Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution

, Volume 53, Issue 6, pp 1099–1113 | Cite as

Farmers’ Perception and Genetic Erosion of Tetraploid Wheats Landraces in Ethiopia

  • Yifru Teklu
  • Karl Hammer


Assessing genetic erosion has been suggested as the first priority in any major effort to arrest loss of genetic diversity. In Ethiopia, although it is generally accepted that significant amount of genetic erosion has occurred and is still occurring, there is little data on its amount and extent. Thus, this study is conducted to quantify the extent of genetic erosion in Ethiopian tetraploid wheat landraces and to identify major causes of genetic erosion. To this end, a field survey of 126 farmers, randomly selected over five districts in eastern, south-eastern and central highlands of Ethiopia during 2001/2002 and 2002/2003 main cropping seasons was undertaken. Questioner was used to collect primary data from farmers who are potentially rich sources of information on genetic erosion at the variety level. Additional data were collected through key informant interviewing. Moreover, resampling was made from Tulo, Chiro and Harar Zuriya districts in eastern Ethiopia. Analysis of history profiles from primary and secondary data indicated a reduction in the use of local varieties over years. Triticum polonicum and T. turgidum are becoming very localized, and therefore, they are under greater threat of extinction. Using the calculation scheme: gene erosion=100%−gene integrity, i.e., the still extant landraces, genetic erosion was calculated for the three different areas where resamplings were made. Genetic erosion of 100% was observed both in T. durum and T. dicoccon in Tulo district. Likewise, genetic erosion of 85.7, 100 and 77.8%, respectively, was calculated for T. durum, T. turgidum and T. dicoccon in Chiro district. In Harar Zuriya, a genetic erosion of 88.9% for T. durum and 100% both in T. turgidum and T. dicoccon was detected. Number of farmers growing landraces of tetraploid wheats drastically decreased in all surveyed areas in the past decades. Displacement of landraces by other crops was the prominent factor for ending landrace cultivation. Farmers’ preference to yield potential and cash crops subsequently reduced the chance of maintaining landraces. Institutional factors like access to credit and the extension advice have influenced farmers’ decision regarding cultivar choice. In all surveyed areas, the most important initial source of seed of improved wheat varieties is the seed credit from the Ministry of Agriculture which uses a ‘plant now, pay later’ scheme to promote the distribution of improved varieties and fertilizers. The problem of genetic erosion through inappropriate maintenance of ex situ collections was also recognized and discussed.


Farmers perception Genetic erosion Landraces Tetraploid wheats Triticum 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. W.S. Ahn, H.J. Kang and M.S. Yoon, Genetic erosion of crop plants in Korea. In: Y.G. Park and S. Sakamoto (eds.) Biodiversity and Conservation of Plant Genetic Resources in South Asia. Tokyo: Jpn. Sci. Soc. Press (1996) pp. 41-55Google Scholar
  2. M. Akimoto, Y. Shimamoto and H. Morishima, The extinction of genetic resources of Asian wild riceOryza rufipogon Griff.: a case study in Thailand. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 46 (1999) 419-425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. T. Amsal, Yield Potential of rainfed wheat in the central highlands of Ethiopia. Ethiopia: Alemeya (1994).Google Scholar
  4. E. Bechere, H. Kebede and G. Belay, Durum Wheat in Ethiopia. An old crop in an ancient land. Addis AbabaEthiopia: IBCR (2000).Google Scholar
  5. H.K. Bekele, H. Verkuijl, W. Mwangi and D. Tanner, Adoption of Improved Wheat Technologies in Adaba and Dodola Woredas of the Bale Highlands, Ethiopia. MexicoD.F: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) and Ethiopian Agricultural Research Organization (EARO) (2000).Google Scholar
  6. A. Brown, A. Young, J. Burdon, L. Christides, G. Clarke, D. Coates and W. Sherwin, Genetic indicators for state of the environment reporting. Canberra: Australia: State of the Environment Technical Paper Series (Environmental Indicators), Department of EnvironmentSport and Territories (1997).Google Scholar
  7. S.B. Brush, In situ conservation of landraces in centers of crop diversity. Crop Sci. 35 (1995) 346-354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. S.B. Brush and E. Meng, Farmers’ valuation and conservation of crop genetic resources. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 45 (1998) 139-150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. K.S.E. Cheah and D.J. Osborne, DNA lesions occur with loss of viability in embryos of ageing rye seed. Nature 272 (1978) 593-599CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. E. Cromwell and C. Almekinders, The impact of seed supply interventions on the use of crop genetic diversity. In: W. de Boef and C. Almekinders (eds.) Encouraging Diversity: The Conservation and Development of Plant Genetic Resources. London: Intermediate Technology Publications (2000) pp. 223-227Google Scholar
  11. W. Erskine and F. J. Muehlbauer, Effects of climatic variations on crop genetic resources and plant breeding aims in West Asia and North Africa. In: M.T. Jackson, B.V. Ford-Lloyd and M.L. Parry (eds.) Climatic Change and Plant Genetic Resources. London: Belhaven Press (1990) pp. Google Scholar
  12. M. Eshetu, Seed Systems and Small-scale Farmers: A case Study of Ethiopia and South Africa. South Africa: University of the free states (2002).Google Scholar
  13. Global Plan of Action for the Conservation and Sustainable Utilisation of Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Rome: FAO (1996).Google Scholar
  14. State of the World’s Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (1997).Google Scholar
  15. C. Fowler and P.P. Mooney, Shattering: Food Politics, and the Loss of Genetic Diversity. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press (1990).Google Scholar
  16. O.H. Frankel and E. Bennett, Genetic Resources in Plants Their Exploration and Conservation. Oxford: Blackwell (1970).Google Scholar
  17. Survey of Crop Genetic Resources in Their Centres of Diversity, First Report. Rome: Food and Agricultural Organization of the U. N. (1973).Google Scholar
  18. O.H. Frankel and M.E. Soulé, Conservation and Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1981).Google Scholar
  19. L.Z. Gao, The conservation of Chinese rice biodiversity: genetic erosion, ethnobotany and prospects. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 50 (2003) 17-32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Guarino L. 1999. Approaches to measuring genetic erosion. In: Serwinski J. and Faberová I. (eds.), Proceedings of the Technical Meeting on the Methodology of the FAO World Information and Early Warning System on Plant Genetic Resources, Research Institute of Crop Production, PragueCzech Republic, 21–23 June 1999, pp. 26–28.Google Scholar
  21. H. Gunhardt, L. Smith, M.E. Haferkamp and R.A. Nilan, Studies on aged seeds. II. Relation of age of seeds to cytogenic effects. Agron. J. 45 (1953) 438-441Google Scholar
  22. G.M. Hailu, Wheat production and research in Ethiopia. In: Gebremariam Hailu, D.G. Tanner and M. Hulluka (eds.) Wheat Research in Ethiopia: A Historical Perspective. Addis AbabaEthiopia: IAR/CIMMYT (1991) pp. 1-16Google Scholar
  23. K. Hammer, Resolving the challenge posed by agrobiodiversity and plant genetic resources – an attempt. J. Agr. Rural Dev. Trop. Subtrop. Beiheft 76 (2004) 184Google Scholar
  24. K. Hammer, N. Arrowsmith and T. Gladis, Agrobiodiversity with emphasis on plant genetic resources. Naturwissenschaften 90 (2003) 241-250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hammer K., Diederichsen A. and Spahillari M. 1999. Basic studies toward strategies for conservation of plant genetic resources. In: Serwinski J. and Faberová I. (eds.) Proceedings of the Technical Meeting on the Methodology of the FAO World Information and Early Warning System on Plant Genetic Resources, Research Institute of Crop Production, PragueCzech Republic, 21–23 June 1999. pp. 29–33.Google Scholar
  26. K. Hammer, H. Knüpffer, L. Xhuveli and P. Perrino, Estimating genetic erosion in landraces – two case studies. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 43 (1996) 329-336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. J.R. Harlan, Collecting of crop plants in Turkey. Agron. J. 42 (1950) 258-259Google Scholar
  28. J.R. Harlan, Agricultural origins: centres and non centres. Science 174 (1971) 468-473CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. J.R. Harlan, Our vanishing genetic resources. Science 188 (1975) 618-621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. H.R. Harlan and M.L. Martini, Problems and Results of Barley Breeding. Washington, DC: USDA Yearbook of Agriculture. US Government Printing Office (1936).Google Scholar
  31. J.G. Hawkes, The Diversity of Crop Plants. CambridgeMA: Harvard University Press (1983).Google Scholar
  32. P.W. Heisey and J. Brennan, An analytical model of farmers demand for replacement of seed. Am. J. Agr. Econ. 73 (1991) 44-52Google Scholar
  33. J.H.W. Holden and J.T. Williams, Crop Genetic Resources: Conservation and Evaluation. UK: George Allen and Unwin Publishers’ Ltd. (1984).Google Scholar
  34. IBCR newsletter. Ethiopia: Addis Ababa (2002).Google Scholar
  35. E. Kjellqvist, Near East – Cereals, Turkey, SyriaIraq, Iran, Pakistan. In: O.H. Frankel (ed.) Survey of Crop Genetic Resources in Their Centres of Diversity, First Report. Rome: Food and Agricultural Organization of the U.N. (1973) pp. 9-21Google Scholar
  36. P.L. Leberg, Effects of population bottlenecks on genetic diversity as measured by allozyme electrophoresis. Evolution 46 (1992) 477-494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. D. Louette, A. Charrier and J. Berthaud, In situ conservation of maize in Mexico: genetic diversity and maize seed management in a traditional community. Econ. Bot. 51 (1997) 20-38Google Scholar
  38. Mburu J. and Edilegnaw W. 2003. Local organizations involved conserving crop genetic resources in Ethiopia and Kenya: What role for on farm conservation? A paper presented at CAPRI-IPGRI international workshop on property rights collective action and conservation of genetic resources September 29th to October 2, RomeItaly.Google Scholar
  39. M.E. Montgomery, L.M. Woodworth, R.K. Nurthen, D.M. Gilligan, D.A. Briscoe and R. Frankham, Relationships between population size and loss of genetic diversity: comparisons of experimental results with theoretical predictions. Conserv. Genet. 1 (2000) 33-43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. M. Mulugetta, An economic analysis of smallholder wheat production and technology adoption in the Southeastern Highlands of Ethiopia. Michigan, USA: Michigan State University (1994).Google Scholar
  41. L.O. Oliveira de and E. R. Martins, A quantitative assessment of genetic erosion in ipecac (Psychotria ipecacuanha). Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 49 (2002) 607-617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Partap T. 1996. Mountain Agriculture Biodiversity Perspectives and Framework for Management. Discussion PaperKathmanduNepal: ICIMOD. In: International Symposium of Agriculture Biodiversity in the HK-Himalayan Region: Status and Management Issues in China/India/Nepal/Pakistan. June1996, ChengduChina.Google Scholar
  43. S. Phillips, Poaceae (Gramineae). In: I. Hedberg and S. Edwards (eds.) Flora of Ethiopia and EritreaVolume 7. Sweden: Uppsala (1995) pp. Google Scholar
  44. J. Provan, J.R. Russell, A. Booth and W. Powell, Polymorphic chloroplast simple sequence repeat primers for systematic and population studies in the genus Hordeum. Mol. Ecol. 8 (1999) 505-511PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. N.R. Sackville Hamilton and K.H Chorlton, Regeneration of Accessions in Seed Collections: A Decision Guide. IPGRI/FAO Handbooks for Genebanks 5. RomeItaly: IPGRI (1997).Google Scholar
  46. F. Setotaw, D.G. Tanner, H. Verkuijl and G. Takele, The adoption of bread wheat production technologies in the Arsi Zone. In: J. Raupp (ed.) Annual Wheat Newsletter. Manhattan, USA: Kansas State University (2001) pp. 44Google Scholar
  47. R.M. Stephen, M. Calibo, M. Garcia-Belen, J.L. Pham and F. Palis, Natural hazards and genetic diversity in rice. Agr. Human Values 19 (2002) 133-149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Synnevåg G., Huvio T., Sidibé Y. and Kanouté A. 1999. Farmers’ indicators for decline and loss of local varieties from traditional farming systems. A case study from northern Mali.Google Scholar
  49. S.D. Tanksley and S.R. McCouch, Seed banks and molecular maps: unlocking genetic potential from the wild. Science 277 (1997) 1063-1066PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Z. Tesfaye, T. Girma, D.G. Tanner, H. Verkuijl, A. Aklilu and W. Mwangi, Adoption of Improved Bread Wheat Varieties and Inorganic Fertilizer by Small-Scale Farmers in Yelmana Densa and Farta Districts of Northwestern Ethiopia. MexicoD.F: Ethiopia Agricultural Research Organization (EARO) and International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) (2001).Google Scholar
  51. Tessema T. 1987. Improvement of indigenous wheat landraces in Ethiopia. In: Engels J.M.M. (ed.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Conservation and Utilization of Ethiopian Germplasm, 13–16 October 1986, pp. 232–238.Google Scholar
  52. T. Tessema and E. Bechere, Developing elite durum wheat landrace selections (composites) for Ethiopian peasant farm use: Raising productivity while keeping diversity alive. Euphytica 102 (1998) 323-328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Y. Tsehaye, The significance of in situ conservation: a comparative analysis of durum wheat diversity between in situ (Bale and eastern Shewa Zones) and ex situ (Ethiopia) conservation sites. In: J. Raupp (ed.) Annual Wheat Newsletter. Manhattan, USA: Kansas State University (2002) pp. 54-59Google Scholar
  54. V. Tunstall, A. Teshome and J.K. Torrance, Distribution, abundance and risk of loss of sorghum landraces in four communities in North Shewa and South WeloEthiopia. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 48 (2001) 131-142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. R. Treuren Van, R. Bijlsma, W. Delden Van and N. J. Ouborg, The significance of genetic erosion in the process of extinction. Heredity 66 (1990) 181-189Google Scholar
  56. N.I. Vavilov, Five Continents. RomeItaly: IPGRI (1997).Google Scholar
  57. M. Worede, Crop genetic resources in Ethiopia. In: J.C. Holmes and W.M. Tahir (eds.) More Food From Better Technology. Rome: FAO (1983) pp. 143-147Google Scholar
  58. M. Worede, The role of Ethiopian farmers in the conservation and utilization of crop genetic resources. In: D.R. Buxton (ed.) International Crop Science Society of America. USA: Madison (1993) pp. Google Scholar
  59. Worede M. 1997. Ethiopian in situ conservation. In: Maxted N. et al. (eds.), Plant Genetic Conservation. The In situ Approachpp. 290–301.Google Scholar
  60. Worede M. 1998. SOS/E: Promoting Farmers’ Seed – its conservation, enhancement and effective utilization. A paper presented at the SSC – Africa Project Workshop, HarareSept. 27th Oct. 1st1998.Google Scholar
  61. M. Worede and H. Mekbib, Linking genetic resource conservation to farmers in Ethiopia. In: W. Boef de, K. Amanour, K. Wellard and A. Bebbington (eds.) Cultivars Knowledge. London: Intermediate Technology Publications (1993) pp. 78-84Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Crop Science, Department of AgrobiodiversityUniversity of KasselWitzenhausenGermany

Personalised recommendations