Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution

, Volume 52, Issue 4, pp 405–419 | Cite as

Genetic Diversity of Japanese Melon Cultivars (Cucumis melo L.) as Assessed by Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA and Simple Sequence Repeat Markers

  • Eijiro Nakata
  • Jack E. StaubEmail author
  • Ana I. López-Sesé
  • Nurit Katzir


The genetic diversity among 67 melon (C. melo L.) cultivars from five Japanese seed companies was assessed using 25 10-mer RAPD primers (56 bands) and nine SSR (36 alleles) markers. These cultivars belong to three horticultural varieties (synom. Groups) spanning eight melon market classes: Group Cantalupensis (market classes Earl’s, House, Galia, Charentais, and Ogen), Group Inodorus [Honeydew and Casaba melons (market classes Amarillo, Piel de Sapo, Rochet, Negro, Crenshaw, and Tendral)], and Group Conomon (market class Oriental). Genetic variation among these cultivars was compared to variation in a reference array (RA) consisting of 34 selected melon accessions from previous studies. Cluster analysis resulted in 11 of 15 Japanese Oriental accessions forming a group with South African RA accessions. The remaining Group Conomon Japanese accessions grouped either with Casaba or with Honeydew cultivars. Japanese Group Conomon accessions and South African RA accessions formed a genetic group that was distinct from all other accessions studied, and suggests either an Asiatic origin for the South African melon germplasm examined or an independent domestication involving similar ancestors. The majority of Japanese House and Earl market class accessions shared genetic affinities, and were genetically different from the Japanese Group Inodorus accessions examined. These Japanese accessions were most similar to Casaba RA accessions. Japanese Galia accessions were similar to either House and Earl’s market classes or to Galia, Ogen, Casaba, and Honeydew RA accessions. Genetic differences exist between melon types that were domesticated from wild, ‘free-living’ subspecies agrestis and from melo.


Diversity analysis Genetic distance Germplasm management RAPD SSR 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Akashi, Y., Fukuda, N., Wako, T., Masuda, M., Kato, K. 2002Genetic variation and phylogenetic relationships in East and South Asian melons, Cucumis melo L., based on the analysis of five isozymesEuphytica125385396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baudracco-Arnas, S., Pitrat, M. 1996A genetic map of melon (Cucumis melo L.) with RFLP, RAPD, isozyme, disease resistance and morphological markersTheor. Appl. Genet.935764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Curtin, P.D. 1984Cross-cultural Trade in World HistoryCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Danin-Poleg, Y., Reis, N., Tzuri, G., Katzir, N. 2001Development and characterization of microsatellite in CucumisTheor. Appl. Genet.1026172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. García, E., Jamilena, M., lvarez, J.I., Arnedo, T., Oliver, J.L., Lozano, R. 1998Genetic relationships among melon breeding lines revealed by RAPD markers and agronomic traitsTheor. Appl. Genet.96878885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Grebenščikov, I. 1953Die Entwicklung der MelonensystematikKulturpflanze1121138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Greuter W.,McNeill J., Barrie F.R., Burdett H.M.,Demoulin V., Filgueiras T.S., Nicolson D.H., Silva P.C., Skog J.E., Trehane P., Turland N.J., Hawksworth D.L. (eds. and compilers) (2000). International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (St. Louis Code). Regnum Veg 138: pp. 1–474Google Scholar
  8. Horejsi, T., Staub, J.E. 1999Genetic variation in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) as assessed by random amplified polymorphic DNAGenet. Resour. Crop Evol.46337350Google Scholar
  9. Jaccard, P. 1908Nouvelles reserches sur la distribution floraleBull. Soc. Vaud Sci. Nat.44223270Google Scholar
  10. Jackson, D.A., Somers, K.M., Harvey, H.H. 1989Similarity coefficients: measurements of co-occurrence and association or simply measures of occurrence?Am. Nat.133436453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Katzir, N., Danin-Poleg, T., Tzuri, G., Karchi, Z., Lavi, U., Cregan, P.B. 1996Length polymorphism and homologies of microsatellites in several Cucurbitaceae speciesTheor. Appl. Genet.9312821290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kirkbride, J.H.,Jr. 1993Biosystematics Monograph of the Genus Cucumis (Cucurbitaceae)Parkway PublishersBoone, NCGoogle Scholar
  13. López-Sesé, A.I., Staub, J.E., Katzir, N., Gómez-Guillamón, M.L. 2002Estimation of between and within accession variation in selected Spanish melon germplasm using RAPD and SSR markers to assess strategies for large collection evaluationEuphytica1274151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Maniatis, T., Fritsch, E.F., Sambrook, J. 1982Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory ManualCold Spring Harbor Laboratory PressCold Spring Harbor, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Mantel, N.J. 1967The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approachCancer Res.27209220PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. McCreight, J.D., Nerson, H., Grumet, R. 1993Melon, Cucumis melo LKallos, G.Bergh, B.O. eds. Genetic Improvement of Vegetable CropsPergamonNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. McCreight, J.D., Staub, J.E. 1993Indo–US Cucumis germplasm expeditionHortScience28467Google Scholar
  18. Mliki, A., Staub, J.E., Zhangyong, S., Ghorbel, A. 2001Genetic diversity in melon (Cucumis melo L.): An evaluation of African germplasm.GenetResour. Crop Evol.48587597Google Scholar
  19. Munger, H.M., Robinson, R.W. 1991Nomenclature of Cucumis melo L.Cucurbit Genet Coop. Rep.144344Google Scholar
  20. Naudin, C. 1859Review des cucurbitacées cultivées on MuseumAnn. Sci. Natl. Ser.479164Google Scholar
  21. Nayar, N.M., Singh, R. 1998Taxonomy, distribution, and ethnobotanical usesNayar, N.M.More, T.A. eds. CucurbitsScience Publishers Inc.New Hampshire, USAGoogle Scholar
  22. Nei, M. 1973Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populationsProc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA7033213323PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Nei, M. 1978Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individualsGenetics89583590Google Scholar
  24. Pangalo, K.I. 1929Critical review of the main literature on the taxonomy, geography and origin of cultivated and partially wild melonsTrudy Prikl. Bot.23397444[In Russian, and translated into English for USDA by G. Saad in 1986]Google Scholar
  25. Pitrat, M., Hanelt, P., Hammer, K. 2000Some comments on infraspecific classification of cultivars of melonActa Hort.5102936Google Scholar
  26. Robinson, R.W., Decker-Walters, D.S. 1997CucurbitsCAB InternationalNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Rohlf J.F. (1997). NTSYS-pc. Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System. Version 1.8. Exeter Software, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Rubatzky, V.E., Yamaguchi, M. 1997World vegetables: Principles, Production, and Nutritive ValuesChapman and HallNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Sakata Y., Sugiyama M. (2002). Characteristics of Japanese cucurbits. In: Nishimura S., Ezura H., Matsuda T., Tazuke A. (ed). Proceedings of the II International Symposium on Cucurbits. Acta Hort. 588: 195–203Google Scholar
  30. Silberstein, L., Kovalski, I., Huang, R.G., Anagnostu, K., Jahn, M.M.K., Perl-Treves, R. 1999Molecular variation in melon (Cucumis melo L.) as revealed by RFLP and RAPD markersSci. Hort.79101111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sokal, R.R., Sneath, P.H. 1963Principles of Numerical TaxonomyFreemanSan Francisco, CA359Google Scholar
  32. Spooner, D.M., Hetterscheid, W.L.A., Berg, R.G., Brandenburg, W.A. 2003Plantnomenclature andtaxonomy: an horticultural and Agronomic PerspectiveHort. Rev.28160Google Scholar
  33. Spooner, D.M., Tivang, J., Nienhuis, J., Miller, J.T., Douches, D.S., Contreras, M. 1996Comparison of four molecular markers in measuring relationships among wild potato relatives Solanum section Etuberosum (subgenus Potato)Theor. Appl. Genet.92532540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Staub, J.E. 2001Inheritance of RAPD markers in Melon (Cucumis melo L.). Cucurbit GenetCoop. Rep.242932Google Scholar
  35. Staub, J.E., Bacher, J., Poetter, K. 1996Factors affecting the application of random amplified polymorphic DNAs in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)HortScience31262266Google Scholar
  36. Staub, J.E., Box, J., Meglic, V., Horejsi, T.F., McCreight, J.D. 1997Comparison of isozyme and random amplified polymorphic DNA data for determining intraspecific variation in CucumisGenet. Resour. Crop Evol.44257269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Staub, J.E., Danin-Poleg, Y., Fazio, G., Horejsi, T., Reis, N., Katzir, N. 2000Comparison analysis of cultivated melon groups (Cucumis melo L.) using random amplified polymorphic DNA and simple sequence repeat markersEuphytica115225241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Staub, J.E., Fredrick, L., Marty, T. 1987Electrophoretic variation in cross-compatible wild diploid species of CucumisCan. J. Bot.65792798Google Scholar
  39. Stepansky, A., Kovalski, I., Perl-Treves, R. 1999Intraspecific classification of melons (Cucumis melo L.) in view of their phenotypic and molecular variationPlant Syst. Evol.217313332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Whitaker, T.W., Bemis, W.P. 1976Cucurbits, Cucumis, Citrullus, Cucurbita, Lagenaria (Cucurbitaceae)Simmonds, N.W. eds. Evolution of Crop Plants.LongramsNew York6469Google Scholar
  41. Yeh, F.C., Yang, R.C., Boiley, T., Ye, Z.H., Mao, J.X. 1997POPGENE, the user-friendly shareware for population genetic analysisMolecular Biology and Biotechnology Center, University of AlbertaCanadaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eijiro Nakata
    • 1
  • Jack E. Staub
    • 2
    Email author
  • Ana I. López-Sesé
    • 2
  • Nurit Katzir
    • 3
  1. 1.Sakata SeedShizuoka-KenJapan
  2. 2.US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Vegetable Crops Research Unit, Department of HorticultureUniversity of Wisconsin MadisonMadisonUSA
  3. 3.Newe Ya’ar Research CenterAgricultural Research OrganizationRamat YishayIsrael

Personalised recommendations