Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution

, Volume 54, Issue 7, pp 1541–1553

Gene expression variation in grapevine species Vitis vinifera L. and Vitis aestivalis Michx.

  • Raymond W. M. Fung
  • Wenping Qiu
  • Yingcai Su
  • Daniel P. Schachtman
  • Kari Huppert
  • Csaba Fekete
  • László G. Kovács
Research Paper


Comparative microarray (Vitis GeneChip) analysis in young leaves revealed considerable variation in gene expression between Vitis vinifera L. and Vitis aestivalis Michx. Approximately 12% of the genes were differentially expressed in the two grapevine species (P < 0.001). Over 200 probe sets were identified which consistently detected transcripts in one grapevine species, but not in the other. We were unable to identify any broad functional category in which transcript abundance was overall different in any one species. Of the genes expressed only in V. aestivalis leaves, we identified a class IV chitinase which was previously shown by others to have a flower- and fruit-specific expression in V. vinifera. Among the transcripts which were differentially expressed (P < 0.001) in both species, we identified genes encoding key enzymes in flavonoid, monolignol, and proanthocyanindin biosynthesis. Statistical exploration of the data suggested that sequence divergence between the predominantly V. vinifera-derived GeneChip probes and the V. aestivalis cRNA did not confound the hybridization data and that the reliability of the microarray results was similar in the two grapevine species.


Chitinase Grapevine Gene expression Microarray Phenylpropanoid metabolism Species-specificity Transcriptome Vitis vinifera 


  1. Adam-Blondon A-F (2006) Genome sequencing projects: strategies and perspectives. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on Grape Genetics and Breeding, University of Udine, Italy, 2–6 July 2006Google Scholar
  2. Adam-Blondon A-F, Aubourg S, Guichard C, Pelsy F, This P, Paillard S, Rathnaparkhe M, Tual S, Dossat C, Wincker P, Weissenbach J (2005) Update of our knowledge on the structure of the grapevine genome. In: Qiu WP, Kovács LG (eds) Proceedings of the International Grape Genomics Symposium, Saint Louis, 2005Google Scholar
  3. Affymetrix (2001) Microarray Suite user’s guide. Affymetrix, Santa Clara, California, Cited 22 May 2006
  4. Affymetrix (2002) Statistical algorithm description document. Affymetrix, Sanat Clara, California, Cited 22 May 2006
  5. Affymetrix (2004) Affymetrix expression analysis technical manual. Affymetrix, Santa Clara, California, Cited 22 May 2006
  6. Alleweldt G, Spiegel-Roy P, Reisch BJ (1990) Grapes (Vitis). In: Moore JN, Ballington JR (eds) Genetic resources of temperate fruit and nut crops, vol 290. ISHS, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp 291–337Google Scholar
  7. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Aradhya MK, Dangl GS, Prins BH, Bourisqou JM, Walker MA, Meredith CP, Simon CJ (2003) Genetic structure and differentiation in cultivated grape Vitis vinifera L. Genet Res 81:179–192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barker CL, Donald T, Pauquet J, Ratnaparkhe MB, Bouquet A, Adam-Blondon A-F, Thomas MR, Dry I (2005) Genetic and physical mapping of the grapevine powdery mildew resistance gene, Run1, using a bacterial artificial chromosome library. Theor Appl Genet 111:370–377PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bieza K, Lois R (2001) An Arabidopsis mutant tolerant to lethal ultraviolet-B levels shows constitutively elevated accumulation of flavonoids and other phenolics. Plant Physiol 126:1105–1115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bisson LF, Waterhouse AL, Ebeler SE, Walker MA, Lapsley JT (2002) The present and future of the international wine industry. Nature 418:696–699PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Derckel JP, Legendre L, Audren J, Haye B, Lambert B (1996) Chitinases of the grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.): five isoforms induced in leaves by salicylic acid are constitutively expressed in other tissues. Plant Sci 119:31–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dixon RA, Xie DY, Sharma SB (2005) Proanthocyanidins – a final frontier in flavonoid research? New Phytol 165:9–28PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ford CM, Boss PK, Hoj PB (1998) Cloning and characterization of Vitis vinifera UDP-glucose:flavonoid 3-O-glucosyltransferase, a homologue of the enzyme encoded by the maize Bronze-1 locus that may primarily serve to glucosylate anthocyanidins in vivo. J Biol Chem 273:9224–9233PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Franke R, Hemm MR, Ruegger JW, Humphreys MO, Clint C (2002) Changes in secondary metabolism and deposition of an unusual lignin in the ref8 mutant of Arabidopsis. Plant J 30:47–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Giannakis C, Bucheli CS, Skene KGM, Robinson SP, Steele SN (1998) Chitinase and β-1,3-glucanase in grapevine leaves: a possible defence against powdery mildew infection. Austr J Grape Wine Res 4:14–22Google Scholar
  17. Goes da Silva F, Iandolino A, Al-Kayal F, Bohlmann MC, Cushman MA, Lim H, Ergul A, Figueroa R, Kabuloglu EK, Osborne C, Rowe J, Tattersall E, Leslie A, Xu J, Baek J, Cramer GR, Cushman JC, Cook DR (2005) Characterizing the grape transcriptome. Analysis of expressed sequence tags from multiple Vitis species and development of a compendium of gene expression during berry development. Plant Physiol 139:574–597Google Scholar
  18. Higgins DG, Thompson JD, Gibson TJ (1996) Using CLUSTAL for multiple sequence alignments. Methods Enzymol 266:383–401PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jones L, Ennos AR, Turner S (2001) Cloning and characterization of irregular xylem4 (irx4): a severely lignin-deficient mutant of Arabidopsis. Plant J 26:205–216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kirst M, Basten CJ, Myburg AA, Zeng ZB, Sederoff RR (2005) Genetic architecture of transcript-level variation in differentiating xylem of a Eucalyptus hybrid. Genetics 169:2295–2303PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kobayashi S, Ishimaru M, Ding CK, Yakushiji H, Goto N (2001) Comparison of UDP-glucose:flavonoid 3-O-glucosyltransferase (UFGT) gene sequences between white grapes (Vitis vinifera) and their sports with red skin. Plant Sci 160:543–550PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Landry LG, Chapple CC, Last RL (1995) Arabidopsis mutants lacking phenolic sunscreens exhibit enhanced ultraviolet-B injury and oxidative damage. Plant Physiol 109:1159–1166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lapierre C, Pollet B, Petit-Conil M, Toval G, Romero J, Pilate G, Leple JC, Boerjan W, Ferret V, De Nadai V, Jouanin L (1999) Structural alteration of lignins in transgenic poplars with depressed cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase or caffeic acid O-methyltransferase activity have an opposite impact on the efficiency of industrial Kraft pulping. Plant Physiol 119:153–163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lunkenbein S, Bellido M, Aharoni A, Elma MJ, Salentijn E, Kaldenhoff R, Coiner HA, Muñoz-Blanco J, Scwhab W (2006) Cinnamate metabolism in ripening fruit. Characterization of a UDP-glucose:cinnamate glucosyltransferase from strawberry. Plant Physiol 140:1047–1058PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mauch F, Mauch-Mani B, Boller T (1988) Antifungal hydrolases in pea tissue. II. Inhibition of fungal growth by combinations of chitinase and β-1,3-glucanase. Plant Physiol 88:936–942PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nuzhdin SV, Wayne ML, Harmon KL, McIntyre LM (2004) Common pattern of evolution of gene expression level and protein sequence in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol 21:1308–1317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Oleksiak MF, Churchill GA, Crawford DL (2002) Variation in gene expression within and among natural populations. Nat Genet 32:261–266PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pellegrini L, Geoffroy P, Fritig B, Legrand M (1993) Molecular cloning and expression of a new class of ortho-diphenol-O-methyltransferases induced in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) leaves by infection or elicitor treatment. Plant Physiol 103:509–517PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Piquemal J, Chamayou S, Nadaud I, Beckert M, Barriere Y, Mila I, Lapierre C, Rigau J, Puigdomenech P, Jauneau A, Digonnet C, Boudet AM, Goffner D, Pichon M (2002) Down-regulation of caffeic acid O-methyltransferase in maize revisited using a transgenic approach. Plant Physiol 130:1675–1685PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pocock KF, Hayasaka Y, McCarthy M, Waters EJ (2000) Thaumatin-like proteins and chitinases, the haze-forming proteins of wine, accumulate during ripening of grape (Vitis vinifera) berries and drought stress does not affect the final levels per berry at maturity. J Agric Food Chem 48:1637–1643Google Scholar
  31. Reisch BJ, Pratt C (1996) Grapes. In: Janick J, Moore JN (eds) Fruit breeding, vol 2. Wiley and Sons, New York, pp 297–370Google Scholar
  32. Reisch BJ, Goodman RN, Martens MH, Weeden NF (1993) The relationship between Norton and Cynthiana, red wine cultivars derived from Vitis aestivalis. Am J Enol Vitic 44:441–444Google Scholar
  33. Ribereau-Gayon P, Glories Y, Maujean A, Dubourdieu D (2000) The handbook of enology, vol 2. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Robinson SP, Jacobs AK, Dry IB (1997) A class IV chitinase is highly expressed in grape berries during ripening. Plant Physiol 114:771–778PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Salmaso M, Faes G, Segala C, Stefanini M, Salakhutdinov I, Zyprian E, Toepfer R, Grando MS, Velasco R (2004) Genome diversity and gene haplotypes in the grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.), as reveled by single nucleotide polymorphisms. Mol Breed 14:385–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sparvoli F, Martin C, Scienza A, Gavazzi G, Tonelli C (1994) Cloning and molecular analysis of structural genes involved in flavonoid and stilbene biosynthesis in grape (V. vinifera, L.). Plant Mol Biol 24:743–755PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Townsend JP, Cavalieri D, Hartl DL (2003) Population genetic variation in genome-wide gene expression. Mol Biol Evol 20:955–963PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Varshney RK, Graner A, Sorrels ME (2005) Genomics-assisted breeding for crop improvement. Trends Plant Sci 10:621–630PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vogt T, Jones P (2000) Glycosyltransferases in plant natural product synthesis: characterization of a supergene family. Trends Plant Sci 5:380–386PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vuylsteke M, van Eeuwijk F, Van Hummelen P, Kuiper M, Zabeau M (2005) Genetic analysis of variation in gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 171:1267–1275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Winkel-Shirley B (2002) Biosynthesis of flavonoids and effects of stress. Curr Opin Plant Biol 5:218–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ye Z-H, Kneusel RE, Matern U, Varner JE (1994) An alternative methylation pathway in lignin biosynthesis in Zinnia. Plant Cell 6:1427–1439PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zyprian E, Akkurt M, Fischer B, Salakhutdinov I, Welter L, Kortekamp A, Eibach R, Töpfer R (2005) Fundamental research meets practical breeding: genetics of disease resistance in grapevine. In: Qiu WP, Kovács LG (eds) Proceedings of the International Grape Genomics Symposium, Saint Louis, 2005Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raymond W. M. Fung
    • 1
  • Wenping Qiu
    • 1
  • Yingcai Su
    • 2
  • Daniel P. Schachtman
    • 3
  • Kari Huppert
    • 3
  • Csaba Fekete
    • 1
  • László G. Kovács
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AgricultureMissouri State UniversityMountain GroveUSA
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsMissouri State UniversitySpringfieldUSA
  3. 3.The Donald Danforth Plant Science CenterSt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations