Advertisement

Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution

, Volume 54, Issue 3, pp 555–562 | Cite as

Acquisition and ecological characterization of Lactuca serriola L. germplasm collected in the Czech Republic, Germany, the Netherlands and United Kingdom

  • A. LebedaEmail author
  • I. Doležalová
  • E. Křístková
  • K. J. Dehmer
  • D. Astley
  • C. C. M. van de Wiel
  • R. van Treuren
Article

Abstract

Expeditions were conducted in the Czech Republic, Germany, the Netherlands and United Kingdom in 2001 (partly 1998) to study Lactuca serriola L. (prickly lettuce, compass plant) geographic distribution, ecology, habitat characteristics and occurrence of diseases and pests on this species. During these missions the seed material of L. serriola L. was collected in an east–west transect of these four countries. The European transect where seeds were collected and field observations were made represents a relatively large area between 2°34′50′′ W–17°32′46′′ E and 47°40′42′′–54°04′19′′ N. The seed material was used for regeneration, inclusion in the national genetic resources collections of individual countries and for research purposes in follow-up studies. During the missions, 50 locations with occurrence of L. serriola L. were visited (16 in Czech Republic and Germany, 10 in UK and 8 in the Netherlands). Individual seed lots of sixteen different plants were collected at each location (L. serriola L. population). Thus, in total 800 seed samples were collected. In Czech Republic and Germany L. serriola L. f. serriola dominated in all observed populations, in the Netherlands both f. serriola and f. integrifolia occurred in pure or mixed stands, whereas in the United Kingdom L. serriola L. f. integrifolia (S.F. Gray) S.D. Prince et R.N. Carter was dominant. L. serriola L. was recorded at various altitudes (−4 to 410 m), different habitats (ditches, along roads, fields and field margins, ruderal places, pavements and parking sites, fallow fields), individual populations varied substantially in size (20 to >1000 plants), area covered (25–10,000 m2), and the structure and character of associated plant communities. Natural infections by downy mildew (Bremia lactucae Regel) and powdery mildew (Golovinomyces cichoracearum (DC.) V.P. Gelyuta) were observed in some populations. B. lactucae Regel was recorded only in Czech Republic, G. cichoracearum (DC.) V.P. Gelyuta was more common in continental Europe. General and specific aspects of L. serriola L. geographic distribution and ecology are discussed.

Key words

Biodiversity Crop wild relatives Disease occurrence Ecology Geographic distribution Habitat variation Lactuca serriola Prickly lettuce 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brant V., Santrucek J. and Svobodova M. (2000). The effect of different ways and frequency of harvesting of set aside arable land on the weed infestation. J. Plant Dis. Protect. 107: 105–112Google Scholar
  2. Braun U. (1995). The Powdery Mildews (Erysiphales) of Europe. Gustav Fischer Verlag, JenaGoogle Scholar
  3. (1997). Origin and domestication of Lactuca sativa L. Genet. Res. Crop. Evol. 44: 165–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Doležalová I., Lebeda A. and Křístková E. (2001). Prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola L.) germplasm collecting and distribution study in Slovenia and Sweden. Plant Genet. Res. Newslett. 128: 41–44Google Scholar
  5. Feráková V. (1977). The genus Lactuca L. in Europe. Universita Komenského, Bratislava, Slovak RepublicGoogle Scholar
  6. Van der Meijden R. and Brandenburg W.A. (1994). Botanical files on lettuce (Lactuca sativa). Gorteria Suppl. 2: 1–34Google Scholar
  7. Grulich V. (2004). Slavík, B. and Štěpánková, J. (eds) Květena České republiky 7 (Flora of the Czech Republic 7), pp 487–497. Academia, Praha, Czech RepublicGoogle Scholar
  8. (1987). Illustrierte Flora von MitteleuropaBand VI, Teil 4. Verlag Paul Parey, Berlin-Hamburg, 1113–1134Google Scholar
  9. (1998). Alien expansive weeds of the Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic. Academia, Praha, Czech RepublicGoogle Scholar
  10. (2002). Klíč ke květeně České republiky (Key to the flora of the Czech Republic). Academia, Praha, Czech RepublicGoogle Scholar
  11. Laghetti G. and Hammer K. (2004). Crop genetic resources from Mediterranean: a review on exploration, collecting and other safeguarding activities. Recent Res. Devel. Crop Sci. 1: 165–209Google Scholar
  12. Lebeda A. (1985). Auftreten der natürlichen Infektion durch den Echten Mehltau (Erysiphe cichoracearum) bei der Gattung Lactuca in der Tschechoslowakei. Acta Phytopathol. Acad. Sci. Hungar. 20: 149–162Google Scholar
  13. Lebeda A. (1994). Evaluation of wild Lactuca species for resistance to natural infection of powdery mildew (Erysiphe cichoracearum). Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 41: 55–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lebeda A., Doležalová I. and Astley D. (2004a). Representation of wild Lactuca spp. (AsteraceaeLactuceae) in world genebank collections. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 51: 167–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lebeda A., Doležalová I., Feráková V. and Astley D. (2004b). Geographical distribution of wild Lactuca species (AsteraceaeLactuceae). Botan. Rev. 70: 328–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lebeda A., Doležalová I., Křístková E. and Mieslerová B. (2001). Biodiversity and ecogeography of wild Lactuca spp. in some European countries. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 48: 153–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lebeda A. and Petrželová I. (2004). Variation and distribution of virulence phenotypes of Bremia lactucae in natural populations of Lactuca serriola. Plant Pathol. 53: 316–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lebeda A., Pink D.A.C. and Astley D. (2002). Aspects of the interactions between wild Lactuca spp. and related genera and lettuce downy mildew (Bremia lactucae). In: Spencer-Phillips, P.T.N., Gisi, U., and Lebeda, A. (eds) Advances in Downy Mildew Research, pp 85–111. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lenné J.M. and Wood D. (1991). Plant disease and the use of wild germplasm. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 29: 35–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mejías J.A. (1994). Self-fertility and associated flower head traits in the Iberian taxa of Lactucarelated genera Asteraceae, Lactuceae. Plant Syst. Evol. 191: 147–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Petrželová I. and Lebeda A. (2004). Occurrence of Bremia lactucae in natural populations of Lactuca serriola. J. Phytopathol. 152: 391–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Prince D.S. and Carter R.N. (1977). Prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola L.) in Britain. Watsonia 11: 331–338Google Scholar
  23. Reinink K. (1999). Lettuce resistance breeding. In: Lebeda, A. and Křístková, E. (eds) Eucarpia Leafy Vegetables ’999, pp 139–147. Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech RepublicGoogle Scholar
  24. Rothmaler W., Bässler M., Jäger E.J. and Werner K. (1999). Exkursionsflora von Deutschland, Bd. 2. Gefässpflanzen Grundband. ed. 17. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg-BerlinGoogle Scholar
  25. Sagarin R.D. and Gaines S.D. (2002). The “abundant centre” distribution: to what extent is it a biogeographical rule?. Ecol. Lett. 5: 137–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stace C. (1997). New Flora of the British Isles. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  27. Stavělíková H., Boukema I.W. and van Hintum Th.J.L. (2002). The international Lactuca database. Plant Genet. Res. Newslett. 130: 16–19Google Scholar
  28. (1981). Gifsla (Lactuca virosa L.) en kompassla (Lactuca serriola L.) in Nederland. Gorteria 10: 179–183Google Scholar
  29. Weaver S.E. and Downs M.P. (2003). The biology of Canadian weeds. 122. Lactuca serriola L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 83: 619–628Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Lebeda
    • 1
    Email author
  • I. Doležalová
    • 1
  • E. Křístková
    • 1
    • 2
  • K. J. Dehmer
    • 3
  • D. Astley
    • 4
  • C. C. M. van de Wiel
    • 5
  • R. van Treuren
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Botany, Faculty of SciencePalacký UniversityOlomouc-HoliceCzech Republic
  2. 2.Gene Bank Department – Workplace OlomoucResearch Institute of Crop Production Praha-RuzyněOlomouc-HoliceCzech Republic
  3. 3.Genebank DepartmentLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK)GaterslebenGermany
  4. 4.Genetic Resources Unit, Warwick HRIWellesbourne, WarwickUnited Kingdom
  5. 5.Plant Research International B.V.Wageningen University and Research Centre, Business Unit Biodiversity and BreedingWageningenthe Netherlands
  6. 6.Centre for Genetic Resources, the Netherlands (CGN)Wageningen University and Research CentreWageningenthe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations