Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution

, Volume 52, Issue 8, pp 1049–1056 | Cite as

Development of Core Collection in Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millspaugh] using Geographic and Qualitative Morphological Descriptors

  • L. J. Reddy
  • Hari D. Upadhyaya
  • C. L. L. Gowda
  • Sube Singh


Pigeonpea is an important pulse crop grown by smallholder farmers in the semi-arid tropics. Most of the pigeonpea cultivars grown to date are selections from the landraces, with a narrow genetic base. With the expansion of the crop to newer areas, problems of local importance are to be addressed. Hence, an economically feasible and faster germplasm evaluation mechanism, such as a core collection, is required. This article describes the development of core collection from 12,153 pigeonpea accessions collected from 56 countries and maintained at ICRISAT, Patancheru, India. The germplasm accessions from 56 countries were placed under 14 clusters based primarily on geographic origin. Data on 14 qualitative morphological traits were used for cluster formation by Ward’s method. From each cluster ≈10% accessions were randomly selected to constitute a core collection comprising 1290 accessions. Mean comparisons using Newman–Keuls test, variances’ comparisons by Levene’s test, and comparison of frequency distribution by χ2-test indicated that the core collection was similar to that of the entire collection for various traits and the genetic variability available in the entire collection is preserved in the core collection. The Shannon–Weaver diversity index for different traits was also similar for both entire and core collection. All the important phenotypic associations between different traits available in the entire collection were preserved in the core collection. The core collection constituted in the present study facilitates identification of useful traits economically and expeditiously for use in pigeonpea improvement.


Cajanus cajan Core collection Genetic resources Redgram 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bisht, I.S., Mahajan, R.K., Patel, D.P. 1998The use of characterization data to establish the Indian mungbean core collection and assessment of genetic variabilityGenet. Resour. Crop Evol.45127133Google Scholar
  2. Brown, A.H.D. 1989a

    The case for core collections

    Brown, A.H.D.Frankel, O.H.Marshall, D.R.Williams, J.T. eds. The Use of Plant Genetic ResourcesCambridge University PressCambridge136155
    Google Scholar
  3. Brown, A.H.D. 1989bCore collections: a practical approach to genetic resources managementGenome31818824Google Scholar
  4. Brown, A.H.D. 1995

    The core collection at the crossroads

    Hodkin, T.Brown, A.H.D.Hintum, J.L.Morales, E.A.V. eds. Core Collections for Today and TomorrowInternational Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI), Wiley-Sayce PublicationRomeItaly319
    Google Scholar
  5. Food and Agriculture Organization, 2003, FAOSTAT database http://www/FAO.ORG.Google Scholar
  6. Frankel, O.H. 1984

    Genetic perspective of germplasm conservation

    Arber, W.Llimensee, K.Peacock, W.J.Starlinger, P. eds. Genetic Manipulations: Impact on Man and SocietyCambridge University PressCambridge161170
    Google Scholar
  7. Frankel, O.H., Brown, A.H.D. 1984

    Current plant genetic resources – a critical appraisal

    Chopra, V.L.Joshi, B.C.Sharma, R.P.Bansal, H.C. eds. Genetics: New FrontiersOxford and IBH Publ. Co.New Delhi113Vol. IV
    Google Scholar
  8. Frankel, M.D., Brennman, T.B., Holbrook, C.C. 1999Identification of resistance to Rhizoctonia limb rot in a core collection of peanut germplasmPlant Dis.83944948Google Scholar
  9. Hannon, R.M., Kaizer, W.J., Muehlbauer, F.J. 1994

    Development and utilization of the USDA chickpea germplasm core collection

    Agronomy AbstactsASAMadison, WI, USA217
    Google Scholar
  10. Holbrook, C.C., Anderson, W.F. 1995Evaluation of a core collection to identify resistance to late leafspot in groundnutCrop Sci.3517001702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Holbrook, C.C., Anderson, W.F., Pittman, R.N. 1993Selection of core collection from the U.S. germplasm collection of peanutCrop Sci.33859861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. IBPGR and ICRISAT1993Descriptors for pigeonpea [(Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]International Board for Plant Genetic ResourcesRomeItalyInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, PatancheruIndia.Google Scholar
  13. Jackson, M.T., Pham, J.L., Newbury, H.J., Ford-Lloyd, B.V., Virk, P.S. 1999

    A core collection for rice-needs, opportunities, and constraints

    Johnson, R.C.Hodkin, T. eds. Core Collections for Today and TomorrowInternational Plant Genetic Resources InstituteRomeItaly1827
    Google Scholar
  14. Keuls, M. 1952The use of the “Studentized range” in connection with an analysis of varianceEuphytica1112122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kumar, P.L., Jones, A.T., Reddy, D.V.R. 2003A novel mite-transmitted virus with a divided RNA genome closely associated with pigeonpea sterility mosaic diseasePhytopathology938191Google Scholar
  16. Levene, H. 1960

    Robust tests for equality of variances

    Olkin, I. eds. Contributions to Probability and Statistics: Essays in Honour of Harold HotellingStanford University PressStanford USA278292
    Google Scholar
  17. McPhee, K.E., Tullu, A., Kraft, J.M., Muehlbauer, F.J. 1999Resistance to Fusarium wilt race 2 in the Pisum core collectionJ. Amer. Soc. Horti. Sci.1242831Google Scholar
  18. Micklas, P.N., Delorme, R., Hannan, R., Dickson, M.H. 1999Using a sub sample of the core collection to identify new sources of resistance to white mold in common beanCrop Sci.39569573Google Scholar
  19. Milligan, G.W., Cooper, M. 1985An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data setPsychometrica50159179Google Scholar
  20. Nene, Y.L., Sheila, V.K. 1990

    Pigeonpea: Geography and importance

    Nene, Y.L.Hall, S.D.Shiela, V.K. eds. The pigeonpeaC.A.B InternationalWallingfordOxon OX 10 8DEUK114
    Google Scholar
  21. Newman, D. 1939The distribution of range in samples from a normal population expressed in terms an independent estimate of standard deviationBiometrika312030Google Scholar
  22. Reddy, L.J. 1990

    Pigeonpea: morphology

    Nene, Y.L.Hall, S.D.Shiela, V.K. eds. The PigeonpeaC.A.B InternationalWallingfordOxon OX10 8DEUK4487
    Google Scholar
  23. Reddy, M.V., Sharma, S.B., Nene, Y.L. 1990

    Pigeonpea: Disease Management

    Nene, Y.L.Hall, S.D.Shiela, V.K. eds. The PigeonpeaC.A.B. InternationalWallingfordOxon OX10 8DEUK303347
    Google Scholar
  24. SAS Institute1989SAS/STAT User’ Guide Version 64SAS InstituteInc.Cary, NC, USAGoogle Scholar
  25. Shannon, C.E., Weaver, W. 1949The mathematical theory of communicationUniversity Illinois PressUrbana USAGoogle Scholar
  26. Singh, L., Gupta, S.C., Faris, D.G. 1990

    Pigeonpea Breeding

    Nene, Y.L.Hall, S.D.Shiela, V.K. eds. The PigeonpeaC.A.B. InternationalWallingfordOxon OX10 8DEUK375399
    Google Scholar
  27. Skinner, D.Z., Bauchan, G.R., Auricht, G., Hughes, S. 1999A method for the efficient management and utilization of large germplasm collectionsCrop Sci.3912371242Google Scholar
  28. Tohme, J., Jones, P., Beebe, S., Iwanga, M. 1995

    The combined use of agroecological and characterization data to establish the CIAT Phaseolus vulgaris core collection

    Hodkin, T.Brown, A.H.D.Hintum, Th.J.L.Morales, B.A.V. eds. Core Collection of Plant Genetic ResourcesInternational Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI), John Willey & SonsNew York, USA95108
    Google Scholar
  29. Upadhyaya, H.D., Bramel, P.J., Singh, S. 2001aDevelopment of a chickpea core subset using geographic distribution and quantitative traitsCrop Sci.41206210Google Scholar
  30. Upadhyaya, H.D., Ferguson, M.E., Bramel, P.J. 2001bStatus of the Arachis germplasm collection at ICRISATPeanut Sci.288996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Upadhyaya, H.D., Ortiz, R., Bramel, P.J., Singh, S. 2003Development of a groundnut core collection using taxonomical, geographical, and morphological descriptorsGenet. Resour. Crop Evol.50139148Google Scholar
  32. Ward, J. 1963Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective functionJ. Amer. Stat. Assoc.38236244Google Scholar
  33. Wojciech, K., Bogdan, W., Somsak, A., Pawe, K. 2000An analysis of isozymic loci polymorphism in the core collection of the Polish Pisum genebankGenet. Resour. Crop Evol.47583590Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. J. Reddy
    • 1
  • Hari D. Upadhyaya
    • 1
  • C. L. L. Gowda
    • 1
  • Sube Singh
    • 1
  1. 1.International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT)India

Personalised recommendations