.6. Distributed by the author. Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, USAGoogle Scholar
  9. Foy CD (1983) The physiology of plant adaptation to mineral stress. Iowa State J Res 57:355–392Google Scholar
  10. Foy CD, Charnay RL, White MC (1978) The physiology of metal toxicity in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 29:511–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fu YB, Peterson GW, Richards KW, Somers D, DePauw RM, Clarke JM (2005) Allelic reduction and genetic shift in Canadian hard red spring wheat germplasm released from 1845 to 2004. Theor Appl Genet 110:1505–1516PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gallardo F, Borie F, Alvear M, von-Baer E (1999) Evaluation of aluminium tolerance of three barley cultivars by two short-term screening methods and field experiments. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 45:713–719Google Scholar
  13. Gallego FJ, Benito C (1997) Genetic control of aluminium tolerance in rye (Secale cereale L.). Theor Appl Genet 95:393–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haug A (1983) Molecular aspects of aluminium toxicity. CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci 1:345–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hede AR, Skovmand B, Ribaut JM, González-De-león D, Stølen O (2002) Evaluation of aluminium tolerance in a spring rye collection by hydroponic screening. Plant Breed 121:241–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kihara H (1983) Origin and history of ‘Daruma’, a parental variety of Norin 10. In: Sakamoto S (ed) Proc. 6th Int. Wheat Genetics Symp., Kyoto University Press, Kyoto, Japan, November 28–December 3, 1983, pp 13–19Google Scholar
  17. Kochian LV (1995) Cellular mechanisms on aluminium toxicity and resistance in plants. Annu Rev Physiol Plant Mol Biol 46:237–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kohli MM, Rajaram S (1988) Wheat breeding for acid soils: review of Brazilian/CIMMYT collaboration, 1974–1986. CIMMYT, Mexico, DFGoogle Scholar
  19. Minella E, Sorrells ME (1992) Aluminium tolerance in barley: genetic relationships among genotypes of diverse origin. Crop Sci 32:593–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mugwira LM, Elgawhary SM, Patel SU (1976) Differential tolerances of triticale, wheat, rye, and barley to aluminium in nutrient solution. Agron J 68:782–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mugwira LM, Elgawhary SM, Patel SU (1978) Aluminium tolerance in triticale, wheat and rye as measured by root growth characteristics and aluminium concentrations. Plant Soil 50:681–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. NLWRA (2001) National Land and Water Resources Audit. The Natural Heritage Trust, Commonwealth of AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  23. Nakamura T, Yamamori M, Hirano H, Hidaka S, Nagamine T (1995) Production of waxy (amylose free) wheats. Mol Gen Genet 248:253–259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nei M, Li WH (1979) Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:5269–5273PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Papernik LA, Bethea AS, Singleton TE, Magalhaes JV, Garvin DF, Kochian L (2001) Physiological basis of reduced Al tolerance in ditelosomic lines of Chinese Spring wheat. Planta 212:829–834PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Polle E, Konzak CF, Kittrick JA (1978) Visual detection of aluminium tolerance levels in wheat by hematoxylin staining of seedling roots. Crop Sci 18:823–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Raman H, Moroni JS, Sato K, Read BJ, Scott BJ (2002) Identification of AFLP and microsatellite markers linked with an aluminium tolerance gene in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Theor Appl Genet 105:458–464PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Raman H, Raman R, Tolhurst R, Martin P (2006) Repetitive indel markers within the ALMT-1 gene controlling aluminium tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). SubmitedGoogle Scholar
  29. Raman H, Zhang K, Cakir M, Appels R, Garvin DF, Maron LG, Kochian LV, Moroni JS, Raman R, Imtiaz M, Drake-Brockman F, Waters I, Martin P, Sasaki T, Yamamoto Y, Matsumoto H, Hebb DM, Delhaize E, Ryan PR (2005) Molecular characterization and mapping of ALMT1, the aluminium-tolerance gene of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Genome 48:781–791PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Rao IM, Zeigler RS, Vera R, Sarkarung S (1993) Selection and breeding for acid-soil tolerance in crops. Bioscience 43:454–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Reid DA, Fleming AL, Foy CD (1971) A method for determining aluminium response of barley in nutrient solution in comparison to response to Al-toxic soil. Agron J␣63:600–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reynolds MP, Mujeeb-Kazi A, Sawkins M (2005) Prospects for utilising plant-adaptive mechanisms to improve wheat and other crops in drought- and salinity-prone environments. Ann Appl Biol 145:239–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Roussel V, Koenig J, Bechert M, Balfourier F (2004) Molecular diversity in French bread wheat accessions related to temporal trends and breeding programmes. Theor Appl Genet 108:920–930PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Roussel V, Leisova L, Exbrayat F, Stehno Z, Balfourier F (2005) SSR allelic diversity changes in 480 European bread wheat varieties released from 1840 to 2000. Theor Appl Genet 111:162–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ryan PR, Delhaize E, Randall PJ (1995) Characterisation of Al-stimulated efflux of malate from the apices of Al-tolerant wheat roots. Planta 196:103–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sasaki T, Yamamoto Y, Ezaki B, Katsuhara M, Ahn SJ, Ryan PJ, Delhaize E, Matsumoto H (2004) A wheat gene encoding an aluminium-activated malate transporter. Plant J 37: 645–653PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Scott BJ, Conyers MK, Poile GJ, Cullis BR (1997) Subsurface acidity and liming affect yield of cereals. Aust J Agric Res 48:843–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sneath PHA, Sokal RR (eds) (1973) Numerical taxonomy. The principles and practice of numerical classification. WH Freeman and Co., San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  39. SoE (2001) State of the environment report prepared by A Hamblin. Department for the Environment, Canberra, ACT, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  40. Stodart BJ, Mackay M, Raman H (2005) AFLP and SSR analysis of genetic diversity among landraces of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell) from different geographical regions. Aust J Agric Res 56:691–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Worland AJ (1986) Gibberellic acid insensitive dwarfing genes in Southern European wheats. Euphytica 35:857–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reilans M, van de Lee T, Hornes M, Frijters A, Pot J, Peleman J, Kuiper M (1995) AFLP, a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res 23:4407–4414PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. J. Stodart
    • 1
  • H. Raman
    • 1
  • N. Coombes
    • 1
  • M. Mackay
    • 2
  1. 1.NSW Department of Primary IndustriesWagga Wagga Agricultural InstituteWagga WaggaAustralia
  2. 2.Australian Winter Cereals CollectionTamworth Agricultural InstituteTamworthAustralia

Personalised recommendations