Advertisement

Numerical methods for EPRL spin foam transition amplitudes and Lorentzian recoupling theory

  • Pietro Donà
  • Giorgio Sarno
Research Article

Abstract

The intricated combinatorial structure and the non-compactness of the Lorentz group have always made the computation of \(SL(2,\mathbb {C})\) EPRL spin foam transition amplitudes a very hard and resource demanding task. With sl2cfoam we provide a C-coded library for the evaluation of the Lorentzian EPRL vertex amplitude. We provide a tool to compute the Lorentzian EPRL 4-simplex vertex amplitude in the intertwiner basis and some utilities to evaluate SU(2) invariants, booster functions and \(SL(2,\mathbb {C})\) Clebsch–Gordan coefficients. We discuss the data storage, parallelizations, time, and memory performances and possible future developments.

Keywords

Code Loop quantum gravity Spinfoam Vertex amplitude Numerical HPC 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the NSF grants PHY-1505411, PHY-1806356 and the Eberly research funds of Penn State. We want to thank François Collet and Francesco Gozzini for providing a basic code for the booster function and the complex gamma function with arbitrary precision floating points numbers and especially for many interesting and helpful discussions. Thanks to NORDITA and to the organizers of the workshop “Quantum Gravity on the Computer”, a very inspiring and useful week in Stockholm. Many thanks to Simone Speziale for fruitful discussions and encouragement and we are very happy to welcome Emilio in this puzzling world.

References

  1. 1.
    Engle, J., Livine, E., Pereira, R., Rovelli, C.: LQG vertex with finite Immirzi parameter. Nucl. Phys. B 799, 136–149 (2008)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Livine, E.R., Speziale, S.: A New spinfoam vertex for quantum gravity. Phys. Rev. D 76, 084028 (2007)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Livine, E.R., Speziale, S.: Consistently solving the simplicity constraints for spinfoam quantum gravity. EPL 81(5), 50004 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Freidel, L., Krasnov, K.: A new spin foam model for 4d gravity. Class. Quantum Gravity 25, 125018 (2008)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kaminski, W., Kisielowski, M., Lewandowski, J.: Spin-foams for all loop quantum gravity. Class. Quantum Gravity, 27, 095006, (2010). [Erratum: Class. Quant. Grav.29,049502(2012)]ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barrett, J.W., Dowdall, R.J., Fairbairn, W.J., Gomes, H., Hellmann, F.: Asymptotic analysis of the EPRL four-simplex amplitude. J. Math. Phys. 50, 112504 (2009)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barrett, J.W., Dowdall, R.J., Fairbairn, W.J., Hellmann, F., Pereira, R.: Asymptotic analysis of Lorentzian spin foam models. PoS QGQGS2011, 009 (2011)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bianchi, E., Modesto, L., Rovelli, C., Speziale, S.: Graviton propagator in loop quantum gravity. Class. Quantum Gravity 23, 6989–7028 (2006)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Speziale, S.: Background-free propagation in loop quantum gravity. Adv. Sci. Lett. 2, 280–290 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bianchi, E., Magliaro, E., Perini, C.: LQG propagator from the new spin foams. Nucl. Phys. B 822, 245–269 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bianchi, E., Ding, Y.: Lorentzian spinfoam propagator. Phys. Rev. D 86, 104040 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Alesci, E., Rovelli, C.: The complete LQG propagator. I. Difficulties with the Barrett–Crane vertex. Phys. Rev. D 76, 104012 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Alesci, E., Rovelli, C.: The complete LQG propagator. II. Asymptotic behavior of the vertex. Phys. Rev. D 77, 044024 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Alesci, E., Bianchi, E., Rovelli, C.: LQG propagator: III. The new vertex. Class. Quantum Gravity 26, 215001 (2009)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Christensen, J.D., Livine, E.R., Speziale, S.: Numerical evidence of regularized correlations in spin foam gravity. Phys. Lett. B670, 403–406 (2009)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Christensen, J.D., Khavkine, I., Livine, E.R., Speziale, S.: Sub-leading asymptotic behaviour of area correlations in the Barrett–Crane model. Class. Quantum Gravity 27, 035012 (2010)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sarno, G., Speziale, S., Stagno, G.V.: 2-vertex Lorentzian spin foam amplitudes for dipole transitions. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 50(4), 43 (2018)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Speziale, S.: Boosting wigner’s nj-symbols. J. Math. Phys. 58(3), 032501 (2017)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dona, P., Fanizza, M., Sarno, G., Speziale, S.: SU(2) graph invariants, Regge actions and polytopes. Class. Quantum Gravity 35(4), 045011 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dona, P.: Infrared divergences in the EPRL-FK Spin Foam model. Class. Quant. Grav. 35(17), 175019 (2018)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dona, P., Fanizza, M., Sarno, G., Speziale, S.: Numerical studies of the Lorentzian EPRL vertex amplitude (in preparation)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Conrady, F., Freidel, L.: On the semiclassical limit of 4d spin foam models. Phys. Rev. D 78, 104023 (2008)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bonzom, V.: Spin foam models for quantum gravity from lattice path integrals. Phys. Rev. D 80, 064028 (2009)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hellmann, F., Kaminski, W.: Holonomy spin foam models: asymptotic geometry of the partition function. JHEP 10, 165 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Oliveira, J.R.: EPRL/FK asymptotics and the flatness problem. Class. Quantum Gravity 35(9), 095003 (2018)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bayle, V., Collet, F., Rovelli, C.: Short-scale emergence of classical geometry. In: Euclidean Loop Quantum Gravity. (2016)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Christodoulou, M., Rovelli, C., Speziale, S., Vilensky, I.: Planck star tunneling time: an astrophysically relevant observable from background-free quantum gravity. Phys. Rev. D 94(8), 084035 (2016)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Christodoulou, M., D’Ambrosio, F.: Characteristic time scales for the geometry transition of a black hole to a white hole from spinfoams (2018)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bianchi, E., Rovelli, C., Vidotto, F.: Towards spinfoam cosmology. Phys. Rev. D 82, 084035 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vidotto, F.: Many-nodes/many-links spinfoam: the homogeneous and isotropic case. Class. Quantum Gravity 28, 245005 (2011)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Alesci, E., Liegener, K., Zipfel, A.: Matrix elements of Lorentzian Hamiltonian constraint in loop quantum gravity. Phys. Rev. D 88(8), 084043 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Perez, Alejandro: The spin foam approach to quantum gravity. Living Rev. Rel. 16, 3 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rovelli, C., Vidotto, F.: Covariant Loop Quantum Gravity: An Elementary Introduction to Quantum Gravity and Spinfoam Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2015)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bianchi, E., Regoli, D., Rovelli, C.: Face amplitude of spinfoam quantum gravity. Class. Quantum Gravity 27, 185009 (2010)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Engle, J., Pereira, R., Rovelli, C.: The Loop-quantum-gravity vertex-amplitude. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 161301 (2007)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Engle, J., Pereira, R.: Regularization and finiteness of the Lorentzian LQG vertices. Phys. Rev. D 79, 084034 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ruhl, W.: The Lorentz Group and Harmonic Analysis. The Mathematical Physics Monograph Series. W. A. Benjamin, New York (1970)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Naimark, M.A., Farahat, H.K.: Linear Representations of the Lorentz Group. International Series in Pure and Applied Mathematics. Elsevier, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rashid, M.A.: Boost matrix elements of the homogeneous Loretz group. J. Math. Phys. 20, 1514–1519 (1979)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Fanizza, M., Martin-Dussaud, P., Speziale, S.: Asymptotics of SL(2,C) tensor invariants (in preparation)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Granlund, T., The GMP Development Team: GNU multiple precision arithmetic library 6.1.2, December 2016. https://gmplib.org/
  42. 42.
    Fousse, L., Hanrot, G., Lefèvre, V., Pélissier, P., Zimmermann, P.: MPFR: a multiple-precision binary floating-point library with correct rounding. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 33(2), 13 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Enge, A., Pélissier, P., Zimmermann, P.: MPC: Multiple Precision Complex Library. INRIA, 1.1.0 edition, (2018). http://www.multiprecision.org/mpc/
  44. 44.
    Kahan, W.: Pracniques: further remarks on reducing truncation errors. Commun. ACM 8, 40 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Yutsis, A.P., Levinson, I.B., Vanagas, V.V.: Mathematical apparatus of the theory of angular momentum. NASA-TT-F-98 (1962)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Johansson, H.T., Forssen, C.: Fast and accurate evaluation of Wigner 3j, 6j, and 9j symbols using prime factorisation and multi-word integer arithmetic. SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 38, A376–A384 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
  48. 48.
    Rasch, J., Yu, A.C.H.: Efficient storage scheme for precalculated wigner 3j, 6j and gaunt coefficients. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 25(4), 1416–1428 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Gozzini, F.: Numerical study of correlations in a Lorentzian spinfoam geometry (in preparation)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Collet, F.: A (simple) expression of the unitary-irreducible SL(2,C) representations as a finite sum of exponentials (in preparation)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Puchta, J.: Asymptotic of Lorentzian polyhedra propagator (2013). arXiv:1307.4747
  52. 52.
    Varshalovich, D.A., Moskalev, A.N., Khersonskii, V.K.: Quantum Theory of Angular Momentum. World Scientific, Singapore (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Riello, A.: Self-energy of the Lorentzian Engle–Pereira–Rovelli–Livine and Freidel–Krasnov model of quantum gravity. Phys. Rev. D 88(2), 024011 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Freidel, L., Louapre, D.: Diffeomorphisms and spin foam models. Nucl. Phys. B 662, 279 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(03)00306-7 ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Dittrich, B.: The continuum limit of loop quantum gravity—a framework for solving the theory. Loop Quantum Gravity, Chapter 5, 153–179, World Scientific  https://doi.org/10.1142/97898132200030006
  56. 56.
    Dittrich, B., Schnetter, E., Seth, C.J., Steinhaus, S.: Coarse graining flow of spin foam intertwiners. Phys. Rev. D 94(12), 124050 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.124050 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Delcamp, C., Dittrich, B.: Towards a phase diagram for spin foams. Class. Quantum Gravity 34(22), 225006 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/aa8f24 ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Bahr, B.: On background-independent renormalization of spin foam models. Class. Quantum Gravity 34(7), 075001 (2017)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Bahr, B., Steinhaus, S.: Numerical evidence for a phase transition in 4d spin foam quantum gravity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117(14), 141302 (2016)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Bahr, B., Steinhaus, S.: Hypercuboidal renormalization in spin foam quantum gravity. Phys. Rev. D 95(12), 126006 (2017)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Bahr, B., Kloser, S., Rabuffo, G.: Towards a cosmological subsector of spin foam quantum gravity. Phys. Rev. D 96(8), 086009 (2017)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Bahr, B., Rabuffo, G., Steinhaus, S.: Renormalization in symmetry restricted spin foam models with curvature (2018). arXiv:1804.00023

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Physics Department, Institute for Gravitation and the CosmosPenn StateUniversity ParkUSA
  2. 2.Aix Marseille Univ, Université de Toulon, CNRS, CPTMarseilleFrance

Personalised recommendations