Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution

, Volume 52, Issue 8, pp 1019–1030 | Cite as

Phenotypic Diversity within a Collection of Distinct Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) Cultivars Derived from Turkish Land Races

  • Eftal DüzyamanEmail author


Ten traditional, Turkish okra cultivars (Batı Trakya, Akköy 41, Kabaklı II, Denizli, Denizli uzun, Bornova (TR-57377 and TR-57420), Amasya Çiçek, Balıkesir T-1, Ağlasun/Burdur) and one commercial cultivar (Sultani/May Seed Company) were selected to represent the variability within domestic okra germplasm from the Anatolian Plateau. Replicated field trials were conducted to evaluate a total of 21 morphological, horticultural and physiological characteristics. Principal component (PC) analysis revealed that first two PC axes explained 49.66% of the total multivariate variation with the first six PC axes explaining 84.23%. The first PC axis separated number of locules, mature pod length and internode length, while the second PC axis separated pod yield/plant, pod number/plant, pedicel length and number of branches. All 21 characters were statistically significant among the cultivars and had at least one high coefficient in at least one of the first six PC axes, which demonstrated that all of them served as distinguishing characters among the cultivars. By using the unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic average four main clusters were consistently formed across all years. The four clusters were also related to the eco-geographic distribution of the cultivars. Each cluster members were also described for their main characteristics, which also provide useful criteria for further evaluation of okra germplasm across Turkey.


Abelmoschus Cluster analysis Germplasm Multivariate analysis Plant genetic resources Quantitative traits Variation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ariyo, O.J. 1987Multivariate analysis and the choice of parents for hybridization in okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench)Theor. Appl. Genet.74361363Google Scholar
  2. Ariyo, O.J., Odulaja, A. 1991Numerical analysis of variation among accessions of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench), MalvaceaeAnn. Bot.67527531Google Scholar
  3. Barazani, O., Atayev, A., Yakubov, B., Kostiukovsky, V., Popov, K., Golan-Goldhirsh, A. 2003Genetic variability in Turkmen populations of Pistacia vera LGenet. Resour. Crop Evol.50383389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bas, T., Koludar, J. 2001Characterisation on okra (Hibiscus esculentus L.) germplasm in TurkeyActa Hort.560133136Google Scholar
  5. Candlish, J.K., Gourley, L., Lee, H.P. 1987Dietary fiber and starch contents of some Southeast Asian vegetablesJ. Agricult. Food Chem.35319321Google Scholar
  6. Charrier, A. 1984Genetic Resources of the Genus Abelmoschus Med. (okra)IBPGRRome(English translation).Google Scholar
  7. Charrier, A., Hamon, S. 1991Germplasm collection, conservation and utilization activities of the Office de la Recherche Scientifique et Technique d'Outre-Mer (ORSTOM)Ng, N.Q.Perrino, P.Attere, F.Zedan, H. eds. Crop Genetic Resources of AfricaIITAIbadan, Nigeria4152Vol. IIGoogle Scholar
  8. Cox, T.S., Kiang, Y.T., Gorman, M.B., Rodgers, D.M. 1985Relationship between coefficient of parentage and genetic similarity indices in the soybeanCrop Sci.25529532Google Scholar
  9. Dash, G.B. 1997Multivariate analysis in okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench)Environ. Ecol.15332334Google Scholar
  10. Düzyaman, E. 1997Okra: Botany and HorticultureHorticult. Rev.214172Google Scholar
  11. Düzyaman, E., Vural, H. 2002Different approaches in the improvement process of local okra varietiesActa Hort.579139144Google Scholar
  12. Elçi, A. 2002The role of the private sector in seed material supply and a new model in the re-stucturing of this sector in TurkeyProceedings of the 1. National Seed CongressEge UniversityBornovaIzmir2736Google Scholar
  13. Hamon, S., Charrier, A. 1983Large variation of okra collected in Benin and TogoPlant Genet. Resour. Newslett.565258Google Scholar
  14. Hamon, S., Sloten, D.H. 1989Characterisation and evaluation of okraBrown, A.H.D.Frankel, O.H.Marshall, D.R.Williams, J.T. eds. The Use of Plant Genetic ResourcesCambridge University PressCambridge173196Google Scholar
  15. Hamon, S., Koechlin, J. 1991The reproductive biology of okra. 1. Study of the breeding system in four Abelmoschus speciesEuphytica534148Google Scholar
  16. Hamon S. and Noirot M. 1991. Some proposed procedures in for obtaining a core collection using quantitative plant characterization data. International workshop on okra genetic resources held at the National Bureau for Plant Genetic Resources, 1990 International Crop Network Series No. 5, pp. 89–94.Google Scholar
  17. Harrison, R.E., Luby, J.J., Furnier, G.R., Hancock, J.F. 2000Differences in the apportionment of molecular and morphological variation in North American strawberry and the consequences for genetic resource managementGenet. Resour. Crop Evol.47647657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. He, Z.H. 1991An investigation of the relationship between the F1 potential and the measures of genetic distance among wheat linesEuphytica58165170Google Scholar
  19. İnan, Y. 1986Breeding report on the Akköy okra cultivarAtatürk Central Horticultural Research InstituteYalovaReport 78, 14 pp. (in Turkish).Google Scholar
  20. İnan, Y. 1988Breeding report on the Kabaklı okra cultivarAtatürk Central Horticultural Research InstituteYalova16Report 84, (in Turkish).Google Scholar
  21. İnan, Y. 1992Breeding report on the Balıkesir okra cultivarAtatürk Central Horticultural Research InstituteYalova16Report 97, (in Turkish).Google Scholar
  22. İnan, Y. 1995Breeding report on the Amasya okra cultivarAtatürk Central Horticultural Research InstituteYalova18Report 113, (in Turkish).Google Scholar
  23. İnan, Y. 1996Breeding report on the Denizli okra cultivarAtatürk Central Horticultural Research InstituteYalova16Report 115, (in Turkish).Google Scholar
  24. Joyce, T.A., Abberton, M.T., Michaelson-Yeates, T.P.T., Forster, J.W. 1999Relationships between genetic \distance measured by RAPD-PCR and heterosis in inbred lines of white clover (Trifolium repens L.)Euphytica107159165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kwon, S.J., Ahn, S.N., Jeong, E.G., Jeon, Y.H., Hwang, H.G., Choi, H.C., Moon, H.P. 2002Relationship between genetic divergence and hybrid performance in japonica rice grown in a cold water-irrigated fieldEuphytica128389396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mahajan, R.K., Bisht, I.S., Agrawal, R.C., Rana, R.S. 1996Studies on South Asian okra collection: methodology for establishing a representative core set using characterization dataGenet. Resour. Crop Evol.43249255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Martin, F.W., Rhodes, A.M., Ortiz, M., Diaz, F. 1981Variation in okraEuphytica30697705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Martinello, G.E., Leal, N.R., Amaral, A.T. ,Jr., Pereira, M.G., Daher, R.F., Dore, C. 2001Comparison of morphological characteristics and RAPD for estimating genetic diversity in Abelmoschus sppActa Hort.546101104Google Scholar
  29. Naumann, C., Bassler, R. 1993Methodenbuch Band IIIVDLUFA VerlagDarmstadtDie chemische Untersuchung von Futtermitteln.Google Scholar
  30. Oliveira, A.C., Garcia, A.N., Cristofani, M., Machado, M.A. 2002Identification of Citrus hybrids through the combination of leaf apex morphology and SSR markersEuphytica128397403Google Scholar
  31. Perenzin, M., Corbellini, M., Accerbi, M., Vaccino, P., Borghi, B. 1998Bread wheat: F1 hybrid performance and parental diversity estimates using molecular markersEuphytica100273279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sneath, P.H.A., Sokal, R.R. 1973Numerical TaxonomyW. H. Freeman and CompanySan FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  33. STATISTICA1994STATISTICA software (version 5.0)StatSoftInc.TulsaOKGoogle Scholar
  34. Vural, H., Esiyok, D., Duman, İ. 2000Cultivated Vegetables (Vegetable Production)Ege University PressBornovaIzmir (in Turkish)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Horticulture, Faculty of AgricultureEge UniversityBornovaTurkey

Personalised recommendations