General Relativity and Gravitation

, Volume 45, Issue 2, pp 395–410 | Cite as

The tetralogy of Birkhoff theorems

Research Article

Abstract

We classify the existent Birkhoff-type theorems into four classes: first, in field theory, the theorem states the absence of helicity 0- and spin 0-parts of the gravitational field. Second, in relativistic astrophysics, it is the statement that the gravitational far-field of a spherically symmetric star carries, apart from its mass, no information about the star; therefore, a radially oscillating star has a static gravitational far-field. Third, in mathematical physics, Birkhoff’s theorem reads: up to singular exceptions of measure zero, the spherically symmetric solutions of Einstein’s vacuum field equation with \(\Lambda =0\) can be expressed by the Schwarzschild metric; for \(\Lambda \ne 0\), it is the Schwarzschild-de Sitter metric instead. Fourth, in differential geometry, any statement of the type: every member of a family of pseudo-Riemannian space-times has more isometries than expected from the original metric ansatz, carries the name Birkhoff-type theorem. Within the fourth of these classes we present some new results with further values of dimension and signature of the related spaces; including them are some counterexamples: families of space-times where no Birkhoff-type theorem is valid. These counterexamples further confirm the conjecture, that the Birkhoff-type theorems have their origin in the property, that the two eigenvalues of the Ricci tensor of 2-D pseudo-Riemannian spaces always coincide, a property not having an analogy in higher dimensions. Hence, Birkhoff-type theorems exist only for those physical situations which are reducible to 2-D.

Keywords

Birkhoff theorem Einstein space Isometry group 

References

  1. 1.
    Goenner, H.: Einstein tensor and generalizations of Birkhoff’s theorem. Commun. Math. Phys. 16, 34 (1970)MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schmidt, H.-J.: On a new conformal duality of spherically symmetric space-times. Ann. Phys. (Leipz.) 9, SI-158; gr-qc/9905103 (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ruban, V.: Generalized Birkhoff’s theorem (GBT) for Einstein–Maxwell fields (\(\Lambda \ne 0\)). In: Abstract Conference GR8, p. 303, Waterloo, Canada (1977)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Konopleva N.P.: The Birkhoff theorem and uniqueness problem of spherically symmetric space-time model in GR (preprint Dubna E4-95-79) (1995)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schmidt, H.-J.: A new proof of Birkhoff’s theorem. Gravit. Cosmol. 3 185; arXiv:gr-qc/9709071 (1997)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rindler, W.: Birkhoff’s theorem with \(\Lambda \)-term and Bertotti–Kasner space. Phys. Lett. A 245, 363 (1998)MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Walz, G. (ed.): Birkhoff-theorem. In: Lexikon der Mathematik, vol. 1, p. 229. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag Heidelberg (2000)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bojowald, M., Kastrup, H., Schramm, F., Strobl, T.: Group theoretical quantization of a phase space \(S \times R\) and the mass spectrum of Schwarzschild black holes in \(D\) dimensions. Phys. Rev. D 62, 044026; gr-qc/9906105 (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Das, A., De Benedictis, A.: Spherical gravitating systems of arbitrary dimension. Prog. Theor. Phys. 108, 119; arXiv:gr-qc/0108020 (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Das, A., DeBenedictis, A., Tariq, N.: General solutions of Einstein’s spherically symmetric gravitational equations with junction conditions. J. Math. Phys. 44, 5637; arXiv:gr-qc/0307009 (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    DeBenedictis, A., Das, A.: Higher dimensional wormhole geometries with compact dimensions. Nucl. Phys. B 653, 279; arXiv:gr-qc/0207077 (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Deser, S., Tekin, B.: Shortcuts to high symmetry solutions in gravitational theories. Class. Quantum Gravity 20, 4877; arXiv:gr-qc/0306114v1 (2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Deser, S., Franklin, J.: Schwarzschild and Birkhoff a la Weyl. Am. J. Phys. 73, 261; arXiv:gr-qc/0408067v2 (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Deser, S.: Introduction to Jebsen’s paper. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 37, 2251 (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ehlers, J., Krasinski, A.: Comment on the paper by J. T. Jebsen reprinted in Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 37, 2253 (2005). Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 38, 1329 (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Johansen, N., Ravndal, F.: On the discovery of Birkhoff’s theorem. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 38, 537 (2006)MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dobarro, F., Ünal, B.: About curvature, conformal metrics and warped products. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 40, 13907; arXiv:0704.0595v1 [math.DG] (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Deser, S., Franklin, J.: Time (in)dependence in general relativity. Am. J. Phys. 75, 281; arXiv:gr-qc/0607020v2 (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Keresztes, Z., Gergely, L.: On the validity of the 5-dimensional Birkhoff theorem: the tale of an exceptional case. Class. Quantum Gravity 25, 165016; arXiv:0712.3758v2 [gr-qc] (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dobarro, F., Ünal, B.: Curvature in special base conformal warped products. Acta Appl. Math. 104, 1; arXiv:math.DG/0412436 (2008)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Weinberg, S.: Cosmology. Oxford University Press, Oxford. From page 37: “According to Birkhoff’s theorem, in any system that is spherically symmetric around some point, the metric in an empty ball centered on this point must be that of flat space. This holds whatever is happening outside the empty ball, as long as it is spherically symmetric” (2008)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Griffiths, J.B., Podolsky, J.: Exact Space-Times in Einstein’s General Relativity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stephani, H., Kramer, D., MacCallum, M., Hoenselaers, C., Herlt, E.: Exact Solutions to Einstein’s Field Equations, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schleich, K., Witt, D.: A simple proof of Birkhoff’s theorem for cosmological constant. J. Math. Phys. 51, 112502; arXiv:0908.4110v2 [gr-qc] (2010)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Goswami, R., Ellis, G.: Almost Birkhoff theorem in general relativity. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 43, 2157; arXiv:1101.4520v1 [gr-qc] (2011)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Goswami, R., Ellis, G.: Birkhoff theorem and matter. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 44, 2037 (2012)MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Havas, P.: On theories of gravitation with higher-order field equations. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 8, 631 (1977)MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Goenner, H.: Almost general relativity. Phys. Lett. A 106, 415 (1984)MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Goenner, H.: Alternative theories of gravitation in the framework of Riemannian geometry. Astron. Nachr. 309, 243 (1988)MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cavaglia, M.: The Birkhoff theorem for topologically massive gravity. Grav. Cosmol. 5, 101; arXiv:gr-qc/9904047v1 (1999)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Vassiliev, D.: Pseudoinstantons in metric-affine field theory. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 34, 1239; arXiv:gr-qc/0108028 (2002)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Charmousis, C., Dufaux, J.-F.: General Gauss–Bonnet brane cosmology. Class. Quantum Gravity 19, 4671 (2002)MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hirayama, T., Holdom, B.: Can black holes have Euclidean cores? Phys. Rev. D 68, 044003; arXiv:hep-th/0303174 (2003)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ayon-Beato, E., Martinez, C., Zanelli, J.: Birkhoff’s theorem for 3-dimensional AdS gravity. Phys. Rev. D 70, 044027; arXiv:hep-th/0403227 (2004)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zegers, R.: Birkhoff’s theorem in Lovelock gravity. J. Math. Phys. 46, 072502; arXiv:gr-qc/0505016v1 (2005)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Deser, S., Franklin, J.: Birkhoff for Lovelock redux. Class. Quantum Gravity 22, L103; arXiv:gr-qc/0506014v1 (2005)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Clifton, T.: Spherically symmetric solutions to fourth-order theories of gravity. Class. Quantum Gravity 23, 7445; arXiv:gr-qc/0607096 (2006)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Clifton, T.: Asymptotic flatness and Birkhoff’s theorem in higher-derivative theories of gravity. In: Kleinert, H., Jantzen, R., Ruffini, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 11th M. Grossmann Meeting. World Scientific Singapore, Singapore (2008)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Quandt, I., Schmidt, H.-J.: The Newtonian limit of fourth and higher order gravity. Astron. Nachr. 312, 97; arXiv:gr-qc/0109005 (1991)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Schmidt, H.-J.: Fourth order gravity: equations, history, and application to cosmology. Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 4, 209; arXiv:gr-qc/0602017 (2007)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Capozziello, S., Stabile, A.: The Newtonian limit of metric gravity theories with quadratic Lagrangians. Class. Quantum Gravity 26, 085019; arXiv:0903.3238v1 [gr-qc] (2009)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Capozziello, S., Stabile, A., Troisi, A.: A general solution in the Newtonian limit of \(f(R)\)-gravity. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 24, 659; arXiv:0901.0448v1 [gr-qc] (2009)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Capozziello, S., Vignolo, S.: On the well-formulation of the initial value problem of metric-affine \(f(R)\)-gravity. Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 6, 985; arXiv:0901.3136v2 [gr-qc] (2009)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Capozziello, S., Vignolo, S.: The Cauchy problem for metric-affine \(f(R)\)-gravity in presence of perfect-fluid matter. Class. Quantum Gravity 26, 175013; arXiv:0904.3686v1 [gr-qc] (2009)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Nelson, W.: Static solutions for 4th order gravity. Phys. Rev. D 82, 104026; arXiv:1010.3986v1 [gr-qc] (2010)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Faraoni, V.: The Jebsen–Birkhoff theorem in alternative gravity. Phys. Rev. D 81, 044002; arXiv:1001.2287v1 [gr-qc] (2010)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Gravanis, E.: Shock waves and Birkhoff’s theorem in Lovelock gravity. Phys. Rev. D 82, 104024; arXiv:1008.3583v1 [gr-qc] (2010)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Mimoso, J., Lobo, F.: An anti-Schwarzschild solution: wormholes and scalar-tensor solutions. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 229, 012078; arXiv:1001.2643v1 [gr-qc] (2010)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Maeda, H.: Gauss–Bonnet black holes with non-constant curvature horizons. Phys. Rev. D 81, 124007 (2010)MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Oliva, J., Ray, S.: A new cubic theory of gravity in five dimensions: black hole, Birkhoff’s theorem and C-function. Class. Quantum Gravity 27, 225002; arXiv:1003.4773v4 [gr-qc] (2010)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Nzioki, A., Carloni, S., Goswami, R., Dunsby, P.: A new framework for studying spherically symmetric static solutions in \(f(R)\) gravity. Phys. Rev. D 81, 084028; arXiv:0908.3333v1 [gr-qc] (2010)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Oliva, J., Ray, S.: Birkhoff’s theorem in higher derivative theories of gravity. Class. Quantum Gravity 28, 175007; arXiv:1104.1205v2 [gr-qc] (2011)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Oliva, J., Ray, S.: Birkhoff’s theorem in higher derivative theories of gravity II: asymptotically Lifshitz black holes. Phys. Rev. D 86, 084014; arXiv:1201.5601v3 [gr-qc] (2012)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Matyjasek, J., Zwierzchowska, K.: Lukewarm black holes in quadratic gravity. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 26, 999; arXiv:1106.2749v1 [gr-qc] (2011)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Capozziello, S., Saez-Gomez, D.: Scalar-tensor representation of \(f(R)\) gravity and Birkhoff’s theorem. Ann Phys. 524, 279; arXiv:1107.0948v3 [gr-qc] (2012)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Capozziello, S., Saez-Gomez, D.: Conformal frames and the validity of Birkhoff’s theorem. In: Proceedings of the AIP Conference, vol. 1458, p. 347; arXiv:1202.2540v1 [gr-qc] (2011)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Olmo, G.: Birkhoff’s theorem and perturbations in \(f(R)\) theories. Ann. Phys. 524, 87; arXiv:1207.4812v1 [gr-qc] (2012)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Dong, H., Wang, Y., Meng, X.: Extended Birkhoff’s theorem in the \(f(T)\) gravity. Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 2002; arXiv:1203.5890v2 [gr-qc] (2012)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Bach, R.: Zur Weylschen Relativitätstheorie und der Weylschen Erweiterung des Krümmungstensorbegriffs. Math. Zeitschr. 9, 110 (1921)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Riegert, R.: Birkhoff’s theorem in conformal gravity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 315 (1984)MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Boulanger, N., Henneaux, M.: A derivation of Weyl gravity. Ann. Phys. (Leipz.) 10, 935; arXiv:hep-th/0106065 (2001)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Gorbatenko, M.: Some consequences of the conformally invariant generalization of Einstein’s equations. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 37, 81 (2005)MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Gerard, J.-M.: The strong equivalence principle from gravitational gauge structure. Class. Quantum Gravity 24, 1867; arXiv:gr-qc/0607019 (2007)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Bouchami, J., Paranjape, M.: Spontaneous breaking of conformal invariance, solitons and gravitational waves in theories of conformally invariant gravitation. Phys. Rev. D 78, 044022; arXiv:0710.5402 [hep-th] (2008)Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Lobo, F.: General class of wormhole geometries in conformal Weyl gravity. Class. Quantum Gravity 25, 175006; arXiv:0801.4401v1 [gr-qc] (2008)Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Oliva, J., Tempo, D., Troncoso, R.: Static wormholes in vacuum for conformal gravity. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 24, 1528; arXiv:0907.1128v1 [hep-th] (2009)Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Brihaye, Y., Verbin, Y.: Spherical structures in conformal gravity and its scalar–tensor extension. Phys. Rev. D 80, 124048; arXiv:0907.1951v2 [gr-qc] (2009)Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Brihaye, Y., Verbin, Y.: Spherical non-abelian solutions in conformal gravity. Phys. Rev. D 81, 044041; arXiv:0910.0973v1 [gr-qc] (2010)Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Brihaye, Y., Verbin, Y.: Cylindrically symmetric solutions in conformal gravity. Phys. Rev. D 81, 124022; arXiv:0912.4669v2 [gr-qc] (2010)Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Verbin, Y., Brihaye, Y.: Exact string-like solutions in conformal gravity. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 43, 2847; arXiv:1008.1170v2 [gr-qc] (2011)Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Kim, S.: Rigidity of noncompact complete Bach-flat manifolds. J. Geom. Phys. 60, 637; arXiv:1001.2759v1 [math.DG] (2010)Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Tanhayi, M., Fathi, M., Takook, M.: Observable quantities in Weyl gravity. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 26, 2403; arXiv:1108.6157v1 [gr-qc] (2011)Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Schmidt, H.-J.: Scale-invariant gravity in two dimensions. J. Math. Phys. 32, 1562 (1991)MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Schmidt, H.-J.: Scale-invariant gravity in two dimensions II. In: Gottlöber, S., Mücket, J., Müller, V. (Eds.) Relativistic Astrophysics and Cosmology, p. 330. World Scientific Singapore, Singapore (1992)Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Mignemi, S., Schmidt, H.-J.: Two-dimensional higher-derivative gravity and conformal transformations. Class. Quantum Gravity 12, 849; arXiv:gr-qc/9501024 (1995)Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Düchting, N.: Second law of black hole mechanics for all 2-dimensional dilaton theories. Phys. Rev. D 63, 024021 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Charmousis, C.: Dilaton spacetimes with a Liouville potential. Class. Quantum Gravity 19, 83 (2002)MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Grumiller, D., Kummer, W., Vassilevich, D.: Dilaton gravity in two dimensions. Phys. Rep. 369, 327; arXiv:hep-th/0204253 (2002)Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Cadoni, M., Mignemi, S.: Cosmology of the Jackiw–Teitelboim model. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 34, 2101 (2002)MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Alvarez, E., Conde, J., Hernandez, L.: The Dirichlet obstruction in AdS/CFT. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 12, 1415; arXiv:hep-th/0303164 (2003)Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Bergamin, L., Kummer, W.: Graded poisson–sigma models and dilaton-deformed 2D supergravity algebra. J. High Energy Phys. (JHEP) 05, 074; arXiv:hep-th/0209209 (2003)Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Bergamin, L., Kummer, W.: The complete solution of 2D superfield supergravity from graded poisson-sigma models and the super pointparticle. Phys. Rev. D 68, 104005; arXiv:hep-th/0306217 (2003)Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Balasin, H., Böhmer, C.G., Grumiller, D.: The spherically symmetric standard model with gravity. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 37, 1435; arXiv:gr-qc/0412098 (2005)Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Bizdadea, C., Cioroianu, E., Negru, I., Saliu, S., Sararu, S.: On the generalized Freedman–Townsend model. J. High Energy Phys. (JHEP) 10, 004; arXiv:0704.3407v1 [hep-th] (2006)Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Grumiller, D., Jackiw, R.: Duality in 2-dimensional dilaton gravity. Phys. Lett. B 642, 530; arXiv:hep-th/0609197v2 (2006)Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Grumiller, D., Meyer, R.: Quantum dilaton gravity in two dimensions with fermionic matter. Class. Quantum Gravity 23, 6435; arXiv:hep-th/0607030 (2006)Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Grumiller, D., Meyer, R.: Ramifications of lineland. Turk. J. Phys. 30, 349 arXiv:hep-th/0604049v3 (2006)Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Grumiller, D., McNees, R.: Thermodynamics of black holes in two (and higher) dimensions. J. High Energy Phys. (JHEP) 04, 074 arXiv:hep-th/0703230v2 (2007)Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Kamani, D.: New actions for the string with the curved worldsheet. Braz. J. Phys. 38, 268; rXiv:0704.0752v2 [hep-th] (2008)Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Bizdadea, C., Cioroianu, E., Saliu, S., Sararu, S., Iordache, M.: Four-dimensional couplings among BF and massless Rarita–Schwinger theories: a BRST cohomological approach. Eur. Phys. J. C 58, 123; arXiv:0812.3810v1 [hep-th] (2008)Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Moretti, V., Pinamonti, N.: Black hole horizons and thermodynamics: a quantum approach. Entropy 12, 1833; arXiv:gr-qc/0507050v2 (2010)Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Olmo, G., Rubiera-Garcia, D.: Reissner–Nordstrom black holes in extended Palatini theories. Phys. Rev. D 86, 044014; arXiv:1207.6004v1 [gr-qc] (2012)Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Bronnikov, K., Melnikov, V.: The Birkhoff theorem in multidimensional gravity. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 27, 465 (1995)MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Israel, W.: Event horizons in static vacuum space-times. Phys. Rev. 164, 1776 (1967)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Horowitz, G.: Black holes in four dimensions. In: Horowitz, G. (ed.) Black Holes in Higher Dimensions, p. 3. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für MathematikUniversität PotsdamPotsdamGermany

Personalised recommendations