Skip to main content
Log in

A note on viability of nonminimally coupled f(R) theory

  • Letter
  • Published:
General Relativity and Gravitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Consistency conditions for nonminimally coupled f(R) theories have been derived by requiring the absence of tachyons and instabilities in the scalar fluctuations. This note confirms these results and clarifies a subtlety regarding different definitions of sound speeds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. The propagation of the two fields in the action (2) could actually be deduced by just treating the two scalars as test fields and expanding around a flat space, and it is easy to see that only the field \(\psi \) has a nontrivial sound speed, stemming from the nonlinear dependence on its kinetic term. In Ref. [3] we however used the full machinery of the cosmological perturbation theory, perturbing both fields and the metric, to arrive at the results that indeed, at the relevant limit, are compatible with the simplest guess one would base on the ample previous literature on scalar fields in cosmology.

  2. One can though check that in practice this does not make a difference for the results as the parameter constraints derived from the two definitions would coincide for all the four explicit example classes of models considered in Ref. [3].

References

  1. Koivisto, T.: Class. Quant. Grav. 23, 4289 (2006). arXiv:gr-qc/0505128

  2. Harko, T., Lobo, F.S.N.: Galaxies 2(3), 410 (2014). arXiv:1407.2013 [gr-qc]

  3. Tamanini, N., Koivisto, T.S.: Phys. Rev. D 88, no. 6, 064052 (2013). arXiv:1308.3401 [gr-qc]

  4. Bertolami, O., Páramos, J.: Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 48, vol 3, 1–13 (2016). arXiv:1406.6422 [gr-qc]

  5. Langlois, D., Renaux-Petel, S., Steer, D.A., Tanaka, T.: Phys. Rev. D 78, 063523 (2008). arXiv:0806.0336 [hep-th]

  6. Arnowitt, R.L, Deser, S., Misner, C.W.: Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 40, 1997 (2008). arXiv:gr-qc/0405109

  7. Mukhanov, V.F., Feldman, H.A., Brandenberger, R.H.: Phys. Rept. 215, 203 (1992)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomi S. Koivisto.

Appendix

Appendix

In this appendix we rederive the action (2) from action (1), again using, as a cross-check, a somewhat different method from [3]. There we kept the matter Lagrangian \(\hat{\mathcal {L}}\) general and applied a Legendre transformation method for both the R and the \(\mathcal {\hat{L}}\). Here we specify \(\mathcal {\hat{L}}=\hat{X}\) and apply a straightforward generalisation of a well-known procedure that recasts a minimally coupled f(R) gravity into a scalar-tensor theory.

So we begin with action (1) where \(\mathcal {\hat{L}}=\hat{X}\). Introducing a field \(\alpha \) and a Lagrange multiplier \(\varphi \) that sets \(\alpha =R\) we can write the action equivalently as

$$\begin{aligned} S = \int \mathrm{d}^4x \sqrt{-\hat{g}}\left[ f_1(\alpha ) + f_2(\alpha )\hat{X} + \varphi \left( \hat{R}-\alpha \right) \right] \,. \end{aligned}$$
(15)

We then vary the action with respect to \(\alpha \), and solve it from its own equation of motion

$$\begin{aligned} f_1'(\alpha ) + f_2'(\alpha )\hat{X}=\varphi \quad \Rightarrow \quad \alpha ={A}(\hat{X},\varphi )\,, \end{aligned}$$
(16)

and it is then legitimate to plug the solution back into the action, to obtain

$$\begin{aligned} S= & {} \int \mathrm{d}^4x \sqrt{-\hat{g}}\left[ \varphi \hat{R} + 2V(\hat{X},\varphi )\right] \,, \quad \text {where}\nonumber \\ V(\hat{X},\varphi )= & {} \frac{1}{2}\left( f_1({A})-\varphi {A} + f_2({A})\hat{X}\right) \,. \end{aligned}$$
(17)

Under a conformal rescaling \(g_{\mu \nu }=\Omega ^2 g_{\mu \nu }\), the relevant quantities transform as

$$\begin{aligned} \sqrt{-\hat{g}}=\Omega ^{-4}\sqrt{-g}\,, \quad \hat{R}=\Omega ^2 R + 6\Omega \Box \Omega -12(\partial \Omega )^2\,, \quad \hat{X}=\Omega ^2 X\,. \end{aligned}$$
(18)

Performing the rescaling with the conformal factor

$$\begin{aligned} \Omega ^2 = \phi = \sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}\frac{1}{\kappa }\log {\varphi }\,, \end{aligned}$$
(19)

we obtain:

$$\begin{aligned} S= & {} \int \mathrm{d}^4x \sqrt{-g}\left[ \frac{R}{2\kappa ^2} + Y + e^{-2\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\kappa \phi }\left( f_1(A) - e^{\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\kappa \phi }A + e^{\sqrt{-\frac{2}{3}}\kappa \phi }f_2(A)X \right) \right] , \nonumber \\ A= & {} A\left( e^{\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\kappa \phi },e^{-\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\kappa \phi }X\right) . \end{aligned}$$
(20)

We have then recovered the same relation between actions (1) and (2) as was obtained in [3].

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koivisto, T.S., Tamanini, N. A note on viability of nonminimally coupled f(R) theory. Gen Relativ Gravit 48, 97 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-016-2087-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-016-2087-5

Keywords

Navigation