Description of the evolution of inhomogeneities on a dark matter halo with the Vlasov equation

Paola Domínguez-Fernández; Erik Jiménez-Vázquez; Miguel Alcubierre; Edison Montoya; Darío Núñez

doi:10.1007/s10714-017-2286-8

General Relativity and Gravitation

September 2017, 49:123 | Cite as

Description of the evolution of inhomogeneities on a dark matter halo with the Vlasov equation

Authors
Authors and affiliations

Paola Domínguez-Fernández
Erik Jiménez-Vázquez
Miguel Alcubierre
Edison Montoya
Darío Núñez

Research Article

First Online: 28 August 2017

7 Shares
151 Downloads

Abstract

We use a direct numerical integration of the Vlasov equation in spherical symmetry with a background gravitational potential to determine the evolution of a collection of particles in different models of a galactic halo in order to test its stability against perturbations. Such collection is assumed to represent a dark matter inhomogeneity which is represented by a distribution function defined in phase-space. Non-trivial stationary states are obtained and determined by the virialization of the system. We describe some features of these stationary states by means of the properties of the final distribution function and final density profile. We compare our results using the different halo models and find that the NFW halo model is the most stable of them, in the sense that an inhomogeneity in this halo model requires a shorter time to virialize.

Keywords

Cosmology Dark matter Numerical methods

This is a preview of subscription content, to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by DGAPA-UNAM Grant IN103514, by CONACYT Network Project 280908 “Agujeros Negros y Ondas Gravitatorias”, and by Conacyt Grant Fronteras 281.

Kinetic theory

Zero angular momentum

When the motion is purely radial and the angular momentum is zero, $L_0=0$, the derivation of the particle density $\rho _f$ in physical space, the momentum density $j_f$, the mean value over momentum space, the average value of an arbitrary function g, and the total number of particles has to begin with a Dirac delta dependence of the distribution function in the angular momenta

$$\begin{aligned} f(t,r,p_r,p_\theta ,p_\varphi )= F(t,r,p_r) \; \delta (p_\theta ) \; \delta (p_\varphi /\sin \theta ) \end{aligned}$$

(A.1)

Transforming the Dirac deltas from coordinates ($p_\theta $,$p_\varphi $) to the new coordinates (L,$\psi $) yields

$$\begin{aligned} \delta (p_\theta ) \; \delta (p_\varphi / \sin \theta ) = \frac{1}{L} \; \delta (L) \; \delta (\psi ). \end{aligned}$$

(A.2)

So that the expressions for the density, current, mean value and average in the case of zero angular momentum become

$$\begin{aligned} \rho _f(t,r)= & {} \frac{1}{r^2} \int F(t,r,p_r) \; dp_r , \end{aligned}$$

(A.3)

$$\begin{aligned} j_f(t,r)= & {} \frac{1}{r^2} \int p_r \; F(t,r,p_r) \; dp_r, \end{aligned}$$

(A.4)

$$\begin{aligned} \bar{g}(t,r)= & {} \frac{1}{r^2} \int g \; F(t,r,p_r) \; dp_r, \end{aligned}$$

(A.5)

$$\begin{aligned} \langle g\rangle (t)= & {} 4 \pi \int g \; F(t,r,p_r) \; dp_r \; dr, \end{aligned}$$

(A.6)

$$\begin{aligned} N= & {} 4 \pi \int F(t,r,p_r) \; dp_r \; dr. \end{aligned}$$

(A.7)

Continuity equation

We start from the Vlasov equation written as

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\partial f}{\partial t} + \frac{p_r}{m}\frac{\partial f}{\partial r} - \frac{\partial \varPhi _{\mathrm{eff}}(r)}{\partial r} \; \frac{\partial f}{\partial p_r} = 0, \end{aligned}$$

(A.8)

where $\varPhi _{\mathrm{eff}}(r) \equiv \varPhi (r)+ L^2/2 m r^2$ is the effective potential. Integrating over momentum space we find

$$\begin{aligned} \int \frac{\partial f}{\partial t} \; d \bar{\omega } + \int \frac{p_r}{m} \; \frac{\partial f}{\partial r} \; d \bar{\omega } - \int \frac{\partial \varPhi _{\mathrm{eff}}(r)}{\partial r} \; \frac{\partial f}{\partial p_r} \; d \bar{\omega } = 0, \end{aligned}$$

(A.9)

with $d \bar{\omega }$ the volume element given in Eq. (2.7).

For now on we will assume that the distribution function is of compact support in phase space (or decays very rapidly). The first term of the above equation is easy to simplify:

$$\begin{aligned} \int \frac{\partial f}{\partial t} \; d \bar{\omega } = \frac{\partial }{\partial t} \int f \; d \bar{\omega } = \frac{\partial \rho _f}{\partial t}, \end{aligned}$$

(A.10)

where have used the definition of the particle density $\rho _f$, Eq. (2.9). In a similar way we find for the second term:

$$\begin{aligned} \int \frac{p_r}{m} \; \frac{\partial f}{\partial r} \; d \bar{\omega }= & {} \frac{2 \pi }{m r^2} \; \int p_r \; \frac{\partial f}{\partial r} \; L \; dp_r dL \nonumber \\= & {} \frac{2 \pi }{m r^2} \; \frac{\partial }{\partial r} \int p_r f L \; dp_r dL \nonumber \\= & {} \frac{1}{m r^2} \; \frac{\partial }{\partial r} \left( r^2 j_f \right) , \end{aligned}$$

(A.11)

where we have now used the definition of the momentum density $j_f$, Eq. (2.10). Finally, the last term can be easily shown to vanish for a distribution function of compact support:

$$\begin{aligned} \int \frac{\partial \varPhi _{\mathrm{eff}}(r)}{\partial r} \; \frac{\partial f}{\partial p_r} \; d \bar{\omega }= & {} \frac{2 \pi }{r^2} \; \frac{\partial \varPhi _{\mathrm{eff}}(r)}{\partial r} \int \frac{\partial f}{\partial p_r} \; L \; dp_r dL \nonumber \\= & {} \frac{2 \pi }{r^2} \; \frac{\partial \varPhi _{\mathrm{eff}}(r)}{\partial r} \int \left( \int \frac{\partial f}{\partial p_r} \; d p_r \right) L \; dL \nonumber \\= & {} 0, \end{aligned}$$

(A.12)

where we assumed that f is zero for large values of $|p_r|$. If we now define the mass density as $\rho _m := m \rho _f$, the Vlasov equation integrated over momentum space reduces to

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\partial \rho _m}{\partial t} + \frac{1}{r^2} \; \frac{\partial }{\partial r} \left( r^2 j_f \right) = 0, \end{aligned}$$

(A.13)

which is nothing more than the standard continuity equation in spherical symmetry. By integrating the continuity equation in physical space it can now be easily shown, by using the divergence theorem, that the number of particles N defined above in Eq. (2.12) is conserved in the sense that $\partial N / \partial t = 0$.

Virial theorem

To obtain the virial theorem, the Vlasov equation in spherical symmetry is multiplied by $r p_r$, and integrated over phase space:

$$\begin{aligned} \int r p_r \; \frac{\partial f}{\partial t} \; dV d\bar{\omega }+ & {} \frac{1}{m} \int r p_r^ 2 \; \frac{\partial f}{\partial r} \; dV d\bar{\omega } \nonumber \\- & {} \int r p_r \; \frac{\partial \varPhi _{\mathrm{eff}}(r)}{\partial r} \; \frac{\partial f}{\partial p_r} \; dV d\bar{\omega } = 0. \end{aligned}$$

(A.14)

The first term above can be rewritten as:

$$\begin{aligned} \int r p_r \; \frac{\partial f}{\partial t} \; dV d\bar{\omega } = \frac{\partial }{\partial t} \int r p_r f \; dV d \bar{\omega } = \frac{\partial }{\partial t} \langle r p_r \rangle . \end{aligned}$$

(A.15)

For the second term in Eq. (A.14) we find:

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{m} \int r p_r^ 2 \; \frac{\partial f}{\partial r} \; dV d\bar{\omega }= & {} \frac{8 \pi ^2}{m} \int p_r^2 \left( r \frac{\partial f}{\partial r} \right) L \; dr dL dp_r \nonumber \\= & {} - \frac{8 \pi ^2}{m} \int p_r^2 f L \; dr dL dp_r \nonumber \\= & {} - \frac{1}{m} \; \langle p_r^2 \rangle \nonumber \\= & {} - 2 \langle K_r \rangle , \end{aligned}$$

(A.16)

where in the second line above we integrated by parts over r, using the fact that f has compact support, and where $K_r=p_r^2/2m$ is the radial kinetic energy.

For the third term of (A.14) we find:

$$\begin{aligned} \int r p_r \; \frac{\partial \varPhi _{\mathrm{eff}}(r)}{\partial r} \; \frac{\partial f}{\partial p_r} \; dV d\bar{\omega }= & {} 8 \pi ^2 \int r \frac{\partial \varPhi _{\mathrm{eff}}(r)}{\partial r} \left( p_r \; \frac{\partial f}{\partial p_r} \right) L \; dr dL dp_r \nonumber \\= & {} - 8 \pi ^2 \int r \frac{\partial \varPhi _{\mathrm{eff}}(r)}{\partial r} f L \; dr dL dp_r \nonumber \\= & {} \langle r F_{\mathrm{eff}}(r) \rangle , \end{aligned}$$

(A.17)

where again we have integrated by parts, but now over $p_r$, and where we defined the effective force as $F_{\mathrm{eff}}(r) = - \partial \varPhi _{{\mathrm{eff}}}(r) / \partial r$.

Collecting our results we find that the integrated Vlasov equation becomes

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{\partial }{\partial t} \langle r p_r \rangle = 2\langle K_r \rangle + \langle r F_{\mathrm{eff}}(r) \rangle . \end{aligned}$$

(A.18)

The last result is known as the virial theorem. In a steady state, the virial theorem implies

$$\begin{aligned} 2 \langle K_r \rangle + \langle r F_{\mathrm{eff}}(r) \rangle = 0. \end{aligned}$$

(A.19)

References

1.
MarrodÃąn Undagoitia, T., Rauch, L.: Dark matter direct-detection experiments. J. Phys. G43(1), 013001 (2016). doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/43/1/013001 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.
Akerib, D.S., et al.: The large underground xenon (LUX) experiment. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A704, 111 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2012.11.135 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.
Bernabei, R., et al.: The DAMA/LIBRA apparatus. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A592, 297 (2008). doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2008.04.082 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.
Akimov, D.Y., et al.: The ZEPLIN-III dark matter detector: instrument design, manufacture and commissioning. Astropart. Phys. 27, 46 (2007). doi: 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2006.09.005 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.
Aprile, E., Angle, J., Arneodo, F., Baudis, L., Bernstein, A., Bolozdynya, A., Brusov, P., Coelho, L.C.C., Dahl, C.E., DeViveiros, L., Ferella, A.D., Fernandes, L.M.P., Fiorucci, S., Gaitskell, R.J., Giboni, K.L., Gomez, R., Hasty, R., Kastens, L., Kwong, J., Lopes, J.A.M., Madden, N., Manalaysay, A., Manzur, A., McKinsey, D.N., Monzani, M.E., Ni, K., Oberlack, U., Orboeck, J., Orlandi, D., Plante, G., Santorelli, R., dos Santos, J.M.F., Shagin, P., Shutt, T., Sorensen, P., Schulte, S., Tatananni, E., Winant, C., Yamashita, M.: Design and performance of the XENON10 dark matter experiment. Astropart. Phys. 34, 679 (2011). doi: 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2011.01.006 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.
Barreto, J., et al.: Direct search for low mass dark matter particles with CCDs. Phys. Lett. B 711, 264 (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2012.04.006 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.
Chavarria, A.E., et al.: DAMIC at SNOLAB. Phys. Procedia 61, 21 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.phpro.2014.12.006 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.
Aguilar-Arevalo, A., et al.: First direct detection constraints on eV-scale hidden-photon dark matter with DAMIC at SNOLAB. Phys. Rev. Lett. (2016) (submitted to) Google Scholar
9.
Aguilar-Arevalo, A., et al.: Search for low-mass WIMPs in a 0.6 kg day exposure of the DAMIC experiment at SNOLAB. Phys. Rev. D 94(8), 082006 (2016). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.94.082006 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.
Agnese, R., et al.: Low-Mass Dark Matter Search with CDMSlite. Phys. Rev. D (2017) (submitted to) Google Scholar
11.
de Lima Rodrigues, R.: The quantum mechanics SUSY algebra: an introductory review (2002)Google Scholar
12.
Cabral-Rosetti, L.G., Mondragon, M., Reyes Perez, E.: Toroidal dipole moment of the lightest neutralino in the MSSM. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 315, 012007 (2011). doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/315/1/012007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.
Biswas, S., Gabrielli, E., Heikinheimo, M., Mele, B.: Dark-photon searches via Higgs-boson production at the LHC. Phys. Rev. D 93(9), 093011 (2016). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.093011 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.
Barranco, J., Bernal, A., Núñez, D.: Dark matter equation of state from rotational curves of galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 449(1), 403 (2015). doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv302 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.
Matos, T., Guzman, F.S., Urena-Lopez, L.A.: Scalar field as dark matter in the universe. Class. Quantum Gravity 17, 1707 (2000). doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/17/7/309 ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
16.
Matos, T., Urena-Lopez, L.A.: Scalar field dark matter, cross section and Planck-scale physics. Phys. Lett. B 538, 246 (2002). doi: 10.1016/S0370-2693(02)02002-6 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.
Matos, T., Bernal, A., Nunez, D.: Flat central density profiles from scalar field dark matter halo. Rev. Mex. Astron. Astrofis. 44, 149 (2008)ADSGoogle Scholar
18.
Navarro, J.F., Frenk, C.S., White, S.D.M.: The structure of cold dark matter halos. Astrophys. J. 462, 563 (1996). doi: 10.1086/177173 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.
Harker, G., Cole, S., Helly, J., Frenk, C., Jenkins, A.: A marked correlation function analysis of halo formation times in the millennium simulation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 367, 1039 (2006). doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10022.x ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.
Athanassoula, E., Fady, E., Lambert, J.C., Bosma, A.: Optimal softening for force calculations in collisionless N-body simulations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 314(3), 475 (2000). doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03316.x ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.
Dehnen, W.: Towards optimal softening in three-dimensional N-body codes I. Minimizing the force error. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 324(2), 273 (2001). doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04237.x ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.
Hockney, R.W., Eastwood, J.W.: Computer simulation using particles. Hilger, Bristol (1988). http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988csup.book.....H
23.
Bagla, J.S.: Cosmological N-body simulation: techniques, scope and status. Curr. Sci. 88, 1088 (2005)ADSGoogle Scholar
24.
Binney, J., Tremaine, S.: Galactic dynamics, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA (2008). http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008gady.book.....B
25.
Colombi, S., Sousbie, T., Peirani, S., Plum, G., Suto, Y.: Vlasov versus N-body: the Henon sphere. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 450(4), 3724 (2015). doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv819 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.
Andreasson, H.: The Einstein–Vlasov system/kinetic theory. Living Rev. Rel. 8, 2 (2005). doi: 10.12942/lrr-2005-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.
Shapiro, S.L., Teukolsky, S.A.: Black holes, white dwarfs, and neutron stars: the physics of compact objects. Research supported by the National Science Foundation, Wiley, New York (1983). http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983bhwd.book.....S
28.
Domínguez-Fernández, P.: On particle dynamics: Vlasov equation and dark matter. Bachelor thesis, UNAM-Mexico (2015)Google Scholar
29.
Jiménez-Vázquez, E.: Numerical simulation of the Vlasov–Poisson system in spherical symmetry. Bachelor thesis, UNAM-Mexico (2016)Google Scholar
30.
Kuzio de Naray, R., McGaugh, S.S., Mihos, J.C.: Constraining the NFW potential with observations and modeling of LSB galaxy velocity fields. Astrophys. J. 692, 1321 (2009). doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/692/2/1321 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
31.
Salucci, P., Burkert, A.: Dark matter scaling relations. Astrophys. J. 537, L9 (2000). doi: 10.1086/312747 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
32.
Liu, W.H., Fu, Y.N., Deng, Z.G., Huang, J.H.: An equilibrium dark matter halo with the Burkert profile. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. 57, 541 (2005). doi: 10.1093/pasj/57.4.541 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
33.
Rubin, V.C., Thonnard, N., Ford Jr., W.K.: Rotational properties of 21 SC galaxies with a large range of luminosities and radii, from NGC 4605 /R = 4kpc/ to UGC 2885 /R = 122 kpc/. Astrophys. J. 238, 471 (1980). doi: 10.1086/158003 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
34.
Leveque, R.J.: Numerical Methods for Conservation Laws. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel (1992)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
35.
Barranco, J., Bernal, A., Degollado, J.C., Diez-Tejedor, A., Megevand, M., et al.: Are black holes a serious threat to scalar field dark matter models? Phys. Rev. D 84, 083008 (2011). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.84.083008 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
36.
Barranco, J., Bernal, A., Degollado, J.C., Diez-Tejedor, A., Megevand, M., et al.: Schwarzschild black holes can wear scalar wigs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 081102 (2012). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.081102 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
37.
Barranco, J., Bernal, A., Degollado, J.C., Diez-Tejedor, A., Megevand, M., et al.: Schwarzschild scalar wigs: spectral analysis and late time behavior. Phys. Rev. D 89(8), 083006 (2014). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.083006 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
38.
Martin-Garcia, J.M., Gundlach, C.: Selfsimilar spherically symmetric solutions of the massless Einstein–Vlasov system. Phys. Rev. D 65, 084026 (2002). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.65.084026 ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
39.
Akbarian, A., Choptuik, M.W.: Critical collapse in the spherically-symmetric Einstein–Vlasov model. Phys. Rev. D 90(10), 104023 (2014). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.104023 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

Authors and Affiliations

Paola Domínguez-Fernández
- 1
- 2
Email author
Erik Jiménez-Vázquez
- 2
Miguel Alcubierre
- 2
Edison Montoya
- 3
Darío Núñez
- 2

1.Argelander Institut für AstronomieUniversität BonnBonnGermany
2.Instituto de Ciencias NuclearesUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoMexicoMexico
3.Escuela de FísicaUniversidad Industrial de SantanderBucaramangaColombia

Description of the evolution of inhomogeneities on a dark matter halo with the Vlasov equation

Abstract

Keywords

Notes

Acknowledgements

References

Copyright information

Authors and Affiliations

Personalised recommendations

Cite article